On Federalist Paper #47 of 1788, James Madison states, "The accumulation of all powers... in the same hands... may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny." (Doc 1) Tyranny is prevented by the Constitution in many ways. This includes using a type of government known as Federalism, forming Congress with both the House of Representatives and the Senate, as well as using a system of checks and balances. Although the United States has been protected from tyranny due to the Constitution for over 200 years, it was not the first attempt of the country to create a government that would not lead to tyranny. The Articles of Confederation, the original constitution of the U.S. was the first step. But, the Articles of Confederation clearly did not do enough to protect against tyranny. For example, under the Articles of Confederation, the states were not obliged to pay taxes to the federal government which lead to the states …show more content…
being tyrant over the federal government. It was clear that the country was falling apart which lead to the creation of the Constitution of the United States. Federalism is the separation of powers between the federal and state governments.
It is pretty clear that this has been a key way to preventing tyranny in the U.S. The federal government of the U.S. is made up of three branches known as the executive, legislative and judicial. The constitution has vested certain powers on these branches. But, any powers that are not specifically granted to the federal government are given to the state governments. Under the 10th Amendment, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people." Federalism did not exist within the Articles of Confederation which lead the state governments to become a tyrant over the federal government. By forming their own armed forces, coining their own money and collecting taxes based on their own will, the states were recognizably their own functioning countries. Federalism assures that neither the state or the federal government will be a tyrant over the
other. Although federalism prevents the federal and state governments from being tyrant over one another, it does not fully prevent different states themselves from being tyrant over each other. When the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia was held, one of the main problems was deciding how states would be represented. The larger states agreed with the Virginia Plan which would base representation based on population. On the contrary, the smaller states agreed with the New Jersey Plan which would provide equal representation for all states. So, the Great Compromise would be suggested which would suit both small and large states. Congress, part of the legislative branch, would consist of both the House of Representatives and the Senate. (Doc 3) The representation in the House of Representatives would be based on state population while representation on the Senate would be equal for all states. (Doc 3) Federalism also does not provide full protection against branches of the federal government from becoming a tyrant over one another. So, a system of checks and balances was created that grants power to the three distinct yet collective branches of power with which each have the ability to perform checks on one another. On Federalist Paper #51 of 1788, James Madison states, "...the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices...as that they may be a check on the other...(The three branches) should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other." Document 2 shows that the judicial branch has control over the other branches with the power of declaring acts unconstitutional. The legislative branch, for example, has the power to impeach the President and Supreme Court judges. (Doc 2) The executive branch also has power to keep check on the other branches such as to veto a Congressional legislation and nominate judges for the Supreme Court. (Doc 2) The Constitution of the United States has defended against tyranny for over 200 years in many ways. The framers carefully drafted the Constitution keeping in mind that anyone and anything could be tyrant over another. The Articles of Confederation clearly had not done enough to prevent tyranny within the country. Federalism plays a pretty large role in protecting the U.S. from tyranny, although other parts of the Constitution are used to fully prevent tyranny. The Great Compromise protects states from being a tyrant over one another while the system of checks and balances prevents the branches of the federal government from being a tyrant over one another. The Constitution of the United States may not, arguably, be perfect. But, it certainly has proven, over the years, to provide great protection against tyranny.
The first guard against tyranny was federalism which means a compound government.In James Madison's quote in Document A it says "In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided
One way that the constitution can guard against tyranny is with Federalism. Federalism is the distribution of powers between the state and the federal government. This prevents both the state and the federal government from having too much power. For example, in Doc A, it says that only states can set up schools, but only the federal government can set up post offices. This makes it
“Give me liberty, or give me death.” We must diminish tyranny among our government. How did the United States accomplish this? After the Revolutionary War, the Founding Fathers decided to construct a government that was of the people, by the people, and for the people. By doing so, they needed to prevent the more than likely possibility of overbearing power falling into the hands of one or a few people, in other words a prevention of tyranny was needed (1769). This structure was stated in the Constitution, a written document that framed our American government, and so the Constitution declared four ways to prevent tyranny: Federalism, Separation of Power, Checks and Balances, and the Great compromise.
You little tyrant king george off with your head.Since the Americans had a bad experience with one person having too much power they made a constitution that guarded against tyranny by, dividing power, making the branches able to check or limit each other, and dividing power between big and little states.
The Constitution guarded against tyranny through Federalism, Separation of powers, Checks and Balances, and The Great Compromise. The constitution guarded against tyranny using federalism. [Federalism is the system where the states and central government share power.] [Document A was written by James
James Madison once said,” All men having power ought to be distrusted.” Through these words, Madison made the statement that not all government officials use their authority for good; some abuse that power and use it to gain more for themselves rather than vesting it within the people. This issue may lead to tyranny. Tyranny is when all powers belong to only one person or group. In May of 1787, the Constitutional Convention was held in Philadelphia to draft a better constitution. One of the topics that concerned many was how the constitution would guard against tyranny. Madison and the other delegates wanted a Constitution that would be strong enough to unite the states and the people together without letting there be one person or group gain too much power. They achieved this in several ways. Today, the U.S. Constitution guards against tyranny by including a separation of powers, federalism, and the fair representation of states.
The year of 1776 was a time of revolution, independence, and patriotism. American colonists had severed their umbilical cord to the Mother Country and declared themselves “Free and Independent States”.1 The chains of monarchy had been thrown off and a new government was formed. Shying away from a totalitarian government, the Second Continental Congress drafted a document called the Articles of Confederation which established a loose union of the states. It was an attempt at self-government that ended in failure. The Articles of Confederation had many defects which included a weak central government that lacked the power to tax, regulate trade, required equal representation and a unanimous vote to amend the Articles, and had only a legislative branch. As a result the United States lacked respect from foreign countries. These flaws were so severe that a new government had to be drafted and as a result the Constitution was born. This document remedied the weak points of the federal government and created one that was strong and fair, yet still governed by the people.
Tyranny is a monster, it has the power to make a country crumble and the people’s rights inside the country to be violated. The reason why this has not been seen in American since 1787 is because of our founding fathers wrote a new Constitution which placed strong safeguards against tyranny. This Constitution guarded against tyranny by establishing separations of power, a system of checks and balances, federalism, and the protection of big states and small states in government. The reason that this new Constitution was created is the Articles of Confederation was too weak. The states had more power over the National Government, which led to problems when the National Government went to collect tax money to pay off the war debt. Another problem with the Articles of Confederation was each state could use any currency they wanted. There was no main currency throughout the states which led to problems when people needed to buy things.
Thomas Jefferson once said “Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.” Over time I have begun to believe that America is evolving into a dystopian society and it is caused greatly by the fact that the United States is a tyranny disguised as a democracy. The reason that the United States government isn’t understood to be a tyranny is because they don’t directly oppress their citizens, but through psychological control make us indirectly oppress ourselves.
Assuring the people, both Alexander Hamilton and James Madison insisted the new government under the constitution was “an expression of freedom, not its enemy,” declaring “the Constitution made political tyranny almost impossible.” (Foner, pg. 227) The checks and balances introduced under the new and more powerful national government would not allow the tyranny caused by a king under the Parliament system in Britain. They insisted that in order achieve a greater amount of freedom, a national government was needed to avoid the civil unrest during the system under the Articles of Confederation. Claiming that the new national government would be a “perfect balance between liberty and power,” it would avoid the disruption that liberty [civil unrest] and power [king’s abuse of power in England] caused.
Before the adoption of the United States Constitution, the U.S. was governed by the Articles of Confederation. These articles stated that almost every function of the government was chartered by the legislature known as Congress. There was no distinction between legislative or executive powers. This was a major shortcoming in how the United States was governed as many leaders became dissatisfied with how the government was structured by the Articles of Confederation. They felt that the government was too weak to effectively deal with the upcoming challenges. In 1787, an agreement was made by delegates at the Constitutional Convention that a national judiciary needed to be established. This agreement became known as The Constitution of the United States, which explicitly granted certain powers to each of the three branches of the federal government, while reserving other powers exclusively to the states or to the people as individuals. It is, in its own words, “the supreme Law of the Land” (Shmoop Editorial Team).
Between 1787 and 1791 the Framers of the US Constitution established a system of government upon principles that had been discussed and partially implemented in many countries over the course of several centuries, but never before in such a pure and complete design, which we call a constitutional republic. Since then, the design has often been imitated, but important principles have often been ignored in those imitations, with the result that their governments fall short of being true republics or truly constitutional. The Framers of the Constitution tried very hard to design a system that would not allow any one person or group within the government to gain too much power. Personally, I think they succeeded. In order to guard against what one of the Founding Fathers called an "excess of democracy," the Constitution was built with many ways to limit the government's power. Among these methods were separating the three branches, splitting the legislature so laws are carefully considered, and requiring members of Congress to meet certain criteria to qualify for office. The Founders did leave a few problems along with their system.
The principle of federalism was established by the Constitution to protect the country from tyranny as well. In this case, it is said that the national government cannot over power the fifty states. In the fifty states, each state consists of two democratic representatives.
Even before the Constitution was ratified, strong argument were made by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison in the Federalist Papers urging the inclusion of a federal form of government to replace the failed confederation. In Federalist Paper No. 9 Hamilton states, “This form of government is a convention by which several smaller states agree to become members of a large one, which they intend to form. It is s kind of assemblage of societies that constitutes a new one, capable of increasing, by means of new associations, until they arrive to such a degree of power as to be able to provide for the security of a united body” (Usinfo.state.gov). The people of the United States needed a central government that was capable of holding certain powers over the states.
The founding fathers carefully constructed the American system of government to prevent tyranny from once again ruling the colonies. The separation of powers was the most important idea in this aspect as it gave power at the top to many different areas. Within this separation, each branch has the ability to check the other branches so none can become more powerful than another. The American system of government fights against tyranny with representation by refining and enlarging the public interest.