Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Failure of the weimar republic in germany
The fall of the weimar republic
Failure of the weimar republic in germany
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Failure of the weimar republic in germany
To start off this essay I will be discussing the conditions in the Weimar Republic that allowed for National Socialism to rise, these are the timber in the Bergen metaphor. One of the reasons that the Republic failed was the massive amount of debt that the country faced after World War 1 as referendums and loans. This crippled the German economy, which took a much larger hit from the Great Depression than the United States did. This economic trouble affected how the people of Germany viewed the Republic. The people had romanticized views on life per-World War 1 and wished to return to that state. By viewing the economic state of German before World War 1 as normal, it then made the economic state on the Weimar Republic abnormal and “therefore blameworthy and illegitimate.” (OR Bessel 101) This illegitimate moved to the …show more content…
Weimar Republic as a whole with the inability to compromise within the many political groups. (OR Peukert 104) Between the economic and social crisis, the Republic was badly weakened. Other factors that contributed to the weakness of the Weiner Republic was the continued existence of the old elites on the right and the chaotic nature of modernization that was condensed in a much shorter amount of time than anywhere else in the world.
When the German Empire fell, it was by a step down by the previous rulers not by the masses kicking them out. This meant that the pre-war elites still existed in the country and were trying to figure out where they belonged in the newly democratic nation. These elites were against social reform, a necessary element of modernization, and voted against it as often as they could. (OR Peuker 104) However, this was not the only thing that about the setback of German modernization, it was also “the peculiarly crisis-prone nature of the process of modernization itself”. (OR Peuker 104) Modernization takes time, something that the Weimar did not have in its favor. Even per-World War 1 the German Empire had attempted to modernize the nation at an alarming pace. All that resulted from this attempt at quick modernization was another piece of “timber” to add to the growing pile of Weimar
failures. The “spark” to ignite the “timber” came on January 30th, 1933 with the appointment of Adolf Hitler as Chancellor of Germany. This came after that National Socialist party had almost been destroyed by finance problems and internal struggle. It was brought back by Paul von Hindenburg in an attempt to gather power within the Republic once more. The “hopeless 'power vacuum' of 1932” caused “the rise of the National Socialists possible in the first place.” (OR Bracher 96) Hindenburg had hoped that the appointment of Hitler would case the masses (who supported the National Socialists) to get behind the Republic. That they would be “capable of taming and exploiting the totalitarian mass movement” to work for the Republic. (OR Bracher 97) Instead the appointment of Hitler worked as the last piece need to bring about the end of the Wiemar Republic and bring about the rise of the Nazi state. One my favorite quotes in the Oxford Reader on Nazism is “Weimar democracy did not fail because of Hitler. Rather, Hitler was the final consequence of its failure.” (OX Mommsen 100) In terms of the Bergen metaphor, this quote means that the Weimar Republics failings were already piled high as timber, all that was needed was the “spark” which Hitler readily provided.
Exploring the Reasons Behind Public's Discontent with the Weimar Government There were a number of reasons why the German people were unhappy with the Weimar government. One of the main reasons for this was the signing of the Treaty of Versailles. The result of this was that Germany has to take the war guilt, Germany had to pay reparations of 6,600 million marks to the allies in particular France, Germany lost its colonies, it lost its air force & tanks, and its soldiers were restricted to 100,000. The Ruhr was demilitarised. Also they lost their colonies and its land was cut up such as the Polish Corridor and Alsace Lorraine.
The first major reason that the Weimar republic failed was that it was extremely inefficient and did not have clear goals set within the government. All the different ideas coming from the parties in the republic, created a situation where the people of Germany were getting very unclear, vague messages. This problem can be seen in the struggle between the German Democratic Party and the Communist Party. Troeltsch, a theologian and leader of the German Democratic Party said, “The development will not stop at democracy, and a ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’ will assume the form of terrorist domination by a minority” (Doc 1). This statement is only somewhat reliable because Troeltsch was a politician, and he would benefit from over exaggerating what would happen if the opposing party were to gain control.
The main purpose of the book was to emphasize how far fear of Hitler’s power, motivation to create a powerful Germany, and loyalty to the cause took Germany during the Third Reich. During the Third Reich, Germany was able to successfully conquer all of Eastern Europe and many parts of Western Europe, mainly by incentive. Because of the peoples’ desires and aspirations to succeed, civilians and soldiers alike were equally willing to sacrifice luxuries and accept harsh realities for the fate of their country. Without that driving force, the Germans would have given up on Hitler and Nazism, believing their plan of a powerful Germany...
The Left and Right at the Birth of Weimar Germany From the general chaos and unrest that followed the Kiel Mutiny in late 1918, the centre-left emerged to lead Germany into a new era of democracy. Philipp Scheidemann, a key figure in the moderate SDP, declared a Democratic Socialist Republic from a balcony in Berlin on 9th November 1918. However, the whole of Germany was not behind him, since simultaneously, and from a different Berlin balcony, Karl Liebknecht, leader of the communist Spartacists (KPD), declared a Soviet Republic.
Nazism possess the core features of totalitarianism, however has a few differences which distinguishes it. Totalitarianism, by the Friedrich-Brzezinski definition, is when the government establishes complete control over all aspects of the state,maintaining the complete control of laws and over what people can say, think and do. Nazi Germany satisfies most of this criteria, as they had a one party system without political opposition. Moreover, they had a single unchallenged leader, in Hitler, to whom the entire nation conformed to. Furthermore, the party had nearly complete control over the country, controlling what people thought through propaganda and censorship, as well as what people could do through fear and terror. However, there are
By 1890, Germans felt their allegiance to a normal state at least as strongly as the citizens of France and other European countries. Germany had not only built up all of the required symbols of national identity such as a common currency, flag and anthem, it relied heavily on well integrated national machinery, including the post office, judiciary, and Reichstag. Even the Prussian Hohenzollerns who ruled over the empire had become symbols of national unity, for Wilhelm II was seen as a German emperor, not a Prussian, and although the man himself was disliked by many, the institution had become a symbol for national unity. Furthermore, a new generation of Germans had grown up with common cul...
...of Carsten and similar historians writing at the time is that the far-left were not as politically strong as first thought so consequently there was a lack of any serious opposition to the established order and in turn they were allowed had more independence and self-determination in implementing Germany’s first republic. So the social basis for a constitutional government in Germany was a lot more widespread than formerly thought. Furthermore, the apprehensiveness of the social democrats can be interpreted in terms of distrusting the unstructured mass movements that existed in the pressing post-war years, and placing their trust in the old elites. However, works such as Feldman’s, ‘The great disorder. The German inflation 1914 – 1924’ argue that the perspective representative potential of soldiers and workers unions and councils were in fact decisively contentious
The general public of Germany had never had any say in political matters; they allowed the Kaiser to make all the decisions regarding themselves and their once-prosperous country. The groups controlling Germany began to change during October and November 1918. More power began to fall into the hands of the people as they realised the blame for their involvement in the war was the Kaiser’s. People such as the armed soldiers, sailors and workers started protesting and going on strike. This was a far cry from before the war, when Germany was wealthy, proud and ambitious. So for a brief period, it seemed that a revolution would take place, with the people of Germany wanting a social and political revolution.
Richard Bessel’s article stresses the political structure of Weimar Germany as the cause of its failure. Its structure was flawed in numerous ways, all of which contributed to its inevitable failure. First of all, the problems within Germany due to the First World War were massive. This caused economic, political and social problems which first had to be dealt with by the new Weimar government. The loss of the war had left Germany with huge reparations to pay, and massive destruction to repair. In order to gain the capital needed to finance efforts to rebuild, and repay the Allies, the economy had to be brought back to its prewar levels. This was not an easy task.
The main reason was that people were discomposed that Germany had lost a war and most of the people blame for the defeat. On the other hand, during 1929-1933, the worldwide Great Depression, which impacted Germany, and there was no leader of Weimar could solve the economic problem.
Adolf Hitler came to power on February 28, 1933 (Rossel). He rose to power using inflammatory speeches and inspiring hope for the defeated Germans. He constructed a system to empower the German people and allow them to thrive in the period after the Great Depression (Noakes). Using keen acumen and decisive moves, he was able to turn Germany into a war machine bent on the creation of an Aryan utopian society, at the cost of all inferior races, especially the Jews ("The Period between 1933 and 1939"). At this time Germany was a defeated country. They had recently had numerous humiliating defeats in WWI, and the Germans no longer had the pride they once had celebrated (Laurita). Augmented by the fact that the Great Depression had ravaged the country and left many in a state of penury and impoverished, the Germans were desperate. As well, Germany was currently a country without any source of stability without a generally supported constitution. When Hitler promised a utopian society filled with hope and where the Germans would be exalted as the superior race, the Germans listened and obeyed his every word (Noakes). Hitler fed on the desperation and hopelessness of these German people to make a society driven by fear; this state of pity allowed Hitler to convince the Germans that he could provide a better future.
The German Weimar Republic was an attempt to make Germany a more democratic state. While this was a very good idea in theory, the Weimar Republic was ineffective due to the instability that came with it. Several factors contributed to the instability of Germany’s Weimar Republic, such as the new political ideals brought forward and the government’s hunger for war. To begin, one of the factors that contributed to the instability of the Weimar republic was the presence of new political ideals. Marie Juchacz unintentionally highlighted that reason in her speech to the National Assembly.
...After we consider all these points mentioned we begin to see how everything worked and connected to form one huge disaster for Germany. We start to see how all these things played a part, the reparations led to unemployment that led to no money that led to overprinting of money. How the huge consequence of the reparations led to the unsuccessful paying of it leading to the French invasion of the Ruhr which led to strikes and therefore no products to trade with. How the unstable Weimar government led to extremist parties that damaged the economy further and brought inflation to its highest. The effects were probably the worst, the starvation coupled with the disease epidemic that killed people off and the worthless tonnes of paper notes roaming around the nation. It all in all was a very bad time in Germany one that they always found it hard to recover from.
German people were unused to a democracy and blamed the government “November criminals”, for signing the Treaty of Versailles. From the very beginning, the new Weimar government faced opposition from both sides of the political spectrum. The Left wing Spartacist group, lead by Liebknecht and Luxemburg, looked up to the new Soviet councils in Russia, wanted to place Germany into a similar system.
After years of trying to unify as one nation and countless failures, the German people now believed that they themselves were among the superior races of the world and it was Germany’s destiny to become the greatest nation the world had ever seen. Under Bismarck’s rule the economy boomed. The German Industrial Complex, powered by its heavy war production, made many men and the nation itself very wealthy. This wealth and prosperity led to an intoxicating feeling among its people, a feeling that they were the next great world