Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A short summary of the history of the Native American-white settler conflicts
A short summary of the history of the Native American-white settler conflicts
The relations between Indians and colonists
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Thesis
In Warrior Nations: The United States and Indian Peoples, Roger L. Nichols aims to provide readers a unique account on various wars, by focusing on the reasons behind each one and by detailing how each conflict effected other, farther away conflicts. . Nichols also provides six main attributes that were the main instigators of war. These attributes are:
• Americans intolerances towards Indians and their actions that reflect that.
• Americans continuous demands for Indian’s land.
• The government’s inability or unwillingness to punish those who inflicts injury in violence.
• Indians militarize nature and the ceremonies that reflect their high opinions of physical conflict.
• Indian men were require to protecting their clan and acting
…show more content…
out revenges. • Indians unwillingness to give up their lands, culture, traditions, and tribal independence. These attributes helps provide a deeper understanding of American-Indian relations in the time 19th century. It also allows for readers to learn about the mistakes that’s causes the various conflicts, and provides a more detail lesson then plainly giving cold hard facts. He does this by comparing eight conflict that had vastly different reasons behind them. Due to the complicated analysis of Indian/American relation the author wrote about, Warrior Nations is obviously not made for kids and young teens in mind. The purpose of this book is to educated and expand on the reader’s history knowledge. More than like, it is going to be someone who is already interested in history, especially military and political, and wants to expand on it. Not to say the average Joe cannot read it, but it does cater to those interested in history. Summary Each chapter contains a deep analysis of one of the following wars: Ohio Valley War, Red Stick War, Arikara War, Black Hawk War, Minnesota Sioux War, Cheyenne and Arapaho War, Chiricahua Apache War, and Nez Perce War. Though these wars do have some similarities, each one have their own unique reasons for occurring. There is a heavy emphasis on the reasons of the war and how it comes about. The actual war is barely touched on, comparatively. Nichols uses a general formula to organize his chapter.
Each chapter begins with background information that leads up to the war, the reasons for the war, and actions and decisions the various leaders taken that led to events that will lead to a snowball effect that ends with the war. The usually takes a good two thirds of the chapter. Once the readers have an establish understanding of the whys, Nichols would finally sum up the war in two pages. This organization formal was effective as the main goal of “Warrior Nations” is to provide a greater understanding of the reason behind each conflict and why the American and the Indians did what they did.
To support his claims and evidence, he uses a hodgepodge group of sources. What is notable is that he uses United States government own documentation on the event and people’s first hand, written account of each event. Yes, Nichols uses books and articles, but he also went and got official, fact check documentation and first hands account of what happened in each war/conflict. As stated, Nicholas main goal is to provide reasons behind the conflict. The best way to provide these reasons is from the very people themselves.
Analyze of Strengths and
…show more content…
Weaknesses The whole point of this book is provide a deep understanding of the reasons for the conflict. This book nails it and then some! Most books only provide cold facts, never interlocking the events together besides a very general statement that the events are between Indians and Americans. This book defiantly did not do this and it made it a very compelling to read. The author was about to make each conflict related in some unexpected ways and provide the motivation of those involve in the conflicts. One example was relating the Red Stick War with the Ohio Valley War. Nicholas explains that the federal government was more focus on what was happening at the Ohio Valley than what is happening in Georgia. This leads to Georgia officials in negotiating with the Creeks and allowing for American militia to join into the civil war between the Creeks and the Red Stick warriors. A different outcome might very well might have occur if the federal government intervene instead of a more local solution. While Nicholas provided an excellent account on the reasons and motivation of those participating in the event, he falls short in the actual details of the war itself. On the Cheyenne and Arapaho War, he sums up the actual war in only two paragraphs. However, going in it was obvious the author focus was what leads up to the fighting and not the actual conflict itself. The fact Nicholas looks at what causes the event than what happens during it provides a unique outlook. He was also able to interlink events to other, creating an understanding that local conflicts does affect other events outside the immediate vacancy. While most analysis would make each event sound isolated and unrelated to other conflicts, Nicholas manages to stand out from the crowd and paints a more complete picture of the cause and effects of a conflict. Relating to HST 3600 Class The book expanded on a few items that were covered in class, and also gives a more detail account on the thought process of Americans at key points of time. For instance, one lesson was about what occur in Ohio and America-Indian relation, and how the Indians join with British to stop the expansion of America. Warrior Nations gives us a more detail insight on why the Indians took up arms against Americans and how the federal and local government responded to their actions. Another key point mention in class was how the United States had a weak standing Army, unreliable militia, and an ineffective bureaucracy.
If the United States had a strong standing Army, a lot of these conflicts would have been dealt with either by force or a better diplomatic system. The treaties and negotiating that were delay due to bureaucracy and how chaotic and confusing the system was and how long it takes for anything to be approve of.
Thought out the whole book, Nicholas alludes or outright stating what he ends up concluding at the end: that the Indian-American Wars were unavoidable due to several key factors. Both groups we unwilling to accept the other’s culture and both lay claim to various lands and resources. Americans constant insistence of Indians giving up their traditions and how they were unwilling to accept Indians in their fold. How unappealing the Indian’s future looked due to Americans intervention and how Indians fled while others decided to defend their settlements and their beliefs.
Conclusion Roger Nichols gave an in-depth account on American-Indian conflicts and how they come about. He explores eight key battles and how there are overarching factors that causes each battle. While Nichols did not go into great detail on individual battles in a specific war, he did accomplish what others did not: providing the reasons and motivations of those that went to war. Some of the reasons were covered in class, though it was defiantly not in as great as detail as Nichols was able to accomplish. Overall, a great book. Warrior Nations was a very enjoyable read, and Nichols accomplish what he set out to do: creating an intellectual analysis of the reasons behind the various wars and how they interlock.
In the book Warriors Don't Cry, Melba has a very strong support system. Her mother, and her grandmother are very big supporters in this book. In the segregated south, white people had power and black people didn't. These nine black student that entered an all white school had very many people discourage them. Whites talked about them, looked at them, and made fun of them. Melba was one out of the nine black students that attended Central High school, but since she had a very supportive family, she didn't let anyone get to her. With this and many other acts, integration such as Melba showed that the white segregationist was a fragile illusion. Melba's story makes clear that the power of whites lie, to some extent, in the consent of the black
A Narrative of a Revolutionary Soldier is a memoir written by Joseph Plumb Martin, an ordinary soldier who served the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War. As the name indicated, the memoir mainly portrays the common men’s experiences and feelings, especially their dangers and sufferings, during the revolutionary period. Based on Martin’s unique perspective, his memoir cannot provide us with the big picture from the top down, such as the military strategy and the charismatic leadership of American revolutionary army. However, it offers exclusive insights and precious details that allow us to closely examine what truly transpired among the thousands of soldiers during that period.
In addition to the road to battle, it is important to know that historical accounts of what led to the battle and what transpired are in dispute. These are not disputes over minor items, such as the exact order of battle or a clear sequence of events in what was a confusing night and dawn battle. Accounts of what transpired are often fundamentally different, and it is clear that various actors suppressed or championed differing accounts for political or personal reasons. By some accounts, the battle began by accident as an Indian patrol sent to keep watch on the Americans drew fire from nervous American sentries, leading the Indians only a mile away at Prophetstown to attack. By other accounts, the Indians planned a deliberate attack in order to strike the American force before the Americans could strike the Indians. Harrison touted the battle as a decisive victory that broke up the Indian confederacy and many historians agreed. However, modern accounts argue that the battle actuall...
The Europeans invaded America with every intention of occupying the land, the bountiful natural resources as well as the complete domination of the native people. The Europeans desire for the land created an explosive situation for the native peoples as they witnessed their land and right to freedom being stripped from them. They often found themselves having to choose sides of which to pledge their allegiance to. The Europeans depended upon Indian allies to secure the land and their dominance as well as trade relations with the Indians. The Indians were in competition with one another for European trade causing conflict among the different tribes altering the relationships where friends became enemies and vice versa (Calloway, 2012, p. 163). These relationships often became embittered and broke into bloody brawls where it involved, "Indian warriors fighting on both sides, alongside the European forces as well as against European forces invad...
...h and the French and Indians, but shows some of the ironic nature of this conflict: that due to kidnapping and tribal adoption, some Abenaki Indians were likely to have almost as many English ancestors as the frontiersmen they opposed. The English frontiersmen could be as "savage" as the Indians. Brumwell does very well dispelling the clichés and stereotypes that many have become accustomed to. He uses records of the Abenaki Indian oral tradition to give a voice to both sides. It is a great book from start to finish. This is a true history buffs companion and a great addition to any library. The book is as complex in its knowledge as it is simplistic and detailed in its imagery. As a result, this book can be read by both specialists and general readers alike and can be pared with almost any text giving light to the French and Indian War or the aftermath thereof.
One limitation Tomedi’s book has is that it is very subjective, allowing the reader to only see a portion of the war through a single person’s view. For example Fred Lawson, an interviewee, stated “We has no idea what was happening over on the other side of the mountain” (Tomedi, 87). Tomedi does not present his readers with a story of “what was happening over the mountain.” The book also neglects various perspectives, such as officers and women in the war. The compilation of stories strictly focuses on combat veterans, many of whom did not know what was going on; they were simply “a bunch of kids…trying to do [their] job” (Tomedi, 8).
The clash between the Native Americans and the colonists did not start off tumultuous. In the early days of the exploration and settlement of the New World they lived in peace. The Indians taught them how to farm and live off the land. In a strange land the colonists made an ally. However, the subsequent turn of events was inevitable. Perhaps the chaos that ensued could have been postponed but there was never going to be a peaceful cohabitation between the colonists and the indigenous people. There were so many vast differences between the religious views and ultimate goals of the two groups. The Native Americans had established trade relationships with various tribes, they had their own religions, and their way of life was a stark contrast to that of the colonists. The worldview of the respective peoples was foreign to the other and the idea of a holistic and unbiased approach to the life of others was foreign.
The Warrior Ethos, by Steven Pressfield depicts the warrior’s mentality from ancient times to the present through a variety of different aspects and stories. In The Warrior Ethos, Pressfield states that men are not born with the certain qualities that make a good warrior, but instead are inculcated through years of training and indoctrination, stating at an early age. He shows how different societies have been able to instill the same or very similar ideals throughout history while maintaining their own unique characteristics. Things have changed from ancient Sparta, where parents would be enthusiastic about their children going to war, and even more elated upon learning they died valorous in battle. These days, most parents are a lot
Throughout the book, Gary B. Nash narrates the war in chronological order to recount the war as it happened and emphasize the events that allowed for people of different class, gender, and/or race to stand up and call for American Independence or to turn on their country and join the British forces. In short, Nash emphasizes that the revolution was a “people’s revolution” [Page XV] and as such divided each chapter with
The Indians felt that the Whites were coming in and taking over the land of their ancestors, without regard. The increased population was also depleting the natural resources of the land. The Indians learned from the Whites that by banding together they were stronger and could present a “show of force” when attacking the settlements. The Indians feared that if they did not take action, there would be nothing left for them (Roark et al., 2012, 103). The Indians were, consequently, forced to fight to maintain their way of life. Whites attempted to
Anderson, F., and R.S Stephenson. The War That Made America. Penguin Group USA, 2005. (accessed December 5th , 2013).
One of the critical tasks that faced the new nation of the United States was establishing a healthy relationship with the Native Americans (Indians). “The most serious obstacle to peaceful relations between the United States and the Indians was the steady encroachment of white settlers on the Indian lands. The Continental Congress, following [George] Washington’s suggestion, issued a proclamation prohibiting unauthorized settlement or purchase of Indian land.” (Prucha, 3) Many of the Indian tribes had entered into treaties with the French and British and still posed a military threat to the new nation.
In Joseph Plumb Martin’s account of his experiences in the Revolutionary War he offers unique insight into the perspective of a regular soldier, which differs from the views of generals and leaders such as popular characters like George Washington. Martin’s narrative is an asset to historical scholarship as a primary source that gives an in-depth look at how life in the army was for many young men during the War for Independence. He described the tremendous suffering he experienced like starvation and privation. He did not shy away from describing his criticism of the government who he believes did not adequately care for the soldiers during and after the war. While he may be biased because of his personal involvement as a soldier, he seems to relate accounts that are plausible without embellishment or self-aggrandizement. Overall, “A Narrative of A Revolutionary Soldier” is a rich source of information providing an overview of military experience during the war.
In this case, it led to more hostility and created the conflict because the states were antithetical in nature to each other. This drove the conflict, not material matters. Bibliography Nye, Jr., Joseph S. “Hard and Soft Power in American Foreign Policy.” In Paradox of American Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
The Warrior’s Honour by Michael Ignatieff conveys the harsh realities of ethnic war to the reader. It opens a window to pictures and experiences that most cannot, and do not , think of on a daily basis. Michael Igantieff has experienced there realities as he travelled around the world in his work as a journalist, and it is in this book that he shares with us his thoughts and ideas about these war torn countries. In this paper I will review the book and discuss major themes and arguments, as well as the downfall and shortcomings of it.