Violence in Blood Meridian By Alex-Hendershot | Studymode.com Alex Hendershot ENG 4UI Ms. Taylor November 19, 2013 Literary Connections: Blood Meridian by Cormac McCarthy Violence is often used in literature by antagonists to symbolize evil and darkness, and to represent the brutal force that opposes the characters. However, in the novel Blood Meridian by Cormac McCarthy, this is not the case. Violence in Blood Meridian is not used as a symbol of evil by the antagonist, but is used by all the main characters, including the protagonist, as a way of life. Blood Meridian is a fictional novel that documents the events of a character who is referred to as only “the kid”, as he joins the Glanton gang, a scalp hunting gang who targets Native Americans …show more content…
living around the United States-Mexico border in 1849. This novel is full of ruthless acts of violence in nearly every scene, which are seemingly mindless and unnecessary. Although violence is most commonly considered a voluntary action of man, this novel proves the notion that violence is unavoidable, and that violence is the inherent trait of man which will result in the downfall of the human race. Cormac McCarthy uses the three epigraphs in the novel to support this premise, and uses them to demonstrate how individuals will progress from committing violent acts for the sake of violence, to committing violent actions to further themselves in life, which then leads to the downfall of the characters. Through the first epigraph, the novel introduces the notion that violence is unavoidable, and that violence is the inherent trait of man which will result in the downfall of the human race. The first epigraph is an excerpt from an essay written by philosopher Paul Valéry, titled “The Yalu”. “The Yalu” is an essay that covers the events of a war between the Japanese and Chinese in 1895, where the Chinese were fighting against what they saw as the worship of technology, science, and individualism, all ideas that the Chinese were against. Paul Valéry writes from the view of the Chinese, addressing how the Japanese worship of intelligence is ill advised. He writes, “Your ideas are terrifying and your hearts are faint. Your acts of pity and cruelty are absurd, committed with no calm, as if they were irresistible. Finally, you fear blood more and more. Blood and time” (Valéry 373). McCarthy selects this quotation to be part of the epigraph because it is an  example of a battle between men for the sheer sake of violence, an idea that will be seen in the beginning of the novel. “The Yalu” is the river in which the Japanese and Chinese battled, and the Chinese were victorious. Though the Chinese won the battle, it is widely agreed upon that there was no true victor, and that this battle was a situation where both parties participated for the sake of violence, because both armies were so wounded that they could not continue. This is very significant because it shows how men will commit violent acts for the sake of violence, an idea that McCarthy uses within the novel to develop the theme. The first instance occurs in the bar at Bexar. The Kid gets in an argument with the bartender about working to pay for a beer, rather than using cash. The Kid, when confronted with a conflict, does not hesitate to use drastic violence. The kid simply “broke the right one [bottle] over the man’s head...and he backhanded the second bottle across the barman’s skull and crammed the jagged remnant into his eye” (McCarthy 25). The Kid, the protagonist of Blood Meridian begins the novel with actions of violence that are unprovoked and unnecessary. The idea that the kid will participate in violence for the sake of violence falls in line with the idea of the first epigraph, and are both used to support the theme that the inherent violence in man will result in the downfall of the human race. Furthermore, the second epigraph of Blood Meridian suggests that man is evolving into a creature that commits violent actions to further themselves in life, a second step towards the trait of violence leading to their downfall.
The second epigraph is a quotation from Jacob Boehme, a German philosopher whose main subject of concern was the nature of evil and sin within man. Boehme wrote about darkness and evil and its relationship to sorrow, in his paper Six Theosophical Points. He says, “It is not thought that the life of darkness is sunk in misery and lost as if in sorrowing. There is no sorrowing. For sorrow is a thing that is swallowed up in death, and death and dying are the very life of the darkness” (Boehme 60). McCarthy selects this quotation for the second epigraph because it is a representation of men feeling desire to commit violent acts. This idea is not directly stated in the chosen quotation, but in the culmination of Boehme’s paper. “..to Böhme, in order to reach God, man has to go through hell first” (Ingen 518), says F. von Ingen, an accredited German author at the time. Boehme believed that salvation through God required suffering, and the endurance of evil such as violence. Boehme lived in the 17th century, a period where creationism was the dominant belief, and when stated that salvation could only occur through suffering it gave man a reason to enforce suffering upon one another. Violence was a desirable act because it was believed to bring salvation, an …show more content…
idea that was crucial to men in the 17th century. Men would be willing to do whatever it takes to further themselves, and in this case they would take violent measures. The idea is used by McCarthy as the characters progress throughout the novel. In particular, the character of Judge Holden has a horrifying desire to commit violent actions. Judge Holden’s life revolves around war, competition and the violence that he enforces upon those who compete with him. The Judge believes that war creates unity in life, and that humans need to go to war to create that unity. He provides insight into his beliefs, stating that, “war endures. ... War is the ultimate game because war is at last a forcing of the unity of existence. War is god” (McCarthy 259). This statement shows how the Judge’s beliefs that the violence produced by war will create unity, are analogous to Boehme’s belief that the suffering of man will result in their salvation. Judge Holden saying that “War endures” (McCarthy 259), is similar to the saying in Christianity ‘God endures’, which draws parallels between the ideas the Judge Holden expresses in Blood Meridian and the ideas that Christians, such as Jacob Boehme, express. Blood Meridian uses an appropriately selected second epigraph to present the case that humans have a desire for violence, a second step toward the downfall of man via their inherent violent nature. Lastly, the third and final epigraph communicates a direct correlation between the downfall of man and their inherent violent nature.
The last epigraph is a newspaper clipping from the Yuma Sun in 1982, claiming that archaeologists had found evidence suggesting that a precursor to modern day humans had participated in scalping. The article reads, “Clark, who led last year’s expedition to the Afar region of northern Ethiopia, and UC Berkeley colleague Tim D. White, also said that a re-examination of a 300,000-year-old fossil skull found in the same region earlier shows evidence of having been scalped” (1982, pg. 4). McCarthy selects this as the final epigraph because it foreshadows the fate of the scalpers within the novel, and because it reveals the violent nature of man leading to the downfall of a species of human in the real world. This quotation suggests that violence has been embedded in human culture dating back to humanoids that existed 300,000 years ago, and that these cultures will inevitably self destruct.. Blood Meridian conveys the same concept as the epigraph by through the death of nearly every character in the novel, specifically the protagonist, the Kid. Nearing the end of the story, the Kid has his final encounter with the Judge, an encounter that shortly results in his elimination from the novel. When the Kid goes to the jakes, or the outhouse, he finds the Judge waiting for him. The Judge “gathered [the Kid] in his arms against his immense and terrible
flesh” (McCarthy 333). The reader knows that when a stranger opens the door a few minutes later, his reaction is to say “Good God almighty” (McCarthy 333). The reader also knows that the Judge emerges from the jakes but the Kid is not mentioned again in the novel, and that the Judge then enters the saloon dancing, and says that he will never die. The presumption is that the Kid has been murdered and sexually assaulted, due to the Judges previous inclinations towards the sexual assault of children, and his brutal assaults on Indian people. The downfall of the Kid, who has been shown to have a violent nature in the beginning of the novel, illustrates the downfall of a human race that is engulfed in violence, and the foreshadowing of the third epigraph coming true (extinction of the scalpers). Both the final epigraph and the downfall of the Kid work cohesively to prove that the inherent violence of man will lead to the downfall of the human race. In conclusion, violence in Blood Meridian is not merely a symbol of evil or darkness, but a way of life. McCarthy uses the three epigraphs, as well as those ideas translated into the plot of the novel, to show the process in which violence will lead to the downfall of civilization. Characters will commit violent acts for the sake of violence, will commit actions to further themselves in their lives, and will eventually reach their undeniable demise. Violence can been seen everyday. Anywhere in the world, at any given moment, violence will be taking place. Although violence is considered to be relevant to those who chose to participate in it, Blood Meridian proves the notion that violence is unavoidable, and that violence is the inherent trait of man which will result in the downfall of the human race.
Cormac McCarthy's setting in Blood Meridian is a landscape of endless and diverse beauty. McCarthy highlights the surprising beauty of combinations of scrubby plants, jagged rock, and the fused auburn and crimson colors of the fiery wasteland that frame this nightmarish novel. Various descriptions, from the desolate to the scenic, feature McCarthy's highly wrought, lyrical prose. Such descriptions of the divine landscape seem to serve a dual function. While being an isolated highlight to this gruesome novel, McCarthy's beautiful setting also serves as an intricate device in defining the novel's themes and creating the reality in which it is set.
In Cold Blood is a true account of a multiple murder case that took place in Holcomb, Kansas in 1959, written by Truman Capote. Capote’s attention to detail causes the reader to gain an extreme interest in the Clutter family even though they were an ordinary family. The suspense that is a result of minimal facts and descriptive settings was an elaborate stylistic technique that gave effective results throughout the book. His ability to make this account of a horrid crime more than just a newspaper description was a great success as a base of his many literary devices, not just is great focus to small details.
Moving forward into chapter seventeen of Cormac McCarthy’s “Blood Meridian”, Glanton’s crew rode on as the Apaches they drank with held back, as they refused to ride through the night. The next night Glanton’s men made a fire and discussed what’s happened in their group, the members who’d been killed. Then brought up there possibly being life on other planets. The Judge immediately disagreed though and did a trick, as if that was being the proof to his point or something.
In Cold Blood is the true story of a multiple murder that rocked the small town of Holcomb, Kansas and neighboring communities in 1959. It begins by introducing the reader to an ideal, all-American family, the Clutters; Herb (the father), Bonnie (the mother), Nancy (the teenage daughter), and Kenyon (the teenage son). The Clutters were prominent members of their community who gained admiration and respect for their neighborly demeanors.
Truman Capote establishes respect and trust in what he writes from with audience, ethos, through the use of an extensive variety of facts and statistics, logos. Capote uses so many dates, times, and other facts about the crime committed in the book and the subsequent investigation that the reader has to believe what the author is writing. The use of all these facts shows that Capote did his research and he interviewed, questioned, and obtained the opinions of every person that even slightly important to crime itself and the investigation/trial. The author is obviously very meticulous when it comes to dates and times; every important event in the book has a date and sometimes even a time of day to go with it. Some examples of dates included were the day of the murders (November 15th, 1959), dates of when Perry and Dick were here or there (December 31th, 1959- a small restaurant in Texas or noon on December 25th, 1959- beach in Miami Florida), date when the two criminals were apprehended (January 1st, 1960), dates when they were brought from this prison to that one and finally when they were brought to death’s row (April, 1960). Other small facts are also used by the author, like facts about the criminal’s early lives or experiences that they had, which could only have been obtained through extensive interviews with Perry and Dick. The use of all these logos by Capote establishes strong ethos, showing the reader that the author did more than enough research to show that he has the knowledge to write a whole book on the subject.
Psychology attempts to provide insight on our lack of self-belief; however, the studies are mostly to no prevail. Subjectively, I believe our subconscious represents a more complex function than what is often portrayed. After all, it acts as a defense mechanism that has been pre-built into our neural network. As such, the capabilities of such a feature are near endless, though difficult to comprehend. To better understand our subconscious, we often simplify it through symbols - most commonly, heaven and hell. Studied throughout the text, symbolism of such representation is easy to interpret as it is presented through distinct quotes from the primary speaker - such as: “I heard sounds from Heaven and I heard sounds from Hell.” Incidentally, the quote also marks a set crossroads on the protagonist's journey of choice as he chooses which side to listen too - guilty or innocent. As expected, his later continuation in the text to commit heinous acts such as assault and murder, solidify his standings with the rebellious side of his conscious - as well as supporting the continuation of heightening the challenge presented by lack of self-trust. In support of this, renowned academic leader Douglas Horton is quoted speaking: “Conscience is the window to our spirit, evil is the curtain”. However, in select cases, the
Cormac McCarthy’s “Blood Meridian” does a marvelous job of highlighting the violent nature of mankind. The underlying cause of this violent nature can be analyzed from three perspectives, the first being where the occurrence of violence takes place, the second man’s need to be led and the way their leader leads them, and lastly whether violence is truly an innate and inherent characteristic in man.
Cormac McCarthy's novel Blood Meridian details what can only be described as the kid's journey through hell. Throughout the novel McCarthy gives the reader the sensation of being in hell. The is brutal and unforgiving physical setting adds a hellish atmosphere in which there is no evidence of any morals or sympathy for the innocent. Judge Holden is even described in terms reminiscent of the devil. All of these factors lead the reader to compare the kid's journey through the Mexican-American border country with a descent into hell.
In Cold Blood is a novel written by Truman Capote in 1966. In Cold Blood is a true account of a multiple murder case that took place in Kansas in the 1950's. The book outlines a brutal murder case, but it shows the story from many perspectives, not just that of the law. Capote introduces you to the Clutter family, a well known, very hard working and loyal family to the community. The town of Holcomb is a small farming town. There is not much excitement in the town, and that is the way the people liked it. Everyone went to church and the community trusted each other, until the unthinkable happened. The town's most prominent family was killed. It is even worse when the only clues are two sets of boot tracks. Everyone in and around the town become scared because if such evil could be brought upon the best family known, what will happen to them? When Truman Capote wrote In Cold Blood, he wrote a masterpiece. When he wrote the book he developed the character Perry so that even after you watched him kill you feel sympathetic for him. He proves that you can even see some good in the worst of people. He does this by slowly developing Perry's character. He gave an in-depth view of Perry's world. He showed that Perry, although he had troubles in his life and sometimes had a total disregard for people's life he also respected the people. Perry felt bad for some of the people he met. He also was willing to forgive people.
The Stranger written by Albert Camus is an absurdist novel revolving around the protagonist, Meursault. A major motif in the novel is violence. There are various places where violence takes place and they lead to the major violent act, which relates directly to the theme of the book. The major violent act of killing an Arab committed by Meursault leads to the complete metamorphosis of his character and he realizes the absurdity of life.
Truman Capote’s non-fiction novel, In Cold Blood, was a breakthrough in literacy in that it was accredited as the first non-fiction novel. There was a lot of controversy when the book was first published because of the incredibility of the work. This could be expected in that time, because people where not familiar with the concept of non-fiction novels yet, but this is where the beauty of this style of writing lies, the recreation of the truth. It would have been impossible for Capote to have documented the occurrence fully, because he only read about the murder after it had happen, after all, this was not what he wanted to do. Capote got a lot of criticism for the book, because of him bending the truth, putting in scenes that never happened and his ways of gathering information, but people still saw the talent that went into creating the non-fiction novel. Truman Capote will forever be recognized for this novel and the contribution he made to literacy. In this essay we will be discussing the strengths and weaknesses of In Cold Blood when it delivers facts and the credibility of the work. We will also be discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the novel when Capote bends reality and ad some parts of fiction.
The exploration of the west was no walk in the park. There were some bloody and gruesome battles that took place. In Cormac McCarthy’s novel, Blood Meridian, he demonstrates how bloody and gruesome the expansion to the west really was. The author uses the literary theory of Deconstruction to show the reader how dark this era really was. McCarthy demonstrates this by using vivid detail during the fights and battles, while staying historically accurate, with the constant presence between good and evil throughout the novel.
"'Lo! There ye stand, my children,' said the figure, in a deep and solemn tone, almost sad, with its despairing awfulness, as if his once angelis nature could yet mourn for our miserable race. "Depending on one another's hearts, ye had still hoped, that virtue were not all a dream. Now ye are undeceived! Evil is the nature of mankind. Evil must be your only happiness. Welcome, again, my children, to the communion of your race!'"
Bloodchild is one of the best science fiction stories in history. The novel was written by an American writer, Octavia Butler. This book was first published in 1984 and edited in 2005 where two stories; Amnesty and Book of Martha were added. Blood child has been a famous novel and it has won several awards such as Science Fiction Award in 1984 (Butler, 1984). The novel Bloodchild generally describes the unusual bond between a human being who has escaped from the earth and invaded the planet of insect-like alien species called the Tilac. This paper thus aims to explore how the information from the novel, "Bloodchild" is related to the real-life situation by looking and analyzing different themes.
This line is spoken by a character played by Steven Segal in the movie Hard to Kill, a movie remarkably similar to every other motion picture Segal has ever touched, and depressingly reflective of a larger cultural trend. In Segal’s movies, characters with names like “Orin Boyd” and “Nico Toscani” boast body counts and a shared insatiable thirst for vengeance. Death becomes a prop employed to dispatch central characters, and a cycle of one-upmanship ensues – we saw Segal rip someone’s throat out in Under Siege, so the next movie has to be more ridiculous in its sheer level of violence to be marketable. In 1999, it came as no real shock to viewers when Segal’s character stabbed a Nazi sympathizer in the neck with a broken wine glass. The reality is that technology gives us the means to transmit images and messages of unparalleled intensity, and as we do that, reality is recursively recreated. As artists and media moguls say less, they attempt to compensate through force, resulting in a constant barrage of deafening sound that amounts to nothing more than noise or visuals so gaudy and exaggerated that the thin shreds of meaning behind them are utterly lost. In this context, death is watered down until it becomes comfortably palpable. Theatres full of families cheer when the hero shoots the bad guy in an action movie, but it never crosses a single mind that a murder has taken place. Viewers wear expressions of smug satisfaction when a crooked lawyer is double-crossed, but the underlying web of lies fazes nobody. In this context, authors have to shout over the noise to communicate the true evils that float between humans. There is no longer ...