Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History of cinema Essay
History of cinema Essay
History of cinema Essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
La Haine is a French film from the 1990s. The film is in black and white camera effect and sets a serious mood and tone. The movie starts off with clips of people rioting and cars being overturned. Right away, you can tell one of the themes in this film will be related with violence. The movie’s main characters are three young men; Said, Hubert, and Vinz. They all were from the projects. Although the three of them were ethnically diverse from one another. They derived from the same background and experienced similar conflicts within the French society. La Haine greatly exhibited how harsh life was for the people living in the projects. The movie revolved around themes such as violence, racism, and the struggle of coming from a relatively poor …show more content…
and bad- reputed background. The cops, in the film, automatically assumed and labeled the people from the projects as delinquents. Henceforth, the relationship between the cops and the people was hateful. The people from the projects rioted, being sick of the system and infuriated, especially after the cops brutally abused an Arab from the projects named Abdel. There were several themes presented in the film La Haine. One major theme was violence in the projects. As mentioned before, the movie began with riots; people turning cars over, vandalizing property, and burning cars and buildings. There was footage being played which clearly showed police brutality. Guns significantly contributed to the violence in the projects throughout the film.
If you had a gun, you basically had power. When a lost gun from the riots was in Vinz’s custody, many internal as well as external conflicts arose. Hubert and Vinz, numerous times, had arguments and tensions arising between them two. Vinz wished to take a life of an officer to avenge the death of his friend, Abdel. Hubert felt that was a terrible idea and wouldn't make a difference because killing one officer wouldn't have solved the issue. Although Vinz never did get to execute an officer, despite his desires to do so, ultimately an officer executed Vinz accidently. Furthermore, in one riot, a group of men who were close to Abdel shot at cops, infuriated. Where there were guns, there was violence in the movie. Guns and violence were a huge theme in the …show more content…
movie. Another theme in La Haine was racism. There were many instances where racial slurs were being thrown around. For example, when Said and Hubert were being detained by the cops in Paris, they abused them both physically and verbally. The cops were unjust, they had no proof or reason to arrest them. Perhaps because of the way they appeared, one Arabic and the other black, the cops automatically assumed they were up to no good. Said, Hubert, and Vinz also threw racial slurs to the whites in Paris, calling them skinheads and neo-Nazis. The film showed that being black or Arabic degraded the person and lost their respect in the eyes of French society. Discrimination was another major theme in the film.
The three men, Said, Hubert, and Vinz were without a doubt unfairly discriminated and mistreated by the cops. Simply because of where they came from, the police never gave them the full respect everyone is entitled to have. The police did not even know them or have proof they committed a crime or offense, but still beat Said and Hubert up severely. Even when a group of the people from the projects were just on the roof top, not causing trouble, they were forced to get off and disperse. And when they refused, the situation got out of hand and violence was
reinforced. La Haine displayed and exposed the harsh police brutality and the struggles for belonging in the projects within the French society during the 1990s. The police picked on these young people whether they had a valid reason or not. It was injustice, and so the people ultimately rioted. Vinz briefly mentioned his hatred towards “the system” in the movie. The projects was a tough place to live in. Even Hubert mentioned that he wished to “get out” from there. Simply being from the projects automatically made them lose all the respect they had. They weren't seen the same way in the cop’s perspective. The film expressed many themes such as violence, racism, discrimination, and struggles. La Haine was filmed and produced in the 1990s by Mathieu Kassovitz. Kassovitz was inspired to make this film with these themes and concepts when Makome M’Bowole, was shot in 1993. M’Bowole was shot by a cop by accident, just how Vinz was shot in the film. Although the film was scripted, these events and issues were very much authentic and huge issues in the 90s. The film incorporated many scenes that were based on real life events. The unfortunate truth is that in the 1990s police brutality and riots were trending globally, not in just France. Discrimination and violence was not only a progressing issue in France, but even in the U.S. In 1992, Rodney King was savagely beaten by cops in Los Angeles. The impact of this was weeks of civil unrest and riots. It was terrible time and situation in both the U.S and France.
In the novel Eggers created an accurate portrayal of the events of racial profiling and looting; this becomes apparent if one views the documentary by Spike Lee, When the Levees Broke. In the novel, Zeitoun was arrested, racially profiled, and labeled a terrorist and a looter. Dave Eggers tells us that Zeitoun, Todd, Nasser, and Ronnie were arrested at gunpoint and later accused of looting a local Walgreen store and of terrorist activities. They are suspects because Zeitoun and Nasser are Muslims from Syria and Nasser and Todd had large amounts of money in their possession. This confirms the higher authorities’ suspicions of the so-called terrorists looting local shops when in fact they were helping local citizens and animals reach safety.
...les and what they were actually going through was true. I could never imagine a mentality of a police chief being this way. It is an absolute horrific way of policing, and goes against anything to what the current era of community policing stands for. Also, what I don’t understand is how not one police officer took a stand against the police chief, and how this type of policing was never reported and deemed as acceptable behavior. The reason I also chose to include the L.A. riots is because it displays a side of the story many people simply do not discuss. The impression that I received is the rioting is deemed as justifiable. Both incidents are classic examples of how a lack of proper ethics and leadership can lead to such tragic incidents. What is even sadder is in between all this innocent people were affected, such as Rodney King, the businesses, and 53 deaths.
The media takes this news focuses on the protestor’s violence and showcases them as the ones creating a scene. The media then showcases police as the ones that have to deal with the situation by detaining citizens, thus making them look like the good guys. The mayor and chief police also take away from the citizen’s freedom by allocating a 7pm curfew and a 25 block ‘no protest zone’. So if individuals were to not follow the set curfew they can be detained even if they had nothing to do with the protest. Police started attacking citizens even before curfew, which stripped citizens more of their freedom and liberty to protest. Individuals who were leaving their office, and who were not apart of the protest were also taken to prison, even when they followed procedure. This proves that the actions taken were not a part of the due process system where we protect individuals but rather part of the crime control module where we screen out innocent people and get them into the
Geoffrey Canada shares his story about growing up in an inner city neighborhood of the South Bronx in the 1950s and 1960s. Geoffrey Canada is one of four boys who live with his mother after their father left them. Geoffrey Canada talks about the struggles of growing up in the inner city and facing many challenges. As Geoffrey Canada grew up he witnessed a lot of violence which included young children getting their hands on firearms. The prevalence of firearms among children has changed the nature of violence in the United States. Violent acts have transformed from fists, sticks, and knifes to guns. Guns have undermined the street code of honor, the OGs back in the day were ruthless but not killers, this new generation has no developed courage and fighting skills but relied on guns for protection.
One of them was racist and would use his authority to exploit minorities. During a traffic stop, the movie director and his wife were pulled over for allegedly performing felatio on her husband. During this stop, the racist cop thought they were drunk, so they were taken out of the car. During the pat down of the wife, the racist cop sexually assaults his wife reaching his hand up her cocktail dress. The director did not say anything when the officer felt up his wife because he was worried about his social role. Social role is a set of expectations for a certain group or type of person. In this case, he was a director and worried that his social role may be tarnished if he were to argue with this police officer. We saw that later in the scene he and his wife began to argue because of
Alvin was physically and verbally abused by the police officer. When Alvin asked the police officer why they stopped him, police officers replied that they stopped him because he looked suspicious with his hoodie on and they asked him why he was walking outside with his empty bag, Alvin tried to explain that he was wearing hoodie because it was cold outside and he was going at home, but police officer did not listen to Alvin, they physically and verbally harassed Alvin. According to the information it shows that, police officers are using their powers on people, this proves that most of the police officers are violating the law, especially when it comes to the person with no gun and no reason to stop them. Like the story of 48 years old man Dan Richardson, who lives in Brownsville, Brooklyn, he was stopped by police officers, because he walked out rom the store with cop of water and police officers thought that he had Alcohol in his cup, one of the officers sniff the cup to check if it was a real water. This type of stories happens a lot of time; this is another type of prof that police violate the people’s right. Many people said that they are scared of going outside, because police is always up there to stop and frisked them; people became indigent
This incident would have produced nothing more than another report for resisting arrest had a bystander, George Holliday, not videotaped the altercation. Holliday then released the footage to the media. LAPD Officers Lawrence Powell, Stacey Koon, Timothy Wind and Theodore Brisino were indicted and charged with assaulting King. Superior Court Judge Stanley Weisberg ordered a change of venue to suburban Simi Valley, which is a predominantly white suburb of Los Angeles. All officers were subsequently acquitted by a jury comprised of 10 whites, one Hispanic and one Asian, and the African American community responded in a manner far worse than the Watts Riots of 1965. ?While the King beating was tragic, it was just the trigger that released the rage of a community in economic strife and a police department in serious dec...
McMahan, 3) So, McMahan’s main premises come into play, either everyone has guns, including criminals, or nobody has guns. “Gun advocates prefer for both rather than neither to have them” McMahan remarks, but ultimately that will just leave the country open to more violence and tragedies. “As more private individuals acquire guns, the power of the police declines, personal security becomes a matter of self help, and the unarmed have an incentive to get guns.” (McMahan, 2) Now everyone is armed, and everyone has the ability to kill anyone in an instant, making everyone less secure. Just as all the states would be safer if nobody were to possess the nuclear weapons, our country would be safer if guns were banned from private individuals and criminals.
Tom is running full speed, maybe even for his life. It is a perfect summer night in San Jose, and Tom and his work partner just left work minutes before. They were walking through a “bad neighborhood” when some thugs started hassling them, and yelling obscenities at them. Tom and his friend walked by them quickly soon to be chased by the thugs. The thugs were threatening Tom and his friend’s life. Tom and his friend continue to run till the reach a busy intersection where Tom pulls out a semi-automatic handgun from his backpack and points it towards the thugs. As soon as the gun is leveled the thugs retreat leaving the two men alone. If there had been no gun Tom and his friend would have been seriously beaten or even killed. Tom did not have a permit for the gun, and might have not been able to get one without a special reason (Rauch 731). People like Tom need to be able to get gun permits, but it is so difficult because of all the criminal activity in America. Gun control laws are pointless and are only binding on the law-abiding citizens.
One of the first arguments is that in a world without guns, the deciding factor in many violence-related situations is physical ability. Harris claims that the world without guns is “one in which the advantages of youth, size, strength, aggression, and sheer numbers are almost always decisive.” The logic behind this is quite justifiable and calls for serious point in the issue. To support this, he references that police are unable to respond and arrive before anything could happen. Though a major weakness in this argument is that the physically superior being could just as well be the one possessing a firearm. In cases where all present are armed, outcomes would be determined by skill and the type of firearm. Harris addresses this by raising the question of which firearms could plausibly be prohibited. Due to the political influence of the NRA and the laws of concealment and hunting, Harris considers handguns and rifles to be the key issue. His argument is weakened due to making a large claim, handguns are the most frequently used firearms in gun violence cases, yet he does not provide any evidence to back up this statement. On the other hand, his claims that handguns are not in the pool of plausible weapon bans gain more credibility by referencing Supreme Court cases. Instead, he focuses attention on how an armed person could change a situation for the better.
First off most citizens do not have any training on how to carry or shoot a gun. This can result in someone being hurt or killed on accident. Secondly a citizen carrying a gun could result in a murder of another citizen over an argument over something. For example in 2014 a retired police officer shot and killed another man over an argument text messaging in a movie theater. Thirdly this gives criminals access to carry a gun and commit a crime wherever they may go. Fourthly a citizen that can carry a gun wherever will also encourage a criminal to carry a gun to counteract the citizen who with the gun. The Inter –university Consortium for Political and Social Research did a survey and found that 75% of criminals carry a gun because they are afraid that the victim has a gun. Fifthly people who do not believe in carrying a gun will be most vulnerable. Say for example an unarmed citizen is in a bar full of other citizens that are armed. If an argument were to start between them and everyone pulled out their weapons on each other than the unarmed citizen would be most vulnerable. Lastly all citizens have different viewpoints on just about everything. With different viewpoints a citizen who is armed could try to us their gun to solve any problems that person may
Both Kassovitz’s La Haine (1995) and Meirelles’ City of God (2003), utilise distinctive techniques in order to present ideas of power, poverty and conflict, as well as to reflect their urban environments in a particular way. Both directors present conflict between the poor and the powerful through a range of powerful micro and macro techniques to create films which expose the problems related to urban areas, and the context that each was set in, which contributes to getting the messages of their films across and thus has a greater impact on the audience.
After the beginning scenes of the movie, the most important moments for Vinz come when he handles the gun. The police gun that Vinz holds throughout the film is a consistent plot point and touchstone for Vinz’s performative blackface. Whenever Vinz either feels diminished or wants to exude confidence, he finds his power in the force of his weapon. When he first shows the gun to Hubert and Said, Vinz says that he wants to “even up the score” and describes the gun as “special” because it was stolen from the cop in the riot. Yet when Said tells Vinz that with the gun he is now a “big man,” Vinz shows discomfort with holding the weapon. At first he decides to store the gun away in a safe but changes his mind at the last moment and brings it with
The first benefit when guns are restricted to own is reducing homicides. Gun is one of the best killing weapons; it is created to put an end to the life of the target that it aims at. Therefore, it ...
Violence. Just mentioning the word conjures up many images of assault, abuse, and even murder. Violence is a broad subject with many categories. Some types of violence are terrorist violence and domestic violence. Violence can arise from many different sources; these sources whether biological, cultural, and social all can evoke violent behavior. All cultures experience some sort of violence, and this paper considers violence as a cultural phenomenon across a range of various settings. Violence plays a part in both Islamic and Indian cultures according to the articles “Understanding Islam” and “Rising Dowry Deaths” by Kenneth Jost and Amanda Hitchcock, respectively. From an anthropological perspective, violence emphasizes concerns of meaning, representation and symbolism.