Valley Of The Dolls Analysis

536 Words2 Pages

The 1967 movie Valley of the Dolls connects to Susan Sontag’s definition of camp in her essay “Notes on ‘Camp.’” Its characters act seriously in the film, the world inside is an entertaining comic that fosters laughter, and everything is seen in quotation marks. Sontag notes in her essay that “Camp is art that proposes itself seriously, but cannot be taken altogether seriously because it is ‘too much.’” It really means that the actors in the film are oblivious to anything humorous or silly happening. They are serious. This happens in Valley of the Dolls at its ending, when Neely O’Hara screams to the top of her lungs in an alleyway next to a dumpster. It’s funny to the audience but real and serious to the character. That’s what makes something campy: the foolishness of a character without her even noticing. …show more content…

But not a bitter or polemical comedy,” as Sontag says. Meaning camp is a cartoon, not meant for controversy; rather for humor that’s enjoyable to watch. Valley of the Dolls presents this when Neely unknowingly discovers that Helen Lawson is wearing a wig. With the wing in her hands, Neely flushes it down the toilet, calling it a “pussy cat” and “meowing” as well. This situation is comical because it shows Neely’s insanity and power. But, realistically, we wouldn’t flush a wig down the toilet. That would be childish and unusual. These situations are comical in campy films like Valley of the

Open Document