Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Einhard life of charlemagne analysis
Einhard life of charlemagne analysis
Consequences Of Feudalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Einhard life of charlemagne analysis
Einhard’s Life of Charlemagne details some important events of Charlemagne’s life as well as aspects of his character. Charlemagne was one of the most powerful and influential Frankish kings of the Early Middle ages. This was the time between the fall of the Roman Empire and the start of the Renaissance. After the fall of the Roman Empire in the west, there were few structured civilization. People gravitated away from big cities and began living in small local villages. Because of this people and towns were very isolated from one another. Feudalism became the social system during this time and it was incredibly important due to the isolation of society. Isolated towns were very vulnerable to attack. Feudalism solved this by establishing a …show more content…
This was not unusual for a king such as Charlemagne and Einhard speaks about Charlemagne’s father and grandfather also pursuing similar military careers. This shows a great deal about the type of society that existed during the middle ages. Today warfare is abhorred and generally only condoned as the last possible option, but during the middle ages, war seems to have been perfectly acceptable. Charlemagne used warfare as a way of building his reputation and growing his kingdom. Of Einhard’s thirty-three chapters ten are devoted solely to describing Charlemagne’s military triumphs; far more than any other topic. Einhard starts out with Charlemagne’s first military undertaking: the Aquitanian War. This war was originally started by Charlemagne’s father but failed to be ended until Charlemagne took the throne. This victory established Charlemagne as a powerful and respectable king. However, Charlemagne did not stop there, his next military pursuit was to provide aid to Hadrian, the Bishop of Rome against the Lombard threat. Like the previous conflict, Charlemagne’s father had attempted this conquest as well. Charlemagne had little difficulty in defeating the Lombards and unlike his father took steps to ensure that the Lombards would no longer pose a threat to the church. Einhard notes that the difference between Charlemagne and his father in the Lombard War was Charlemagne’s ceaselessness. Einhard recounts Charlemagne’s father compelling the Lombard king to surrender hostages, restore to the Roman’s what had been taken and promise to never seize Roman land again. Charlemagne, however, did not stop until the Lombard king surrendered and his heir driven from all of Italy. With this act, Charlemagne showed that he was a stronger king than even his father and gained a great deal of reputation as well as the favor of the church. With two impressive military triumphs
Einhard, as a servant of Charlemagne, had witnessed the entire life of his king. It made him possible to describe the personal life of his king in great detail. For example, he stated what activities his king chiefly enjoyed, what clothes he was accustomed to wear, and even what he used to do between meals. According to Einhard, “In summer, after the midday meal, he would take off his clothes and shoes as if it were night and would rest for two or three hours.” This indicated that Einhard described the adult life of his king with details and that Einhard knew the subject he was writing about extremely well. His writing also showed the military campaign that Charlemagne conducted. For instance, he stated, “While he was vigorously and almost constantly pursuing the war with the Saxons, and had placed garrison at suitable points along the frontier, he attacked Spain with as large a force as he could” (Einhard, p. 24). While Einhard’s work mostly focused on the official life of Charlemagne and his military campaign, Notker’s writing consisted of anecdotes about the king based on the stories he heard during his childhood. Notker, as mentioned earlier, was born twenty-five years after the death of Charlemagne and wrote the biography seventy years after the king’s death. In often cases, the anecdotes tended to be exaggerated; therefore, they seemed as if they were myths or fictional stories. Also, Notker’s writing was
Charlemagne is a known for his success to try to maintain his empire. This new empire will embrace the unity of Christian faith. Under Charlemagne, new lands are conquered and a Renaissance is embraced. He even tries to revive the Christian faith. Charlemagne is a man that hopes to be an inspiration to the next generation. These deeds of Charlemagne is seen in the Two Lives of Charlemagne. In the Two lives of Charlemagne, both Notker’s and Einhard’s goal is to portray Charlemagne as a man of good character, a man that accomplishes many deeds and a man that hopes to provide an outlet for the next generation.
After contemplating Einhard’s purpose for writing The Life of Charlemagne it is important to examine his qualifications for doing so. Early on in the introduction there is a brief history on Einhard and his education.
The most famous work about Charlemagne is a book entitled The Two Lives of Charlemagne which consists of two separate biographies published into one book and tells the story of Charlemagne's life as two different people experienced it. Apart from this, there are many other places you can turn to learn more about the life of the king of the Franks, including letters, capitularies, inventories, annals, and more. However, each of these sources seem to paint a different picture of Charlemagne. In one, he seems to be a very average guy; in another, a mythical being, almost god-like; and a strong and firm political leader in yet another. It is because of this of this that we will never really know exactly who Charlemagne was or what he was like, but we do have an idea of what he did and how he lived thanks to those who decided to preserve it.
The relationship between politics and faith in the age of Charlemagne would not have been possible or necessary without the people's true belief in their religion. Einhard himself reveals the depth of his faith when he sites the numerous omens foretelling Charles' death, as well as speaking of the "Divine ordination, (page295)" of Louis. The business of religion was taken seriously by all parties mentioned in Einhard's Life, and the church, being an integral part of the western world, could thus hardly have been ignored. In addition, the strong forces of competing religions made the question of faith one of great import in the West, making a solid Catholic union absolutely necessary. The alliance of Rome and the Frankish Empire was not entirely without its drawbacks, but its rewards are seen in the survival of Charlemagne's name into the present.
The reason Einhard wrote his biography of Charlemagne was to explain to the world how this man, who was also his personal friend, was a great leader. Einhard begins by telling some history of Charlemagne’s family and ancestry. Einhard then goes on to tell about every war Charlemagne was ever involved in. Einhard’s main reason for writing this description of Charlemagne’s reign is just to inform people of what he believe to be the reign of the greatest ruler of all time. He seemed proud to have lived at the same time as Charlemagne. He thought Charlemagne made no mistakes in the wars he was involved with. Einhard was proud of what Charlemagne did for the churches at the time of his reign. “Whenever he discovered one in his kingdom that was old and ready to collapse he charged the responsible bishops and priests with restor...
Critical questions can arise about Einhard's work for the simple fact he was a palace official of Charlemagne. Einhard was a minister of his Royal Majesty. He was highly respected for his knowledge, intellect, brilliance, integrity and character. He shared a personal relationship with the King and his family. It can be believed that his book was to make sure that the greatness of Charlemagne was recorded for history and maybe not the facts. The way he recorded the history of Charlemagne could have been more ...
Samuel Epes Turner, Einhard: The Life of Charlemagne, New York: Harper & Brothers, 1880. http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/basis/einhard.asp#Saxon War
“The apprenticeship of a King” describes how Charlemagne gained power through conquest and diplomacy. In 768, King Pippin died and his kingdom was divided between his two sons. Charles, the elder, and the younger was Carloman. The author says that little is known of Charles’ boyhood. When he was of the right age, it is recorded that he worked eagerly at riding and hunting. It was the custom of the Franks to ride and be practiced in the use of arms and ways of hunting. We may reasonably infer that acquiring these skills formed a major part of his early education. Charles was not a “man of letters” and the author makes no attempt at explaining this other than to point out that literacy was considered unimportant at that time for anyone other than the clergy and Charles didn’t become interested in “letters” until later in life. Bullough explains a number of experiences in public duties and responsibilities, which were assigned to Charles by his father, thus, giving him an apprenticeship to rule the kingdom. For some reason tension between Charles and his brother began shortly after their accession. The author explains a number of conflicts. The younger brother died however, at the end of 771 and a number of prominent people in his kingdom offered allegiance to Charles. Bullough names and explains those subjects. The result was the re-uniting of those territories, which helped to establish the kingdom of the Franks.
Throughout the middle ages, many empires were working on expanding their territory, but it was not always a success unless they had the appropriate leadership to guide them in the right direction. The main empire that grew to extraordinary lengths is that of the Roman Empire. Through many conquests and battles and with an amicable government, it attained its fortune. However, on the other hand, there was another government that shared similarities with that of Rome; this was the empire of Charlemagne, otherwise known as the Carolingian Empire, but it failed to have a prosperous eternity.
Charlemagne also known as Charles the Great, created a legacy that is greatly honored still to this day. He is seen as one of the greatest conquerors ever because of territories he conquered, the diversity he created, and the building of one of the greatest empires known to mankind. Since the fall of Rome, most of the continent of Europe has not been ruled by someone, until Charlemagne came along. Charlemagne was the founder of the Holy Roman Empire and was the one person to practically lead Europe out of the Dark Ages.
Charlemagne, or Charles the Great, reigned during a time of much turmoil and upheaval in Europe during middle ages. Charlemagne’s background and family history contributed much to his rise to power. The triumphs of his past lineage prepared him to take on the task of governing the Frankish Empire, and defending it from invaders. Charlemagne accomplished much during his supremacy. He not only brought education back into medieval Europe, but also invented an efficient way to govern his people. His conquests against the many adversaries of the Holy Roman Empire expanded his empire across the majority of Europe. His conquests also formed strong ties between the Catholic Church and the State. Charlemagne’s drive to convert Europe’s primitive and pagan tribes to Christianity nearly effaced the Saxons, whom he battled with for the majority of his reign. The crowning of Charlemagne as Holy Roman Emperor created a turning point in history. Within years after his death, however, his once great empire amounted to nothing. Charlemagne’s reign as King of the Franks and as Holy Roman Emperor greatly influenced the course of Europe during the middle ages.
Europe’s social structure in the Middle Ages consisted of feudalism. A hierarchical society of Kings granting land to nobles, who would then give a fief to a knight in return for service. The knight would then have peasants or serfs working on their fief. However, as the plague spread, many peasants died and their labour could not be replaced. This loss of workforce had a significant impact upon the economy as grain was not being harvested and livestock roamed free. The agrarian economy had been severely damaged, the land became uncultivated and returned back to its natural state. This rural collapse eventually led to food shortages in towns and cities.
The feudal system was one that arose in England after the invasion and conquest of William I. It has been said that this was the perfect political system for this time period. Life was really hard back in the Middle Ages and safety and defense were really hard to come by after the empire fell. There were no laws to protect the poor, so they turned to their lords to keep them safe. The king was in complete control of the system and he owned all the land. One quarter was kept as private property and the rest was given to the church or leased
Charlemagne can be described as “the greatest king of the middle ages,” and he became emperor or king around the year 768 A.D. after his brother died and left him as the only heir to his father. It all started about a century earlier with a Frankish warlord named Pepin. Pepin had come to power by forcing his way to become the Frankish kings trusted right-hand man. He would begin to use his authority while upholding that he was only a royal servant. After Pepin died his son Charles Martel would then govern Merovingian areas and the Frankish royal administration.