Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why julius caesar is significant
Julius caesar effect on rome today
Julius caesar impact on roman society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Julius Caesar the Hero
Was Julius Caesar a hero or a tyrant? To answer that, Caesar was a hero. In the article, “Killing Caesar” by Jon Herman the author states all the good things Caesar had done for the Roman citizens, such as, creating jobs so people could work, he kept fresh water throughout Rome, He also made sure they had food, and he made fun events for them to attend.
Many people viewed Julius Caesar as a hero for trying to improve Rome when he was the leader. One thing that Caesar has done to try and improve Rome was creating jobs for the Roman citizens so they can work and support their families, “Caesar created jobs by building roads, temples, and aqueducts.” If Caesar had not of created those jobs then there would be a lot of hungry and homeless families in Rome, which would have caused chaos and commotions. The jobs that were created by Caesar shows that he wanted what was best for Rome and its citizens, which supports people claims for calling him a hero.
…show more content…
Caesar is also seen as a hero because he cared for the people and they knew that he did, “To the people Caesar was more god than man.” Before Caesar became the Roman leader the senate had ruled Rome poorly.
Once Caesar had become the leader of Rome he took away all of the senate’s power, “The senate had ruled Rome poorly, caring more about their own political squabbles than the people, and now Caesar had taken their power.” Taking away the senate’s power shows an act of heroism form Caesar because he noticed a major problem within Rome and he took it upon himself to fix it. If Caesar was to not take the power from the senate then Rome would have still been in bad condition, and the senate would still think that there was nothing wrong and everyone in Rome was fine. Also if the problem had not been fixed while Caesar was the leader the citizens of Rome would have seen him as a weak ruler causing Caesar to be disliked, and seen as a tyrant instead of a
hero. Yet again, many people believe that Caesar is a tyrant. The reason they say Caesar was a tyrant is because they think that Caesar was the type of person who demanded something in return if he was to do something good, “Whatever good Caesar brought to Rome would soon be outweighed by his mad quest for power.” This would also make them think that Caesar was too dangerous since he knew how to gain all the power he wanted. However their claims of Caesar being a tyrant are wrong because Caesar only wanted to improve Rome and make Rome a better place. Caesar did bring a lot of good to Rome but he never demanded for the Roman citizens to give him anything in return. Even though Caesar didn’t ask for anything in return he did receive love and respect from the Roman citizens, and love and respect is not something someone cannot ask for because it’s something you have to earn and that’s what Caesar did. Therefore Caesar was not a tyrant he was a hero. After all, Caesar turned out to be a hero from all the good things he had done for Rome, which was stated in the article, “Killing Caesar” by Jon Herman.
Even though he may not have been a hero like you would see in a comic book, Julius Caesar was surely heroic to the Roman people. His conquering of land, strength as a military leader, and care for his citizens all show his greatness. Also, many more than half of Roman citizens absolutely loved Caesar. Mainly middle and low class citizens, these people viewed Caesar as a leader who did an exceptional job in charge of
Julius Caesar, an important figure in Roman history, lived during the end of the Roman Republic. His actions would shape the world around him forever. He was an important figure because he grew the Roman Empire, he brought about the end of the Roman Republic , and was able to grow his status within his lifetime and become dictator for life.
Julius Caesar was unquestionable a cunning Politian as portrayed within historical documents, even though the events were documented after the accounts of his rule materialized there are still numerous theories about his political ability’s and how he was viewed by the people he governed. This paper is intended to present the reader clear vision on how Julius Caesar was viewed during his dictatorship of Rome. Was Julius Caesar a selfish dictator or model politician? There will be five diverse source accounts of the events which will be examined for similarities and differences based on the historical evidences.
Exordium- “Power does not corrupt men; fools, however, if they get into a position of power, corrupt power” - George Bernard Shaw. Was the great Roman Emperor Julius Caesar a fool or power hungry? Today I would like to explain why I think he was truly power hungry.
Julius Caesar (July 100 BC – 15 March 44 BC) was a Roman general, statesman, Consul, and author of Latin prose. He played a critical role in the events that led to the demise of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. On March 15 44 B.C.E, the Roman dictator Julius Caesar was murdered. There are multiple accounts of this incident, while all accounts came after the death of Caesar, the writing on the incident portray Julius Caesar to have been a selfish dictator.
...e him a better dictator. One of his greatest traits was that he was able to rule with an iron fist, but in my opinion I don’t think he abused his power since all he was trying to do was make Rome a huge and dominant empire. Obviously people who didn’t know him too well didn’t understand him, which made him appear as a scary and ruthless ruler, but even Cicero was able to change his mind about Caesar before the Gallic war was over. In the end, Caesar was one of the best dictators our world has ever seen.
In Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar", Caesar is displayed as a powerful and dynamic figure in Rome because of his many accomplishments in previous wars as well as battles. When Caesar returns to Rome from a recent victorious defeat in battle, he receives a warm welcome by all the citizens of Rome. They consider and see Caesar as a hero and a strong individual, which is why they attempt to crown him King three times. A group of generals in Caesar's army are jealous and concerned with the amount of power Caesar has; they make arrangements to kill him. "Power is said to be a man's greatest desire he'll do whatever it takes to achieve his goal, even to kill." In comparison to Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar" and the film Julius Caesar, we see many similarities. Furthermore, I will discuss these similarities in great depth.
In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare shows how friends often betray each other. Julius Caesar is about to be crowned king of Rome, when some well-known Romans decide that it is not a good idea for this to happen. They form a conspiracy and kill Caesar. Brutus, an honorable Roman and a very good friend of Caesar’s, betrays Caesar by killing him for the good of Rome. Antony, Caesar’s best friend and another honorable Roman, betrays Brutus by turning against the conspirators. Cassius, a respected Roman, and Brutus betray each other by arguing and destroying their friendship. All this betraying lead to many deaths in the play.
When the name Julius Caesar is heard, it can only trigger the image of a great leader that led Rome into prosperity. Caesar's military excellence brought more power and more land; that lead to the increase of size and strength in Rome. His dictatorship helped the stability and prosperity in Rome. Caesar's assassination lead to a monarchy that was ruled by Octavin. His death lead to a domino effect ending in the ultimate collapse of the Roman Empire. Many people of the 21st century follow the path of Julius Caesar and try to be as great as he was. The assassination of Julius Caesar was a tragedy due to the contributions he made to Rome's prosperity during his life, and the chaos that occurred in Rome after his death. The contributions that Caesar made towards the strength of Rome's success, and the chaos and collapse of Rome after his death made the assassination of Julius Caesar a tragedy.
“Caesar was a brilliant general, a clever engineer, and administrator of genius, and a leader who demanded and commanded loyalty. He also was a corrupt politician” (Dando-Collins 4). Caesar would go on to be a dictator and his gain in power would corrupt him. He often bypassed the Senate, taking their power away. With Caesar’s growing power the Senate feared that they would soon lose their political relevance.
Throughout many of Shakespeare's plays, a tragic hero is identified; a heroic figure that possesses a character flaw that leads to his defeat. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, there has been controversies over who is actually the tragic hero. Many people agree that Marcus Brutus is the tragic hero. However, others argue and identify Julius Caesar as the tragic hero. After examining these two characters, a conclusion is easily drawn. Brutus is the tragic hero of this play because when a person who possesses such heroic qualities dies, it is a true tragedy.
Julius Caesar may have been a noble person, but the people of Rome did not think so. In Julius Caesar, Shakespeare shows the Caesar comes to an unhappy end when he is murdered by the people he loved most. Within this play Julius Caesar is portrayed as a tragic hero. A tragic hero is defined as “the main character of a tragedy [who is] usually dignified, courageous, and high ranking” (Novel Study Guide). Also vital to defining a tragic hero is that, “the hero’s downfall is caused by a tragic flaw” (Novel Study Guide). It is evident that Julius Caesar is William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar is a tragic hero given that he is of noble stature, has a fatal flaw and comes to an unhappy end.
For many years people have been arguing of Caesar and i he was a dictator or reformer.Was Julius Caesar a dictator or reformer? Caesar was a dictator who deserved to die for these reasons. Julius Caesar deserved to die, because he treated his defeated enemies inhumanely. He weakened the senate of Rome. and he started multiple wars. Julius Caesar was a dictator of Rome, he had to die for the welfare of Rome.
Julius Caesar Themes play an integral role in the play Julius Caesar. The actions and the way that the characters express themselves define the themes of the play. The play is not comprised of one or two themes, but rather made up of an innumerable amount of them. A major theme in the play is fate. Fate is found from the smallest instance, such as a dream, to the prediction from a soothsayer.
	Shakespeare illustrated Caesar as a tragic hero by showing that he was a noble man of high rank. Every Roman followed his leadership and Caesar also defeated the great Pompey. First of all, At the Feast of Lupercal Caesar manipulated the commoners and made himself look noble to the commoners. Casca said, "Why there was a crown offered to him;...people fell a-shouting" (I,ii,221-223). Next, To show how noble and great Caesar was, the Romans would stand along the street sides to watch him pass by. "Madam not yet, I go to take my stand; /To see him pass on to the Capitol," said the soothsayer (II,iv,25-26). Finally, Caesar had the greatest rank possible as he would have been crowned king if it wasn’t for the conspiracy’s plot. As Casca said, "Indeed they say senators tomorrow; /Mean to establish Caesar as king..." (I,iii,87-88).