Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discrimination at employment and how to avoid it research paper
Workplace prejudice and discrimination
Discrimination scenarios in the workplace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
This week’s assignment presents two cases studies involving employers who may or may not have committed unfair labor practices under the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA). The two case studies, “Discharged for Facebook Comments” and “The Disputed Safety Bonus”, present two different employment scenarios where the behavioral actions of the employee lead the employer to terminate their employment (Holley, Jennings, & Wolters, 2012). In both cases, the employees filed unfair labor practice lawsuits against their former employers. This paper will summarize the two cases and seek to answer the questions asked at the end of each case study.
In the first case study, “Discharged for Facebook Comments”, the employer, an ambulance service, received a customer complaint regarding one of its unionized emergency medical technicians (Holley, Jennings, & Wolters, 2012). Table 1 summarizes the pertinent events occurring in this particular case study.
Table 1
Party Involved
Event
Supervisor Requests employee to file written response to complaint
Employee Requests union representation prior to filing a written response
Supervisor Denies employee’s request for union representation
Employee Posts negative comments on social media site regarding the supervisor
Co-Workers Reply to employee’s comments, offering support
Company Becomes aware of employee’s negative social media comments
Company Suspends employee pending investigation
Company Terminates employee’s employment, citing violation of company policy regarding blogging internet postings
Union Files unfair labor charge with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on behalf of the employee
Note. Adapted from “The labor relations process,” 10th edition by William H. Holley, Jr., Kenneth M. ...
... middle of paper ...
...d every employer has a duty to protect his interests and those of his employees by remaining vigilant to how the laws are applied to changing technologies.
Works Cited
Binger, R. A. (2011, August 30). Employee Social Media Griping: Can An Employer Terminate Employees Because of Their Social Media Posts Without Violating Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act? Retrieved November 9, 2013, from http://www.dannamckitrick.com/articles/2011/08/employee-social-media-griping-can-an-employer-terminate-employees-because-of-their-social-media-posts-without-violating-section-8a1-of-the-national-labor-relations-act/
Holley, W. H., Jennings, K. M., & Wolters, R. S. (2012). The labor relations process. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
National Labor Relations Act | NLRB. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.nlrb.gov/resources/national-labor-relations-act
The ethical issue in this situation is the willingness of the company’s director to prevent the employees from organizing in union. Among others, the company’s director try to use unfair tactic like diversion, intimidation, manipulation, termination of job contract and threat to shut down the company leading to massive loss of job. In an ethical standpoint, these tactics are wrong.
Defamation is a tort action that has been widely recognized, nonetheless, it has only been within recent years, that the concept has been increasingly utilized in the employment context (Mcconnell, 2000, p. 78) . However, it is useful to first lay out the elements of the defamation tort as they occur in the employment setting. First, there must be a false, and defamatory statement. A statement is defamatory if it harms the employee's reputation or discourages others; such as potential employers, from wanting to have any contact with the employee. Second, the statement, be it written or oral, must be "published," that is, transmitted to a third party. Next, the defendant/employer must be responsible for the publication of the false and defamatory statement. Last, defamation damage to the plaintiff must occur; caused either by the statement itself, or by its actionable
Moran, J. J. (2008). Employment law: New challenges in the business environment. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
...usly shamed, embarrassed, and demeaned their employees. I think this kind of behavior is a way of separating employers from employees. It helps keep employees in line and also adds the benefit of making employers feel good about themselves at the expense of their employees. Demeaning actions prevent employees from organizing or protesting for higher wages or better conditions. It keeps them “in their place” and does not allow them to hope or strive for anything better. In spite of the dehumanization of employees by employers, there are silent rebellions committed by lower class employees such as jokes, gossip, doing other's work, and just in general helping each other out. These are silent protests, they do not change the status quo in any way, that would be too risky for these employees. It is survival and caring in a corporate world that does not care about them.
...lley, W. H., Jennings, K. M., Wolters, R. S., & Mathis, R. L. (2012). Employment & Labor Relations. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
MacLaury, J. 1998. “A Brief History: The Department of Labor.” The United States Department of Labor.
Bennett-Alexander, Dawn D. & Hartman, Laura P. (2001). Employment Law for Business (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Primis Custom Publishing. Downloaded February 4, 2008 from the data base of http://www.eeoc.gov
Sloane. A. A., Witney, F. (2010). LABOR RELATIONS (13th editions). Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ
Mortimer, M., 2006. Employment Law and Labor Law. Employlaw.com retrieved December 11, 2008 from: http://www.employlaw.com/hoffa.htm
The balance of power between management and labor has long been an issue. Historically, employers had the upper hand, and workers were afforded few rights in terms of pay, working conditions, or fair treatment (Fossum, 2012). Individual workers found that they had little influence over their own work situations and were frequently at the mercy of employers. Over time though, some progress was made in drawing attention to the plight of workers. The power of organizing began to give groups of workers some voice in workplace matters. Unfortunately, however, initial attempts at unionization of workers during the nineteenth century were short-lived and often marked by violence (Fossum, 2012). It was not until the twentieth century that major legislation gave unions a sense of legitimacy and workers slowly gained some leverage in the employer-employee relationship.
Social media has immensely evolved in how many companies and employers do business in recent years. It has helped many companies grow and expand by usage of social media by mass and instant communication and advertising through this technology. Like anything, there is a side effect. The social media "downfall” is the subject of employees bashing their employer's reputation in regards of employee’s communication via social media about their employers. With such controversy, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has had to step in to distinguish what is considered lawful of unlawful termination due to these actions by employees and their employers. The question to ask if such an issue should arise is to determine if it is concerted activity or not. This will help the NLRB determine if proper disciplinary procedures have been taken.
Labour and Employment Law. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing Company.
Holley, William H, Kenneth M. Jennings, and Roger S. Wolters. The Labor Relations Process. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning, 2012. Print.
Labor relations emerged as response towards combating the economic unrest that accompanied the 1930 Great depression. At this period, massive unemployment, decreasing salary and wages, and over competition for jobs despite poor working conditions, was being experience; especially in the US. In turn employees were aggravated and therefore resorted to labor strike that often escalated to violence. To avoid such incident that could potentially harm further an ailing economy, the US government set precedent by passing their first related Labor relationship act, also referred to as the Wagner act. This act excluded public sector and some employees in the informal sector, farm workers to be specific. However, the progressive change in business and labor environment, necessitated changes in the labor laws to ensure they are more inclusive (Haywood & Sijtsma, 2000).
Suffield, L., & Templer A. (2012). Labour Relations, PH Series in Human Resources Management, 3rd Edition