Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Youth participation in politics essay
Lowering the voting age statistics
Lowering the voting age statistics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Voting is an important civic duty that United States citizens earn when they become 18 years old. Some citizens in the United States wish to change this age to 16. Today’s society views 16 year olds as ignorant, care free, and reckless citizens who are definitely not capable of making an appropriate vote. Although some argue there is no such thing as an inappropriate vote, and that voting is not a test of knowledge, it definitely is. As school systems fail to give the required civic education youth needs, 16-year-olds will not be informed to produce quality votes. Imagine 16 year olds who have no preparation, voting for the President of the United States. There needs to be changes within the civics education before the voting age is even questioned. As well as education, 16 year olds also lack responsibility. They are growing up and are under the pressure of peers, family and media sources. With all the pressure and influences resting on their shoulders they should be able to wait two more years for their own opinions and views to develop. While waiting these 16 year olds can also develop a more concerned outlook on politics and become more engaged. Without youth interest in politics lowering the voting age would be useless. For how much work and time is put in to campaigning and engaging youth, the youth should start to show more concern for their government before the efforts are wasted. The civics education in the United States needs to be reevaluated. Few teachers have the knowledge to develop civic literacy within their students, and are not supported in doing so. Today more than half of high school government teachers can not give adequate explanations of civic topics. (Black) In the article “Tomorrow's Citizens,” author ... ... middle of paper ... ... Jan. 2014. Perlman, Merrill. "1971: 18-Year-Olds Get the Vote." New York Times Upfront. 05 Sep. 2011: 24. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 16 Jan. 2014. Shin, Annys. "Takoma's Teen Voters Will Make History." Washington Post. 04 Nov. 2013: B.1. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 15 Jan. 2014. Smith, Heather. "Rock the Vote 2.0." Esquire Vol. 148 No. 6. Dec. 2007: 208. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 15 Jan. 2014. Tisch, Jonathan M. All Together Now: Collaboration and Innovation for Youth Engagement. Rep. The Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement, 2013. Web. 11 Jan. 2014. Vescera, Zak. "Overcoming Generational Apathy." Vancouver Sun. 27 Mar. 2013: A.13. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 15 Jan. 2014. Wiltshire, Kenneth. "Sweet 16 and Too Immature to Vote." Australian (Canberra). 15 Oct. 2009: 12. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 15 Jan. 2014.
On the national civics assessment, “two-thirds of 12th graders scored below ‘proficient’…and only 9 percent could list two ways a democracy benefits from citizen participation” (O’Connor and Romer 4). The information provided clarifies just how little students know about democracy. Without education on the subject, they are unaware as to how their government contribution is beneficial and why it is needed in the first place. The students, because of their lack of understanding, therefore choose to not take part in their government and fail to carry out their duties as a citizen. The authors provide more research that shows “the better people understand our history and system of government, the more likely they are to vote and participate in the civic life” (O’Connor and Romer 8).
The young as well as the older people of Canada seem to be in a deadlock. The question of if the federal government should or should not lower the voting age is a question debated surely around the dinner tables of families in Canada, as well as in the ranks of the government. Some people even suggest that the age needs to be raised. What would make people want the voting age to be lowered to an even lower age than the young adult age of 18? On the other hand how can the youth of Canada who have their own individual views be able to make a difference without being able to vote? Both sides provide for an intriguing look into the facts and resolutions for an appropriate way to either change the voting age or keep it the same. Throughout this paper I will look at and analyze the arguments of the youth who claim to be 'disenfranchised', as well as others who see the lowering of the voting age to be detrimental rather than an improvement to the Government of Canada's political process. In 1854, before Canada became a responsible government the only people allowed to vote were people who had a high value of land which they owned, and had a high income. Women and people with other ethnic backgrounds and religious beliefs were also denied the right to vote. This did not mean that these people did not have their views and beliefs on who and what they wanted in their government but rather they were denied the right. These laws have changed since then drastically and Canada has become a democratic country (rule by the people). However, the frustration of not being able to vote and support their ideals and politicians does live on in the hearts and minds of thousands of young Canadians under the age of eighteen. The...
Samples, John. "Three Myths about Voter Turnout." Political Analysis. N.p., 14 Sept. 2004. Web. 2 Dec. 2013. .
In “You’re 16, You’re Beautiful and You’re a Voter,” author Anya Kamenetz states her belief that the voting age should be lowered to sixteen. Kamenetz gives several premises to her argument.
Ross, Kelly. “Electoral College Outdated.” Northern Arizona News. 6 Feb. 2011. Web. 13 Mar. 2012.
Considering the delegates that are currently running for office, a voter should have a vast level of understanding regarding the intentions of each and every candidate. Arguing whether to raise or lower the age limit for the right to vote has raised many speculations as to how it would affect the economy. There are pros and cons within both sides of the argument, but any decisions made by the powers that be will have an adverse effect on today’s society if it is placed in the hands of the younger generation. Therefore, raising the voting age to twenty-one is a better way of making sure that voters are more aware and would be more equipped to making a more sound decision rather than lowering
Nicholas Kohler and Colin Campbell with Steve Maich (2006) 18-year-olds too Immature to Vote, Studies Suggest.
Pam Belluck discusses and strongly criticizes voting age in her article " Sixteen Candles, but Few Blazing a Trail to the Ballot Box". She starts by referring to a day of a regular sixteen year old girl, who was preparing for a musical, then going out to eat with her boyfriend and last visiting the polls to vote. With the use of this type of claims and a very sarcastic tone throughout her writing, Belluck develops her position, arguing that young voters “lack of competence, maturity and experience”(par. 6) and for this reasons they are not prepared to vote properly. During her argument she exposes different opinions in this controversial manner of voting, describing the actions of supporters that believe that the young generations should be
In Carrie Kirby's article "Why Students Want to Lower the Voting Age" published in the October 7th, 2015 edition of The Atlantic, Kirby looks into the arguments being made by student activists in San Francisco who are trying to lower the voting age to 16. She begins by mentioning Oliver York, a 16-year old who has an answer to practically any question one could raise about allowing 16 and 17 year olds to vote. York argues that this case is similar to those which occurred in the early 1900s in the fight for women's suffrage, any how many had dismissed the thought because they would "just vote the way [their] husbands would vote." Jillian Wu, another 16-year old, points out that 44% of Scottish teens voted differently than their parents during
Gagnier, Christina M. "Democracy 2.0: Millennial-Generated Change to American Governance." National Civic Review (Fall 2008): 32-36.
Hello, I am RJ Dearing. I am a sophomore at Washington Virtual Academies and I am writing to you to tell you why you should change the minimum age to vote to be at least closer to sixteen years of age. The younger generation of teens and young adults who also have a few opinions on politics like myself would love to voice our opinions on our own ballets. The only problem is the minimum age to vote right now is eighteen. A whole two years of waiting for our voices to be heard, when all you have to do is change the minimum age and let us have our voice heard on political matters.
Government officials have considered lowering the voting age to sixteen from its current standard of eighteen. This would not be a wise decision because people under the age of eighteen are referred to as children for a reason. The reason is that they have clearly not completed cognitive development. In humans, a muscle located at the front of the brain, called the frontal lobe, is responsible for the reasoning skills and maturity of one’s self. This muscle is not fully advanced until the age of twenty-one. “In calm situations, teenagers can rationalize almost as well as adults. But stress can hijack what physicians call, "hot cognition" and decision-making. The frontal lobes help put the brakes on a desire for thrills and taking risk -- a building block of adolescence; but, they're also one of the last areas of the brain to develop fully”. (Source A). This statement notifies that there is no shame in the lacking understanding of a teenage brain, but that they should be given the full extent of time to mature before being handed such responsibilities as voting. Research has indicated that throughout its lifetime, the human brain undergoes changes. “You may have noticed a paradox that exists among students today. Although there are exceptions to the rule, this generation of kids is advanced intellectually, but behind emotionally. They are missing many of the marks of maturity they should possess”. (Source B). Teens also normally remain in a more insecure phase, that they eventually grow out of. However, before progressing from this phase, teens are easily swayed by their pee...
Decreasing the voting rates would happen if we changed the voting age to 16 years old. Teenagers should be in school and worrying about their education. If they go out to vote they could be missing out on their education.
I also think that the voting age should change because it would give the 16 year olds a reason to have pride of their country. We make bad decisions making just like adults do. We live in this country just like adults do. For example, say one day we choose a bad president, say he changes everything about the country we live in.The adults and the 16 year olds would have to change the way they have lived in the past and become more adapt to the new changes in their country. The adults are not in this alone. Whatever happens to the country about bad decisions making they are dragging in the 16 year olds that could not make any decisions for themselves.
Politicians have been working to increase voter turnout for years. Lowering the voting age could be their new solution. Many adults only vote in elections that they find particularly interesting, like the 2016 Presidential Election, which had record voter turnout. If teens were allowed to vote at a younger age, kid’s issues would make their way to the polls. Hopefully, these new issues would interest adults and make them more likely to vote. Teens that were introduced to politics at a younger age would build the habit of voting and would be more likely to continue voting as they got older. Parents would have to drive their kids to the polls, making them more likely to vote