Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Materialism in Today's Society
Materialism in the us today
Materialism in the us today
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Materialism in Today's Society
According to the auditing standard, “Materiality means the amount or amounts set by the auditor at less than materiality for the financial statements as a whole to reduce, to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality for the financial statements as a whole” (Canadian Institue of Chartered Accountants 2012a). We might also consider out textbooks definition “The magnitude of an omission or misstatement, in the light of surrounding circumstances, makes it probable that the judgment of a reasonable person relying on the information would have been changed or influenced by the omission or misstatements (Arens, et al 2012). As we can see the definition of materiality can vary based on the source. In our own words we view materiality as whether or not omitted or missing information would affect a decision made by someone who was relying on the information.
MATERIALITY, IN HISTORY
Over the years materiality has changed and evolved in various ways to reach the point where it is today. We will now take a look at some of the major changes in materiality over the past century. With respect to events prior to 1950, it is important to know that Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS) were publicized in October 1947; however, they were not yet elabo¬rated upon (Selley 2010). This means that while the standards were created they were not well researched or very specific at this point. Next we will talk about one of the largest changes in the history of auditing with respect to materiality. Starting in the U.K. in 1900 the use of the phrase “true and correct” was changed to “true and fair” (Selley 2010). This was a big turning point for auditing because not on...
... middle of paper ...
...s an Auditing Concept." University of Mississippi Libraries Digital Collections: Accounting Collections. http://clio.lib.olemiss.edu/cdm/ref/collection/deloitte/id/25065 (accessed 02 22, 2014).
Udrea, Ana, Todea Nicolae, Stancia C. Lonela, Demian E. Gabrieala, Pintilie Corneliu, and Alina Ciuhureanu. 2010. "The Importance of Determining Materiality in Statutory Auditing." International DAAAM 21, no. 1: 905-06.
Vorhies, James B. 2013 "The New Importance of Materiality CPAs can use this Familiar Concept to Identify Key Control Execptions." Journal of Accountancy. http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/Issues/2005/May/TheNewImportanceOfMateriality.htm. (accessed 02 21, 2014).
Wright, Tiffany C. 2014 "What is a "Materially Adverse" Impact in Accounting." Azcentral.com. http://yourbusiness.azcentral.com/materially-adverse-impact-accounting-17471.html (accessed 02 21, 2014).
Arens, Alvin A., Elder, Randall J., and Beasley, Mark S. (2012). Auditing and Assurance Services:
Rittenberg, Larry, Bradley Schwieger, and Karla Johnstone. Auditing. 6th ed. Mason: Thomas South-Western, 2005. 10-40.
References Financial Accounting Standards Board. 2006, July 6 -. Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. Financial Accounting Series, 1-55. Wolk, H., Dodd, J., & Tearney, M. (2003).
The utilization of the concept of materiality in auditing dates many years. Varying definitions of materiality during the preliminary stages of utilization prove that auditors recognized a need for this concept but did not have a standard for defining the term. The recognition by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) of the need for this concept prompted a decision to determine a universally recognized definition of materiality. In the book, Auditing Concepts for a Changing Environment, the FASB defines materiality as, “the magnitude of an omission or misstatement of accounting information that, in light of surrounding circumstances, makes it probable that the judgment of a reasonable person relying on the information would have been changed or influenced by the omission or misstatement” (Rittenberg and Schwieger 2001, 92). In essence, the concept helps auditors determine the financial information that...
The purpose of an auditor's job is to make an assertion. In order to do so, evidence must be collected to authenticate said opinion. AS 1105 details the characteristics of audit evidence and the steps necessary to obtain an appropriate level of audit evidence. If the risk of material misstatement is high, the amount of required evidence collected also increases. Quality over quantity is another precept of audit evidence. The higher the quality, the less evidence is needed; whereas increasing the amount of substandard evidence collected does not bolster a position. The relevance and reliability are also two metrics used to evaluate audit evidence; both are required characteristics and must be
Marshall, M.H., McManus, W.W., Viele, V.F. (2003). Accounting: What the Numbers Mean. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Marshall, D. H., McManus, W. W, & Viele, D. (2002). Accounting: What the Numbers Mean. 5th ed. San Francisco: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
Since the early 1970s, the auditing profession has been under increased pressure and scrutiny by government and users of audit reports. The phrase ‘ Audit Expectations Gap’ was first coined when the AICPA put the Cohen Commission together in 1974 to investigate whether the ‘expectations gap’ existed. However, the history of the expectation gap goes right back to the start of company auditing in the nineteenth century (Humphrey and Turley 1992). Since then, events ranging from the collapse of Arthur Anderson to the ongoing savings and loan problems seemed to have made the gap become more and more apparent.
Albrecht, W. S., Stice, J. D., Stice, E. K., & Skousen, k. F. (2002). Accounting Concepts and Applications. Cincinnati: South-Western.
When it comes to anthropological theory the combination of several established ways of thought often result in a completely new and independent way of thinking. Cultural Materialism is one of these children theories that resulted from a coming together of social evolutionary theory, cultural ecology and Marxist materialism (Barfield). The goal of cultural materialism is to explain politics, economics, ideology and symbolic aspects of a culture with relation to the needs of that society. From a cultural materialist point of view society is indisputably shaped by the factors of production and reproduction. From this all other facets of society, such as government and religion, must be beneficial to that society’s ability to satisfy the minimum requirements to sustain themselves (Harris 1996). An example of this would be the invention and continued use of industry because it increased the ability to produce needed materials and food. One important aspect of the cultural materialistic approach is that it operates completely from the etic perspective. Marvin Harris, one of the founders of cultural materialism, believed that a holistic approach is vital to correctly analyzing culture and believed that the emic approach failed at providing a wide enough scope. Harris tried to employ the scientific method and incorporated it into his theory. The result of this is that cultural materialism focuses only on events that are observable and quantifiable and replicable (Harris 1979). Cultu...
Both accounting and finance deal with money and assets; however, they are categorically different concepts. This portion of the essay will discuss the dissimilarities between accounting and finance. Examples of different concepts will be given for both practices.
Alteration: paper evidence difficult to alter without detection. Any one tries to change anything on paper there must be marks, auditor can find the marks and whether there are changes in financial statements. Any change for fraudulent, misappropriation of asset can been found easily if auditor wants to find.
Paul, B & Miller, W 1985, ‘The conceptual framework: myths and realities’, Journal of Accountancy, vol. 159, issue. 3, p. 62, ProQuest Central Database, viewed 30 April 2014
The fundamental duty of an external financial auditor is to form and express an opinion on whether the reporting entity’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with the relevant financial reporting framework. In discharging this duty, the auditor must exercise “reasonable skill, care and caution” (Lopes, J. in Kingston Cotton Mill Co 1896) as reflected in current legal and professional requirements.
The evolution of auditing is a complicated history that has always been changing through historical events. Auditing always changed to meet the needs of the business environment of that day. Auditing has been around since the beginning of human civilization, focusing mainly, at first, on finding efraud. As the United States grew, the business world grew, and auditing began to play more important roles. In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, people began to invest money into large corporations. The Stock Market crash of 1929 and various scandals made auditors realize that their roles in society were very important. Scandals and stock market crashes made auditors aware of deficiencies in auditing, and the auditing community was always quick to fix those deficiencies. The auditors’ job became more difficult as the accounting principles changed, and became easier with the use of internal controls. These controls introduced the need for testing; not an in-depth detailed audit. Auditing jobs would have to change to meet the changing business world. The invention of computers impacted the auditors’ world by making their job at times easier and at times making their job more difficult. Finally, the auditors’ job of certifying and testing companies’ financial statements is the backbone of the business world.