Was The Mexican American War Justified

1114 Words3 Pages

Mexican American relations were at an all time low following the defeat of a power hungry dictator known as General Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna by the Republic of Texas. When Texas was annexed by the United States as President James K. Polk was taking office, tensions continued to escalate. Diplomats were sent, but then scoffed at, causing Polk to call for troops along the border. Mexican aggression fueled a small, armed conflict that became known as the Thornton Affair, furthering the escalation of Mexican American tensions. War became necessary to end this widespread political and military issue. The United States was justified in going to war with Mexico because the US was defending Its sovereignty, Mexico was the initial aggressor, and …show more content…

Firstly, American troops were brought to the border due to the Mexicans challenging America's honor. Following the Slidell affair, in which Mexican officials ordered an American diplomat with a formidable and respectable offer to buy California was kicked out of Mexico City, troops were stationed along the border as a show of force and a response to the to the challenging of America's honor. The manner in which the Mexicans treated Slidell, the American diplomat, was deplorable and was a direct attack on an American citizen. And on the twenty fifth of April these troops were then fired upon by Mexican soldiers. If Mexico had accepted Americas generous offer for California, no troops would of been present along the border avoiding a conflict. Continuing, Mexico fired the first shoots of the war. James K. Polk the president at the time of the Mexican American war stated, “[The Mexicans] invaded our territory and shed American blood, upon American soil” (Polk, 10).The land in which the incident occurred was American territory following the Annexation of Texas. Mexico firing upon American troops was the first armed incident of the Mexican American war, and a subsequent cause for war, which warranted a strong response to the incident due to the fact the incident was a direct attack on America on American land. Moreover, Mexico had ignored, and scoffed at …show more content…

Firstly, the US was more fit to control the land because they were a superior religion in God's eyes. The majority of the citizens of the United States were Protestant whereas the Mexicans were majority Catholic. The citizens of America were better suited to control the land the Mexicans possessed due to the fact that Protestants interpret God's teachings in a superior way compared to Catholics. The war that followed was merely doing God's work liberating the Mexican citizens of an unfit leadership of a lesser religion who had no business controlling such a large portion of land. Secondly, the United States was destined to control the Mexicans land. The land the Mexicans possessed was according to God's will bound to be the United States. The Americans on such land were supernaturally successful, with rapid industrialization and gold filled soil, the success of the Americans could only be explained by god rewarding his people for doing his work. The war was acting upon God's plan and behaving as good followers of the lord by taking such land. Lastly, the citizens of America had no reason to not believe that God wanted them to control the Mexican’s land. John O'Sullivan, a newspaper writer, and average American citizen, stated “Of our manifest destiny to overspread continent allotted by God” (O’Sullivan, 8). The people of America during that time truly

More about Was The Mexican American War Justified

Open Document