West Coast Hotel v. Parrish: The Case that Caused a Constitutional Revolution

1732 Words4 Pages

According to William E. Leuchtenburg, along with other successors, West Coast Hotel v. Parrish was the case that constituted a constitutional revolution. Leuchtenburg gives evidence of the main arguments of his opinion concerning the shift in the Court during this particular case as well as others that came after it. The significance of this case was that it upheld the “minimum wage” legislation passed by Washington State even though there was the uprising issue of “liberty of contract.” The presented case of West Coast Hotel v. Parrish provoked a constitutional revolution in the United States (Leuchtenburg, pg. 163). This case was not an open-and-shut case and encountered much opposition especially from the review of Tipaldo. As a result, it overturned the decision made by the trial court, which was based on the case, Adkins v. Children’s Hospital (Leuchtenburg, pg. 164). Although a portion of Leuchtenburg’s evidence supporting his opinion on which case constituted a constitutional revolution involved the shift in the Court’s decision-making, the question of the reason for the shift in the Court begs to be explained. At the time, during the case of West Coast v. Parrish, the court seemed to be in sorts fueled by politics. The Justices were concerned with the consequences that could very well up rise from their reluctance to approve the standard legislation. In other words, they may have shifted their votes in hopes of saving the traditional foundation. Justice Roberts’ voting decisions would then need to be closely examined seeing that he supported the liberal side in 1934 concerning the case of Nebbia v. New York, supported the conservative side in 1935-1936 concerning the Rail Pension and Tipaldo, and then returned to suppor... ... middle of paper ... ...urg touches on what he believes to be a “constitutional revolution” but I disagree with his interpretation. On the other hand, it seems to me that Leuchtenburg is claiming that the constitutional revolution happened in a very short period of time under the direction of Roosevelt. This leads me to believe that there was a large amount of pressure put on the Justices from Roosevelt seeing that they came to so many decisions and overturned past decisions in such a short amount of time. I believe that Leuchtenburg’s proceeding case, West Coast Hotel v. Parrish, does not hold precedent in being constituted as a constitutional revolution because of the external influences that were so prevalent during the decision making. Decisions that are surrounded by political forces and persuasion do not count towards being revolutionary when they did not come about by themselves.

Open Document