Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on the need for global health policy
Global perspectives on health
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on the need for global health policy
Disadvantages of the current system
Despite these benefits, the present level of control that funding bodies and donors have over priorities limits the input that global health need has in the decision-making algorithm. Although there are a multitude of global health players, if calculated by resource allocation, a small number of wealthy donors set the majority of global health priorities (31) which reduces the opportunity for empirically determined need for a program to be factored into the discussion. The major disparity between the priorities set by global health actors and need is exemplified in Rwanda where the local government highlighted the disproportionately high funding targeted at HIV/AIDs when the nation only had a 3% infection rate (2, 32). Under such guidance, long-term prioritisation, particularly with those issues where outcomes are difficult to measure, is rare. Long-term funding is
Here, this has been demonstrated by the examination of the problem, politics and policy streams which have brought health systems strengthening efforts to attention in recent years, but has not attracted large-scale dedication to the issue. In fact, commitment to HSS has largely been restricted within the disease-specific interests of the major donors. Furthermore, the recent global financial recession resulted in economic concerns taking precedence over health systems strengthening. It is argued here, that priorities driven by funding, in present state, fosters inefficiency and inequality where resources are not allocated to where they are needed most. A superior system would be one in which the power of major donors is constrained or their interests are altered so as to ensure that global health need is the basis of policy
In conclusion, the ultimate significance to this type of work is to improve the quality of healthcare in these extremely impoverished nations. This argument is represented in Tracy Kidder’s Mountains Beyond Mountains, Monte Leach’s “Ensuring Health Care as a Global Human Right”, and Darshark Sanghavi’s “Is it Cost Effective to Treat the World’s Poor.” The idea that universal healthcare is a human right is argued against in Michael F. Cannon’s “A “Right” to health care?” Cannon claims that it would not work, and fills the holes that the other authors leave in their arguments. All of these articles share the same ultimate goal, and that is to provide every individual with adequate health care, and to not let so many people die from things that could easily have been prevented or treated.
Exploring the documentary on frontline Sick Around the World, I was shocked to hear where the United State’s healthcare system stood in comparison to other nations’. I felt highly astonished when finding out that our country shamefully holds thirty seventh place when being categorized for our National healthcare. Our healthcare system has grown a reputation for being highly unjust and corrupt when providing utilities and services for citizens. This upsets me because reflecting over the statistics presented in the documentary, our country should have a remarkably better healthcare system considering how much more money we spend. By comparing our financial investments and structure to other countries, one would think our nation would finally find a solution to
While the moral backing for public health in its current state may be sound, what many researchers fail to understand is that the many moral failings of its predecessors that color the legacy of public health internationally and at home. As discussed in the chapter “Colonial Medicine and its Legacies” within the textbook Reimagining Global Health arranged by Paul Farmer, before the conception of global health there was international health which sought to distribute health as a good horizontally across international, political lines. Under the framework of international health, public health workers became agents of a cold war enmeshed in the fiscal, geopolitical, and territorial struggles between two hegemons rather than the holistic value of community health. While international health as a framework has largely been abandoned, much of its rhetoric can be found within our current framework of public health such as the enumeration of certain parts of the world as "1st world", "2nd world",
Public health has made substantial advantages that have decreased the mortality rate and increased the life expectancy. At the beginning of the 20th century, the 5 leading causes of death were…. Talk about how shitty public health was prior to these changes
Throughout the world, in countries rich and poor, people have no access to basic physical and mental healthcare nor to immunizations from infectious disease. Some people have no access because they lack the resources to buy and the state does not provide it. Others may be able to afford healthcare but because there are no services available in their communities they must do without it.
The implementation of a universal health care system in the United States is an important challenge that needs to be overcome. There are numerous amount of editorial that argue on both sides of the debate. Some people argue that a universal health care system would bring costs down and increase access to care while others argue that a universal health care system would be too expensive and reduce the quality of care. The correct answer requires intensive understanding and economics to overcome, the arguments must be examined for a proper answer.
“If you look at the human condition today, not everyone is well fed, has access to good medical care, or the physical basics that provide for a healthy and a happy life.” This quote by Ralph Merkle shows that something so easily taken for granted is healthcare. Most of us wouldn’t even think about it as a privilege, something that has just always been there and always will. In America, we would never even imagine not being able to receive medical care in our times of need, in other countries that is not at all the case. Many will die from easily preventable and treatable diseases because they do not have medical care. The charity Doctors of the World is committed to helping those who do not have easy access to medical care
The Department of US health concerns works towards improving the health status of citizens across the political and economic regimes of United States of America. The perspectives that are explored on global health include medicine, where path...
African governments have given in to the whim’s of international organisations such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Health Organisation (WHO) in social and health policies, and with this, has come a shift away from former emphasis on social justice and equitable market efficiency to public health services for all now being perceived as a major threat ...
I learned that the U.S. spends less than 1% in global health activities with most the funds going to programs to help with HIV/AIDS. The fact that we only spend 1% of our federal budget in global health was surprising, I thought the percentage was higher since we have global health programs that are implemented in over 60 countries. I have always thought of our nation as a giving and caring nation that brings aid to under developed countries in an effort to not just protect our country but to also help the population of those countries to care and help themselves. With our nation being the single largest donor to address global health challenges it is important that we continue to increase our efforts in protecting our nation and helping other nations do the same. As we help other countries to develop
London, England. The.. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine n.d., Session 5: The role of the state. in global health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England. Ricci J.
Currently in low to middle income countries, the poor healthcare infrastructure limits the citizens to seek medical attention. For example, South Africa recently tried to pass a national healthcare bill which allows all the citizens to be able to afford an insurance policy, much like that of United States. Unfortunately, there is a blinding error in national healthcare policies. The social issues are the same for United States and South Africa. Simply, no matter what standard of living a country has, the healthcare infrastructure cannot accommodate for all of the people. The poorly organized system does not help the population to access standardized health diagnostics. No matter what system the citizens of a country has, 100% of the people cannot be guaranteed a standardized health diagnostics.
In contrast, my sense of being powerless is further strengthened after I realized global health problems cannot be solved simply through increasing funding and human resources. In fact, global health problems are tied with contingent factors. The local political, social and economic aspects all need to be taken in consideration when designing a global health model. Any careless actions can lead to unintended consequences, affecting several human lives. Indeed, all the big talks had overwhelmed me until I learned about the community partners approach used by UNICEF and Partner In Health in several global designs such as Rwanda.
A theoretical basis does also exist for the reverse causation, from health expenditure to income and economic growth. The role of health care spending, as an investment, on stimulating economic growth has been suggested by Mushkin. According to him, health is considered as capital. Therefore, investment on health can increase income and hence lead to overall economic growth. (Mushkin, 1962). This is especially seen on low income or developing countries. The World Health Organization’s Commission on Macroeconomics and Health report of the year 2001, states that “extending the coverage of crucial health services to the world’s poor could save millions of lives each year, reduce poverty, spur economic development and promote global security” (World Health Organization, 2001).
HIV does not only affect the well-being of individuals, it has large impacts on households, communities and even nations as a whole. Peer discussions and personal research has also made me realize that some of the countries suffering from this HIV epidemic also rather unfortunately suffer from other infectious diseases such as malaria and tuberculosis, relative poverty and economic stagnation. Despite these setbacks, new inte...