Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Creation vs evolution argument essay
Creation versus evolution arguments
The debate on creation and evolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Creation vs evolution argument essay
The debate among creationists and evolutionists as to the origin of modern life on Earth has pushed increasingly into the limelight over the last several years. Unfortunately, such mainstream coverage has caused many of the related issues to become skewed and misinterpreted. In the article “Five Major Misconceptions about Evolution,” Mark Isaak attempts to make clear the true nature of evolutionary theory so that, if it must be challenged, such arguments can be made on a purely factual basis rather than, as Isaak says, “against a set of misunderstandings that people are right to consider ludicrous” (“Misconceptions” Para. 1). He presents these misconceptions and his explanation of the faulty logic behind each one in five main categories: “Evolution has never been observed,” “Evolution violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics,” “There are no transitional fossils,” “The theory of evolution says that life originated, and evolution proceeds, by random chance,” and “Evolution is only a theory; it hasn't been proved” (“Misconceptions” Para. 2). In addressing each of these proposed falsehoods individually, Isaak forms an argument with few faults that is clear, precise, and effective.
Mark Isaak is not the most well-known or established author, but he has written numerous articles, mostly about creation and evolution issues, but also on subjects as different as mythology and philosophy (“Home Page”). While not explicitly claiming to be any sort of expert in this particular subject, Isaak cites reliable scientific sources like Natural History in support of his argument.
Isaak doesn't seem to have one specific intended audience. His emphasis on systematically dissolving common misconceptions points to an intended audience of creationis...
... middle of paper ...
...ryone who works with the theory of evolution (and has a good working knowledge of it) is on the same “team,” so to speak, and “finding a better alternative to evolution would win them fame and fortune” (“Misconceptions” Para. 26), which is one final key example of Isaak's logical sensibility. By avoiding making harsh criticisms of opposing viewpoints and simply presenting the facts in an understandable way, Mark Isaak successfully reaches as close to a middle ground as possible in order to make the truth clear in such a polarized debate.
Works Cited
Isaak, Mark. "Five Major Misconceptions about Evolution." The TalkOrigins Archive. 01 Oct 2003. Web. 8 Sep 2009. .
---. "Mark Isaak's Home Page." Curiosities of Biological Nomenclature. 11 Aug 2008. Web. 14 Sep 2009. .
One Long Argument: Charles Darwin and the Genesis or Modern Evolutionary Thought. Ernst Mayr. Harvard University Press, 1993.
“Today in Dayton, they are selling more books on evolution than any other kind and the bookshops in Chattanooga and other cities of the state are hardly able to supply the demand for works on evolution. The trial has at least started people to thinking.” (Lienesch, 2007, p. 168)
Sarfati, Jonathan D. Refuting Evolution: A Response to the National Academy of Sciences' Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science. Green Forest, AR: Master, 1999. Print.
Darwin's theory of Evolution have been known by the world for many centuries. Even so, not all scientists supp...
Anyone with even a moderate background in science has heard of Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution. Since the publishing of his book On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection in 1859, Darwin’s ideas have been debated by everyone from scientists to theologians to ordinary lay-people. Today, though there is still severe opposition, evolution is regarded as fact by most of the scientific community and Darwin’s book remains one of the most influential ever written.
"Introduction to Creationism Versus Evolution: At Issue." Creationism vs. Evolution. Ed. Eric Braun. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. At Issue. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 18 May. 2014.
A lot of people, Christians and non-Christians alike often question the accuracy of the theory of evolution. Those who express doubts about the theory are often labelled “unscientific” or “backwards” by some in the pro-evolution camp. At times, the popular perception of evolution seems to be that it has been proven beyond all doubt and there are no scientific obstacles left for it. In fact, there are quite a few scientific flaws in the theory that provide many reasons for it to be doubted. It is true though, none of these questions necessarily disproves evolution, but they do show how the theory is less than settled.
The misunderstanding that the second law of thermodynamics disproves the possibility of evolution occurring gives rise to passionate discussions among evolutionists and creationists alike, however the argument reflects more so a lack of understanding of physics, and science in general, than a lack of understanding of biology and evolution. The statement evolution does not violate the second law of thermodynamics can be made because of correct scientific information, and research that provides proof. Unlike the opposing argument, there is no scientific evidence behind it.
18 February 2014 “NSTA Position Statement: The teaching of Evolution”. NSTA.org. -. nd. Web. The Web. The Web.
Talking on both sides of the debate, each side feels as though the other has no scientific reasoning come up with their theory. In reading the article written by Shipman, the evolutionists believe that intelligent design has no concrete evidence on how the world was crea...
Scott ensures to immediately cut that idea and replace it with the concept of common ancestors. This is because most people who deny the theory of evolution view it as a linear process even though it does not really work that way. As the book progresses it shifts into the spectrum of creationism and explaining the various creation myths, as well as the continuum of creationism and evolution which shows the degree of literal Biblical interpretation and how it corresponds with evolution, if at all. Scott also clarifies that the position of most people is not a “God did it” mindset, but it is closer to a mentality that God works through natural
Evolution views life to be a process by which organisms diversified from earlier forms, whereas creation illustrates that life was created by a supernatural being. Creation and evolution both agree on the existence of microevolution and the resemblance of apes and humans but vary in terms of interpreting the origins of the life from a historical standpoint. A concept known as Faith Vs Fact comprehensively summarizes the tone of this debate, which leads to the question of how life began. While creation represents a religious understanding of life, evolution acknowledges a scientific interpretation of the origins of life. The theory is illustrated as the process by which organisms change species over time.
One of the greatest questions of all time is: "Where the heck did we come from?" One of the most popular answers to this question is creationism, the idea that everything was created by a higher being. Another idea is evolution, the idea that all living organisms descended from a less complex organism. Up and coming in the last century, evolution possesses a new way of thinking that is being greatly accepted by the scientific community. Despite this fact many people argue that evolution has no facts to support it and there are several reasons why evolution can't happen.
Without evolution, and the constant ever changing environment, the complexity of living organisms would not be as it is. Evolution is defined as a process that results in heritable changes in a population spread over many generations (8).Scientists believe in the theory of evolution. This belief is based on scientific evidence that corroborates the theory of evolution. In Figure 1 the pictures of the skulls depict the sequence of the evolution of Homo-sapiens. As the figure shows, man has evolved from our common ancestor that is shared by homo-sapiens. The change of diet of homo-sapiens over time has thought to contribute to the change in jaw structure and overall skull shape.
As the Sealand lady points out, evolution cannot be denied and the chrysalid cannot be stopped in its development to the next stage. The Waknuk society's anti-intellectualism, which tries to put a stop to both logic and imagination, and its efforts to deny evolution, are doomed to be a dead end.