Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why the voting age should be lowered
Why the voting age should be lowered
Voting age
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why the voting age should be lowered
It was 1970 when our government finally came to the realization that 18-year-olds are able to make responsible political decisions(Elections Canada, 2014). Eventually, when people do come to the realization that 16-year-olds are capable of making responsible decisions as well, there will be a dissatisfaction in the amount of elections loss of the voices of our soon to be adults. As of this moment, our government is continuing to waste time through their hesitation in further reducing the voting age to 16. Our society should stop being complacent with the number of voters there are currently and should instead focus on improving our future elections by incorporating the ideas of 16-year-olds. There are many reasons why the government should give the right for our youth to vote such as New perspectives that provide insightful and unique ideas, it’s better to have youth vote at 16 than 18 and giving the right people who already take on the responsibilities of an adult. …show more content…
Bringing 16-year-olds into the election will allow for new voices and new ideas that are rarely ever considered by actual adults such as school grade education. More often than not, when a specific age group is finally given the opportunity to express their ideas towards politics they take it. In Canada, after 18-year-olds were given the eligibility to vote, in the 1972 election, voter turnout increased by approximately 2 million ballots in comparison to its previous election in 1968 (E.C 2015). By including 16-year-olds into our election, we would receive new interpretations in our elections that couldn’t be thought of by adults because the experiences they had as a 16-year-old differs from the adolescence we have
It’s very unsettling to know that there was a six percent decrease in young voters (ages 18-29) in the 2012 election compared to 2008 (Circle Youth data). In 2007 the National Conference of State Legislatures publicly released a report and data set on voter turnout in democratic countries. This is a quote from that report titled Getting out the Vote, “It should be noted that in 1972, 18-year-olds were added to the eligible voting population, thus decreasing the percentages. Nonetheless, voter tu...
To enforce voting to be mandatory , this will prompt more Americans to pay attention to the choices for their representatives. Mandating would stimulate the demand side, motivating voters to understand and acknowledge who they are voting for. Therefore , voting is to be a responsibility than a option.
In “You’re 16, You’re Beautiful and You’re a Voter,” author Anya Kamenetz states her belief that the voting age should be lowered to sixteen. Kamenetz gives several premises to her argument.
Over the recent year’s American voters have brought back a way of voting that was used during the country’s old age of existence, this rediscovered act is known as early voting. Early voting started in the early 1990s, though the outcome has not had such a high consistency over the years it is still recommended to help the Election Day process in the country. Since voter turnout is not entirely consistent due to the process being constantly shortened by state laws, the argument against early voting is that it is a waste of taxpayers’ money, opponents believe it is ineffective. Although that is not the case, in his 2016 blog article, “A Brief History of Early Voting,” Michael McDonald inform readers on the brief history of early voting as he states how the rates of voters who has cast their ballots before election day has increased over the years, “from less than a tenth to about a third” (qtd. in McDonald) since the 1990s. This proves to show why the money being spent on this act is not simply being wasted. Although early voting has
The Voting Age Must be Lowered for Democracy to Exist in America. Imagine for a moment that senior citizens were denied the right to vote. Imagine senior citizens being thought of as too incompetent to vote because some senior citizens are senile. Can you imagine such a large percentage of the American public being denied the right to vote – simply on account of their age? It doesn't happen in America, right?
The landscape of Canadian politics is the result of integrating multiple layers together; however, the component of age is exceptionally important to consider as the young people of this generation will inevitably become the leaders and policy makers of the next generation. This statement is proven in the article Political Parties, You Can No Longer Ignore Young Voters. The author Jane Hilderman addresses the relationship between youth and civic involvement. This article highlights that “in the 2015 federal election, 57 per cent of young Canadians voted, which is an incredible 18 percentage point jump from the previous election” (Hilderman 2016). The statistics prove that the 2015 federal election was indicative of the increasing awareness
Think of your life right now. What are you currently doing in your life? Worrying about school, studying for tests or exams, having fun, playing sports, listening to music and most of all enjoying your life. And then suddenly. You need to know about politics. Who are you going to vote for? What if you know absolutely nothing about politics? What are you going to do? All these questions start piling on top of each other and they leave you constantly worrying about something that you should not have to worry about until you are 18. Today I'm going to be talking to you about whether or not the voting age should be lowered to 16. I strongly believe that it should not be lowered to 16 because 16 and 17-year-olds lack political knowledge and engagement,
According to researcher Henry Milner about 60 per cent of young people have little ability to make relevant distinctions about politics in Canada. This shows the ignorance held towards politics in the lives of Canadians. Attesting to the fact, forcing people into voting when they are
The youth of today face many challenges. They face the normal challenges of becoming an adult and gaining their independence, leaving home for the first time, busier schedules than ever, and the new right to vote. Voting for the first time is an exciting experience and offers a new freedom not previously experienced but many of today’s youth decide not to exercise their new right. There has been a 15% decline in the turnout of 18-25 year olds since 1972 (Levine, Peter and Mark Hugo Lopez). This could be the result of confusion on the process of voting, more instability of their living situation, lack of interest, and lack of knowledge regarding politics.
As mentioned above, no time has there been as much exposure for the young generation to all of the political intricacies, issues and events than there is now. The availability of information and ease of access, should give them a reason to research, look up each and every candidate in the running. Unlike the current generation, people back then did not have the internet in their time, they did not have the luxury of being able to really get to know the people who are running for office. This makes the youth’s role in the elections all the more important as they should take up whole heartedly the label of being an “educated youth”. It’s so easy for the young people all over the country to rant about corruption and how our government is failing us
Wandering through the month of November, seeing that election is around the corner. Many polls are being put together for a really important event. You ask yourself, “Does age really have to matter to participate in these moments? Why can’t I use my voice?” At the end of the race, seeing who's the next presidents or new laws that can one day be very affected not just you but for everyone else.
According to the Senate Judiciary Committee supporting lowering the voting age in 1971, this leads to a search for a way to contribute to change, often birthing violent or destructive pastimes, instead of the constructive act of voting. Lowering the voting age would give teens the power to change the world, thus empowering and rejuvenating a politically wary social group. Politicians have no reason to care about the interests of 16 and 17-year-olds under current law, in contrast, with the proposed law, politicians would be required to fight for the interests of said younger group to keep their job. Bolstering the morale and democratic ideals of a struggling adolescent generation is a massive effect this small alteration in current legislation would
They might say that sixteen through seventeen year olds may not be educated enough. If anything sixteen is a great age to start voting. It’s right when you start learning about politics. As you get older you tend to forget things, so it’s better to vote when you are sixteen because the knowledge is fresh in your mind. When you are at the age of sixteen you are stable. When you are eighteen you are out looking for a home to live or going off to college. They have better things to think about than politics in their mind. With the recent presidential election people have been complaining about Donald Trump becoming president, if sixteen through seventeen year olds were allowed to vote then Hillary probably would have won. If you check on an all the social media then you’ll see that most of the teenagers have strong opinions and are with
Before discussing the improvements that could be made, it is important to analyze why less young people vote than other
There is a discussion going around about whether the voting age should be kept 18, or if it should be changed to 16. On one side, people argue that "having younger voters is crucial at a time of an aging voting population and low voter turnout". However the opposite states that "lowering the voting age would decrease the percentage of participation". I believe that lowering the voting age would not be beneficial, however we should focus on raising the percentage of young people that vote.