In society the use of illegal drugs is strongly opposed by the government. With the introduction of increasingly potent and seemingly dangerous drugs to American Society, President Richard Nixon declared a “War on Drugs”. While the “War on Drugs” is generally regarded as a beneficial program, it is actually detrimental to American society. Throughout American History, various presidential administrations focused money and resources on the war on drugs, leading to the rise of gangs and organized crime, increased racism, increased government expenditure, increased taxes and a decrease in drug safety. As American life became increasingly stressful in the nineteenth and twentieth century, Americans resorted to drugs to cope with the stress. The …show more content…
Firstly, the growing market for cocaine led to the Medellin Cartel and Pablo Escobar’s rise to power in Colombia and with that came violence and death (Shmoop). Under Escobar’s leadership, the Medellin Cartel was responsible for killing the Justice Minister of Colombia, eleven Colombian Supreme Court justices, one hundred innocent people and many more (Shmoop). Due to the fact that cocaine was very expensive, it was uncommon in poor African-American communities, which made crack cocaine especially prominent in such communities (Stuff You Should Know: How Crack Works). Crack cocaine differs from cocaine in that crack has a significantly shorter high that lasts for only fifteen minutes and thereby making it even more addictive to its users (Stuff You Should Know: How Crack Works). Due to the high addictiveness of crack cocaine, street gangs such as the Bloods and the Crips were able to acquire crack cocaine from suppliers such as Freeway Rick Ross, and gain control of the streets of Los Angeles and, by the mid eighties, most of California (Stanford). Until the introduction of crack cocaine, the Bloods and Crips were less violent and less powerful, but as their market expanded they both vied for a monopoly on the crack industry in California, which led to increased gang recruitment, size and violence (Stuff You Should Know: How Street …show more content…
While government intervention really began in the nineteenth century, the “War on Drugs” was officially started by President Richard Nixon. Nixon’s “War on Drugs” began with Operation Intercept in 1969, in which the Nixon administration stopped every car at the US-Mexico border for two weeks to search for marijuana, but failed to find any major drug shipment (Shmoop). Nixon later went on to pass the Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act that actually reduced penalty for marijuana possession, however it also grants law enforcement new powers to conduct drug related searches (Shmoop). However, it was not until 1971 that Nixon coins the term “War on Drugs” and 1973 that he creates the Drug Enforcement Agency (Shmoop). Then after Nixon’s presidency, in 1984, joint US and Colombian officials destroy over one billion dollars of cocaine. Then in 1986, the Reagans begin an anti-drug campaign with the slogan “Just Say No” and pass the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 which provides a minimum sentence for drug related crimes and leads to an increase in incarcerated federal criminals (Shmoop). Also in 1986, the Medellin Cartel is incited for its crimes (Shmoop). Lastly, in 1988 Reagan passes new drug laws which state that because crack cocaine is one hundred times more addictive than cocaine, it deserved a one hundred times harsher punishment, despite the fact that there was no actual proof
Kids start being introduced to drugs at a very young age because the first interaction with them is being told not to do any of them. Most kids have no idea what drugs are until this program is introduced in elementary schools telling kids not to do drugs. In “There’s No Justice in the War on Drugs”, Milton Friedman talks about the injustice of drugs and the harsh reality of being addicted to drugs, and the causes or side effects that come along with them. The author clearly argues the “war on drugs” and uses analysis and data to prove his argument. The author agrees that the use of government to keep kids away from drugs should be enforced, but the use of government to keep adults away from drugs, should not be enforced. The author has a clear side of his argument and the audience can clearly see that. He argues against the “war on drugs” claim that President Richard M. Nixon made twenty-five years ago, he adds ethos, logos, and pathos to defend his argument, and uses a toulmin
The War on Drugs is believed to help with many problems in today’s society such as realizing the rise of crime rates and the uprooting of violent offenders and drug kingpin. Michelle Alexander explains that the War on Drugs is a new way to control society much like how Jim Crow did after the Civil War. There are many misconceptions about the War on Drugs; commonly people believe that it’s helping society with getting rid of those who are dangerous to the general public. The War on Drugs is similar to Jim Crow by hiding the real intention behind Mass Incarceration of people of color. The War on Drugs is used to take away rights of those who get incarcerated. When they plead guilty, they will lose their right to vote and have to check application
“[The war on drugs] has created a multibillion-dollar black market, enriched organized crime groups and promoted the corruption of government officials throughout the world,” noted Eric Schlosser in his essay, “A People’s Democratic Platform”, which presents a case for decriminalizing controlled substances. Government policies regarding drugs are more focused towards illegalization rather than revitalization. Schlosser identifies a few of the crippling side effects of the current drug policy put in place by the Richard Nixon administration in the 1970s to prohibit drug use and the violence and destruction that ensue from it (Schlosser 3). Ironically, not only is drug use as prevalent as ever, drug-related crime has also become a staple of our society. In fact, the policy of the criminalization of drugs has fostered a steady increase in crime over the past several decades. This research will aim to critically analyze the impact of government statutes regarding drugs on the society as a whole.
While the War on Drugs may have been portrayed as a colorblind movement, Nixon’s presidency and reasoning for its implementation solidifies that it was not. Nixon coined the term “War on Drugs” in his 1971 anti-drug campaign speech, starting the beginning of an era. He voiced, “If there is one area where the word ‘war’ is appropriate, it is in the fights against crime” (DuVernay, 13th). This terminology solidified to the public that drug abusers were an enemy, and if the greatest publicized abusers were black, then black people were then enemy. This “war” started by Nixon claimed it would rid the nation of dealers, but in fact, 4/5 of arrests were for possession only (Alexander, 60). Nixon employed many tactics in order to advance the progress
America's War on Drugs: Policy and Problems. In this paper I will evaluate America's War on Drugs. More specifically, I will outline our nation's general drug history and look critically at how Congress has influenced our current ineffective drug policy. Through this analysis, I hope to show that drug prohibition policies in the United States, for the most part, have failed.
When societies finally become comfortable with reality, they begin to abandon the murderous laws that impede their growth. Currently, the social stigma and legislated morality regarding the use of illicit drugs yield perhaps the most destructive effects on American society. Drug laws have led to the removal of non-violent citizens from society- either directly by incarceration or indirectly by death - which is genocidal in quantity and essence. I base my support of the decriminalization of all drugs on a principle of human rights, but the horror and frustration with which I voice this support is based on practicality. The most tangible effect of the unfortunately labeled "Drug War" in the United States is a prison population larger than Russia's and China's, and an inestimable death toll that rivals the number of American casualties from any given war, disease or catastrophe.
As described in novel The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference the course of any trend, movement, social behavior, and even the spread of a virus has a general trend line that in essence resemble a parabola with 3 main critical points. Any trend line first starts from zero, grows until it crosses the first tipping point, and then spreads like wildfire. Afterwards, the trend skyrockets to its carrying capacity (Galdwell, 2000). Then the trend gradually declines before it reaches the next tipping and suddenly falls out of favor and out of memory. Gladwell defines tipping points as the “magic moment when an idea, trend, or social behavior crosses a threshold, tips, and spreads like wildfire” (Gladwell, 2000).
The war on drugs began with the presidential term of President Nixon in the 1970s. According to drugpolicy.org, “He dramatically increased the size and presence of federal drug control agencies, and pushed through measures such as mandatory sentencing and no-knock warrants. Nixon temporarily placed marijuana in Schedule One, the most restrictive category of drugs.”
Throughout U.S governmental history, policies have been known to affect the way of life and every aspect. The topic it choose to research is about “The War on Drugs”, the impact policies have on society and if it does help the public or tend to extent social inequality. This topic is very important to me in the sense that, I look at the community I live and see how drugs have affected people lifes, broken up families and also destroyed the community itself. I wanted to know if the “war on drugs” stop our neighborhood from being flooded with drugs or it just over shadow the real problems that needs to be tackled.
To fully understand the significance and the seriousness of a War one must first fully understand the reasons that caused it in the first place. In this specific case the solution begins with several important yet seemingly simple questions…What is marijuana? How is it used? And why is it so coveted and widely distributed in Jamaica as well as the rest of the world?… All these questions help clarify the reasoning behind the war on drugs and further investigation shows how Jamaica ends up being an important country in this puzzle as well. Lets begin with the first question, (What is marijuana), of course the dictionary definition is simply put,-a preparation of the hemp plant, Cannabis sativa, for use as an intoxicating hallucinogenic drug; applied to a crude preparation of the dried leaves, flowering tops, and stem of the plant that is generally smoked. However, beyond this explanation is what is commonly known as weed, which is simply an alternative to tobacco that results in sensational relaxed feeling that is described as high. This drugs origin can be traced back to ancient days when it was used as a healing supplement to cure several different medical conditions; its been used as a drink as well as an eliminator of menstrual pain and even more ironic marijuana has served as a religious connotation as well. However, the most commonly known usage of marijuana (after its being outlawed in the 1930’s) is as a drug and smoked or consumed by other means.
At even the national level, the “war on drugs” was just as detrimental. Reagan's narcotics policy had doubled both drug arrests and the prison population in the US. Under him, the media propaganda helped ignite public concern – sometimes bordering hysteria – which effectively created “a mandate for a massive campaign against drugs –an intensified federal enforcement effort, harsher prison sentences, and omnipresent narcotics surveillance of ordinary Americans.” Bush's “war on drugs”, an
The United States has a long history of intervention in the affairs of one it’s southern neighbor, Latin America. The war on drugs has been no exception. An investigation of US relations with Latin America in the period from 1820 to 1960, reveals the war on drugs to be a convenient extension of an almost 200 year-old policy. This investigation focuses on the commercial and political objectives of the US in fighting a war on drugs in Latin America. These objectives explain why the failing drug policy persisted despite its overwhelming failure to decrease drug production or trafficking. These objectives also explain why the US has recently exchanged a war on drugs for the war on terrorism.
In 1971, President Nixon declared a “war on drugs.” He substantially increased the presence and size of federal drug agencies, and passed legislation like mandatory sentencing laws and unconstitutional warrants. Nixon even listed marijuana as a Schedule One drug, the most constrictive drug category. Over forty years later, the U.S is still waging a war on drugs, spending billions of dollars per year and creating major social issues.
The world has many different issues, and without them the world would be a perfect place. An issue that causes a lot of controversy is drug abuse. Though the world can never be a perfect place, humans still need to do our best to make in inhabitable as possible, and drugs cause a lot of harm towards humans. Therefore, it is my belief that the first thing that needs to be fixed should be drugs and their abuse. Many possible solutions to this problem exist.
War on Drugs is an expression applied commonly to the campaign against illegal drugs by the U.S. government. President Richard Nixon of U.S introduced the term in 1969. War on Drugs comprises of several drug policies, military aid and assistance, and assistance from participating countries. Through this campaign, the U.S government intends to discourage and eliminate the production, distribution, and utilization of illegal drugs. This paper argues that the battle against illegal drug has led to overcrowding in prisons in U.S.