Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Formation of contracts business law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Formation of contracts business law
Introduction
In forming a valid contract, it is paramount that the person who enters into the contract must have the full capacity in terms of age and mind. This means the person who has not reached the age of majority, or is of unsound mind, cannot make a valid contract. This is provided by Section 11 of the contracts Act 1950 whereby “every person is competent to contract who is of the age of majority according to the law to which he is subjected, and who is of sound mind, and is not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject.”
A minor is a person below the age of majority. Under the Age of Majority Act 1971, the age of majority is 18. With regards to the minor’s contractual capacity, the general rule is that all contracts
…show more content…
The claimant sent his agent to Cambridge because he had heard that the defendant was spending money freely and might be the sort of person who would be interested in high class clothing. Following the agent’s visit, the claimant supplied the defendant with various articles of clothing to the value of 145 Pounds. The clothes included 11 fancy waistcoats. The claimant then sued the minor for the price of the clothes. There was evidence that the minor’s father was in a good position, being an architect with a town and country house, and it could be said that the clothes supplied were suitable to the defendant’s position of life. However, the father proved that the defendant was adequately supplied with such clothes when the claimant delivered the …show more content…
This developed to the common law principle that as a general rule any contract entered into by a minor is not binding unless it falls within the recognized category of exceptions.
References
Text Books
Alsagoff, S. A. (2010). Principles of the Law of Contract in Malaysia (3rd ed.): LexisNexis Malaysia Sdn Bhd.
Fong, C. M (2010). Contract Law In Malaysia: Sweet & Maxwell Asia a division of The Thompson Corporation (M) Sdn Bhd.
Miss P. It's Law [Minors' Capacity To Contract]. Retrieved from http://itslaw.blogspot.com/2011/02/minors-capacity-to-contract.html
Wu M. A. & Vohrah, B. (2012). The Commercial Law of Malaysia (2nd ed). Selangor: Pearson and Longman
Statute Laws
Contract Act 1950
Age of Majority Act 1971
Contracts (Amendment) Act 1976
Insurance Act 1996
Cases
Government of Malaysia V Gurcharan Singh & Ors (1971) 1 MLJ 211
Mohori Bibee v Dhurmodas Ghose LR 8 Exch 132
Nash v Inman (1908) 2 KB 1
Rajeswary & Anor v Balakrishnan & Ors. (1958) 3 MC 178
Tan Hee Juan v The Boon Keat (1934) MLJ
Sweeney, B, O'Reilly, J & Coleman, A 2013, Law in Commerce, 5th edition, Lexis Nexis, Australia.
Twomey, D. (2013). Anderson's Business Law and the Legal Environment, Comprehensive Volume [VitalSouce bookshelf version]. Retrieved from http://digitalbookshelf.southuniversity.edu/books/9781285696683/id/L35-1-7
The Legal Status of Sixteen and Seventeen Year Old Youth in Ontario. Toronto, Ont.: Canadian Foundation for Children Youth and the Law (Justice for Children & Youth), 1993. Print.
Having evaluated the current state of English contract law, mainly made up of piecemeal solutions, it can be seen that despite being satisfactory and doing its job, there still remain gaps within the law of contract where unfairness is not dealt with. Moreover, due to the ad hoc nature of those piecemeal solutions, the latter have often produced inconsistent justice and have manifested cases of unfairness. Hence, “a relatively small number of respected Justices have endeavored to draw attention to the fact that the application of a general principle might be useful and even necessary in English law.”
If the elements of a contract did exist between these parties, there could still be some possible reasons why a contract might not be valid based on facts not present in the scenario. For example, if Sam was a minor at the time he made the agreement with the chain store, the contract would not be valid because of contractual capacity. Per the law a contract by minors is voidable by the minor itself. Other reasons that would deem a contract invalid are lack of genuine assent, which means that the accepting party entered the agreement under fraudulent circumstances, duress, undue influence and/or misrepresentation. Moreover the validity of the contract could be hindered due to lack of proper form. This typically refers to
E.G. Lorenzen, Causa and Consideration in the Law of Contracts (1919). Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 4560.
In Maung Ko Gyi v. Daw Ohn Khin , the statute is clear. A promise to and from a minor cannot be enforced. However, the judges in the case had referred to Burmese Customary Law in the Dharmata which contained similar provisions. Besides that, Hart says that it is determinate at its core, and there the linguistic form in which it is expressed is well-defined enough for it to form the basis of legal decisions in general.
The idea of “the child” is constantly evolving, and children appear to be maturing more rapidly each year. As a response, laws pertaining to minors have had to keep up with these social changes. In the health care context, the competency of children is constantly scrutinized and challenged. Accordingly, reforms to past laws that deemed minors lacked decisional capacity have resulted in the “mature minor” doctrine. Although this doctrine allows minors a degree of independence in the decision-making process it maintains many grey areas. The age of consent is inconsistent across provinces and territories, and the guidelines used to assess competence are vague and sometimes arbitrary. With such inconsistency in the measuring of adolescent competence, it brings me to question the competence granted freely to adults. To rightfully judge competence there must be a prototype, something that I and others can form a explicit definition around. With what I have collected, since individuals gain decision-making autonomy when they reach the age of consent, than the defining characteristic of comp...
Even though Malaysia’s law system is similar to English Common law system, things like family conflicts and small conflicts at work are so...
The basic law of a contract is an agreement between two parties or more, to deliver a service or a product. And reach a consensus about the terms and conditions that is enforced by law and a contract can be only valid if it is lawful other than that there can’t be a contract. For a contract to exist the parties must have serious intentions, agreement, contractual capacity meaning a party must be able to carry a responsibility, lawful, possibility of performance and formalities. Any duress, false statements, undue influence or unconscionable dealings could make a contract unlawful and voidable.
This case mentioned below is a fine example of understanding the Law of Contract in a better manner. (Gerald, 2014).
Minors: The Australian law restricts the entry of Minors in the formation of the contract. So any contract made with the person under the age of 18 will be considered as voidable contract. (Clarke, 2016)
In Article 160 of Federal Constitution, it implies the meaning of law where it states that ‘the common law in so far as it is in operation in the Federation or any part thereof’ which concerns on extent to which the English law is applicable in Malaysia (teacher, 2013). In Malaysia, English law can be found in the Civil Law Act 1956 (Act 67) (Revised 1972) (CLA 1956) under section 3 of the Act, where under the Act, English law is defined as 'the common law of England and the rules of equity' (Wan Arfah Hamzah, 2009). According to Farid Sufian Shuhaib (n.d.), in his journal ‘Towards Malaysian Common Law: Convergence between Indigenous Norms and Common Law Method’ emphasized that “The predecessors of the Civil Law Act 1956, namely the various Ordinances and enactments, had served well the British imperialist in Malaya and Borneo. They provide a semblance of legitimacy to things the British had done and continue to do, namely imposing their law on the colony. They also have served well a newly independent Malaya and Malaysia in providing continuity and stability to her fragile legal system that suffered' the onslaught of imperialist law and political might”. Common law and equity had left such a lasting bequest of legal system and laws due to the conflicting opinion in interpreting the First Charter of Justice granted to Penang in 1807 during the British colonization of
Besides, English law can be found in the English common law or rule of equity. Under civil law Act 1956, section 3, In Peninsular Malaysia, the courts shall apply the common law of England and the rules of equity as administered in England on the 7th day of April 1956 where English law are applicable (Kozuka, n.d.). In Sabah and Sarawak, the courts only will apply the common law of England with statutes of general application as administered or enforced in England on the 1st December 1951 and 12th days of December 1949 respectively (Kozuka, n.d.). However, English commercial law also applies in Malaysia under section 5(1) of the Civil Law Act 1956 that the principles of English commercial law as they stood on 7th April 1956 shall be applicable in Peninsular Malaysia except for Penang, Malacca, Sabah and Sarawak in the absence of the local laws (Kozuka,
The courts of England and Wales acknowledge that the above must be something of value, in order to amount to consideration. A valuable consideration in the perspective of the English La...