Two Power Houses in a Powerless Land: Russia and United States

772 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Russian tensions with the US and Soviet Union

Two Power Houses in a Powerless land.
In April 2009, United States president Barack Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev grabbed attention in the London G20 summit by saying that they would give US -Russia relation a fresh start. They stressed that the United States and Russia will now focus on mutual interest. After being invited to Russia a few months after the G20 summit President Obama and Russian President Medvedev announced the Obama–Medvedev Commission to improve communication and cooperation between the United States and Russia.
Developments between the two countries progressed after the 2009 G20 summit as well. In fact, during the 2012 Seoul Nuclear Summit, US President Barack Obama was overheard on camera assuring Russian President Medvedev that he will have “more flexibility” in his second term, to which Medvedev replied, “I will transmit this information to Vladimir”. Although, this was in regards to anti-missile defense, it clearly showed the calm relation to happen in Obama’s second term.
However, things haven’t gone according to plan. In recent months after Obama’s start of his second term, relations have degraded rather than improving. The fight for power betweenIt started with Edward Snowden leaking classified documents, and lastly being granted asylum in Russia. The relations intensified when the nations had different stand points about the situation in Syria. The war in Syria has had a significant corrosive effect on the Relations between the United States and Russia. IN regards to Syria, the United States has a very negative track record with them. Back in 2002, the United States included Syria in a list of state that make up an “axis of evil” which was first listed by President Bush. The two nations pa...

... middle of paper ...

...ary power to influence the decisions made not only by the Assad Regime in Syria but also to influence the likes of Israel and Saudi Arabia as she can have greater advantage in the future by having better relations with these nations. However, Putin’s Russa stopped all attempts made by the United States to make any intervention in Syria. On 19 July, 2013 Russia, for the third time, vetoed against the United Nations Resoltution that would have punished the Syrian government with economic sanctions for failing to carry out a peace plan. This shows the role of how power influences between the two nations.
On 18 April 2013 American allies Britain and France provided letters to the United Nations claiming possession of evidence that chemical weapons have been utilized multiple times in the time ncluding in and around the cities of Aleppo, Homs and possibly Damascus.

Show More
Related

  • Soviet Union Dbq

    678 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States and The Soviet Union were originally joined together by the want to defeat The Nazi army, in 1941-1945. The alliance remained, and strengthened, among the two until the end of World War II. At the end of World War II, a rupture between the two occurred. The differences began earlier, but there was a straw that broke the camels back. The reason The United States and The Soviet Union’s alliance did not work out is because The Soviet Union and The United States were complete opposites, The Soviet Union proved to be faulty, and they were never truly allies.

    Read More

  • Watershed Years

    861 Words  | 2 Pages

    The major factor that led to the true end of the Cold War was the ongoing personal and diplomatic relationship between Presidents George H. Bush and Mikhail Gorbachev. This resulted in the reduction of the Russian military and favorable arms agreements. Key indicators of the substance behind this relationship were the Soviet troop withdrawals from Czechoslovakia, Afghanistan, and Hungary (lifting the Hungarian/Austrian “Iron Curtain” along the border). Subsequently the opening of the Berl...

    Read More

  • Cold War

    1240 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1992, Russian President Boris Yeltsin and U.S. President George Bush formally declared that their countries did not regard each other as potential enemies (Walker). These events marked the end of the Cold War and of communist threat as we know it.

    Read More

  • The Moscow Theater Hostage Crisis

    2016 Words  | 5 Pages

    Half an hour later the president of Russia and Russian authorities were informed. An hour later Russian troops and the police secured the perimeter and started to discuss about different possible assault tactics.

    Read More

  • Kissinger and Me

    872 Words  | 2 Pages

    Once Kissinger has this truth to form the foundation of his argument, he introduced his major claim: that the crisis is an opportunity to achieve greater cooperation between the west and Russia. This is not only his thesis, but it also establishes a loci of the preferable wherein greater cooperation between global powers is deemed more valuable than confrontation.

    Read More

  • Failure of the Détente Between the Superpowers

    1275 Words  | 3 Pages

    Failure of the Détente Between the Superpowers The French word ‘détente’, which the Oxford English Dictionary describes as “the easing of strained relations, especially in a political situation” (www.oed.com), first appeared in this context when a German newspaper used it to describe the visit of a British monarch at the beginning of the 20th century (Froman, 1991). In this essay, I will attempt to explain the cold war détente between the superpowers of the USA and the USSR in the 1970’s, concentrating first on its positive developments between 1971 and 1973 and then on the events that lead to its ultimate failure, symbolised by the soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979. The first real steps of relaxation of tensions were taken with the Moscow summit and the signing of the SALT 1 (Strategic Arms Limitations Talks) agreement in May 1972. The SALT agreement was a staring point for attempts to control nuclear arms, to restrict the impact and spread of nuclear weapons and to secure a balance due to ‘Mutual Assured Destruction’ (the notion that a nuclear attack from one side would lead to a retaliation from the other and therefore both sides would be greatly damaged) between the two superpowers and were to be followed up by further arms limitations talks within the next five years (Kent and Young, 2004). Also, agreements were reached on lowering the risk of accidental confrontation and on cooperation in science, health and environmental issues.

    Read More

  • America's Extreme Power In The Twentieth Century

    1078 Words  | 3 Pages

    Let’s back up a little bit. During World War Two, Russia, or the Soviet Union, and the United States were allies when they had a common enemy, which was Adolf Hitler’s Germany. It is like that old saying “The enemy of my enemy is my friend,” this is especially true of these two powerful countries. After Germany was defeated, and the United States and Soviet Union no longer had any reason to be allied, so they started becoming more and more split.

    Read More

  • The Dual Executive: The Prime Minister Of Russia

    606 Words  | 2 Pages

    Russian government has and continues to revolve around the current President. The communistic country has deferred most if not all of its power to the sitting leader, who can do anything from appointing the head of government, to dissolving a whole branch of legislature. This mixed government system allows the President of Russia to be in complete and total control of the country leaving a foul, dictatorship like stain on whomever is ‘honored’ to bear the title. Russian Presidents can also influence many things outside of the government, such as the media and military. One of the most important things that the Russian President can do is appoint the Prime Minister of the nation.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of President Barack Obama's Speech To The Nation On Syria

    1087 Words  | 3 Pages

    The night before the anniversary of 9/11 in 2013, Barack Obama delivered a speech to the United States of America on the subject of Syria’s inhumane use of chemical weapons on its own citizens. The United States’ intelligence analysts estimated that more than 1,400 civilians were killed due to the chemical warheads that were launched on the area right outside of Damascus. In President Barack Obama’s address to the nation on Syria, he attempts to persuade the American people to support his plan of a targeted air strike on Syria. By describing the victims of Syria, giving reasons for the inhumanity of the Syrian government, and reinforcing his credibility,

    Read More

  • Violence and Crisis in Syria

    2020 Words  | 5 Pages

    ...lecting convincing evidence that Syria has used Sarin gas in Ghouta, Syria. Currently, diplomacy has prevailed; the Security Council has shown rare unity on Syria by passing Resolution 2118 requiring Syria to destroy its current stockpile of chemical weapons and prohibits Syria from using, developing, stockpiling, or transferring any chemical weapons. Syria by not agreeing to these terms will face penalties under Chapter Seven of the United Nations Charter. Syrian government has yet to defy the resolution and the OPCW has declared they have successfully destroyed the sites used for production of the chemical weapons it remains to be seen whether the 2014 deadline for destroying Syria’s current stockpile of ammunition will be met in light of the ongoing destabilizing conditions. Despite this amount of progress fighting between the regime and rebels has continued on.

    Read More

  • Putin Research Paper

    580 Words  | 2 Pages

    Putin ruined there democracy as himself president. He had to much control and did not know what to do. Putin has a lot of experience now than he did a long time ago but he still did not fix this problem. Russia is not doing what they need to do in their economy right now. Putin may not be able to fix what he had started.

    Read More

  • Constructivism and The Civil War in Sirya

    830 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since March 2011, Syria had no longer experienced a situation called peace and harmony. Syrian’s daily life is filled with the events of killing, bombing and torturing of their brothers and sisters. This unresolved conflict began with a revolution to against the government for brook the promise to have betterment in political system (citation). However the government had responded by harsh action. Starting from this point, Syria had slide into Civil War. Based on the brief description about situation in Syria, I strongly believe that the best International Relation theory to describe this situation is constructivism. This is because the Civil War in Syria is socially constructed by some factors which will be discussed deeply in the next paragraph. In this essay, I will emphasize on the two factors that lead to Syria Civil War which are identity conflict in a state and the absence of shared norms of sovereignty; and provide a solution from constructivism perspective which is diplomacy negotiation and limitation to it.

    Read More

  • Realism And Liberalism Essay

    1539 Words  | 4 Pages

    Jack Donnelly states that “Theories are beacons, lenses of filters that direct us to what, according to the theory, is essential for understanding some part of the world.” These various theories, or lenses for viewing the world help us understand the way in which countries interact and why things occur in the field of international relations. The two main schools of thought in the field are Realism and Liberalism. One must understand these theories in order to be able to understand what is happening in the world. Understanding the filters that are Liberalism and Realism, one can look to make some sort of understanding as to what is happening right now between the Ukraine and Russia. The subsequent annexation of the province of Crimea by Russia is of paramount importance to multi governmental organisations like the United Nations and the European Union who are looking to understand this event from the Realist perspective as well as the Liberal paradigm.

    Read More

  • International System Essay

    926 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since the earliest recorded history, there has always been one elusive title that a State has strived for, the title of Super Power. Power is one of the fundamental characteristics of the international system and the distribution of power among states. It is obvious that states are unequal in power and this “entails a number of important implications for international politics”. As a result of this lack of power, the ‘weak states’ desires and concerns are often neglected and the ‘strong states’ demands usually shape the international agenda. In the Modern Society, some would argue that we have two great powers in Russia and the United States, but if you measure and compare the two countries, The United States is more powerful. Some of these categories are population in which the U.S has more than double Russ...

    Read More

  • Essay On Angela Merkel

    1178 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...the invitation while congratulating Chancellor Merkel on creating a new government at the end of 2013. Merkel is not ready to let bygones be bygones, though. She has publicly stated that relations between the U.S. and Germany were heavily strained as Snowden flooded the internet with NSA documents. President Obama will need to work fast to strengthen the bonds with Chancellor Merkel. The shift in Ukraine’s leadership, and Russia’s subsequent annexation of Crimea means this is no time for the U.S. and Germany to be at odds with one another. For her part, Chancellor Merkel has taken a stand similar to Obama’s when it comes to Russia and Crimea. They both have agreed on sanctions against Russia. Merkel has even called on all of the European countries to make sure Russia knows they all stand united, while at the same time leaving the lines of communication open.

    Read More

More about Two Power Houses in a Powerless Land: Russia and United States

Open Document