Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of leadership in our society
Personality traits and leadership styles
Importance of leadership in our society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of leadership in our society
Think of this, a world of followers, no direction, no guidance, no inspiration, and no motivation.A world filled with confusion, savagery, unorganized, simply put, pure chaos. The followers do as they please, do what is or isn’t right. These followers are lost, since birth to death, they just wander the Earth’s land, with no regrets. This world is the world without leadership, a world of pure followers. Leadership is critical to survival, not just in the military, but in all walks of life. Leadership is the factor to victory, by looking at historical leaders on how they influenced their environment, as well as looking at the traits of a leader, and the philosophy of leadership.
Napoleon Bonaparte, one of the greatest military leaders of his
…show more content…
Leadership has many characteristics, but as well as personal who use this ability for both good and evil. In a book called The Warrior Ethos by Steven Pressfield, he speaks about Alexander the Great and his many characteristics of his leadership. As described in Pressfield, Alexander was in a waterless desert with his men. A couple of scouts go to Alexander, with the helmet of water as a gift. Alexander thanks them and dumps the water in front of all his men. The men cheer, with a king, likes this to lead us, no force on earth can stand against us”.On another event, Alexander also began to give away all his belongs to his men (42-43 Pressfield). This leadership characteristic is of generosity and caring for the team. Alexander chooses to suffer from his fellow men than to have the satisfaction of drinking water. He also gave up his valuables to show his men, that he cares for them more than himself. Another act of his kindness to his followers, was Alexander helped a veteran by giving him warmth and food (44-45 Pressfield). This is true leadership, being a leader isn’t going off and telling the followers what to do. It is to guide them, care for them, and inspire them to become great or even greater than the leader themselves. The goal is to become a leader, not a boss, to lead, and not to enforce. Alexander has the showing and skills of a true leader, one who cares for
Part 1, The Basics of Leadership, Chapter 1 covers Fundamentals of Leadership while Roles and Relationships are covered in Chapter 2. This section describes and depicts levels of Leadership. We as a military are set apart from other non-military professions in that Soldiers must be prepared to use deadly force and have the courage required to close with and destroy the enemy. All leaders, from non-commissioned officers and warrant officers, to commissioned officers, inherently possess a great responsibility. The repercussions of decisions and actions impact the lives of Soldiers and their families. Additionally, these decisions affect the battlefield environment including enemy and non-combatants, both military and
A leader must always lead by example, be self-accountable for his/her professional and personal behavior. Have moral and mental strength to do what is right, with confidence and resolution, even in the face of temptation or adversity. A leader must be committed to its SAILORS, so that its SAILORS will be committed to him/her. In today’s Navy, we must be leaders in
Secondly, military leaders tend to hold high levels of responsibility and authority at low levels in our organizations. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, military leadership is based on a concept of duty, service, and self-sacrifice. We take an oath to that effect.” There is no formula for leadership, as great leaders have different leadership styles. When discussing military leaders and what makes them great examples of success, their personalities range from flamboyant and daring to reserved and cautious in battle.
The Warrior Ethos, by Steven Pressfield depicts the warrior’s mentality from ancient times to the present through a variety of different aspects and stories. In The Warrior Ethos, Pressfield states that men are not born with the certain qualities that make a good warrior, but instead are inculcated through years of training and indoctrination, stating at an early age. He shows how different societies have been able to instill the same or very similar ideals throughout history while maintaining their own unique characteristics. Things have changed from ancient Sparta, where parents would be enthusiastic about their children going to war, and even more elated upon learning they died valorous in battle. These days, most parents are a lot
Military leadership is always an important factor in war. Good commanders will accomplish the goals of their side, while inferior generals will only hinder performance and fail their leader. However, not all great generals are victorious. Victories depend heavily on the availability of resources. Leadership does not relate to the supplies one has to draw from, but instead to the personal traits of the man himself.
Lastly, Alexander was an incredibly poor sport when it came to his victories over other cities and/or countries. There are multitudes of people who think of Alexander the great as an outstanding leader and respectful
One of the reasons for Alexander’s military success is because he was brought up by a great military leader. Alexander’s father was King Phillip II of Macedonia, a great military leader himself. When Alexander was a young man, around 16, his father realized his potential and pulled him out of school and put him out on the field to learn (McGill). He also got him a tutor, one of the best in all of history, Aristotle. Alexander’s young life will prove to be one of the largest reasons for his...
Dwight David Eisenhower (1955), the 34th President of the United States, gave an explicit definition of leadership, “The job of getting people really wanting to do something is the essence of leadership….” The Army, like any other civilian organization, defines different levels of leadership depending on a size of a unit a leader is in command of. Tactical and organizational leaderships are two first interconnected levels of leadership in the Army. Both levels of leadership have many commonalities regarding duties and responsibilities; yet they are very different in the way the leaders develop themselves, train, and take care of their soldiers.
All soldiers, especially leaders, are highly recommended to keep a certain set of values that radiate throughout the entire U.S. Army. They are challenged to keep them near and dear to their hearts and to define and live them every day. A leader is one who takes these challenges serious and abides by
In the military we look for leadership in different forms from many people starting from the Private to the Commander of the unit. Leadership will build the trust of a unit through positive moral or it could break a unit with low morale. Leadership as the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of a vision or set of goals (Robbins & Judge, 2009). I as Soldier I get to observed leaders at their job and
Ancient Greece has set the tone for the standard of how great sculptures were crafted. Therefore, a classic example of this form is the Fallen Warrior from the East Pediment, taken from the ruins of the temple of Aphaia. With its mythology and architectural styles, Ancient Greece has undoubtedly changed the way sculptures were made and still inspires many artists to this day.
Alexander began his military campaign and his rule much where his father left off. Whether or not it was his aim, this created a sense of normality for the men that was part of his father’s regime. Alexander’s position as a warrior-king who stood side-by-side among his men also served to create respect among his peers. Gradually, as Alexander conquered more Persian land, he began to adopt the policies of Persian rulers. Alexander’s change in policy extended beyond just political roles, he gave consideration to the local gods in many of the lands that he conquered. Eventually, Alexander brought people in from the conquered nations to serve under him.
Leadership can be defined in many ways, but one thing all leaders have in common is determination to get a task done. Although leaders may carry out this action in many different ways they all do what needs to be done in order to reach their goal. Florence Nightingale was willing to gather a group of women and pick up and leave her home to tend to the wounded soldiers of the Crimean War.
Alexander was speaking and influencing directly to them. These individuals all had a common purpose and felt very passionate in their beliefs. As we know, leadership does not happen if others don’t have the same feelings as the leader does. Alexander was also able to energize individuals through his writings toward achieving something together. Both he and his followers had a common goal or mutual purpose.
There are many leaders in the world, but a great ruler is passionate, honorable and one who can inspire even in the most hopeless circumstances. Alexander the Great was a great ruler. Alexander the Great was a ruler that was not only inspiring, but he was fearless, smart, bold and courageous. Alexander the Great inspired his soldiers to crave more. He has inspired people since the day he started ruling. What is inspirational about Alexander the Great is that he inspired his troops to the point that they did not question him when they were outnumbered three to one in a battle, they trusted him with their lives and were willing to die for him (Alexander the Great: man behind the legend).