Was The Mexican American War Justified Essay

979 Words2 Pages

Justified or Not?
Did the United States have a plausible reason to go to war with Mexico? Like many other wars that have happened thus far, it had its supporters and opposers. The Mexican-American War lasted for nearly two years (1846-1848) and ended rather abruptly. This territorial dispute resulted in a lot of unnecessary blood shed and the only thing gained was a piece of land that was known as Texas. There are many conflicts that still reside over this topic; the major one being: was it justifiable?
To begin with, the growing populations West of the Mississippi wanted more land and pressured the government into annexing Texas, Oregon, and other territories (Textbook 354). About twenty years before this, Mexico declared their independence …show more content…

This two year war was over the land of Texas, or any land in between the US and the Pacific Ocean, and who would own it. With a single misunderstandment, sixteen American troops and an unknown amount of Mexican troops were killed; Polk saw this as a means to war. American troops were outnumbered and attacked by the Texas-established border of Rio Grande. Both sides considered Texas to be theirs, although Texas had been annexed to the United States. Many saw the annexation of Texas as a curse, but some saw it as a blessing. One in particular, John L. O’Sullivan, states that the American citizens should embrace Texas with hospitality and that soon enough California will be theirs too. He states that although weak, Mexico has challenged the nation and is restricting them from completing the plans of God (DOC A). To have a war, both houses of Congress must consent. After Polk’s War Message that stated he had stationed troops at Rio Grande to protect Texas; it was his duty because Texas was now a part of the Union now. He tells of the attack and then states that Mexico has crossed a line and now they must not surrender, they must fight back. On May 13, 1846 the houses voted; in the US Senate it was forty to two, in the House of Representatives it was one hundred and seventy-four to fourteen (DOC B). From Mexico’s viewpoint, they saw the annexation of Texas to be “inadmissible for both legal and security reasons” (DOC C). …show more content…

Many states like Massachusetts objected the war. Charles Sumner, a state legislator, states in his “Objections to the Mexican-American War” that Mexico should just charge the United States with robbery. He also says that by expanding slavery, American citizens denied “the great truths of American freedom” (DOC D). Sumner saw Mexico as pure because they rejected slavery, while many parts of America were pro-slavery. Although annexed to the US, it was never really clear what was going on with Texas. It went from one nation to another without hesitation. Yes, Texas left Mexico but Texans knew that the Mexican government would never accept the annexation to America. This war was not justified, they could have had various meetings and talked it out like many generations have done before. Both sides made rash decisions and for that many troops paid the price. The United States could of found another way, but greed clouded the minds of many and would not let go until it had what it wanted: more

Open Document