Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The war 1812 effects
The war 1812 effects
Effects of nationalism on america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The war 1812 effects
The years right after the War of 1812 “saw a growing spirit of nationalism throughout the country.” (Keesee, Sidwell, 192) During this time, 6 more states were added: Louisiana, Indiana, Mississippi, Illinois, and Alabama. Important leaders during this time period were John Quincy Adams, Daniel Webster, Henry Clay of Kentucky, and John C. Calhoun. Henry Clay called nationalism the “American System.” Since colonial days, America had been “a source of raw materials for Europe, particularly Britain, and a market for British finished goods.’’ (Keesee, Sidwell, 192) American manufacturing would “shake up this long standing agreement.” (Keesee, Sidwell, 192) A tariff is a tax on imported goods. A protective tariff is “an unusually high tariff designed …show more content…
to shield a nation’s manufactures from potentially fatal foreign competition.” (Keesee, Sidwell, 192) The Tariff of 1816 was America’s first “protectionist legislation.” (Keesee, Sidwell, 192) The charter for the 1st national bank expired in 1811, causing private banks to issue inflationary paper money. The war only worsened financial problems created by inflation, which made it difficult for the national government to meet its “obligations.” (Keesee, Sidwell, 192) The Republicans during the 1790s were “brutally opposed to both a national bank and a protective tariff. When in power, however, they tended to set aside their misgivings over the constitution in favor of such ‘Federalist’ measures”. (Keesee, Sidwell, 193) In 1816, a 20-year charter on a 2nd bank of the United States was approved. Such a bank would assist economic growth by providing “uniform currency, a source for loans to the public and private sectors, and a depository for government revenue.” (Keesee, Sidwell, 193) The definition of internal improvements is “Funding for roads, canals, and harbor developments that would reinforce commerce and communication…Why should Maine… be taxed to pave a road in Maryland?” (Keesee, Sidwell, 193) The gravel of the national road finally reached from Baltimore, Maryland to Vandalia, Illinois. After the War of 1812, the renewal of trade and the “growth of domestic industry and western land sales” gave the country “economic good times.” (Keesee, Sidwell, 194) The panic was basically a depression. In Liverpool, England, the price of cotton fell “sharply,” because of high American prices and low prices from India. (Keesee, Sidwell, 194) Also, the protective tariff of 1816 caused “oppressive monopolies.” (Keesee, Sidwell, 194) The second cause was irresponsible banks. The banks gave loans to settlers in the western territories. Many defaulted on their loans which caused “bitterness” towards the National bank. (Keesee, Sidwell, 194) Since new states were being admitted so quickly, people got upset over slavery in the new states. Some wanted slavery to be completely abolished, and others wanted slavery to be legal. People were confused about whether it was okay to have slaves in that area. Luckily, the representatives in DC came up with a solution. The Missouri compromise of 1820 proposed that Maine be admitted as a Free State and Missouri as a slave state, and slavery wouldn’t be permitted north of Missouri’s southern border. Democratization gave the average citizen a greater voice in his government. Voting was extended to all adult white males. There was a strong two-party system “From 1796 to 1820 a congressional caucus selected the presidential and vice-presidential nominees for its party.” (Keesee, Sidwell, 196) A caucus is a “closed meeting of party leaders.” (Keesee, Sidwell, 196) People were upset because they believed that the caucus was choosing “for the people.” The 1824 election “discredited” the caucus system. There were four candidates in the presidential election of 1824.
Andrew Jackson, John Q. Adams, William H. Crawford, and Henry Clay were the candidates. Clay couldn’t possibly win, but he could, as Speaker of the House, vote for any candidate. He voted for Adams. When Adams became President, he chose Clay for Secretary of State. People though t that it was a corrupt bargain between Adams and Clay so that Adams would win and Clay could be Secretary of State. The 1828 election ended up being an “Adams-Jackson rematch.” (Keesee, Sidwell, 197) Jackson’s running mate was John C. Calhoun. Adams said that “The reign of King Mob seemed triumphant,” meaning that the mob had chosen …show more content…
Jackson. Jackson was born in Carolina backcountry in 1767.His parents were Irish-Presbyterians who had left Ulster 2 years before his birth. His father, Andrew Sr., died in an accident while clearing fields 2 days before Andrew Jr. was born. At 13 he joined the patriot army to fight the British. After the war he studied law in Salisbury, NC. “His grit earned him the admiration of his ranks, ‘He’s tough as hickory,” they would say, and so he was.” (Keesee, Sidwell, 199) As president, he was not an innovator. Jackson thought that men who held their position for too long would be corrupted by their power. Jackson replaced only 20% of officeholders during his presidency. Spoils system means Jackson’s replacement of officers. The spoils system, in fact, lasted for half a century. Jackson’s cabinet members got their jobs as “political rewards for services performed during the campaign,” but they didn’t really influence his decision. (Keesee, Sidwell, 200) Jackson’s true advisors were a close group of friend’s critics called his “kitchen cabinet.” (Keesee, Sidwell, 200) In 1828, Congress passed a new tariff which mainly southerners were worried about. They called it the “Tariff of Abominations.” (Keesee, Sidwell, 200) The south opposed it because it destroyed their economy, which relied on shipping. In December 1828, South Carolina denounced the tariff as being unconstitutional. Calhoun wrote a pamphlet that brought up the topic of nullification, meaning the states could nullify any act that was unconstitutional. Daniel Webster argued that a state could neither secede nor nullify an act. John Q. Adams proposed a modification to the tariff which was passed, making the tariff lower, but still higher than Southerners wanted. Finally, Clay proposed the Compromise Tariff of 1833, which was passed on March 1, gradually reduced the tariff. In 1832, Nicholas Biddle proposed a 20 year renewal of the bank’s charter, even though it didn’t expire until 1836.The recharger bill passed congress, but Jackson vetoed it.
The 1st third party was the Anti-Masonic Party. Jackson won the election again with Van Buren as his vice-president. In October 1833, Roger B. Taney, the new secretary, removed federal deposits and put them into state banks. The Specie Circular of 1836 required that gold or silver coins must be used to buy property instead of paper money. About 94 treaties were forcibly signed by Indian tribes. The treaties were considered “legal justification” for moving the Indians westward. (Keesee, Sidwell, 204) The Seminole War extended from1835 -42.The Seminole Indians were resisting removal to the west. Almost 1500 Americans and an unknown number of Indians died in the battles. The Cherokees tried to resist by going to court. Justice John Marshall decided in favor of the tribe. Andrew Jackson said, “John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it.” (Keesee, Sidwell,
204) Anti-Jackson forces came together to form the Whig party. The Whigs were also a nationalistic party. In 1834, the Whig party “won” 98 seats in the House of Representatives. The Whigs had a plan for the 1836 election. They would put in so many candidates that the votes would be too divided and the vote would be thrown to the House of Representatives. Then, their 98 members would vote for Van Buren, and he would win. Only a few weeks passed after Van Buren became president when the Panic of 1837 began. As discussed before, there were two major causes. Van Buren proposed an independent treasury, but Congress didn’t pass the bill until 1840. William Henry Harrison and John Tyler ran for president and vice-president in the 1840 election. The Whigs presented Harrison as “a humble, but heroic backwoodsman while Van Buren was dainty and aristocratic.” (Keesee, Sidwell, 208) When Harrison won the election, he got pneumonia during his inaugural speech and died, which made Vice-President John Tyler the president. Works Cited Keesee, Timothy, and Mark Sidwell. “The Age of Jackson.” United States History, Fourth ed., BJU Press, 2012, pp. 192–209.
After the war of 1812, there was a strong sense of nationalism since the young United States had won a war against the powerful British Army. However, the loss of thousands of southern slaves and the British embargo led both the north and the south to lament over the cost of the war. The time period from 1815 – 1825 that some historians call the era of good feelings was not as positive a time period as the title implies; factions ran rampant on the verge of causing an implosion for our country’s political system.
The French and Indian War changed the economic, political, and ideological relations between Great Britain and the American colonies in many ways. Politically the colonist felt like they were deprived of representation, when Great Britain imposed unfair taxation without any say. Economically, many colonist were infuriated with the British because the British were starving them of many resources and making high taxes and tariffs. Ideologically, it brought feelings of discontent towards Britain. Boycotts during the war opened the eyes of the colonist. It showed them they had the ability to make a change and proved that they could unite together. The colonist no longer viewed Great Britain as the great mother country, but as a tyrant who looked to feed on the American colonies new sense of life.
The “Era of Good Feelings,” beginning after the war of 1812 and lasting into the 1820s, is typically represented as a positive time in American history full of nationalism. However, in considering this time period, one remember to examine both the positive nationalistic perspective and the negative sectionalist perspective. Socially, after the war of 1812, the American morale was strengthened and nationalism grew. Politically, the collapse of the Federalist party after the Hartford convention lead to a more united voting population, having only one viable party to vote for. Economically, the national bank expanded its power and protective tariffs were issued, which were looked upon negatively in the south, causing division
War is what keeps a nation from dying, it is the backbone of a country. This is the shown throughout the course of World War I, also known as “the war to end all wars.” World War I started in the summer of 1914. Archduke Francis Ferdinand, from the Austro – Hungarian Empire was visiting Bosnia. He was shot, along with his wife, Sofia, by a young man from the Black Hand, Gavrillo Princip. What were the three main factors that started World War I? There were three main underlying causes that started World War I: greed, nationalism, and militarism.
Many tribes resisted this policy. Wars were fought as a result. The Sac and Fox Indians in Wisconsin and Illinois reoccupied their lands after having been forced to move west of the Mississippi. They were defeated. The Seminole Indians refused to sign a treaty to give up their lands. They, too, fought and lost a bitter war to remain on their land.
Prior to the “Era of Good Feelings”, America was characterized as a nation where people did not recognize themselves in union but instead identified themselves according their region. During this period America became more integrated (politically, socially and economically) and a sense of nationalism prevailed. In the years following the War of 1812 America 's status on the world stage strengthened, the economy grew and became more prosperous due to the market revolution, and new forms of transportation and their improvements connected the country in ways that had not been seen before. Despite this rise in nationalism, there were also some elements of sectionalism that had existed since colonization.
Many people found this election to be a revolution and a great future for the country. That is not exactly what happened. In 1832, Andrew Jackson sent a letter to congress saying he does not support the National Bank. He says that if the bank were to happen, it would be the rich in most control. The bank would be more for the rich and the foreign but have no benefits for the poor. (Doc.4) Jackson’s political rival, Daniel Webster believes that this letter from Jackson showed just how evil Jackson was. Webster does not think Jackson was vetoing for the good of the people but to ‘stir the pot’. By Jackson sending this letter, it causes a stir between the rich and the poor. The poor would feel imbalanced against the poor and arguments would rush out. (Doc.5). This letter he wrote to congress was one of his many times when he was “selfish” and used his powers unjustly to make something go the way he wanted. Was Jackson trying to inflame the different classmen? Was this
After the U.S gained their independence form Britain, they faced the greatest obstacle that would threaten their independence. This was a second war fought against Great Britain called the War of 1812. The war was fought on land and on sea and lasted almost three years. There were many forces that led Americans to declare war on Britain in 1812.
...resentatives would choose the new president from the top three candidates (“Amendment Twelve: Election of President and Vice President”). Due to these terms, Henry Clay was eliminated as a possible choice to become the president. It was now between Jackson, Quincy Adams, and Crawford. However, just because Clay was out of the election, it didn’t mean that he wouldn’t play a major role in how it eventually turned out. Clay wanted to have as much power as possible. When being president wasn’t an option anymore, he turned to the remaining candidates in hope of striking a deal that would give him the influence that he so desperately sought. The most promising candidates were obviously John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson. Clay openly detested Jackson. He did not believe that he was qualified to be the next leader of the country. (Gould, Lewis, Ohshinksy, and Soderlund).
The French and Indian war, also better known as the seven year war, was in 1754. It all began in the early spring of 1754 through 1763, when George Washington and some 160 Virginians and hand full of Mingo Indians started to move when they were concerned about the French military presence in their county. The battle first started when a Mingo chief, the Indian leader that was with George Washington in his campaign, led a unit of soldiers into a small French encampment in the woods. It was a very small battle but, the fight ended up with 14 French men wounded. While Washington was trying to get all the available information from their French dying commander to help their plans in the war, the Indians killed and scalped the remaining survivors including the commander.
“The Era of Good Feelings” was not a proper description for the years between 1815 and 1825. Sectionalism was frequently present throughout the country, while times of nationalism were scarce and occurred generally during the Monroe administration. The Monroe Doctrine and the Election of 1820 expedited nationalism, yet by the Election of 1824 this nationalism suffered a great decline. Even during the years of “nationalism” under Monroe, eruptions of sectionalism were also evident with the Missouri Compromise and McCulloch v. Maryland. The feelings of separation among the nation were inevitable with the issue of slavery and constantly evolving political views. Therefore the erroneous label given to this era is generally farcical, since actions of sectionalism mostly overpowered the feeling of nationalism.
The federal government proceeded to find a way around this decision and had three minor Cherokee chief’s sign the “Treaty of New Echota” in 1835 giving the Cherokee lands to the government for 5.6 million dollars and free passage west. Congress got the treaty ratified by only one vote. Members of their tribes murdered all three chiefs who took part in the signing of the treaty. After this event there was not much the Cherokee’s could do and were forcibly moved west on what they called and are known today as the ‘Trail of Tears,’ which became a constitutional crisis in our history. In this instance the lack of cooperation between the branches of the government was the downfall for the Cherokee nation. The way the Cherokee’s were forced west caused losses of up to twenty percent of the nation. This figure is only a guess and scholar’s think it was more a third of the nation was lost. The ‘Trail of Tears’ was also a morale issue in the United States, later having an impact on our history the way other Native American races in general are treated in the future.
Whereas Nationalism did emerge following the war of 1812, it was quickly squashed down and overshadowed by the growing sectionalism and tension in the United States. Tariffs, the National Bank, and slavery all played a role in further dividing the nation and securing that sectionalism would prevail. Even though the period was traditionally labeled as the “Era of Good Feelings”, it was anything but, thanks to the emergence of sectionalism and the division of the North and South.
The Indian removal was so important to Jackson that he went back to Tennessee to have the first negotiations in person. He gave the Indians a couple simple alternatives. Alternatives like to submit to state authority, or migrate beyond the Mississippi. Jackson Offered generous aid on one hand and while holding the threat of subjugation in the other. The Chickasaws and Choctaws submitted quickly. The only tribe that resisted until the end was the Cherokees. President Jackson’s presidency was tarnished by the way the U.S. government handled the Native Americans. Although financially, and economically Jackson truly was a good leader, some people view him in a negative way because of the “Indian Removal Act.”
The War of 1812 has always been a part of American history not very exiting to learn about for most Americans. It was a tumultuous time for the New Republic and some of the battles of the war shamed the new nation. The War of 1812 did not have the same glorious, honorable, and just cause of the American Revolution. The British made fools of the American people and even burned the Capitol and the White House, the centers of American politics, to the ground. However as shameful as the war was, it also had some good benefits and it demonstrated to Great Britain and the rest of the world that the United States of America was its own sovereign nation, and not some British Sphere of Influence. Although the treaty of Ghent failed to address the important issues that brought the United States to war, the War of 1812 helped the country improve itself internally by way of increased nationalism, greater industrialization and a more stable economy, and an overall safer nation.