Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discuss american identities
Expression of identity in America
Expression of identity in America
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Discuss american identities
In this classes, we learned about all various aspects of what people from our past thought an American was. The idea of what I thought an American was has changed completely. I thought that an American was someone who was born in the United States or someone who had fought for our country or even our freedom, in some respects. Now, I know that an American can be something different depending on the person you are talking to or their beliefs. We viewed the differences of what an American was from Walt Whitman, Thomas Paine, and de Crevecoeur. What was an American to Walt Whitman? “I CELEBRATE myself, and what I assume you shall assume, for every atom belonging to me, as good belongs to you. (Whitman)” To Whitman an American was Democratic. Whitman celebrates both the man and the woman and he believes that we are all equal. Whitman also believes that we are all partial of something. SO, to Whitman an …show more content…
To Thomas Paine an American was someone who was Revolutionary. Thomas Paine wanted to see a change in how the “English” were acting. “Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but necessary evil in its worst state an intolerable one…. (Paine).” Paine feels like we will be in the same situation with the government if we don’t become revolutionized. As far as Paine sees it, an American is someone who is willing to make a change in the government. What was an American to de Crevecoeur? “What then is the American, this new man? He is either an European, or the descendant of an European, hence that strange mixture of blood, which you will find in no other country. (Crevecoeur)” To Crevecoeur the new man was someone who did everything different as what they did in the past. The new man was someone who was willing to change for the better of his country, state or himself. The new man is also willing to add to what we have already accomplished in America. To Crevecoeur, an American is the “new
Michel-Guillaume-Jean de Crevecoeur was a French born citizen who moved to New York and became a naturalized citizen of Great Britain. After living in America as a citizen for a while, Crevecoeur decided to write an essay titled “Letters from an American Farmer”. During this time, tensions in America between the colonists and loyalists were increasing, and because of this the idea of America as a sovereign nation and territory was becoming popular. Crevecoeur wrote this essay in order to discuss what it means to be an American, and why people should be honored to be called an American. Crevecoeur believes that America is a melting pot of the world, and is full of opportunities for anyone who lives there. In order to back up his claim, Crevecoeur uses rhetorical devices, especially pathos, while he does also use ethos and logos as well.
Paine believed that America needed to break free of the British clutches. He spoke out against slavery and joined the army to help fight the war. He did not agree with hereditary monarchy and wrote another paper to argue this point (Franklin 321). Paine was very aware of his criticizers, and worked very hard to persuade them toward his way of thinking. In his pamphlet Common Sense he writes: "I have heard it asserted by some, that as America has flourished under her former connection with Great Britain, the same connection is necessary towards her future happiness, and will always have the same effect"(Paine 323). Paine states the following argument: ."..for I answer roundly, that America would have flourished as much, and proba...
St. Jean De Crèvecoeur's Letters from an American Farmer and Henry David Thoreau's various essays and journal entries present opposing views of what it means to be an American. To somewhat simplify, both writers agree that there are two kinds of Americans: those who are farmers and those who are not. Crèvecoeur views farmers as the true Americans, and those who are not farmers, such as frontier men, as lawless, idle, inebriated wretches (266). Sixty years later, Thoreau believes the opposite: farmers are doomed and bound to their land, and free men who own nothing posses the only true liberty (9). Both Crèvecoeur and Thoreau judge men and their professions on industry, use of nature, freedom, and lawfulness.
Paine wanted to show others that there is more than one religion and one does not have to be so accustomed to a monarchy. Americans later fought for their independence and gained it once it was gained Americans succeeded from
“In this great American Asylum” Crèvecoeur’s diction reflects his opinions with the first words. Using the words great and asylum to describe America revels the author’s feelings. “Can a wretch who wanders about, who works and starves, can that man call England or any other kingdom his country?” Crevecoeur’s commiseration is displayed towards, “the poor of Europe.” Having an undertone of disgust, the reader sees wretch and can tell how Crevecoeur looks upon England, “A country that had no bread for him, who met [him] with nothing but frowns of the rich, [he] owned not a single foot of surface.” However, the main view focuses on, “the poor of England” and why America is where they ventured. Crevecoeur’s language is fascinating, “Everything is
Paine attempts to show how America is far greater than any one man. For example, Paine states, “Tis not the affair of a city, a county, a province, or a kingdom; but of a continent-of at least one eighth part of the habitable globe” (642). This showcases that Paine does not feel as if America is a fledgling nation by any means. He believes America is one of the major continents on the Earth. This statement is also way for Paine to show the reader how they are not fighting for a small piece of land, but that they are fighting for a continent to establish a new nation on. He utilizes this as a way to illustrate how the significance of this revolution is gigantic and will not just have effects on the colonists presently living in America, but that it will effect the world as a whole till the end of time. Once again, Paine is able to show that this revolution is not just a mindless overthrow of the present government, but it is a significant way to altar the lives of the colonists’ descendants in an extremely amazing
	During the 1770s Thomas Paine was a political philosopher and writer. He encouraged people to fight for American independence from Britain. He is one of the more creative figures of his period. Paine talked about American revolutionary ideas with his 1776 writing, Common Sense. In the writing, Paine made a point that Great Britain was trying to corrupt the American colonies and that they contributed nothing to America’s well being.
Poetry is a universe of subjectivity. When two poems are set up, side-by-side, to create discussion, results may vary. But it is clear in Sherman Alexie’s two poems, “Defending Walt Whitman” and “How to Write the Great American Indian Novel”, where the discussion must go. Alexie explores Native American culture and the effect that the Europeans have had on the native people of the United States. This feat is accomplished through the thoughtful use of several literary devices, including tone, simile, allusion, and metaphor.
Thomas Paine anonymously wrote “Common Sense”, a pamphlet discussing the ideas of independence from Britain. This helped the colonists put their frustrations with their government into words. Paine wrote it so simply that anyone could understand his ideas, and it was quite persuasive. He says, “The sun never shined on a cause of greater worth.” (Baym 326) Essentially, Thomas Paine explains how independence from the monarchy would be a really wonderful thing, and he ultimately explains that this independence is inevitable. He talks about how Britain is the parent of America. He compares America to a child growing independent of its parents. Although at one point, America was “flourish[ing] under her former connection with Great Britain”, he says that now it is time for America to grow independent. He uses the example of a child who has been raised on milk never moving on to eating meat. Although the child grew a lot on milk, that doesn’t mean that he wouldn’t continue to grow by eating meat, by gaining more independence. (Baym 326) And he says that while Britain is their parent country, parents shouldn’t “devour their young,” or “make war upon their families.” (Baym 327) He’s using this extended parent example to show that America really doesn’t need a parent country anymore. This idea of total independence from Britain put a lot in perspective for Americans at the time. They became empowered and confident in this idea of
Whitman’s approach to poetry is a reflection of his thought. These thoughts are free and wild, and his typical run-on sentences and his endless litanies of people and places represent the thoughts trying to be conveyed. The overall effect of these run-on sentences provides the reader with a feeling of greatness and of freedom. All of the feelings that are evoked from Whitman’s style can be classified as quintessentially American democratic feelings. The belief that Whitman had no style would imply that Americans as a society have no style, a statement that not only Whitman but Emerson and Thoreau as well fought against through their writings. Whitman and Emerson fighting for the same cause is not coincidental, Whitman has often been viewed as the “child” of Emerson, his work being greatly influenced by Emerson. Whitman’s technique of looking at everything as a whole and always opposed to breaking up the whole can be linked to his belief of unity within our country and the reason why he took the Civil War extremely hard and personal.
Thomas Paine was a quite possibly one of the most important revolutionaries for America. He was an English-American political activist, philosopher and political theorist that wrote a political pamphlet, back in 1776, that was extremely influential in convincing colonists that declaring their independence was the appropriate thing to do during the revolutionary. This revolutionary pamphlet was named “Common Sense”. The pamphlet inspired people in the Thirteen Colonies to declare and fight for independence from Great Britain in the summer of 1776. In Common Sense, Paine challenges the authority of the British government and the royal monarchy. Thomas Paine was very direct in the pamphlet and addressed the common people of America. It was
In his series of essays and "letters" on American life, Michel-Guillaume-Jean de Crevecoeur gives his readers numerous examples of the superiority of America to all other countries of that time. He believes that one reason for superiority is that America is with out the aristocracy so prevalent in Europe at the time, which led to a hard working and socially equal society. Another reason Crevecoeur sees America as a superior society is the accepting, and assimilating into one new race, the poor peoples from all European countries. This led to an extraordinarily diverse population, much more diverse than any one of the European countries eight-tenth century. It was for these reasons, as well as many others that Crevecoeur saw America as the greatest nation of the 1700’s.
Crèvecoeur depicts Americans as though they are a new race or sub-set of people formed from European descent. He mentions, “they are a mixture of English, Scotch, Irish, French, Dutch, Germans and Swedes. From this promiscuous breed, that race now called Americans have arisen” (310-311). Although the American character is founded on liberty, industry, independence, and happiness, Crèvecoeur mentions how extraordinary the diversity is among Americans. Although many Americans came from different customs, traditions, and governments, Crèvecoeur suggests their ability to unite on relatively new ideologies distinguishes them as a nation. Also, adopting the customs of America and rendering an individual's previous traditions, seems to be the product of the high-risk, high-hope behavior distinctive to Americans. He defines, “he is an American, who, leaving behind him all his ancient prejudices and manners, receives new ones from the new mode of life he has embraced, the new government he obeys, and the new rank he holds” (312). Incorporating new doctrines, governments, and hierarchies the American character develops with the growth of the nation. This becomes exclusive to American identity because it is relatively new as is the American nation and culture. While Americans are unified by similar ideas, and those ideas
French aristocrat, J. Hector St. John Crèvecoeur, through this passage from his collection of essays, Letters from an American Farmer, constructs the definition of an American through the emphasis of America’s superiority to Europe, in the way that the country fosters growth and opportunity. Crèvecoeur’s purpose is to define Americans as the way he interprets them and their lifestyles. He adopts a nationalistic and convincing tone in order to depict the quality of life in America, in comparison to that of Europe, to the other European aristocrats and elite. This is done in connection with his strong invocation of feelings and emotions to further support his claim. Crèvecoeur commences his essay through the numerous uses of rhetorical
( The Daily News. Emerson, 2017) In conclusion, the meaning of “American” it is synonym of freedom, opportunity, hope. But every perspective influences a change of it is meaning, always creating a new idea, a personal example of what for each person means a key word as "American". Summarizing in brief words all people have a different perspective depending on what they have lived, and give a response of their meaning based on their