Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion about battered women syndrome
Essays on battered woman syndrome
Conclusion about battered women syndrome
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conclusion about battered women syndrome
Victim-precipitated homicide theory is the focus on how the victim contributes to their own death by provocation. In 26% of homicide cases, the victim is the direct, positive precipitator in the crime (Wolfgang, 1957) . Some potential victims cause their own death when they engaged in situations that cause them to be victimize. In all victim precipitated homicides, the victim either initiated the confrontation or continue the confrontation. There are many actions that these victims can do to cause their own death. It could be as minor as throwing insults and giving dirty looks or can be as major as assault (i.e. brawl). Whatever is the case, victims’ situations are self-generated and can be prevented if these potential victims can improve on their interpersonal skills. For example, there are two type of situations that are connected to victim precipitated homicide. The first situation is the situational rage where the victim engaged with the offender due to an …show more content…
unpleasant encounter. During the confrontation, the victim says or act in a threating or negative manner which causes the offender to act out. A perfect example would be road rage. Initially, the victim would perform an illegal traffic move with the offender responding to the act either by blowing the car’s horn or hand gesture. Instead of doing what normal people would do and ignore the offender’s insult, the victim continues to act inappropriate towards the offender until the offender decides to pull out a gun and shoot at the victim. Another situation is called accumulated rage.
It is when the offender accumulates rage overtime due to the potential victim’s taunts. Eventually, the offender will get to a point of uncontrollable rage and attack the victim. The perfect example for accumulated rage is the battered wife syndrome. As it is more of a legal term than a proven medical disorder (Cornell University Law School, n.d.), it is when a battered wife kills her husband due to years of abuse. A marriage works when there are open communication, trust and support. If a spouse is having problems in their life, they are supposed to lean on their partner for support. In the aboved example, the husband fails to not only uphold is vows but fails to communicate his problem in a healthy way. Instead, he takes out his frustration on his wife, lowering her self-esteem and worth. With the continuous abuse by the husband, the wife will eventually accumulate rage towards her husband until the day she acts upon them resulting in the husband’s
death.
The differences between a victim and a creator is the level of responsibility. A victim prefers to blame other because they don’t want to take responsibility for the mistakes that they made. An example of a victim uses defender strategies. For example, when you are failing a class, and you just give up and stop trying and instead of working harder you blame the teacher or other people, and then you start saying things like “ that teacher sucks at teaching”, and you just start saying negative thing of other people and sometimes yourself, sometimes you even critisize yourself and thats the inner critic mindset. On the other hand a creator has a much more clearer mindset and is not sucked into the victim category so easily. An example of a
The Murderers Are Among Us, directed by Wolfe Gang Staudte, is the first postwar film. The film takes place in Berlin right after the war. Susan Wallner, a young women who has returned from a concentration camp, goes to her old apartment to find Hans Mertens living there. Hans took up there after returning home from war and finding out his house was destroyed. Hans would not leave, even after Susan returned home. Later on in the film we find out Hans was a former surgeon but can no longer deal with human suffering because of his traumatic experience in war. We find out about this traumatic experience when Ferdinand Bruckner comes into the film. Bruckner, Hans’ former captain, was responsible for killing hundreds
Imagine yourself going out to a neighborhood party trying to relax after a stressful week. You might want to socialize, drink, or watch television. Now try to think about the penalties that can occur when the party gets out of control such as loud outbursts, fighting, and physical behavior. Depending on the setting of the party, there could be a possible chance of violence happening. In this case, the violent actions can result to homicides, shootings, and suicides. Homicides can vary based on age, gender, race, and methods of killing the victim. Shootings are quick reactions to dealing with victim. Suicides result to choosing to kill one’s life. Overall, there are different reasons to why individuals feel the need to kill someone else. It
The sentencing of underage criminals has remained a logistical and moral issue in the world for a very long time. The issue is brought to our perspective in the documentary Making a Murderer and the audio podcast Serial. When trying to overcome this issue, we ask ourselves, “When should juveniles receive life sentences?” or “Should young inmates be housed with adults?” or “Was the Supreme Court right to make it illegal to sentence a minor to death?”. There are multiple answers to these questions, and it’s necessary to either take a moral or logical approach to the problem.
Generally, the study of crime mainly focused on the offender until quite recently. In fact, Shapland et al (1985) described the victim as ‘the forgotten man’ of the criminal justice system and ‘the non-person in the eyes of the professional participants’. A new perspective was brought with victimology, an expanding sub-discipline of crimin...
When the victim does not fit the ideal victim attributes which society has familiarised themselves with, it can cause complications and confusion. Experts have noticed there is already a significant presence of victim blaming, especially for cases involving both genders. The fear of being blamed and rejected by the public is prominent in all victims. Victim blaming proclaims the victim also played a role in the crime by allowing the crime to occur through their actions (Kilmartin and Allison, 2017, p.21). Agarin (2014, p.173) underlines the problem of victim blaming is due to the mass of social problems and misconceptions within society. The offender can have “an edge in court of public opinion” if victim blaming exists, resulting in the prevention of the case accomplishing an effective deduction in court (Humphries, 2009, p.27). Thus, victims will become more reluctant to report offences because of their decrease in trust in the police and criminal justice system, leading to the dark figure of
Victimology is a scientific research and study with insights on the issues and patterns of victimization. These issues lead to inquiries regarding relationships of the parties, the vulnerabilities of the victim, and the attacker’s affect upon the victim and the other individuals that surrounded said victim. Understanding the relationships, the victim, the attacker, and the crime open up theories to patterns developed from such victimization. Moving through this process in preparing, equipping, and training for said crimes enhances
The relationship between social harm and criminology has been discussed all around the world within different approaches. Some criminologists such as Hillyard and Tombs, believe to be a better alternative to the concept of crime, due to the fact that involves a lack of more harmful issues that go unpunished in our society, others disagree saying that, actions can only be penalized within communities if they are seen as a crime. However, crime is looked at differently within societies, social groups, and nation states, as a result of distinct cultures and beliefs.
As I mention above the four key features of the typical homicides is that the criminals do not plan their crime but here is contradictory, some homicides are plan like serial killers. Serial killers plan their crime, it might not be all the way through but to an extend they plan their crime. Serial killers follow the three steps on how they kill. First, they interpret the scene and the behavior of the target in a specific way. Second, they transform their emotions into an action and third, the killer needs to uphold his or her behavior (Katz, 1988). No matter how they plan their crime, every crime or every kill has a background or a history to it. Whatever the circumstance may be, there is always an emotion that is presented through the whole process of the killer. For example the serial killer, Dr. Harold Shipman, one of the worst serial killers of United Kingdom. He was the suspect of 250 victims over the period of his 28 years doctor career. He would inject his patients with diamorphine (also known as heroin, it would made the patient feel high, relax and they would not know what ...
Victims of crime will deal with a wide range of immediate, short-term and long-term reactions. All victims will experience shock, distress, numbness and disconnection. It can affect their emotional, psychological, physical, social, financial and spiritual wellbeing, causing people to change their behaviour and lifestyles. Victims who have suffered violent crimes and threats to their lives and personal injury will have a different reaction and have a harder time coping with their feelings than those who are victims of nonviolent
...lity that the victim may actually be partly to blame for the crime that was committed against them. Therefore it is often the environment that the criminal lives in, and the people that around them that influence them into committing a criminal act.
The world will always be full of crime, thus it is necessary for scientist to grow along with the gruesome and increasing amount of violations. Due to this it sparked scientist to develop crime theories in which emerged to explain why crime is caused by individuals. Some of the few theories that have advanced over the past century and provided many answers to why crimes are committed are biological theories, psychological theories and learning theories. These theories provide an insight to its first use and change in order to provide answers.
We are all affected by crime, whether we are a direct victim, a family member or a friend of a victim. It can interfere with your daily life, your personal sense of safety and your ability to trust others.
Victim precipitation is separated into two different categories: victim facilitation and victim provocation. Victim facilitation being instances where the victim "facilitated" the crime by creating the opportunity, such as: walking around late at night in dangerous areas, going to the ATM and withdrawing large amounts of money at unsafe times or places, getting intoxicated and diminishing one's own capacity to protect themselves. In all these cases someone is more easily a target or a victim because of a situation they put themselves in making it easier to be taken advantage of. Victim provocation is an even more active role in potential victimization. Provocation is when the victim overtly entices or antagonizes their perpetrator. This could again go along with intoxication when someone is provoking or pushing the buttons of someone else to the point that they provoke violence from the second party.
Michael Sanders, a Professor at Harvard University, gave a lecture titled “Justice: What’s The Right Thing To Do? The Moral Side of Murder” to nearly a thousand student’s in attendance. The lecture touched on two contrasting philosophies of morality. The first philosophy of morality discussed in the lecture is called Consequentialism. This is the view that "the consequences of one 's conduct are the ultimate basis for any judgment about the rightness or wrongness of that conduct.” (Consequentialism) This type of moral thinking became known as utilitarianism and was formulated by Jeremy Bentham who basically argues that the most moral thing to do is to bring the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest number of people possible.