Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The educational system as a social institution
Macro theory in sociology
Educational system as a social institution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The educational system as a social institution
Veazie Street Elementary school has a complex and involved social culture with many different, often detrimental layers that can be studied through a sociological lens. Upon studying the Elementary school however, it is apparent that the school is significantly underperforming academically especially in their mathematic competencies. In order to completely understand the interaction between academically struggling Elementary schools and society as a whole each of the three theoretical perspectives of sociology must be addressed and evaluated. From a macro social perspective low performance schools can be viewed extremely differently but equally significant through the functionalist and conflict theories, and from a micro social perspective of symbolic interactionism. To begin, the functionalist perspective must first be outlined which at its most basic level, “emphasizes the contributions and functions performed by each part of society”(Dias), in this case the underperforming Veazie Street Elementary school. In a complex social society most aspects contribute to the society’s well- being and survival, including the consensus of the members of that society (Dias). These contributions according to the functionalist perspective are also symbiotic in which various parts of society will compensate and change due to a variation in another part. The changes can be explained by two types of human functions. Manifest functions which are obvious and “intended and recognized at the time”(Dias), and latent functions which are not obvious and “unintended and unrecognized until later” (Dias). This balancing act of society’s parts is principle to the functionalist perspective because it tends to produce stability, order, cooperation, and... ... middle of paper ... ...of students did score higher although there is still a large percentage that are not at appropriate comprehension level. It goes to show that symbolic interactionism truly is a micro social analysis due to the fact that every individual may subjectively interpret any symbol in daily life in a different light. Clearly each sociological perspective has something very different to say about how it views the social aspect of underperforming schools and the interaction they have with society as a whole. While functionalism focuses on certain positive aspects, and conflict theory argues our societies competitive tendencies, it is apparent that all three of the perspectives need to be addressed in order to gain a well-rounded educated opinion as to how any of societies’ many individual aspects fit into the massive complex web that defines our social structure.
To begin, Mary Sherry discusses the corrupt school system that lingers. In her article, we obtain insight on how schools
Functionalism views society as the stability and assimilation of a range of forces that function within it. While society is a separate entity with a life of its own, there are individual elements contributing to that stability. Functionalism as a sociological theory emphasizes assimilation rather than the dissociation of society. Therefore, the society is seen as a whole that is compromised of parts which give one another their identity and their function. The part, whether that is education, such as a school, or sports, such as a football team, operates in relation to the other parts, and cannot be entirely understood in isolation from the other parts. All the parts are interrelated, and when there is a disturbance in any one of the parts, is when you can see the interdependence. But what is important about this theory is that “there will always be some reorganization and tendency to restore equilibrium” (Wallace and Wolf 17). Functionalist do not believe it’s crucial that the people involved in the society to be aware of this interconnectedness anymore than the brain and heart consciously realize that they work together as an organism.
It’s no surprise that there are faults within our schools in today’s society. As both authors’ point out if our educational system is
We live in a society where we are surrounded by people telling us that school/education and being educated is the only way to succeed. However, the school system is not up to the standards we want it to uphold. There are three issues we discuss the most which are the government, the student, and the teacher. In John Taylor Gatto 's essay “Against School”, we see the inside perspective of the educational system from the view of a teacher. In “I Just Wanna Be Average”, an essay written by Mike Rose, we hear a student 's experience of being in a vocational class in the lower level class in the educational system when he was supposed to be in the higher class.
The functionalist perspective consist of institutions and social facts. The institutions are the structures that meet the needs for society: such as hospitals, businesses and police forces. Social facts are ways of thinking and acting, which were formed before individuals in society existed. An example of social currents is suicide. Functionalism tries to level both the social facts and institution which depend on each other. This causes for society to evolve by population growth. As the population grows, people in society become interdependent on each other, and move up in society. As Ryan's father did after he found all the evidence that lead his son to commit suicide. He saw the importance in the situation to announce to the other families to try to resolve the issue of suicide in the teeneage
Urban schools in New York City have been criticized for many failures in the last past years. Failures such as low achievement, disconnection between students and teachers, poor teaching methods, inappropriate conduct, lack of security, and lack of motivation from students as well as from teachers. To improve these issues, few changes have been implemented such as the metal detectors. The effectiveness of these changes is been questioned. But the best way to see the effectiveness, it’s by looking at the school’s progress. Most schools are still failing, which clearly means that the new methods are not working out. These unsuccessful adjustments lead to a possibility for a reform in the school system. The reform would have to consider changes not only from the system itself, but also the areas that surround the school. Therefore, it is not reasonable to expect that urban schools can be reformed without changing the political economy of urban areas. The reasons why it cannot be reformed is because the political economy determines the amount of resources available, generate a lot of violence, and creates teenagers who will be pursued to the “code of the streets”. When it comes to change, it always works better starting from the outside to the
In a broad sense, the field of social foundations of education entails beliefs and values in school and society, the political economy in schools and society, and the culture of the school. There are a magnitude of social forces that affect educational policies on a daily basis such as; government, religion, family and the economy. Each of these social structures influences one another which results in many conflicts in regards to a “democratic education.” The social foundations of education do not meet the criteria of a democratic education because of certain laws or rules that are established. For example, the delegation of funds in schools is solely based on the property taxes of a specific community. Therefore, the schools in poor communities receive less funding than the schools in wealthy areas. When young people have no say in the regulations that they are bound by, then they cannot be said to live in a democratic environment or understand what it truly means to be “democratically educated.”
Haroutunian-Gordon, Sophie, and Elizabeth Meadows. School: Studies in Education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2009. Print.
High school and college dropout rates are at an all time high. Secondary school students are told throughout high school that if they don’t go to college then they will never be successful. Going to college doesn’t always make a difference because many career choices such as teachers and lawyers are highly contested and result in either no job or low salary. Low pay deters teacher’s motivation and they tend to work part time jobs to supplement their income. Public schools standards are comparable to a kangaroo court’s procedure; private schools are known for better teachers, environment, and test grades. The major problems in the public school system include the lack of funding, lack of resources, and lack of standards.
By analyzing these functions, one can gain a better understanding of the problem at hand. In a school community the function of production is fulfilled by the teachers who produce scholars. Next is distribution. The teachers distribute grades to the students, the school distributes paychecks to the teachers, and the state distributes money to the school based on performance on national tests. Third comes consumption. The students consume knowledge through books, technology, etc. One example that schools contribute to socialization, is through the formation of cliques, which may alienate some students as well as affect their learning. The function of social control is fulfilled in the fact that the school’s funding is based on performance. This falls in line with the notion that public school teachers teach the test as opposed to the course’s actually curriculum. They [the teacher’s] know that if the school does not perform well on the test that it could not only cost the school it’s funding, but that they could also potentially lose their job. In this scenario, the function of social participation is fulfilled by the teachers banning together and staging a ‘sickout.’ Students and parents alike helped to fulfill the function of mutual support. According to The Detroit News (2015), Students carried signs with messages such as, “Cure to Snyder Flu: A strike to win,” “Stop Snyder’s Plan to Destroy Detroit Public Education” and “Stop Snyder’s Plan to Destroy Detroit Public Schools.” Parent Donya Scott, whose two daughters attend Detroit School of Arts said she supported the teachers. “I think it’s pretty cool and I give them a thumb’s up,” she said. “We need DPS because this is where it all started. I don’t think
Structural functionalists believe that society leans towards social order and equilibrium. Institutions such as education are like important organs that keep the society/body healthy and well that is how structural functionalist view education. Social equilibrium means the same as social order, and is guaranteed when nearly everyone accepts the general moral values of their society. Hence structural functionalists believe the aim of key institutions, such as education, is to socialise children and teenagers. Socialization is the process by which the new generation learns the knowledge, attitudes and values that they will need as productive citizens. Although this aim is stated in the formal curriculum, it is mainly achieved through "the hidden
Social forces play a major role in the achievement that takes place in our nation’s schools. Factors that take place outside of the classroom have significant effects that intrude on a child’s learning environment. These social forces hold no prejudice to the youth for whom they afflict and arise in every school setting across the public school system. It is important that one recognizes the impact that social forces have on the future leaders of our country and what conflicts they create for our present day learners. Because we live in a competitive society and want to be able to compete in the global economy, achievement pressure runs rampant in classrooms across the country (Anxiety.org, 2011). When parents and teachers can become aware of the emotional burdens and adverse effects that high achievement pressures carry, they will no doubt second guess their choice to perpetuate them (Weissbourd, 2011). The first step in solving any problem is to first be able to acknowledge it.
Overall, society places much importance on education, often regarding it as the main source of social mobility. Functionalist, Talcott Parsons (1959) believes the most important part of secondary socialisation is education, as it serves to pass on the norms and values of wider society which apply outside of the home. Functionalists argue that there is no inequality, since education is free and provides a formal curriculum of core subjects, such as: English; Maths; and Science. Parsons claims the education system passes on vital information and evaluates everyone through the same competiti...
The functionalist perspective argues for education as a means of development from simple, traditional social structures to more complex, modern ones. Drawing heavily from biological theories, functionalism equates society with a living organism composed of various internal systems, asserting that an understanding of these systems, in our case social practices and institutions, requires an examination of the means by which they serve the ‘body’, society (Feinberg and Solitis, ). In assessing the relationship between education and development, it is imperative to note that functionalists associate the advent of formal, compulsory education with the requirements of modern society, with modernity seen as synonymous with industrialization. That
According to Parsons, a leading functionalist, ‘schools, like the wider society, operate on a meritocratic basis where children achieve their status according to merit, or worth, rather than the basis of their sex, race, or class’ (Parson & Bales 1956, cited in Giddens & Sutton 2013, p. 871) and this follows the basic functional idea that society should have inequality, but based around a person’s individual worth to the society, and not by their socio-economic background or any other factor outside of their control. Conflict theorists reject this as they say an individual’s worth is consistently heavily influences by their lineage. Functionalists justify the resulting inequality of their meritocratic system as people receive what they deserve; a different kind of equality. Sadovnik (2011) continues to write that schooling provides the opportunity for the development and preservation of modern and democratic societies, particularly in regards to equal opportunities for everyone. Pierre Bordieu contradicts this, arguing that schools are only there for the advancement of middle and upper class families, leaving many working class children alienated from any education (Holmes 2015), and Sadovnik (2011) adds that many conflict theorists suggest functionalists are confusing reality with ideology in terms of education deliverance, with