Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Debate in organ donation
Debate in organ donation
Debate in organ donation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Debate in organ donation
The book Unwind by Neal Shusterman is about the concept of unwinding an human being. Unwinding is the concept or process in which a child or teen’s organs and other parts of the body are taken out. These organs and body parts are then used to save other people’s lives. For example if a person doesn't have an arm then they could get an arm from an unwind. If someone is missing an organ then they could get one from an unwind. Many people may say or think if you unwind a person you are killing the person. However the government of this society says that they are still alive but just in a different way. Unwinding is not a good concept for many reasons. Some reasons is that there will be less jobs. If there are only good people in the society then cops won't be needed. …show more content…
Another reason is that people are dying.
Although the government is saying they are technically alive they are actually not still alive, all the parts are not in one body. Another reason on why unwinding is bad is that the person being unwound could grow up and become someone famous or important. For example if a family decides to unwind their 10 year old boy, in the future he could grow up and cure cancer for example. Another reason on why unwinding is not beneficial is that the person receiving the parts will become a whole new person. For example when Cyrus got a part of a brain he became a new person. From time to time the brain told Cyrus what to do. The part of the brain told Cyrus to steal something from a store and it told him to go to Joplin. Another reason on why unwinding should not exist is that the parents that sign the unwind order might feel regret. The parents could feel regret because they had their own son
unwound. One reason why unwinding is not beneficial is that there will be less jobs. There will be less jobs because if everyone that is bad is being unwound then we will not need cops. We will not need cops because there will be no crime. If cops are not needed then they will lose their jobs and won’t be able to support their own family. If there are less jobs than the economy could go down because less people are getting money and the money that the police officers could have gotten they could have spent it on items they needed. But however they lose their jobs and the things they could have bought could affect the economy. Many people would be fired and that is a lot of money that these people could not spend and the economy would be worse then its status at the moment. Another reason for why unwinding is bad is that people are dying. The government may say that the unwinds are technically alive but the person is really not. The person being unwind their organs and parts are going to a bunch of people. A person should be considered alive is if all their body parts and organs are in one body. All the body parts and organs should not be in multiple bodies but only in one body. If people are being unwound and killed then the population will go down. If there are less people then the economy could be affected. If there are less people then there will be less money in circulation causing the economy to go down. Another reason for why unwinding is not good is that the person being unwound could one day grow up to become someone special. For example if a little boy is being unwound he could have grown up to become someone important. The little boy could grow up and find the cure for cancer. If he is unwound then he will not grow up and have the possibility of being someone famous or important. However if he isn’t unwound then he could live and have a future when he grows up. Another reason for why unwinding should not exist is that the person getting the organ or body part will become a whole new person. For example in the book it says “As they walk, Lev can tell Cy's mind is somewhere else. Maybe it's in Joplin. What could be there? Maybe a girlfriend moved there? Maybe he had tracked down his birth mother. All of a sudden Lev realizes something. "He lived in Joplin, didn't he!” This shows the from time to time Cyrus becomes a different person. It shows that the other part of the brain is telling Cyrus to go to Joplin. Many other people could be affected and become a whole new person. One last reason for why unwinding is bad is that the parents the sign the unwind order would feel regret. They would feel regret because they had their own child unwound and killed. The parents may feel that they did not kill own son. But however they are dead because and all their organs and body parts are taken out. Some parents however may not feel regret because they could think that it is ok because they could just have another baby. The parents that do feel regret probably think that they had their child unwound and that they could have stopped it but decided not to. Many people could say that unwinding has made society better. They could say that there will be less crime because all the bad people will not be in their society. Although this is true something bad always happens to something so true. If there is less crime than the society has no need for their police officers. If we don’t need police officers then the government will fire them. If they are fired they can’t survive and support their own family. If many police officers are fired then they can't spend as much money and the economy could also be affected. As we can see if one good thing happens then even more bad things will happen. Therefore unwinding will not benefit the society. Unwinding should still not exist because it will not benefit society. For example there will be less jobs because there will be less police officers and they could not support their family if they lose their jobs. Another reason is that the person getting the part they will be a whole new person. If they get a part of a brain then from time to time that part of the brain could take over that person and become a whole new person. Another example is that the person being unwound could one day grow up to become someone special. One of the unwounds could grow up and find a cure for cancer. If they were unwound then this would not have happened. These are just a few reason on why unwounding should not still exist.
Alexander Stowe is a twin, his brother is Aaron Stowe. Alex is an Unwanted, Aaron is a Wanted, and their parents are Necessaries. Alex is creative in a world where you can’t even see the entire sky, and military is the dream job for everyone and anyone. He should have been eliminated, just like all the unwanteds should have been. He instead comes upon Artimè, where he trains as a magical warrior- after a while. When he was still in basic training, and his friends were not, he got upset, he wants to be the leader, the one everyone looks up to.
The fourth Chapter of Estella Blackburn’s non fiction novel Broken lives “A Fathers Influence”, exposes readers to Eric Edgar Cooke and John Button’s time of adolescence. The chapter juxtaposes the two main characters too provide the reader with character analyses so later they may make judgment on the verdict. The chapter includes accounts of the crimes and punishments that Cooke contended with from 1948 to 1958. Cooke’s psychiatric assessment that he received during one of his first convictions and his life after conviction, marring Sally Lavin. It also exposes John Button’s crime of truancy, and his move from the UK to Australia.
I read the book Lonesome Howl, which is a drama book and a love story. The book was about two main character whose names are Jake and Lucy. They lived with their family in two different farms, but in the same community besides a mountain covered in a big wicked forest where many rumors took place. The farmers around the place lost many sheep’s since a feral beast. It was a quite small community and a lot of tales was told about it to make it even more interesting. Lucy was 16 years old and lived with her strict father and a coward of mom who didn’t dare to stand up for her daughter when she were being mistreated and slapped around by her father. Lucy was a retired and quite teenager because of that. She had a younger brother whose name was Peter. Peter was being bullied in school and couldn’t read since the education of Peter was different compare too Lucy’s. She helped him in school and stood up for the mean bullies, although all she got in return was him talking bullshit about her with their cruel dad which resulted with her getting thrash.
Homesick is a novel that exposes many different relationships, the strength of relationships, and how they can endure tremendous pain. The various relationships between Alec and Vera, Alec and Daniel, and Vera and Daniel are considerably different because of the variation in generation represented by each character. Each relationship in this family has its strengths and weaknesses depending on the past of the relationships. The relationships in the novel Homesick are seen through all of the character's eyes, so we can see how each character felt about the other characters. These characters do not tend to say what they think, we can see this many times throughout the novel. These relationships can be observed by seeing how they act, speak, and treat one another.
The book, Into the wild, takes us into the world of a young man named Christopher Johnson McCandless. He travelled across the western United States from 1990 to 1992, and on April 28, 1992, he started his last adventure and walked into the wilds of Alaska. About 112 days later, he died of starvation. Unsurprisingly, public opinion polarized on his behavior. Some may admire his courage and noble ideals, though some regard him as an idiotic and arrogant narcissist. Although he died on his way to find the truth and back to nature, I believe that Chris McCandless should be considered as a hero, but I cannot completely approve of all his behaviors.
In the essay “Everything Now” Signs of Life in the USA: Readings on Popular Culture for Writers, author Steve McKevitt blames our unhappiness on having everything we need and want, given to us now. While his writing is compelling, he changes his main point as his conclusion doesn’t match his introduction. He uses “want versus need” (145) as a main point, but doesn’t agree what needs or wants are, and uses a psychological theory that is criticized for being simplistic and incomplete. McKevitt’s use of humor later in the essay doesn’t fit with the subject of the article and comes across almost satirical. Ultimately, this essay is ineffective because the author’s main point is inconsistent and poorly conveyed.
Suzanne Collins published Catching Fire in 2009. During that year the United States was at war with Iraq. The main cause of the war was the terrorist attack that occurred on September 11, 2001. There is however another reason for the war. George W. Bush wanted retribution for his father, George H. W. Bush. The President of Iraq, Saddam Hussein attempted to assassinate George H. W. Bush. Years later Bush’s son was elected as president and also held a personal vendetta against Hussein. The Iraq War was an armed conflict in Iraq that consisted of two parts. The first was an attack on Iraq on 20 March 2003 by an invasion force led by the United States. The second part was much longer, ending in 2011, in which rebellions came out to go up against the forces and the newly formed Iraqi government.
This era is where the shift from a centralized task force has gravitated to a decentralized task force, causing some friction from both the community and the officers that serve it. Police are told that they are needed to listen to the concerns for the community; however, law enforcement is still the primary goal. Police forces now have to defend the values for which the forces were built upon. The idea of problem solving has come into question with police discretion towards certain run-ins with the law. Williams and Murphy argue it is due to the lack of sensitivity from minorities and the concern on crime itself than the community. Kelling and Moore contradict Williams and Murphy, with Kelling/Moore suggesting the era is more about listening to concerns of the community and improving the citizen satisfaction. But both the article came to the conclusion of the silent underlying problems that are becoming more of a “quiet riot” with the police and the
who were there but learn them in such a way that we are allowed to
One of the main themes in the novel, Unwind by Neal Shusterman, is that all life, in whatever form it takes, has intrinsic value and should be cherished to the greatest extent. In the passage, the Admiral signs an order for Harlan, his son, to be unwound because he was caught stealing but later changes his mind, however it was too late. This novel is centered on the idea of parents unwinding their children when the child was deficient in some way because unwinding was “a more…efficient option.” The parents wouldn’t be able to stop the action in any way because once they signed the order, “it had already been done”, there was no turning back. The Admiral realized that he made a rash decision and regrets that he didn’t appreciate his son more.
Although, it has also been criticized for been incompatible with the community, inflexible and undermining some goals of policing, it is still acknowledged as an important organizational development in policing during the latter half of the 20th century (BJA, police executive research
Breaking rules is what makes humans learn. This is what David Levithan interpreted in his 322-page fictional novel, Every Day. David Levithan uses characterization, vivid imagery, and irony to convey to readers that systems don’t follow rules.
The novel, Alone Together: Why We Expect More From Technology and Less From Each Other (2011) written by Sherry Turkle, presents many controversial views, and demonstrating numerous examples of how technology is replacing complex pieces and relationships in our life. The book is slightly divided into two parts with the first focused on social robots and their relationships with people. The second half is much different, focusing on the online world and it’s presence in society. Overall, Turkle makes many personally agreeable and disagreeable points in the book that bring it together as a whole.
The novel Upside Down, by Eduardo Galeano depicts the injustices and unfairness of several branches of the global society. The differences between the colonized and the colonizer as Galeano writes is always growing and so is the gap between rich and poor. The author challenges western and eurocentric minds as to why on average, countries in the northern hemisphere have a higher standard of living than countries in the southern hemisphere. At first as a reader I thought the writer was whining about the unfairness of the world, but it is the social opiates such as the false idea of capitalism and choice that keeps us in check in this so called democracy. The author forces the reader to open their hearts to a concept that today's capitalist, power hungry society has almost forgotten
In our times, the police have become the criminals. Some police are using their power to do bad things, and society has come to fear police. The law enforcement system needs change. The courts have failed the police, and the police have turn to other means of justice. We must stop the corruption in the police force.