Tyranny In George Orwell's Animal Farm

620 Words2 Pages

If Napoleon decides that he can walk on two legs, sleep in beds, and drink alcohol what was the point of the rebellion? They say that they want to get away from human activities but yet they are still exerting them into their daily lives. Why would Napoleon let the animals do that if that is what they were trying to get away from? To me it seems like they aren't trying to get away from it. It seems like Napoleon wants to portray a human role and be powerful at the same each time. He does it without considering anyone else's feelings. So, I believe tyranny isn't helpful to the animals on the animal farm, because everyone isn't equal like they promised, Napoleon can make decisions without discussing it with anyone else, and Napoleon scare the animals into listening so he can lie as much as he wants with no consequences. One reason that tyranny isn't good for the …show more content…

For example, he lied about the snowball stories. One way that I know is because they said that snowball came and stole the key and threw it down a well. Then, they found it under a sack of food and said that he came in the middle of the night and hid it there. So, how did he throw it down a well one night, then climbed down and up the well the next night so he can hide it under a sack of food and he didn't get caught by any animal? How did he knock the windmill down during the storm if he is only a little pig? He also said that snowball was sided with the farmer the whole time and that he had documents to prove it. Well since he had proof how come he didn't show the animals so that they can see the proof that snowball was a trader. As you can see, he can lie about anything he wants without any consequences at all. As you can see, tyranny in the animal farm isn't helpful. It will only works for so long. Soon they will notice that they're being lied to. What happens

Open Document