Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character analysis of oedipus the king
Analysis of the character of King Oedipus in Sophocle's play as a tragic hero in classical terms
Character analysis of oedipus the king
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Character analysis of oedipus the king
Perception “It all depends on how we look at things, and not how they are in themselves.”-Carl Jung. This quote by Carl Jung can relate to everyone and it can relate to any literature piece. For example, many people have different views or opinions about the presidential inauguration. In literature every character has their own way of perceiving things, whether they’re good perceptions or not, it is about how they view a situation. In Sophocles’ Greek drama Oedipus, famous American poet Emily Dickinson’s poem “We Grow Accustomed to the Dark,” and famed Greek storyteller Aesop fable “The Dancing Monkeys”, the common theme is not everything you see is what it appears to be. In the Greek drama Oedipus, this theme is very persistent throughout the story. In the beginning of the story Oedipus has become king of Thebes because their previous king was murdered. Oedipus was told that king Laius was killed by thieves at three crossroads in the land of Phocis. Jocasta told Oedipus that he was murdered right before he was installed ruler of the land. …show more content…
“We grow accustomed to the Dark-” is within itself a portrayal of not seeing things of what it appears to be. We just take the darkness and get used to it without searching why the darkness is there in the first place. “When not a moon disclose a sign- Or star- come out- within-” We feel hopeless when a dark situation comes about and we look for signs, but when they aren’t there we give up. The bravest, however, search and see the darkness for what it is. Darkness can portray a bad situation, but can eventually end up a good situation. They learn to see and realize that what they saw isn’t what it appeared to be. “Either the Darkness alters- Or something in the sight-” sometimes you need to take a good look at something, “adjust your sight”, and realize it is something that can change and there is nothing to worry
The author then uses darkness to describe the faces of the adults on Sunday evenings after dinner when everyone is relaxing with their own thought's. "For a moment nobody's talking but every face looks darkening, like the sky outside...The silence, the darkness coming and the darkness in the faces frighten the child obscurel...
imagery of darkness. It is interesting to note how the speaker distinguishes these details, yet in
“…they will never see the crime I have committed or had done upon me!” These are the words Oedipus shouted as he blinds himself upon learning the truth of his past. It is ironic how a person blessed with perfect physical vision could in reality be blind to to matters of life and conscience. During his prime as King of Thebes, Oedipus is renowned for his lucidity and his ability to rule with a clear concept of justice and equality. The people loved him for his skill and wit, as he saved Thebes from the curse of the Sphinx. As a result, Oedipus became overly confident, and refuses to see that he may be the cause of the malady that is plaguing his kingdom. Although physically Oedipus has full use of his eyes, Sophocles uses sight to demonstrate how Oedipus is blind to the truth about his past what it might me for both him and his kingdom. Upon learning the truth, Oedipus gouges out his eyes, so he won’t have to look upon his children, or the misfortune that is his life. Once physically unable to see, Oedipus has clear vision as to his fate, and what must be done for his kingdom and his family
Though calling Teiresias’ news as foolish deceit. Oedipus later learns that the murder of King Laios had been foretold. to be at the hands of his lost son, which he exiled and sentenced to. death when his son was still a baby. Knowing that the same prophecy was told to him by Apollo, Oedipus now knows that he is implicated in.
When he does visit the prophet, Tiresias, he learned that he adopted. It comes out that Oedipus was the unknown man who killed Laius from the revelation that the old king was killed at the same crossroads Oedipus remembers from his fight. In addition, it is revealed that Oedipus was the child Jocas...
Dramatic irony in Oedipus the King is evident throughout, which is similar to the latter play, but in a different form. In here, the irony is evident. Oedipus the King revolves around characters' attempts to change their destiny (which fails) - Jocasta and Laius's killing of Oedipus and Oedipus's flight from Corinth. Each time somebody tries to avert the future, the audience knows their attempt is futile, creating irony. When Jocasta and Oedipus mock the oracles, they continue to suspect that they were right. Oedipus discounts the oracles' power, but believes in his ability to uncover the truth, yet they lead to the same outcome. His intelligence is what makes him great, but it is also what causes the tragedy. When he ridded Thebes of the Sphinx, Oedipus is the city's saviour, but by killing Laius and marrying Jocasta, he is its affliction, causing the blight that strikes the city during the opening. Meanwhile, the characters, especially Teiresias, mention sight, light, darkness, &c as metaphors, while referring to `seeing the truth'. However, while Teiresias knows the truth and is blind, Oedipus can see all but the truth. When he discovers the truth, he becomes blind. Also, he does not just solve the Sphinx's riddle - he is its answer. His birth is mentioned throughout the play (crawling on `4 legs'), and he never relies on anybody but himself (`standing on his own `2 legs'),...
Ironically, he initially became a King by solving a riddle and now he is trying to solve another to try and maintain his image and control his destiny. “Human happiness is built on an illusion” (Dodds 27). This quote is a good connection to the role of Oedipus, because while attempting to keep the Kingdom under control and keep his image unharmed, he is left in the dark by ignoring the signs. The irony of ignoring the past continues when “Creon brings the information that there will be no relief until the murderer of Laius is expelled from the city… [And] the murder mystery slowly becomes a quest for Oedipus ' identity” (Derrida). Building upon the investigation, Oedipus grows a keen interest for who he truly is. Is there any truth to the prophecies that which he and Jocasta have seemingly forgot about? At this point, it seems as though Oedipus must finally face his fear and discover the truth that he has been avoiding for so long. The only way for Oedipus to find out the lies he has been living is to seek for the only witness of his father’s murder, a shepherd. Only until Oedipus threatens to kill the shepherd does he tell the truth and reveal the tragic events which have been avoided for so long. In this moment before certainty of the past is brought to light, the relationship between self-control and self-image is linked and soon to be changed
Prior to the birth of Oedipus, a prophecy was spoken over Laius and his wife Jocasta. They were told that their son would one day be his father’s killer and would then marry his mother. In fear, King Laius and Queen Jocasta sent the baby Oedipus off with a slave to be killed. He was never killed, but rather was given to a childless king and queen which lovingly raised him. Oedipus was never factually told about his lineage. Later in his life, Oedipus was confronted by several unknown men while traveling. Upon confrontation, Oedipus killed all but one of the men in self defense. Unknowingly, Oedipus had begun to fulfill the prophecy for one of the men had been his birth father, Laius.
In the play, Oedipus exemplifies the limitation and fallibility of human knowledge through the usage of confirmation bias. Oedipus is portrayed as an intelligent and perceptive character, and was known throughout the kingdom of Thebes for his clairvoyance demonstrated through solving the riddle of the sphinx. Despite his intellectual ability, throughout the play we see him struggle with piecing together the simple truth that he himself was the culprit behind Laius’ murder. Oedipus utilizes fantasy because he is unable to fathom the idea that he is the evil that blighted the kingdom, therefore, he only seeks information that adhere to the belief that he is not the culprit. At first he concocts the idea that both Teiresias and Creon were conspiring against him so that Creon can take the throne away from him. In order to convince himself and everyone else that he is not the culprit, he decides to vilify Creon because if Creon were to be the murderer, he himself couldn’t possibly be. Afterwards, when Oedipus learns of his father’s death, he rejoices and fantasizes about having bested the Gods, since he believed that prophecy did not come true after all. When relying on fantasy was not enough, Oedipus turns to repression and refuses to accept the information that
In Oedipus the King, Sophocles suggests that the impact of seeing the truth is harmful rather than enlightening. Whenever Oedipus strives to discover more to strengthen Thebes’ perspective of him, it leads him closer to his fate as determined by prophesy. Tiresias stands as a model in the play for the individual who is able to see the meaning beyond plot of events although his is blind, and Oedipus represents the oblivious arrogant individual who is never content because they need to be the unsurpassed individual. In the play, Sophocles illustrates the downside of a personality like Oedipus who desires to see the truth by ending the play with the brutality of gouging out his own eyes. Ultimately, the play reinforces that seeing the truth is harmful and being content with what you have, without greedily striving for more, can help avoid fate and a related deposition.
For instance, in “Further Arrivals”, Susanna Moodie arrived her destination; however, the nature around her is elusive and dark which she needs to face her inner darkness toward her identity and outside - the environment. Susanna Moodie was at a stage of transformation, physically and mentally. She needed to adapt the cold weather in Canada also her identity and challenges of facing this new land. Nevertheless, she reveals huge fear of being at this place where she was alienated from human, as she states, “My brain gropes nervous/ tentacles in the night, sends out/ fears hairy as bears,/ demands lamps; or waiting” To overcome this fear of nature, she believes she eventually needs the “wolf’s eyes” to adapt the nature and wilderness and her wish of civilization - the artificial light from “lamps”.
He is blinded by the truth of his life due to the unknowing of who his parents were. This metaphorical blindness is taken so far that Oedipus gets angry whenever someone mentions the prophecy and the probable truth of it. Tiresias declares that Oedipus “live[s] in hideous shame with those most dear to [him]… [and] cannot see the evil” (321). Although Tiresias begins telling about the truth by hinting at certain situations, Oedipus still remains oblivious and completely blinded. Tiresias is unable to keep to himself any longer and begins providing insight to the prophecy, proving that Oedipus is "blind... [and] cannot see the wretchedness of [his] life" (322). As the story starts to unravel, the truth is forced out and revealed to Oedipus. Due to this, and the revelation that it was because of Oedipus that Thebes was stricken with trouble, the blindness is taken to a physical level. Near the very end of the tragedy when Oedipus uncovers everything he looks up to the sky and praises the "light [and] look[s] upon [it] for the last time" (354). The physical light gives way to mental images that Oedipus is unable to see with physical sight. The truth is revealed and Oedipus is unable to cope with it, therefore causing him to blind himself by gauging out his eyes. This causes him to finally see the horrific
As the play draws to a close, it is shown how Oedipus learns the true nature of things. Oedipus remains blind to the truth until he can deny it no longer. After hearing the testimony of the herdsman it is perfectly clear to Oedipus that he has fulfilled the prophecy by killing his father and marrying his mother, in turn bringing the great misfortune about the city of Thebes. Upon discovering the truth, along with discovering Jocasta’s dead body, Oedipus blinds himself with the pins on her dress and shouts that his eyes “would no longer see the evils he had suffered or had done, see in the dark those he should not have seen.” (1280-1282).
Without darkness there would be many beautiful objects that a person could not see. The only time a person can see the stars in all of their beauty is when it is dark outside. This beauty is what Princess Batcheat is attempting to see when she gets kidnapped by the army of Chup. Iff the Water Genie explains why Princess Batcheat would go into the Twilight Strip. “Sirs’ Maybe you don’t know it but the young people of Gup do go into the Twilight Strip just occasionally, that is to say sometimes, that is to say most frequently. Living in the sunlight all the time, they wish to see the stars, the earth, the other moon shining in the sky. Darkness my sirs has its fascinations: mystery, strangeness, romance” (Rushdie 103). The young citizens of Gup know that there is beauty in the darkness, if it was ugly and not worth seeing they would not go into the Twilight Strip. Salman Rushdie shows the attractiveness of darkness by having the young people of Gup go into it. Darkness holds mysteries and romance. Light through darkness is not the only beauty that darkness holds. Darkness itself can cause objects to be beautiful. Haroun discoveres this information when he meets a Shadow Warrior named Mudra who is fighting his shadow in the forest of Chup. “The warrior was a striking figure. His long, sleek hair hung to his waist in a thick ponytail. His face was painted
The myth of Oedipus is one of a man brought down by forces aligning against him. Over the years, different playwrights have interpreted his character in various fashions. In Sophocles’ Oedipus the King, Oedipus is a man who is blind to the path on which his questions take him and exemplifies the typical tyrannical leader in ancient times; in Senaca’s Oedipus, it is the fear of his questions that give Oedipus a greater depth of character, a depth he must overcome if he is to survive his ordeal.