Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
American foreign policy in the inter-war years
Relations between ussr and usa
American foreign policy during the interwar period
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: American foreign policy in the inter-war years
Date of Submission:
The United States has undergone a tremendous change involving drastic and sometimes significant evolvement since the 1st World War until the year we are today 2017. If there is one thing that the United States has never compromised is the matter of National Security, Terrorism and the safety of the Americans. U.S always values peace and prosperity through diplomatic negotiations between its rival nations. After the 2nd World War, the era of the 2nd Cold War was at an alarming state in the U.S. The USSR has a lot of power over the U.S in terms of military deployment in case of war, more power in terms of the weapons they had. The U.S military was not well equipped with the needed resources for combat in case of war eruption.
…show more content…
This is the reason why the National Security Council together with the Congress Men drafted and presented the NSC-68 report to President Truman. In 2001, the U.S underwent a moment of torment when the terrorists hit the Twin Towers of the World Trade Centre, killing 2700 people, injuring more than 7000 and destroying property worth $ 1trillion. By that time, the U.S military and other investigative Agencies including the CIA were not able to protect the Americans against terrorism since the law did not provide a platform to do so. This is the reason the Patriotic Act was passed after the attack on September 2001. Therefore the main threat the U.S usually faces is the matter of National Security and Terrorism as we can see being stressed by the two documents presented in the years 1950 and 2001. The NSC Report 68 was drafted in April 14th, 1950 by the National Security Council under President Truman.
The report drafted alongside recommendations for the military strategy was to be issued to President Truman following the socialists (communists) over the nationalists' movement triumph in China and the Soviet atomic bomb detonation. The U.S did not want communism to be spread into the western region since the USSR was there enemy and people could be turned against themselves if they took over. The NSC-68 as it is commonly known, after it being disseminated all over the U.S, it became a foreign policy and all the country’s economic and diplomatic containment strategies were all converted to one involving the military. With the growth of the Soviet Union at the time, Cold War had made the Americans believe that the USSR had outsmarted the U.S. And with the tension growing and the communists infiltrating the U.S government slowly, if the USSR had attacked the U.S, they would have won and Communism will have ruled the U.S. The diplomatic and economic strategies that the U.S was using in order to make peace with the Soviet Union could not have borne any fruits. This is the reason why the National Security Council (NSC) Report 68 helped in turning all these strategies into military involvement and making the report a blueprint for the U.S's foreign policy. The NSC-68 proved to be of great importance and after militarizing all the strategies, the Cold War eased and ended by 1950’s when the USSR and U.S joined forces. It was also the NSC-68 Report the ended McCarthyism in the U.S brought along with the Cold
War. The U.S.A Patriot Act, on the other hand, has been of great importance initiative after it being passed and signed into law by President Bush in the year 2001 October a month after the devastating attack on the World Trade Centre. It has helped a lot in polarizing the national security. The act has helped a lot in strengthening and uniting America through the provision of appropriate tools that are required in intercepting and obstructing terrorism. This act has chiefly lowered the cause for obtaining any intelligence warrant against any suspected terrorist, spies plus other enemies of the U.S. the act has led to peace without any devastating terror attack since the year 2001 after the signing of the bill and passing it into law. It has been of great importance to the country at large. President Trump talks about “Making America Great Again” which is simply exercising the NSC-68 and changing any diplomatic strategy into military involvement which is great according to me. The major ideological difference between the U.S and the Soviet Union was that the US was a Capitalist while the Soviet Union was a Communist. Being a capitalist meant that people were given freedoms in the U.S. These freedoms were; free elections, freedom of the press and the freedom of speech or protests. Also, in the U.S, anything the citizens produced belonged to them. The Soviet Union being a Communist, on the other hand, meant that their people were never at all given any freedom. All the Protestants were taken away quietly by the Soviet Union. The government was the one in control deciding what should appear in the newspapers and what is said by the press. When the elections came, the government decided who would vie and all of them would be communists leaving the citizens stuck there in communism. Anything made also belonged to the government. The same case as explained above would apply to the political and economic states of the U.S and the Soviet Union, but now politically and economically respectively. Through exercising of Capitalist in the U.S by the government, it ensured that the citizens are offered an advantage in making sure that the country’s economy, politics and also socio-cultural activities are well secured. Soviet espionage which lasted since the early 1940s to late 1950s has grown a lot of terror and hysteria among the American people. Upon the arrests of various communists in the government at that time, it had divided the nation into two. To bring unity into the nation again, the NSC drafted Report 68 which later led to the growth of internal security and other loyal programs under President Truman’s reign. The relationship here is that if it were not for the Cold War in the U.S created by the Soviet Union, these programs would not have emerged. The major similarity between the NSC-68 and the Patriotic Act is that they were both made in accordance with the U.S Constitution to take care of the national security. The difference is that the NSC-68 was a report to the president while the Patriot Act was a bill passed and signed by the president as a law. The other difference also is that the NSC-68 was drafted in the era of Soviet Union reign in order to change the economic and diplomatic strategies of bringing peace into military involvement while the Patriotic Act was passed after the 2001 terror attack to polarize national security against any act of terrorism. In order for the government to protect the national security, it always has to infringe on the civil liberties. To my point of view, it is constitutionally sound. This is because the same constitution that protects the citizens from the anti-terror activities through military and investigative agencies empowerment is the same constitution that supports civil liberty of the citizens including all their freedoms. Therefore, to protect the citizens against national security, civil liberties have to be infringed. In a nutshell, I would say that both the NSC-68 and the Patriotic Act has brought a significant change to the U.S and another era of peace has been born. The goal and objective of thwarting any exploit on financial systems of America by suspected parties of terrorism, terrorists finance, and money laundry plus drug traffickers by terrorist groups has been achieved over the last 50 years.
Eisenhower’s dynamic conservatism now known as Modern Republicanism labeled him as a nonpartisan leader, who was fiscally conservative in reducing federal spending and socially moderate in maintaining existing social and economic legislation of the New Deal. With the policy shift of Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, foreign policy in dealing with Communism went from containing it, to rolling it back. The Strategic Air Command was established as a fleet of super bombers that were equipped with nukes that would allow for massive retaliation in the place of a large standing army or navy, and the threat of massive retaliation was used to get the Soviets to surrender, and issued the Mutual Assured Destruction, where both sides knew that neither nation would declare nuclear war because it would result in total annihilation ...
The alliance formed between the US and USSR during the second world war was not strong enough to overcome the decades of uneasiness which existed between the two ideologically polar opposite countries. With their German enemy defeated, the two emerging nuclear superpowers no longer had any common ground on which to base a political, economical, or any other type of relationship. Tensions ran high as the USSR sought to expand Soviet influence throughout Europe while the US and other Western European nations made their opposition to such actions well known. The Eastern countries already under Soviet rule yearned for their independence, while the Western countries were willing to go to great lengths to limit Soviet expansion. "Containment of 'world revolution' became the watchword of American foreign policy throughout the 1950s a...
The Cold War was a period of dark and melancholic times when the entire world lived in fear that the boiling pot may spill. The protectionist measures taken by Eisenhower kept the communists in check to suspend the progression of USSR’s radical ambitions and programs. From the suspenseful delirium from the Cold War, the United States often engaged in a dangerous policy of brinksmanship through the mid-1950s. Fortunately, these actions did not lead to a global nuclear disaster as both the US and USSR fully understood what the weapons of mass destruction were capable of.
During the Cold War, the United States engaged in many aggressive policies both at home and abroad, in which to fight communism and the spread of communist ideas. Faced with a new challenge and new global responsibilities, the U.S. needed to retain what it had fought so strongly for in World War II. It needed to contain the communist ideas pouring from the Soviet Union while preventing communist influence at home, without triggering World War III. With the policies of containment, McCarthyism, and brinkmanship, the United States hoped to effectively stop the spread of communism and their newest threat, the Soviet Union. After the war, the United States and the Soviet Union had very different ideas on how to rebuild.
...“our technical superiority” to fend off further Soviet invasions; only negotiating with the Soviet Union when it agrees with the intentions of the United States and its allies; and, for President Harry Truman to support a massive build-up of both conventional and nuclear arms. NSC 68 wants to contain expansionism through a more aggressive military stance—be ready to stop it immediately. NSC 68 does not consider “behavior modification” just action.
Russia, as a communist state, wanted to spread communism. This is seen through Document 6, where Stalin is portrayed asking the question- who should be freed from freedom next? In other words, who should the Russians free from democracy, or spread communism to? America felt a communist world is dangerous, and thus stood obstacle in the Soviet Union’s path to spread communism. Just as the Soviets wanted to spread communism, the United States wanted to contain communism. Document 4 effectively portrays this policy. The Document is the speech where President Truman is explaining the Truman Doctrine in which the US is to protect any nation battling communist pressures. The speech splits the world into communist and democratic camps, intensifying the nations’ thirsts for more power and stifling the other’s power. Within Document 3, Kennan states that the only way to influence the Soviet Union is through force. One way this force took form was through international organizations. The democracies of the world, fearful of communism’s spread, created the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Those who made up the organization were to aid each other if attacked. In this way, they could fight the spread of communism through force, in turn, influence the Soviets. The US, as a part of NATO, was now taking direct steps against the Soviet Union, and thus steps toward the Cold War. To counter NATO, the communists formed the Warsaw Pact. This had same purpose as NATO, and hence was also a step toward the Cold War. The different beliefs of the Soviet Union and the United States incited the Cold
Overall, this college would provide a good education with three of my most beloved and favoured subjects for my career goals/interest. So, my keen interests are my three picked courses that have the grade requirements that I am available to overcome and exceed. Also, this college is very close to my location (7 Hadley Croft, B66 1DP) and provides a bus service in Oldbury and West Bromwich, which is a perfect combination to travel to this college. Overall, there won’t be any worry or difficulty of reaching Halesowen College thus this place forms to be an excellent place for me to continue my education for Year 12 and Year 13.
The political ideologies of the USA and of the Soviet Union were of profound significance in the development of the Cold War. Problems between the two power nations arose when America refused to accept the Soviet Union in the international community. The relationship between the USA and the Soviet Union was filled with mutual distrust and hostility. Many historians believe the cold war was “inevitable” between a democratic, capitalist nation and a communist Union. Winston Churchill called the cold war “The balance of terror” (1). Cold war anxieties began to build up with America and the Soviet Union advancing in the arms race for world dominance and supremacy. America feared the spread of Communism
The Soviet Union began to view the United States as a threat to communism, and the United States began to view the Soviet Union as a threat to democracy. On March 12, 1947, Truman gave a speech in which he argued that the United States should support nations trying to resist Soviet imperialism. Truman and his advisors created a foreign policy that consisted of giving reconstruction aid to Europe, and preventing Russian expansionism. These foreign policy decisions, as well as his involvement in the usage of the atomic bomb, raise the question of whether or not the Cold War can be blamed on Truman. Supporting the view that Truman was responsible for the Cold War, Arnold Offner argues that Truman’s parochialism and nationalism caused him to make contrary foreign policy decisions without regard to other nations, which caused the intense standoff between the Soviet Union and America that became the Cold War (Offner 291)....
They say that the pen is mightier than the sword, and in the case of the Truman Doctrine and NSC-68, this rings true. The world was seeing so many vast changes in power, so many revolutions, and so much blood shed due to war; it was hard to find a solid standing ground for the United States when it came to their stance on foreign policy. America has been a proud nation, and one that stood firm in its believes, but in the late 1940s and early 1950s, many people in government disagreed on just what to do when it came to the issue of Soviet Union, the rise and fall of communism, and countries such as Greece and Turkey, failing due to the revolutions they were facing because of soviet uprising. President Truman, writer of the Truman Doctrine, would
In addition to the prevention of communism, President Truman’s decision was also influenced by the apprehensive environment during The Cold War. The Soviet Union was able to ruin the United States as the monopoly of nuclear bombs in 1949 when they successfully detonated their firs...
With this book, a major element of American history was analyzed. The Cold War is rampant with American foreign policy and influential in shaping the modern world. Strategies of Containment outlines American policy from the end of World War II until present day. Gaddis outlines the policies of presidents Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon, including policies influenced by others such as George Kennan, John Dulles, and Henry Kissinger. The author, John Lewis Gaddis has written many books on the Cold War and is an avid researcher in the field.
Though the Cold War is over, and the threat that has loomed over the United States and the rest of the world that depended on the United States for military support for the better part of this century has largely been eradicated, does not mean that there are no longer any security threats to the United States. The United States remains cautious in regards to the unstable status that Russia frequently seems to be in, as well as security threats from other nations like Iraq, and to some degree China.
In 1945 the United States saw the Soviet Union as its principal ally. By 1947, it saw the Soviet Union as its principal opponent. The United States misunderstood the Soviet regime. .Despite much pretence, national security had not been a major concern of US planners and elected officials. historical records reveal this clearly. Few serious analysts took issue with George Kennan's position that "it is not Russian military power which is threatening us, it is Russian political power" ; or with President Eisenhower's consistent view that the Russians intended no military conquest of Western Europe and that the major role of NATO was to "convey a feeling of confidence to exposed populations, which was suposed to make them sturdier, politically, in their opposition to Communist inroads."
The Vietnam War was an extension of Cold War An Ideological conflict between Capitalism and Communism. In this protracted war scores of critical events happened and many proxy wars were fought between Nations belonging either of the Capitalist/ Communist bloc. The contrasting ideas of West and East about Government and economy was the driving force between the than two major forces of the World. The Western Nations were in favor of bringing democratic system of Government and Capitalist economy in the newly liberated Nations whereas, Russia considered it to its right specially on Eastern European countries. United States considered Communist's expansion more threatening in 1949, when Mao communists took control of China. Truman and Acheson inaugurated a plan called "Containment". Through this plan United States sent a message to all the newly liberated Nations and Europe that it will deploy all its resources in defending these Nations against expansionist Communist bloc. Its all-economic, Technical, Military assistances to such countries would be meant to block Communism. It considered Soviet expansion a fear for itself and its Allies. It therefore further made a Master Plan to build the dwindling economies as well as North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). In this purview United States continued its involvement in the World politics, to maintain its role as World leader. To show the Third World that United States was willing and capable to standup to communism anywhere in the World.