Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benjamin franklin book on freedom and security
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Benjamin franklin book on freedom and security
Ben Franklin himself said, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
There are two subjects essential to this warning, the oppressive overbearing authority and the people who are willing to sacrifice their liberty for security.
There are for possible outcomes with these two subjects:
1. The people of the nation have an attitude that does not allow a domineering government, thus out of fear no domineering government arises.
2. The people of the nation have an attitude that does not allow a domineering government, nevertheless a domineering government arises under radar.
3. The people of the nation have an attitude that allows themselves to be dominated, thus a domineering government arises.
4. The people of the nation have an attitude that allows themselves to be dominated, a domineering government however does not arise.
Opportunity is a time or set of circumstances that allows for a possible action to occur. Given the opportunity, a domineering government will arise
History will repeat itself, it has time and time again. Utopia is virtually impossible by its very definition as applied to the philosophy of today. The inevitable outcome of all organized systems is thus the enslavement of the human majority and the eventual revolution of a new system.
Thus outcomes number two and three are most likely to happen eventually. The question remaining is thus, how can a nation prevent a domineering government for the longest time? This is outcome number one comes into play; a democratic system is by its very design meant to prevent a domineering government from arising. Outcome number four is the most unlikely to happen becau...
... middle of paper ...
...ew act and lead it down a path it was never meant to go. The people of the United States are now more than ever willing to sacrifice their liberty for security.
Dependency on government leads to a loss of personal liberty. The government should seek to make the people more independent and less reliant on social welfare programs. The fact that we see more dependent people now than ever before is a sure sign that U.S. citizens are sacrificing their liberties for security and comfort.
We are not necessarily meant to live a comfortable lifestyle. Such a life would chock the freedom's that make hero's out of men.
We need to separate the definition of peace and the definition of comfort as it applies to a people's own independence.
The attitudes of the people who will allow themselves to be dominated is by far worse than a domineering government.
Our nation seems as if it is in a constant battle between freedom and safety. Freedom and security are two integral parts that keep our nation running smoothly, yet they are often seen conflicting with one another. “Tragedies such as Pearl Harbor, 9/11 and the Boston Marathon bombings may invoke feelings of patriotism and a call for unity, but the nation also becomes divided, and vulnerable populations become targets,” (Wootton 1). “After each attack a different group or population would become targets. “The attack on Pearl Harbor notoriously lead to Japanese Americans being imprisoned in internment camps, the attacks on 9/11 sparked hate crimes against those who appeared to be Muslim or Middle Eastern,” (Wootton 1). Often times people wind up taking sides, whether it be for personal freedoms or for national security, and as a nation trying to recover from these disasters we should be leaning on each other for support. Due to these past events the government has launched a series of antiterrorist measures – from ethnic profiling to going through your personal e-mail (Begley 1). Although there are times when personal freedoms are sacrificed for the safety of others, under certain circumstances the government could be doing more harm than good.
With the dawn of civilization soon thereafter followed the creation of authoritarian and totalitarian establishments. The history of man is inundated with instances of leaders rising to power over certain groups of people and through various means gaining formidable control to be used for good, evil, or an ambiguous mixture of both. However, it is an undeniable fact that once unchecked power is acquired, tyranny often ensues, and thus a dictatorial regime is born. Over the centuries, governmental establishments have risen and fallen, but as history and civilization progress, so does the potential for a larger and more powerful domination. The development of differing and contrasting theologies and structural philosophies leads not only to conflict, but perhaps more prominently to unification under one rule with a common belief, especially when that unifying belief provides a promising sense of belonging and structure to a weak society. This is what led to the rise of two of the most domineering totalitarian governments in history: Stalin’s Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) and Hitler’s Nazi Germany, or the Third Reich.
Moreover, a stumpy level of political jeopardy in a given state does not essentially match to a high degree of administrative autonomy. Certainly, some of the more firm countries are also the most controlling. Also, the long-term evaluations of political jeopardy ought to account for the hazard that an administratively domineering setting is only steady as long as top-down regulation is upheld and populaces prohibited from a free exchange of thoughts and merchandises with the outside realm.
The purpose for which government has been instituted, according to Founding Father Alexander Hamilton, is “because the passions of men will not conform to the dictates of reason and justice, without constraint.” In an effort to constrain men’s passions, nations and revolutionary groups have tried many forms of government. But the institution of a new government necessitates some form of revolution, either violent or peaceful. In many cases, the onset of this revolution begins with the subjugation of a people, often through the process of colonizing a land which is already inhabited.
In history, governments have endeavored to rule their subjects. Major forms of authority consist primarily of monarchy, absolute monarchy, oligarchy, democracy, tyranny, theocracy, and republic. By examining the main faults of each government, the republic is clearly the superior form.
A. Government is the necessary evil that is merely convenient on the short run; however, a majority of governments are not beneficial toward the people and it fails to pertain to the service of the community.
...Safety and Happiness” (Declaration of Independence- Text Transcript). If the American citizen is not able to stand up and fight for what they believe in, the government will become overpowered and they will always win.
These defects provided an insurmountable barrier to effective constitutional government. Several failures illustrated the new governments weakness. These failures included:
Such an institution, according to Gibson’s definition, can prove to be very problematic, especially in a political realm. A leader of any sort, in office through election or use of force, who adheres to this sort of government institution, can do little to no good for their country. Such an institution does not have to stem from an individual; “weaker groups could agree to instit...
Benjamin Franklin once stated “Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.”
Governments need to protect citizens from negative externalities that arise regardless of the culprit. They should regulate markets to prevent predatory practices by those who seek to gain at the cost of everyone. Government needs to protect and regulate the use of our resources so that we do not deplete those that are finite but needed for life. Everyone has to be allowed to participate in government, to access and share information (within limits), and to speak out if they think that the government is not meeting the needs of the
Political foundations, for example, the detachment of forces, federalism, and bicameralism are expected to restrain the force of the administration so it won't carry on in a domineering way. Political support inside of these organizations gives further insurance in light of the fact that residents will be cautious in securing their opportunities. While the Protective model of majority rule government expect a contrary perspective of human instinct, in that it is designed for keeping people from controlling the state to the hindrance of freedom, the Developmental model of popular government accept a more constructive perspective of individuals. Through cooperation in administrative establishments and the undertakings of their groups, individuals build up a wide valuation for people in general great and what it requires.
In summation this paper discussed the three correct types of regimes according to Aristotle; furthermore it examined the deviations of these regimes. This was done by firstly examining a regime led by royalty, secondly by observing the characteristics of an aristocratic regime and thirdly by discussing a regime ran by constitutional government. Finally defining the three correct types of regimes the deviations of these regimes: tyrannical, oligarchic and democratic were examined.
Napolitano, Andrew P.. It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong: the case for personal freedom. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2011. Print.
In today’s society, these themes are still dominant. While some view freedom as a responsibility, others take advantage of the privilege. Those with a survival of the fittest attitude do what they want, when they want, in order to get what they want. People with individual conscience believe they have the privilege to do what is right, whether it be for themselves or for others. Unfortunately, those who search for freedom are usually seeking it from those who take advantage of it. While freedom comes with a cost, every American should be able to enjoy their own freedoms and liberties without anyone restricting them.