Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Human Rights essays the universal declaration of human rights
Human Rights essays the universal declaration of human rights
Discrimination in the usa
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
All individuals are born with certain rights that are guaranteed to us a citizen of the United States and as human beings. These rights include the fact that “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights” (“Universal Declaration”). In the United States we are also guaranteed the rights to not be discriminated against due to race, gender, age, sex, and sexual orientation, however, discrimination is all too common. Discriminatory laws and practices occur all over the United States daily and affect many minority groups. In recent months, North Carolina Passed a new law, House Bill 2 or BH2, that requires individuals to use the bathroom of their biological sex, or what sex they were born. House Bill 2 violates the rights of thousands …show more content…
Rawls’s Theory of Justice is a way to determine is a certain problem or aspect of society is fair or just. An important part of the Theory of Justice is the Original Position. The Original Position is hypothetical and non-historical, meaning that it has never happened and that it can never happen. This position allows for all biases to be removed. A very important part of the Original Position is the Veil of Ignorance. The Veil of Ignorance keeps the deciders from knowing what types of categories regulate society. In the case of HB2 the deciders would not know that race, gender, sex, or sexual orientation regulate society. This allows the deciders to make a decision that is impartial because they do not know how society is structured, which keeps them from giving one group an advantage. The Veil of Ignorance forces the deciders to think like they would be the minority. In this case, the deciders would have to make their decision about BH2 being fair or just from the point of view of the transgender population. Making the decision from this point of view guarantees that the minorities will not be treated unjustly. Rawls’s makes this a condition of the Veil of Ignorance because the deciders will not know what part of society they would be a part of. The Original Position and Veil of Ignorance are one condition to determining if an aspect of society is fair. Rawls’s also uses the …show more content…
The American Civil Liberties Union, or the ACLU, was founded in January of 1920 with the goal of protecting and preserving the rights and liberties guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States to every individual in the US. The ACLU deals with all types of social injustices, including voting rights, human rights, racial justice, and many more. The ACLU is a national organization that has local offices located in every state as well as Washington DC and Puerto Rico (“America Civil…”). Each local office is staffed with lawyers and other individuals who are willing to help individuals fight to end social injustices in a national or personal scale. The fight to end HB2 was started by the North Carolina office, however, this case will affect all transgender individuals in the United States when the Judicial system rules. The ACLU offers service to all individuals, no matter race, gender, national origin, or legal status. This means that the ACLU does not have any typical clients because they embrace all types of people. THE ACLU helped defeat a bill that was similar to HB2 in Florida. To defeat this bill, the ACLU put a petition on its website with the hope of gaining 75,000 signatures. To date, the petition has not meet the goal, however they have received 60,988 signature and at 60,000 signatures the bill was not passed (“Using the Restroom…”). The ACLU has
In the article N.C. Gov. Already Enforcing HB 2 with Trespassing Laws by Trudy Ring states that the governor of North Carolina says he will use trespassing laws to enforce the restroom provisions of House Bill 2, while officials of the state university says they won’t enforce the controversial law at all. "We 're using trespassing laws that we were using before House Bill 2, we 're using that now," he told reporters, according to a video. It also talks about a transgender case in Virginia regarding a boy who transgendered himself from female to male and was denied access to the school boys’ bathroom. This essay traces how governor of North Carolina, McCrory uses power, discrimination, and transphobia to deny transgender people the right to use the restroom based on their gender identity.
ALCU of Ohio. “LGBT Rights on the Docket.” ACLU of Ohio, 25 Sept. 2015, www.acluohio.org/archives/cases/obergefell-v-hodges
They pass many laws about employment and abortion along with others. In 1971, during the Phillips v. Martin Marietta case, “the Supreme Court rules that an employer violates Title VII when it refuses to hire women with young children while hiring men who are similarly situated.” (https://www.aclu.org/files/). This prevents discrimination while hiring. In 1973, during the Roe v. Wade case, the Supreme Court rules that a woman 's right to abortion is part of the constitutional right to privacy.“ (http://civilrights.findlaw.com/civil-rights-overview/). This gives the women the reproductive rights they wanted. The cases that the African American’s won were also important. In 1896 Plessy vs. Ferguson case, the Supreme Court made a decision which “allowed the use of ‘separate but equal’ racially segregated accommodations and facilities.” (http://civilrights.findlaw.com/civil-rights-overview/). This prevented segregation on buses and other facilities. Another important case was the 1954 Brown v Board of Education, in which “the Court prohibited racial segregation of public schools.” (http://civilrights.findlaw.com/civil-rights-overview/). These landmark cases impacted and advanced the movement by granting the oppressed one more right. The Supreme Court gave the women and African Americans different rights, but
As a country it is important that we understand and value the importance of civil rights. The following cases demonstrate the importance of rights and liberties. In Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), the Supreme Court ruled on the inherent right to privacy. The Supreme Court ruled that the state could not ban the use of contraceptives. They determined that this was a violation of martial privacy. The state was attempting to fine and/or arrest people that were using any type of medicine or instrument to prevent pregnancy. This case was followed by Roe v. Wade (1973), where the Supreme Court not only gave women the right to privacy but also the right to have an abortion. In Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002), the Supreme Court gave parents in Ohio the right to use vouchers in order for their children to attend religious or private schools. While these cases protect liberties, the cases involving civil rights are far more reaching. In Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Supreme Court prohibited racial segregation of public schools. In Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson (1986), the Supreme Court ruled that a “hostile environment” related to sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination. The impact of protecting our civil rights ensures a more inclusive American
When a transgender person uses the bathroom that corresponds to their gender identity, it boosts well-being. It is legal to for transgender individuals to use whichever bathroom they feel to be is more beneficial. Many schools and states are trying to appeal this law. When the South Dakota House of Representatives were faced with the option to veto this law they chose to keep the law in place (“South Dakota House”). New York has also reinforced transgender individual’s right to choosing a bathroom (“New York mayor”).
Diversity is where there are many different kinds of people living in a community together. This means that in a set environment there will be black, Asian, gay, straight, differently abled people living together in a community. Discriminatory prejustice must be able to be recognised by the carer, for example, if a woman is being discriminated against in a care home, or treated differently in a hospital setting, the carer must be able to recognise that this behaviour is happening, and inform a higher power, or go through the complaints procedu... ... middle of paper ... ... es.
“We simply cannot say we live in a country that offers equal justice to all Americans when racial disparities plague the system by which our society imposes the ultimate punishment,” stated Senator Russ Feingold.
Early April 2016, North Carolina passed a law restricting governments from passing laws that are discriminatory. This law is intended to protect Transgender people from discrimination. Discrimination against Transgenders is against the law, and it has stirred up arguments throughout the nation. With more and more people standing up against discrimination regarding Transgenders, the debate about Transgenders is now nationwide. Unfortunately, Transgenders still continue to face public discrimination due to misinformation and misleading statements from the media.
basic civil rights protections for GLBT people.” (Currah, Minter p.9) Many of the LGBT population feel like their personal freedoms and liberties have been violated as lawmakers in some states and countries infringe on their personal rights. Passings of legislature that marginalizes the LGBT population is not only unjust and inhumane but it causes sociological and societal implications that question that persons beliefs about themselves leading to the dangerous climate facing the group from within themselves and the population around
Humans have established their own rights in society for many, many years now. However, because some humans differ from the norms that are built in society, they are shunned and denied their rights until they conform to society’s norms. There have been numerous groups of people who have been denied their rights in America. African Americans, immigrants, Native Americans, and gays have been isolated simply because that is the way they were born into this world and others do not find them “normal”. There is another group that has also been mistreated though: people who identify themselves as transgender.
By only giving the choice of using a Men’s or a Women’s bathroom it has further enforced the gender binary: “In the moment that one must choose between two doors—one marked “men” and one marked “women”—the binary construction of gender is never more blatantly enforced” (Herman, 2012, p.25). When someone is presented with only two choices of restrooms, it is enforcing the ideals that those are the only two options a person can be. Also these gender binaries are shaming anyone who does not fit into them. These gender binaries are so normalized and engrained in society that they lead to inadequate bathroom access for transgender people throughout the United States. The trans people are the ones who do not fit society’s gender norms and they are being isolated, because of
...e veil of ignorance is an important feature of the original position. The veil of ignorance eliminates arbitrary advantages by setting up a fair initial contract situation. Without the veil of ignorance, there would be little chance of an outcome that is unbiased and based on equality of all. If societies were to be constructed without the veil of ignorance or the original position, everyone in the society would be motivated by fear of power and threat. These individuals would be living in a society that is unjust and unfair because most people would be looking to further their own individual goals at the expense of others. Therefore, living with the veil and the original position is better than living without it because people will be all given an equal opportunity in life, be treated fairly and live in a society that encourages cooperation and prevents conflict.
Furthermore, as there are only male and female identities on the ID cards, and there are only male and female’s washrooms, many transgender people have faced serious insults and discriminations in the public. These serious insults happen almost every day in their life and it has caused severe mental stress on them, which would lead them to have emotional disorders and depressions. They are facing unequally in the public utilities and services. The transgender community should have the right to use the restroom of the gender they identify with or have an alternate choice. Transgender people deserve the right to have access to a comfortable, safe place to go to the restroom just as any other human being. Yes, it could potentially be a dangerous liability, but remember the feelings of the people who live in the wrong body. A safe way for the trans community to use the restroom would be to give the option of a gender neutral facility. The problems that the transgender people are facing are not just some emotional harmfulness; it is some problems and inequalities that would seriously endanger their lives, like health cares and life-threatening behaviors which are caused by the ongoing
North Carolina’s discriminatory HB2 law is extremely disappointing, and it takes away some of the LGBT community’s most basic rights and protections” (Smith). I completely agree with Jonas, Lovato and Springsteen. This law needs to be abolished very soon. There should be a law implementing gender neutral bathrooms everywhere, so transgender people can feel comfortable and safe, no matter where they are. Transgender people should have the right to go to work, not feel discriminated against, and be able to use the bathroom safely.
Florida’s, Texas’s and Kentucky’s new proposed bathroom laws have “caused fear and dismay among transgender people around the country” (Tannehill). Kentucky laws are more focused on the school systems but Florida 's and Texas’s laws treat transgenders as if they were criminals. Both of these states have regulations that will give transgenders civil and or criminal charges for using the bathroom they identify with (Tannehill). A transgender could be charged a fine for using the wrong bathroom and “people who report a transgender people in the bathroom to claim civil damages, for example a bounty” (Tannehill). Florida and Texas are trying to look out for the best interest of the majority population, however, “we all have to use the bathroom, but these laws would seemingly force transgender people to choose between fines and jail, risking horrific violence or leaving the state” (Tannehill). These laws have been seen as unreasonable to the transgender community and have been fought by the ACLU lawyer Joshua Block, “We’re talking about people who also have their sense of privacy and modesty, and who are not going to want to have everyone see an anatomical part of themselves that they feel should never have been there in the first place,” (Marcus). It has also been found that it’s illegal for employers to carry out such rules, “The Equal Employment