Voltaire Vs. Hampson

1343 Words3 Pages

The enlightenment was a period in history where certain ways of thought were developed. There were doubts of the existence of a supreme being and belief in the natural order of things. "The stability of a divinely-created and unchanging order was challenged by a new conception of life as a constant and shapeless flux" (89). Norman Hampson analyzes many famous philosophical books of the time and overall feels that "Only two attitudes seemed to remain: to follow Hume in denying man's access to objective knowledge of any kind, or to accept d'Holbach's conception of a universe of matter in motion, in which everything happened out of necessity and the answer to every question was `because it cannot be otherwise'" (95). Again, the existence of God was thoroughly questioned as well as the reason for man to have morals. Science, philosophy, and theology all went hand-in-hand. Candide displayed this way of thought, but in an extremely more pessimistic and sarcastic manner. Hampson and Candide agree on many points on the optimism of the 18th century. The Enlightenment was an age of thought that begins in an optimistic phase, but slowly becomes pessimistic through the century. Candide and Pangloss feel that everything is for the best in this best of all possible worlds. Through their trials and tribulations, they keep up this attitude, only to be proven wrong through experiences of religion, persecution, unfairness, and death. A common agreement between Voltaire and Hampson is that God should only care that man is moral, that through justness, man will get along and be rewarded fairly. Hampson's statement: "Many Christians shared with the Deists the conviction that religion was at least as much concerned with the welfare of man as with the...

... middle of paper ...

...cultivating the garden lets the group of characters keep away from the unfair world in which pessimism is present, while cause and effect are easily measurable in the garden.

Voltaire and Hampson both follow the decline in attitudes of optimism throughout 18th century Europe through philosophizing about religion, the oppression of Monarchical societies, and the role that man should play in society. They agree that slavery was horrible, that man should be inherently benevolent, and that the question of a supreme being is still questionable (Voltaire did believe in a supreme being, but through Candide, he presents the question of Providence's existence). So, nearing the end of optimistic thought, Hampson suggests pessimism and Candide said it: "Oh Pangloss! You had no idea this abomination existed. That does it; I have to renounce your optimism after all" (83).

Open Document