Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Similarities between human and chimpanzee behavior
Human evolutionessay
Human evolutionessay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Similarities between human and chimpanzee behavior
Warfare has been present in our lives for many years. Not only has warfare existed within humans but has also been present in animals such as the chimpanzees. A known example of warfare amongst Homo sapiens is the Yanomamo village. The Yanomamo village shows us that warfare is not just for fighting but to also resolve conflicts. Warfare is very important to understand as it explains how it is related to human evolution. We refer to warfare as a process of battle but it is an organized aggression between autonomous political units that is usually motivated by a common purpose (Thorpe, 2003).
Warfare is evident among humans and we commonly associate warfare with humans. An example of warfare among humans is the Yanomamo village of the amazon.
…show more content…
It is known that warfare has been present even at the start of the prehistoric times (Otterbein, 1999). When we think of warfare we associate it with Homo sapiens, but warfare is also present in animals like the chimpanzee. The chimpanzees are the closest relative to us Homo sapiens, and warfare is seen among the chimpanzees as the young male chimpanzees patrol their territory and defend it from neighbouring groups. These chimpanzees defend their territory from neighbouring groups so that they do not steal any of their resources. This is due to the chimpanzees having a territorial instinct that exists within them. By fighting the chimpanzees will have more access to resources when they win (Thorpe, 2003). When there is less resources among the groups, the chimpanzees start to become hostile which leads them to have intergroup conflict (Wilson & Wrangham, 2003). From the chimpanzees we are able to see how important human evolution is to warfare because the victors of the fight will lead them to have more resources which means the males will have a higher chance of reproductive success therefore will lead to more offspring to continue their lineage. When chimpanzees fight they bare their teeth to show aggressiveness and dominance over each other (De Waal, 1988). By doing this it will scare away or intimidate their opponent. When the chimpanzees bare their teeth …show more content…
Wilson & Wrangham (2003) states that both species defend their territory but there is no indication of any lethal violence among them. However the bonobos may intermingle with friendly neighbouring bonobo communities, and as they intermingle with other members from different communities, they will groom and copulate without any signs of aggression (Wilson & Wrangham, 2003). Even though both the chimpanzee and bonobos bare their teeth, the bonobos bare their teeth in a friendly and pleasurable context, such as during sexual intercourse, the bonobos will bare their teeth when they feel threatened or their infants are screaming. Or when they are having fun, the bonobos will often have their full teeth-baring making them look like they are laughing which makes them look more human like (De Waal, 1988). The chimpanzees, bonobos and the Yanomamo village are very important to understand when we are relating it to warfare. Within the bonobos we are able to see that there is less intergroup violence compared to the chimpanzees. This helps us understand that warfare is evident in not only just humans but also animals as the bonobos share the same characteristics of laughing with the humans and that even though there is less intergroup violence among them we are able to see that they will still show signs of aggressiveness when needed (De Waal,
There are many reasons that the human race goes to war against each other. In the essay The Ecstasy of War (1997) by Barbara Ehrenreich, she states that one reason that war is started between men is people want to expand, to move further in life and the man-kind are trained to be ready for war.
War is term that we are very familiar with. First, Friday defines warfare as armed conflict between organized bands or bodies. Then you really need to define organized. Gangs could be considered organized. Or how many does it take to be organized? Could two people be considered organized? I think legitimate should be included in that definition. Then again when two gangs fight, they still are making warfare. When looking at the organized part I think you have to be thinking multiple people.
There are contrasts in tool kits used by different groups of chimpanzees, which seem to be a result of the environment in which they live as well as information that is shared by the group. For example, in 1973 it was reported that chimpanzees in Gombe did not use hammer stones, but those of Cape Palmas did. We will explore the tool use of Chimpanzees from the wild, including Gombe, Tai National Forest, and the Congo Basin---and contrast those with Chimpanzees in captivity in locations of Zoo’s both in the United States and abroad.
Primates housed in organizations like zoos and laboratories have developed catastrophic behavior; due to the lack of their natural habitat and the lose of freedom to pursue their own lives. Chimpanzees have directed themself to attempt abnormal and often revolting behavior. During their life in captivity they exibit biting themselves, drinking urine, eating feces, pating genitals, rocking, plucking hair, and fumpling niples (Birkett and Newton-Fisher). Another factor that gives chimpanzees
She is considered to be the worlds expert on chimpanzees and is known for her fifty-five year study of social interactions of wild chimpanzees in Gombe Stream National Park in Tanzania. She also has worked expansively on conservation and animal welfare issues. Goodall began studying in 1960 because she didn’t have training directing her research, Goodall payed closer attention to things that other professionals may have looked over. Instead of numbering the chimps Goodall observed, she gave them names. She witnessed these animals to have distinct personalities, which was an alternative idea at the time. Goodall found that, “it isn’t only human beings who have personality, who are capable of rational thought and emotions like joy and sorrow.” She observed many behaviors such as kisses, hugs, and tickling, which was considered only to be “human” interactions. Goodall reported that this is evidence of the supportive and loving bonds that develop amongst family members and other chimps within the community. Her findings suggest the connections and similarities between human and chimpanzees other than just genes alone, but can be seen in emotion, intellect, and domestic and social relationships. Goodall watched as chimps made and used tools in their everyday life, which challenged the belief that humans were the only toolmakers and users of them. In contrast to the affectionate
When it comes to interacting with the environment tool use by chimpanzees is very vital to differentiating their intelligent within their culture. Chimpanzees are some of the very few unique primates that use a variety of tools which makes them stand out as very proficient tool users besides humans. According to David Watts chimpanzees use the tools to enhance their way of living. “Chimpanzees at several well documented sites mostly use tools in extractive foraging, and extractive tool use can substantially increase their foraging efficiency. They also use tools for hygiene and for several other purposes, including attracting the attention of conspecifics, as in leaf-clipping” (Watts 2008, 83). Subsequently chimpanzees are intellectual enough to alter an object to create a tool, and then use the tool for a precise purpose. Then on the other hand chimpanzees use tools to overcome everyday obstacles. As expressed by Watts chimpanzee toolkits mak...
She took this time to recover from a failed marriage and the death of her late husband. She went back to Africa and was greatly saddened by all the harmful pesticides that people were using all around the world. She used her own healing time to study and actually understand inside of a chimp’s head. Her notes suggest that chimps and humans are very much alike. A human’s brain is more complex and can have a greater mind and thinking way beyond the average primate. She concluded while a human can ask further questions about the past, present, and future; chimps let their instincts come over. This explains why chimpanzees are very territorial and aggressive. Her findings also lead to that humans are forever revolving and chimps are not. Aside from her observations, she also unveiled the importance of the idea of conservation and animals’ rights. Goodall keeps pushing for humans to care for their world, wildlife, and themselves. (Editors)
Throughout situations and research conducted by not only Robert Sapolsky or Jane Goodman, but from many other credited sources, we can blatantly see the, if not identical, similarities between the two species of humans and baboons. The most apparent likewise characteristics of this can be read and documented in Professor Sapolsky’s book, A Primate’s Memoirs. Sapolsky, who spent hundreds if not thousands, of hours studying these Savanna Baboons, sheds a vast insight into ideas of social dominance, mating strategies, instinctual prowess, community settings, hygiene, and reform of an entire generation; many of which can be unknowingly seen directly in the common occurrence of a humans daily life. One of the biggest ideals shown throughout history is the need for power and dominance.
In Thayer’s article, he makes an attempt to incorporate Darwin’s Evolutionary Theory into the international security studies. The article tries to answer a central question that what are the implications of Evolutionary theory to realist theory of international security and in what way can peace be achieved if warfare is part of human nature? This paper agrees with Thayer that Evolutionary theory provides a scientific theory foundation for realism and is an ultimate cause for war and ethnic conflicts, as well as the assumption that origin of war is intrinsic in human nature as part of their evolution history. This paper will also suggest that a balanced structure of the world could contribute to temporary peace. But it need to be noted that the theory is also limited since Evolution theory could not fully explain many other forms of security problems like civil wars and terrorism. To review Thayer’s article, first, the paper will briefly explain how Evolutionary theory act as an ultimate cause for realist theory in terms of two human traits: egoism and domination. Following that, the paper will discuss the implications of Evolutionary theory to international relations. This paper will also evaluate the theory by comparing it with Waltz’s and Gleditsch’s theory on peace and war. Finally, it will conclude the paper by summarizing main points.
Celli, Maura L., Satoshi Hirata, and Masaki Tomonaga. "Socioecological Influences On Tool Use In Captive Chimpanzees." International Journal Of Primatology25.6 (2004): 1267-1281. Academic Search Premier. Web. 16 Apr. 2014.
Chimpanzees portray their emotions through a number of facial expressions and mannerisms. Just like humans, they undergo mood swings, jealous rages, and laughter. For instance, Goodall observed during her research that a male gorilla “would threaten [me] with an upward and backward movement jerk of his head…” Some of their emotions are easy to read, while at other times we have to look at multiple places on their faces to understand their feelings. A chimpanzee also uses its facial expressions and sounds to communicate with each other, such as hoots and yells.
Hobbes, as one of the early political philosophers, believes human has the nature to acquire “power after power” and has three fundamental interests which are safety, “conjugal affections”, and riches for commodious lives. (Hobbes, p108, p191) From this basis, Hobbes deducts that in a state of nature, human tends to fight against each other (state of war) to secure more resources (Hobbes,
Of these the Eskimos are perhaps the most conspicuous examples, but the Lepchas of Sikkim described by Geoffrey Gorer in Himalayan Village are as good.” Eskimos and Lepchas don’t even fully understand defensive warfare. Lepchas are gentle and don’t participate in violence and warfare. Eskimos do fight other Eskimos, but they do it to test their strength and bravery, not war. Eskimos and Lepchas prove that warfare is not a biological necessity, because they don’t need warfare to thrive, or to let frustration out, or to solve conflicts. Therefore, warfare is an invention. If warfare were biologically necessary every human being would be participating in
Genetically, we are nearly identical. They are valuable to the environment and, as a result, to humans by maintaining forest species, which creates revenue, food, and medicine to local communities. Great Apes are not given a fair chance to sustain themselves with low reproduction rates during a rise in commercial hunting. That alone is too much without taking into consideration other forms of habitat disturbance occurring simultaneously. Campaign groups must remain persistent in their efforts to protect primates and educate not only the people intimately affected by the issue, but the global community as a whole.
War has been around for centuries. From the time modern civilizations began, war has played an integral part in human history. It shaped the world into the modern world we live in. War has been said to be a great motivator, for example, the Great Wall of China was built to fend off the attackers from the north. However, the negative aspects of war far outweighs any positive effects it might have. The destruction of civilizations, cities and countries, mass killings of men, woman and children alike, the disastrous effect it has on economy and the after effects of war can last for centuries.