Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character analysis two kinds by amy tan
Walk about character analysis
Buggin out character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There are various opinions on the westward expansion explained throughout the following texts: “Reporting to the President, September 23- December 31, 1806” (pages 418-21) by Stephen Ambrose, “The Way to Rainy Mountain” by N. Scott Momaday”, “Chief Joseph Speaks…” by Chief Joseph, and lastly “There is No True history of the Westward Expansion” by Robert Morgan. Heroes and villains were presented in all of the texts to show there was different sides and opinions to each story of the expansion. There were also emotions such as anger and happiness shown throughout the texts. It is now claimed that there is no true history shown due to the multiple biographies with only opinion. The way Robert Morgan presents his idea in “There is No True history of the Westward Expansion” implies that he was not a supporter of westward expansion. The author writes about various texts to make a claim stating the following: ‘“There properly no history ,” Robert Waldo …show more content…
Emerson wrote, “only biography.”’ His claim is supported by stating various texts in his writing that are only biography. The issue stated with the biographies being released is the fact there is only the person’s opinion released from one side which makes the person’s opinion contradicting to the other side. “Chief Joseph Speaks…” by Chief Joseph infers that the westward expansion was not beneficial to the Nez Perce tribe.
He states, “For a short time we lived quietly. But this could not last. Chief Joseph supports his claim by giving a timeline of the horrific events that had occurred. The tribe had given up land to live peacefully with the white men: however, this did not solve any issues. In the text, Chief Joseph states, “ If an Indian breaks the law, punish him by law. If a white man breaks the law, punish him also.” Although the tribe wanted peace, it was not given to them. In the text, “The Way to Rainy Mountain” by N. Scott Momaday, the author quotes, “The end, too, was a struggle, and it was lost.” The prologue tells about the Kiowa people relocating during the westward expansion and their sentimental relationship with the land. Many of the Kiowa people “withered and died like grass.” Momaday supports his claims of the hardships created during the expansion by using words to describe the way the people
felt. “Literally the world had been waiting for their return.” “Reporting to the President, September 23- December 31, 1806” (pages 418-21) by Stephen Ambrose presents a positive opinion on the westward expansion. Jefferson stated facts and opinion on the Lewis and Clark about how the expedition looking for the land had occurred. The world had wanted enlightenment. People involved waited patiently for tales of grizzly bears, gigantic trees, and horrific storms. This texts supports an optimistic reaction to the expansion by telling only positive occurrences. Throughout all of the texts, different opinions were formed about the expansion. None of the information given was factual; although it seemed as though most of the texts were supporting a negative experience. “The Way to Rainy Mountain” by N. Scott Momaday”, “Chief Joseph Speaks…” by Chief Joseph, and “There is No True history of the Westward Expansion” by Robert Morgan created a negative tone in the texts by giving important details to make it easily understandable why the natives were upset about the occurrences. The white men took their land, which was sentimental to them, and their recourses. The whites did not benefit the natives in any way to create peace.
Chief Joseph and Helen Hunt Jackson are two very important people who both share strong yet different perspectives toward the treachery of the U.S. Government along with the unfair treatment of Indians around the 1800’s. Chief Joseph was born in 1840 in the Wallowa valley of Oregon, and belonged to the Nez Percé tribe, which was made up of some 400 indians. The Government had made many valid promises among the tribes, just to come back and break these words with more conflict and war. All Chief Joseph was in search for was for the chaos among the whites and indians to be replaced with peace, brotherhood, and equality. Stated in the text, “We ask that the same law shall work alike on all men.” In other words, Chief Joseph believed that people
There are many ways in which we can view the history of the American West. One view is the popular story of Cowboys and Indians. It is a grand story filled with adventure, excitement and gold. Another perspective is one of the Native Plains Indians and the rich histories that spanned thousands of years before white discovery and settlement. Elliot West’s book, Contested Plains: Indians, Goldseekers and the Rush to Colorado, offers a view into both of these worlds. West shows how the histories of both nations intertwine, relate and clash all while dealing with complex geological and environmental challenges. West argues that an understanding of the settling of the Great Plains must come from a deeper understanding, a more thorough knowledge of what came before the white settlers; “I came to believe that the dramatic, amusing, appalling, wondrous, despicable and heroic years of the mid-nineteenth century have to be seen to some degree in the context of the 120 centuries before them” .
Permissiveness coupled with a self-righteous entitlement is not considered very flattering on anyone, much less a developing young country. The loose handle the US government had in the 1800s on its land-hungry constituents contributed to the worst (but among the most overlooked) genocide in recorded history. The few preventative actions taken by the federation to slow the quickening roll of excessive expansion were overruled or overlooked by the citizens. Deciding that the east coast was no longer enough to satiate their appetite for possession, they looked to the west. Imagining themselves to be Moses, claiming their promised land, the settlers surged westward, citing Manifest Destiny, a concept that suggested providence had intended the
During the early to mid eighteen hundreds, there was great unrest across the country over territorial expansion. Half of the nation believed that it would be beneficial to the country if we expanded, while the other half were firmly opposed to expansion. Within the century, the United States managed to claim Texas, California, and the majority of Indian-owned lands. Opinions on this expansion were mixed around the country. Polls taken during the time period show that the majority of the south and west supported expansion, while northerns were opposed to it. (Document B) This was because the northerners had different values and beliefs than the southerners of westerners. Both the opponents and supporters of territorial expansion during the time period between 1800 and 1855, had a tremendous influence on shaping federal government policy. However, it can be argued that the supporters of territorial expansion had the largest impact. They were able to sway the federal government to create policies and new laws that were in favor of supporter’s beliefs.
Westward movement is the populating of lands, by the Europeans, in what is now known as the United States. The chief resolution of the westward expansion is economic betterment. The United States story begins with westward expansion and even before the Revolutionary war, early settlers were migrating westward into what is now known as the states of Kentucky,Tennessee, parts of the Ohio Valley and the South. Westward Expansion was slowed down by the French and the Native Americans, however the Louisiana Purchase significantly improved the expansion efforts. Westward expansion was enabled because of wars, the displacement of Native American Indians, buying land, and treaties. This paper will discuss the effects of westward expansion on domestic politics and on American relations with other nations.
The Manifest Destiny was a progressive movement starting in the 1840's. John O'Sullivan, a democratic leader, named the movement in 1845. Manifest Destiny meant that westward expansion was America's destiny. The land that was added to the U.S. after 1840 (the start of Manifest Destiny) includes The Texas Annexation (1845), The Oregon Country (1846), The Mexican Cession (1848), The Gadsden Purchase (1853), Alaska (1867), and Hawaii (1898). Although this movement would take several years to accomplish fully, things started changing before we knew it. New technology took off right away!
From 1800 to 1850, there was an increased interest in territorial expansion in the United States. During this time the United States found itself in a position to acquire more land, starting with the Louisiana Purchase all the way to the Mexican Cession. Upon reviewing the documents, it became clear that documents A, I, and H, were against the expansion the the United States while the rest documents were mostly for the expansion of the United States. However, each of the documents were conveying different views from various people spread out over the span of 50 years. Numerous amounts of debates emerged arguing if the United States should obtain the new land, and people’s thoughts on the matter were influenced by the different wars and activist groups, and
Over the years, the idea of the western frontier of American history has been unjustly and falsely romanticized by the movie, novel, and television industries. People now believe the west to have been populated by gun-slinging cowboys wearing ten gallon hats who rode off on capricious, idealistic adventures. Not only is this perception of the west far from the truth, but no mention of the atrocities of Indian massacre, avarice, and ill-advised, often deceptive, government programs is even present in the average citizen’s understanding of the frontier. This misunderstanding of the west is epitomized by the statement, “Frederick Jackson Turner’s frontier thesis was as real as the myth of the west. The development of the west was, in fact, A Century of Dishonor.” The frontier thesis, which Turner proposed in 1893 at the World’s Columbian Exposition, viewed the frontier as the sole preserver of the American psyche of democracy and republicanism by compelling Americans to conquer and to settle new areas. This thesis gives a somewhat quixotic explanation of expansion, as opposed to Helen Hunt Jackson’s book, A Century of Dishonor, which truly portrays the settlement of the west as a pattern of cruelty and conceit. Thus, the frontier thesis, offered first in The Significance of the Frontier in American History, is, in fact, false, like the myth of the west. Many historians, however, have attempted to debunk the mythology of the west. Specifically, these historians have refuted the common beliefs that cattle ranging was accepted as legal by the government, that the said business was profitable, that cattle herders were completely independent from any outside influence, and that anyone could become a cattle herder.
The American Progress by John Gast was a painting that focused on the Manifest Destiny in 1872. Westward Expansion was an ideal thought throughout the nineteenth century by early Americans. This ideology was common at the time because American’s thought that the Manifest destiny would allow them to start off fresh; commonly, people thought that it was an economic opportunity. Evidently, this ideal start of a new life portrayed a positive view of Westward expansion. Gast’s painting is an example of the Westward expansion and how it symbolizes a wonderful uprising to move forward with life. This painting shows the highlights of the expansion, but this may not have been the complete truth behind the artwork.
...ed on Westward expansion, then it is none too appealing to realize that Westward expansion meant the brutal conquest of the native population. To come to grips with this reality, Native Americans were pushed out the conscious of Americans. Westward expansion is much more palpable if the West is viewed as free, open land that was ripe for the taking – as described in Turner’s thesis. When Americans were finally confronted with the fact that Native Americans had occupied the land, the Natives were depicted as brutes that were not capable of correctly taking care of the land. Overtime, however, historians have been able to modify Turner’s thesis into a more balanced argument. Turner’s thesis, however, remains important due to the fact that it is such a clear representation of American attitudes about the frontier and Westward expansion at the turn of the century.
During the 1800s the United States government promoted Westward expansion in different ways in order to obtain territory in the West. This movement towards the West had a major change for the United States. The united states obtain territory in the West by many different ways which had both negative and positive effects. The united States obtain territory by many different ways like purchasing territory and by wars. The Westward expansion had both positive and negative effects on society. The Westward expansion led for the United States to obtain more territory.
The Americans during the early 1800's were very manipulative and were willing to do anything in order to accomplish their goals. Westward expansion was very important to the United States, claiming more land to the west was a symbol of power and the more power the United States had the more intimidating they were to neighboring countries. The only thing standing in the way of the Americans westward expansion were the natives that called that land home. In the beginning of westward expansion the Americans wanted to create a friendship with the native Americans and establish trust. So they decided to discreetly take advantage of the Indians by creating treaties that claimed to offer amazing opportunities as long as the Indians aggreged to relinquish their land to the Americans. For example in the document entitled, A Treaty between the United States of America, and the Kaskaskia Tribe of Indians. (August 13, 1803) it states, "The annuity
Let’s go back in time to the 1800’s. When America was as divisive as ever, and Westward was beginning. Westward Expansion affected everybody in the east and west, however, not all people were impacted in a good way. Westward Expansion affected Native Americans negatively and white settlers positively. This is because white settlers acquired larger and more fertile land and their numbers grew excessively, while Native Americans had no shelter or resources, and their population was dropping like flies.
Yes, In the passages, Robert Morgan makes the claim that was supported the land because the land is the most popular thing that Morgan talked about in the passage.the passage states that Morgan wanted to expand the western expand The passage also stated that people wanna to cross the land without fighting. Therefore, people were trying to fight back there land to get back to the land.My people some of them have run away to the hills and have no blankets and no food.
The Westward Expansion of the United States, that had lasted from 1803 to 1853 was a very important event that had occurred in the United States. It was a way of American settlers justify the seizing of land in the Western part United States. This was also known as Manifest Destiny in that settlers thought that it was their God given destiny to explore and expand their territories. The Westward expansion had led to many technological advancements that benefited the U.S. and had helped settlers gain better opportunities to better their lives. However, the Westward Expansion had increased tensions that led to the Civil War by crumbling the compromises that had soothed the positions of pro and anti-slavery settlers.