Continuing high levels of unemployment was a major issue of concern in Britain during the interwar period of 1918 to 1939, and an issue which triggered a political commitment to full employment that lasted until the mid 1970’s. Despite an immediate post-war economic boom in 1918, the rate of unemployment throughout the period reached as high as 17.0 per cent (nearly three million people) and never fell below 7.4 per cent (M.E.F. Jones, 1984, p.386), a significantly higher rate than the pre-war (1870-1913) average of 5.8 per cent (T J Hatton, 2004, p.347). Much controversy exists about the specific causes of this high rate of unemployment. It is likely that no single factor was solely responsible. Instead here were a number of problems within the British economy and changes in export markets that must be considered in order to understand why the problem existed and why it persisted throughout much of the period.
The end of the First World War triggered a brief economic boom, where consumer demand rose as a result of the spending of income stored during the war. Consumer expenditure per head of the civilian population dropped to a low of £72.26 in 1918, only to rise to £78.48 in 1919 before declining again (S.N. Broadberry, 1990, p.273). This had a catastrophic effect on the shipping industry, where surges in consumer demand caused several ships to be ordered and built. However, such a short-lived boom was not anticipated, and so there was a severe slump in the industry resulting from over-supply. This lead to almost 60 per cent of those employed at the start of the post war period having lost their jobs by 1932 (A. E. Booth and S. Glynn, 1975, p.632).
Pre war Britain relied heavily on certain export industri...
... middle of paper ...
...oyment and the labour market, 1870–1939. In FLOUD, R. & JOHNSON, P., (eds.) The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain Volume 2: 1860-1939. Cambridge.
HEIM, C. E. (1983) Industrial Organisation and Regional Development in Inter-War Britain. In FLOUD, R. & JOHNSON, P., (eds.) The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain Volume 2: 1860-1939. Cambridge.
LEE, C. H. Scotland, 1860-1939: Growth and Poverty. In FLOUD, R. & JOHNSON, P., (eds.) The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain Volume 2: 1860-1939. Cambridge.
M. E. F. Jones (1984) The economic history of the regional problem in Britain, 1920-38. In Journal of Historical Geography, 10, 4. Academic Press Inc. (London) Ltd.
NATIONAL ARCHIVES. (2013) Interwar Period. [online] Available from: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cabinetpapers/themes/interwar-period.htm
[Accessed: 16th November 2013]
Encl. "World War I and the Economy." January 2001. Encyclopedia.com. Electoronic. 24 October 2013. .
Levine, Linda. “The Labor Market During the Great Depression and the Current Recession”. 19 June 2009. 6 March 2010. < http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/R40655_20090619.pdf>.
Whiteside, Noel and James Gillespie. "Deconstructing Unemployment: Developments in Britain in the Interwar Years," The Economic History Review, Vol. 44, No. 4. (Nov., 1991), pp. 665-682.
Cooper, Catherine W. "The Legacies Of Captain John Smith." American Geographical Society's Focus On Geography 50.1 (2007): 30-36. Academic Search Elite. Web. 13 Mar. 2014.
§ Lee, C. 'The Service Industries' in Floud, R. and McCloskey, D. (eds.) The Economic History of Britain Since 1700: Volume 2: 1860-1939 (1994) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Horwitz, Steven, and Michael J. McPhillips. "The Reality of the Wartime Economy: More Historical Evidence on Whether World War II Ended the Great Depression." Independent Review Vol. 17, No. 3 (2013): n. pag. Questia School. Web. 2 May 2014.
Derek Aldcroft` s article, `The Entrepreneur and the British economy, 1870-1914 published in 1964 spearheaded the broad indictment of the British entrepreneur...(2).......
In Britain, industrialization changed the lives of workers in many ways. One way workers lives changed is being able to earn higher wages. They could make more money in factories than on farms. Wi...
The mid 19th century was an age of growth like no other. The term “Industrial Revolution” refers to the time period where production changed from homemade goods, to those produced by machines and factories. As industrial growth developed and cities grew, the work done by men and women diverged from the old agricultural life. People tended to leave home to work in the new factories being built. They worked in dangerous conditions, were paid low wages, and lacked job security (Kellogg). It is difficult to argue, however, that the economic development of the United States was not greatly dependent on the industrial revolution.
...epression. Obviously the high need for workers during World War II made people earn money. Many of them saved a lot of their money because they knew that they would probably lose their job after the war. Then, when Congress decided to cut tax rates in 1945, Americans had much more money to spend and they felt confident in starting new businesses, which led to a very low unemployment rate after the war and the end of the Great Depression.
During the late 1700’s, the United States was no longer a possession of Britain, instead it was a market for industrial goods and the world’s major source for tobacco, cotton, and other agricultural products. A labor revolution started to occur in the United States throughout the early 1800’s. There was a shift from an agricultural economy to an industrial market system. After the War of 1812, the domestic marketplace changed due to the strong pressure of social and economic forces. Major innovations in transportation allowed the movement of information, people, and merchandise. Textile mills and factories became an important base for jobs, especially for women. There was also widespread economic growth during this time period (Roark, 260). The market revolution brought about economic growth through new modes of transportation, an abundance of natural resources, factory production, and banking and legal practices.
Kearns, Gerry. "The Imperial Subject: Geography and Travel in the Work of Mary Kingsley and Halford Mackinder." Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 22.4 (2004): 450-72. Web. 25 Apr 2010.
P. Deane. (1969). Structural change. In: Carlo M.Cipolla The Fontana Economic History of Europe The industrial revolution in England 1700-1914. London: p.Deane. 41-43
Over the last several years, Ireland has experienced a dramatic change in employment. A quick study of the latest CSO “Employment and Unemployment” survey shows where jobs have been lost and gained, by sector of employment. Some sectors have seen job losses in the hundreds of thousands while other sectors have been slowly growing. The period from April 2007 to April 2013, there has been a loss of 266,000 jobs (CSO, 2013). The study suggests that the loss of jobs was greatest in the Construction and Industry sectors. While gains occurred in the Education, Information and Communications, and Human Health and Social Work sectors. These changes show that the tasks associated with low, skill and education are on the decline. The jobs that need a higher education level are on the rise (National Skills Bulletin, 2013, 28). Due to this trend, subsidies in the Education sector should be increased to train and better equip the workforce. It would be of a great benefit to the entire economy, as an increase in education may attract more business to Ireland. It would also make the workforce more adaptable to change, giving people stability in their lives.
Unfortunately, there are many Americans out of work in today’s current declining economy. Unemployment can be defined as a person who is out of work involuntary, not by choice. These people are looking jobs and available to start work. Being unemployed can be disheartening and deciding what the next step is can be challenging. Underemployed can be described as being inadequately employed, such as a low-paying job that requires fewer skills than one possess. (Daly, Hobijn, and Kwok 2015) Making ends meet can be difficult for one who has been affected by this economy over the past few years. America still has a high unemployment rate since the decline of the current job market. And many Americans are struggling to establish the skills needed for employment, or the underemployed are force to lower they skill to make a profit. America’s economic status has force the underemployed and unemployed to make ends meet with the current jobs available. And last but not least some have also utilized these difficult times to venture into new discoveries to make life hassle free. So, we wonder is Americans giving up in today’s economy or do they settle for lower end job to establish a steady income to make ends.