Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ancient Greek culture
Personal values and decision making
Ancient Greek culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ancient Greek culture
There are many philosophical approaches to ethics that are utilized today; however, virtue ethics is one approach that can be examine; Virtue ethics is one philosophy that was developed by Aristotle and other ancient Greeks. Virtue ethics focuses on the quest to understanding and living a life of moral character. The heart of virtue ethics is the insight that what we do flows from who we are and therefore we need to culture a virtuous character if we are going to respond to situations morally. Virtue ethics accentuates personality; which focuses on how individual’s actions versus consequences. One way to look at virtue ethics is to analyze practicing being honest, brave, just, generous, so the person develops honorable and moral character …show more content…
The four ways that individuals can approach a situation is The principle approach, the consequence approach, the virtue/character approach, and the moral sentiment approach. As a matter of fact, making decisions turns out to be easy to make when an individual know what approach they are using. Most of the decision that individuals make are based on their values and principles. In my opinion, as God’s creation made in his image, all man possesses a character like God. The two central attributes of God are his holiness (expressed in his justice) and his love. God is holy in nature, and he lives and operates by his own holy laws. He instructs all man to live according to his holy laws, and live justly. A person’s moral actions comes from within the person. The person displays good will and a social responsibility to do what is just and fair towards others. The Bible tells us to love one another as Christ has loved us. We are free to choose our action and how we conduct ourselves in this world. For example, the actions of Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden. They were perfect people who made a bad chose to disobey God. Their disobeyed effected the whole world which is the consequence of their sin. The Bible states, “so whoever knows the right thing to do, and fails to do it, for him it is sin. Adam and Eve sin made them immoral in the eyes of
An employee of ABC Company, Luke is in charge with a project of developing new purchased land. The company is planning to build an adult entertainment retail store which confidently lay near where his brother, Owen, lives. If the plans are announced to the public, the property of the surrounding neighborhood will drop significantly. What concerned Luke is that Owen just told him about the offer to sell his house at a decent price compared to the current real estate market. However, Owen is considering if he should wait for a couple year and sell his house later at a higher price as the estate value may increase.
Virtue ethics is an approach that “deemphasizes rules, consequences and particular acts and places the focus on the kind of person who is acting” (Garrett, 2005). A person’s character is the totality of his character traits. Our character traits can be goo...
In Aristotle 's Nicomachean Ethics, the basic idea of virtue ethics is established. The most important points are that every action and decision that humans make is aimed at achieving the good or as Aristotle 's writes, “Every art and every inquiry, and similarly every action and choice, is thought to aim at the good... (Aristotle 1094a). Aristotle further explains that this good aimed for is happiness.
On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com. ———. "
n this reflective journal entry, we are going to look at that the ethical issues that were presented in the Ethics Game simulations, the decision-making steps that were completed to address ethically the issues, and the ethical lenses that I used to make decisions throughout the simulation. We are also going to take a look at how these different ethical lenses influenced my decision and the how I could use the concepts that I have learned in my workplace.
When we discuss morality we know that it is a code of values that seem to guide our choices and actions. Choices and actions play a significant role in determining the purpose and course of a person’s life. In the case of “Jim and the Indians”, Jim faces a terrible dilemma to which any solution is morbid. On one hand, Jim can choose to ignore the captain’s suggestion and let the whole group of Indians be executed. Alternatively, he may decide upon sacrificing one Indian for the sake of saving the rest. Both options involve taking of person’s life. Regarding what should Jim do in this circumstance, there are two approaches according for Jim’s dilemma that should be examined. By looking into the Deontological moral theory and the moral theory of Consequentialism we can see what determines an action that is morally required.
Virtue ethics is a moral theory that was first developed by Aristotle. It suggests that humans are able to train their characters to acquire and exhibit particular virtues. As the individual has trained themselves to develop these virtues, in any given situation they are able to know the right thing to do. If everybody in society is able to do the same and develop these virtues, then a perfect community has been reached. In this essay, I shall argue that Aristotelian virtue ethics is an unsuccessful moral theory. Firstly, I shall analyse Aristotelian virtue ethics. I shall then consider various objections to Aristotle’s theory and evaluate his position by examining possible responses to these criticisms. I shall then conclude, showing why Aristotelian virtue ethics is an unpractical and thus an unsuccessful moral theory in reality.
Hursthouse, R. (2003, July 18). Virtue Ethics. Stanford University. Retrieved March 6, 2014, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/ethics-virtue
Virtue theory is the best ethical theory because it emphasizes the morality of an individual in which their act is upon pure goodness and presents as a model to motivate others. Aristotle was a classical proponent of virtue theory who illustrates the development habitual acts out of moral goodness. Plato renders a brief list of cardinal virtues consisting of wisdom, temperance, courage, and justice. This ethical theory prominently contradicts and links to other theories that personifies the ideal being. However, virtue theorists differ from their own expression of these qualities yet it sets a tone that reflects on the desire to express kindness toward others.
Virtue ethics is a theory about finding our highest good and doing so will develop a vigorous character within each person. Character is important because it shows that a person has certain beliefs and desires in doing the right thing and when the right thing is accomplished, happiness follows (Hartman, 2006). Virtue ethics derives from Aristotle and he concludes that by doing virtuous acts all through life happiness and respectable character will develop (Morrison & Furlong, 2013). Finding the highest good within oneself brings happiness and great character to that individual.
The virtue ethics approach differs with other frameworks in that; it is not an ethical theory in the same way that Utilitarianism or Kantianism are, It is not so much a guide for moral decision-making, more a description of the moral life. Theories such as Utilitarianism and Kantianism address the question “How should I act?” – Virtue Theory addresses the questions “How should I live my life?”, and “What kind of person should I be?”It is interested in the whole person, not just their actions.
Virtue Ethics Virtue ethics is a theory used to make moral decisions. It does not rely on religion, society or culture; it only depends on the individuals themselves. The main philosopher of Virtue Ethics is Aristotle. The. His theory was originally introduced in ancient Greek.
This theory involves evaluating the individual making the decision rather than the actions or consequences themselves. Aristotle defined “virtue as a character trait that manifests itself in habitual actions.” (Boatright, 2012) This means that you are not considered virtuous because you did the right thing one time, you must be consistent. Virtue character traits include: compassion, courage, courtesy, etc. these traits not only allow for ethical decision making but they also provide happiness to the individual possessing the traits. When a person has virtue as a part of their character their actions will be moral and ethical without having to choose between what they want to do and what they should do – the decision would be the same. Their actions and feelings would coincide with the moral rationale of the virtue theory. Advantages of the virtue theory are instilling good moral character traits into individuals allowing for more ethical decision making based on personal character. Also, the virtue theory promotes happiness through good moral character which encourages people to make ethical business decisions but also ethical personal decisions – leading to a more fulfilling life. A disadvantage is virtue ethics is trying to determine a list of virtues that people should possess, each trait needs to be carefully
As mentioned by Thiroux & Krasemann, expresses how the establishment of virtues is based on the measurement of righteous perceptions (72). For instance, as a society we know mainly through trial and error what type of moral codes to develop. Many people undergo errors of society and we established what is common sense because of it. Therefore, virtue ethics isn’t solely on notions to project a list of rules in order to be a decent human being, but to apply these basic principles to how we feel as well (Thiroux & Krasemann, pg.78).
For instance, Matthew 12:34-25 recorded, ““...out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things.” Unfortunately, Aristotle’s theory, Virtue Ethics, fails because one may have difficulties to find a balance between two characteristics. However, if one sees Jesus Christ as the example of a balanced, virtuous, person, Virtue Ethics seems increasingly promising, though it still fails to explain why living in balanced is moral. Paul wrote in Romans 2:14-15 that nature reveals the God’s law. Similarly, Natural Law Ethics argues that nature reveals morality. However, Natural Law Ethics fails because it is incomplete in satisfying ethical questions such as how a depraved human could rationalize the morality of nature. As aforementioned, Jesus Christ is a wondrous example to follow. Individuals may say that He acted in a Utilitarian fashion since, for instance, He died for others, without any apparent regard for Himself. Therefore, Utilitarianism seems formidable. However, Utilitarianism has