Uk Constitution Should Be Controlled

Everyone’s freedom is a primary vehicle to creativeness and chance to perform their opportunities that given to people. However, freedom is valuable, so there is also democracy and rights. Given this, a constitution is key of freedom, democracy and rights, although to achieve that, the constitution should be controlled. This essay will first explore the reflection of the unwritten way that UK maintain to their constitution of thousands of years, against the overwhelming majority of written constitutions and how it is working methodically with a focus on its sources. Next, it will investigate the level of standard that UK adopted the Rule of Law with a particular reference to Dicey Theory. Parliamentary Sovereignty will be also considered essentially

Generally, the significance of UK’s Constitution resemble with a treasury of a country, which have layers and each layer contains each sources of the UK constitution. Britain is believed that they have an unwritten constitution. This is myth whereas Britain do have partly written documents1 with non-legal sources such as conventions that consist of their Constitution.2 Britain do not have one single document (Codified Constitution), which Americans have. The Monarchy (Constitutional Monarchy) is the primary reason that UK have uncodified constitution and has further power than the judiciary. If Britain decide to codify their constitution which has to do, will provide power to judges for the interpretation of the case law,3 whereas common law need to be accurate. Under the R (Jackson and Others) v Attorney General (2005), a conflict between the two Houses occurred and consequently Parliament Acts used to force the Bill and a Royal Assent was given and the Act was created. The effective laws have been beneficial to people who needs to survive and applied to their lives without dilemmas. People at least pay attention if monarchy is unelected or unable to force the country or if they are remaining neutral which prevent the chaos of the politicized people. Therefore, constitution should be the customary law and the sources would be the strong

Magna Carta (Great Charter) has been one of the oldest documents, which begins the story of the powerful empires of that time set out rules of the people’s lives and future and with The Bill of Rights 1689, gave further rights to people and respect them with a democratically opinion of the Parliament. The Act of Settlement 1700, was famous after the unity of the three countries and the creation of the Great Britain. The Treaty of Union 1706, created the current and most powerful state with their own currency, unified parliament, and the administration of the country. The European Communities Act 1972, probably is the primary reason that UK have the most serious problems with the European laws which provided in two cases. Finally, it will be explain clearly the problems of The HRA and The Bill of Rights 1689. Therefore, this essay admire the sources of British constitution and the pride of the history of the sources and the conservation of them, albeit the preferable of a codified one, which will solve several problems of the