Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How humor is used in literature
Humour in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The concept of humor is an incredibly complicated one, having undergone complex analyses and innumerable manners of usage from the times of the ancient Greeks through the modern era. Masters of comedy and their works have become part of the human experience, widely ranging from Shakespeare’s masterful Much Ado About Nothing to the much-loved television series I Love Lucy. Humor, although in many ways considered to be largely mass-market and tailored to the popular majority, has not escaped the realm of scholarly analysis. Sigmund Freud, in particular, explored many aspects of humor, culminating in his famous work The Joke and Its Relation to the Unconscious. In this essay, I would like to explore Freud’s fascinating ideas about the nature of humor, comparing them to the ideas of another expert in his own discipline, actor and director Woody Allen. Regarding the philosophy of humor and its effect on both the humorist and his or her listener, Freud and Allen share many concepts of the inner workings and overall process of comedy and wit. This agreement is especially apparent when considering the quality of Jewish humor and the characteristics of the Jewish comedian.
Freud’s Conception of the Nature of Humor
When Freud produced The Joke and Its Relation to the Unconscious, the discipline of psychoanalysis was in its beginning stages. The Joke was the final work in a series of three books, all focused on seemingly minor individual aspects of the mental life of people and discussed how these issues could reveal important clues about the inner workings of the intellect. The first two books were Interpretation of Dreams, written in 1900, and Psychopathology of Everyday Life, which was written in 1901. All three works offer a bett...
... middle of paper ...
...eru, Illinois: Carus Publishing, 2004. 132-150. Print.
Billig, Michael. “Freud and the Language of Humor.” The Psychologist 15 9 (2002): 452-455. Electronic.
Bleiweiss, Mark E. “Self-Deprecation and the Jewish Humor of Woody Allen.” The Films of Woody Allen: Critical Essays. Ed. Charles P. Silet. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006. 58-77. Electronic.
Freud, Sigmund. The Joke and Its Relation to the Unconscious. New York: Penguin, 2002. Print.
Freud, Sigmund. Beyond the Pleasure Principle: The Standard Edition. New York: W.W. Norton, 1990. Print.
Freud, Sigmund. “Humour.” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 9 (1928): 1-6. Electronic.
Girgus, Sam B. The Films of Woody Allen, Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Electronic.
Yacowar, Maurice. Loser Takes All: The Comic Art of Woody Allen. New York: Ungar, 1979. Print.
Festa, Conrad. “Vonnegut’s Satire.” Vonnegut in America: An Introduction to the Life and Work of Kurt Vonnegut. Vol. 5. 1977. 133-50. The GaleGroup. Web. 10 March. 2014.
ADLER, Mortimer J. Editor in Chief. Great Books of the Western World. The Major Works of Sigmund Freud. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 1996.
Psychologists, sociologists and anthropologists study humor because it is a fundamental culture value, but they still can’t determine why certain things make some people laugh and others not. There are “humor quotient” tests that are designed to measure an individual’s sense of humor, but these tests are questionable. These tests aren’t accurate because almost all humor depends on cultural background knowledge and language skills. Not every person in the whole world, or even in one country share the same background knowledge and skills, therefore they cannot have the same type of humor. “The fact remains that individuals vary in their appreciation of humor” (Rappoport 9). Since humor varies from individual to individual, humor lies in the individual. How successful or funny a joke is depends on how the person receives the joke, humor cannot be measured by a statistical
Steve Almond’s “Funny is the New Deep” talks of the role that comedy has in our current society, and most certainly, it plays a huge role here. Namely, through what Almond [Aristotle?] calls the “comic impulse”, we as a people can speak of topics that would otherwise make many of uncomfortable. Almond deems the comic impulse as the most surefire way to keep heavy situations from becoming too foreboding. The comic impulse itself stems from our ability and unconscious need to defend and thus contend with the feeling of tragedy. As such, instead of rather forcing out humor, he implies that humor is something that is not consciously forced out from an author, but instead is more of a subconscious entity, coming out on its own. Almond emphasizes
Freud, S., Strachey, J., Freud, A., Rothgeb, C., & Richards, A. (1953). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (1st ed.). London: Hogarth Press.
Hardvard University student, Antonia Peacocke, emphasizes in her essay "Family Guy and Freud: Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious"
Black Humor in Vonnegut's Cat's Cradle The phrase Black Humor has the broad meaning of poking "fun at subjects considered deadly serious or even taboo by some"2. This definition is simple, and yet embodies an important idea that is often lost in more complex definitions: the idea that Black Humor can actually be "fun", and provoke laughter. This is not, of course, the only important aspect of the term, and I shall explore some of the other important defining features of Black Humor before moving on to discuss its use in Kurt Vonnegut's Cat's Cradle3. Many critics have attempted definitions of Black Humor, none of them entirely successfully. The most significant recurring features of these definitions are that Black Humor works with: absurdity, ironic detachment4; opposing moral views held in equipoise, humanity's lack of a sense of purpose in the unpredictable nuclear age, the realization of the complexity of moral and aesthetic experience which affects the individual's ability to choose a course of action5; and a playing with the reader's ideas of reality6.
Contemporary Psychology, 36, 575-577. Freud, S. (1961). The Species of the World. The Complete Works of Sigmund Freud. London: The Hogarths.
Waiten,W., (2007) Seventh Edition Psychology Themes and Variations. University of Nevada, Las Vegas: Thomson Wadsworth.
Freud, Sigmund. The Ego and the Id. The Freud Reader. Ed. Peter Gay. New York:
Similar to many other lively pleasures, humor can only be experienced if it resonates with a person. Without some kind of comprehension, there cannot be any type of reaction. Only once an outlandish statement, inappropriate remark, or unexpected situation, is remotely understood will a person be able to label it comical or sober. Since there are billions of people worldwide with their own languages including it’s respective idioms, euphemisms, the age old saying of “there is truth in every joke” applies to each culture individually.
In the one-act play Death Knocks, Woody Allen constructs a humorous allegory revolving around an ordinary man, Nat Ackerman, and his unanticipated encounter with death. In the story, death is personified as an actual character and resembles his victim’s overall appearance. However, Death is not simply portrayed as a typical frightening character but more as an uncoordinated klutz. With the intention of preventing Death from accomplishing his mission, Nat challenges Death to a game of gin rummy and wins one more day of life. In Woody Allen’s Death Knocks, the ironic dramatization of death enables Nat to utilize humor as a coping mechanism to alleviate the common fears associated with dying.
If there is one way to bring a smile to someone’s face, it is laughter. Funny jokes, comical stunts, sarcasm- Every person is different when it comes to what makes them laugh. Some find dry humor comical. Others think sarcasm or joke-filled ranting are the best. ‘Comedy’ is such a broad term, broad enough to allow everyone to find something they find comical. In fact, ‘comedy’ includes a specific type of drama, one where the protagonist is joyful and happy endings are expected. Comedy is like a drug; it allows you to escape reality. When we say the word ‘comedy’ in the present, we are generally referring to a type of performance which provides humor. However, in its broadest sense, comedy has only one purpose: comedy makes people smile and
Humor has been the source of entertainment throughout history. Today humor is practiced in movies, plays, songs, television shows and radio. Humor has brought fame and fortune to those who have mastered its power.
In the book he outlines his theory that “humor expresses in a socially acceptable way the strongest human impulses: sexuality and aggressiveness” (Zik). Freud also wrote a later essay entitled, “Humour,” in which he expands upon the ideas in his book on jokes. In the essay, Freud writes, “Humour is not resigned; it is rebellious. It signifies not only the triumph of the ego but also of the pleasure principle, which is able here to assert itself against the unkindness of the real circumstances” (163). Thus, humor is a way of coping with trauma and the vicissitudes of