As we have been chosen to head up our department in a company merger, we have described how we will become a team through the stages of growth as well as how we will resolve conflict.
The first four stages of team growth were developed by Bruce Wayne Tuchman. This was published in 1965. “Tuckman’s Stages” were formed because Tuckman believed “that these stages are inevitable in order for a team to grow to the point where they are functioning effectively together and delivering high quality results.” Forming, storming, norming and performing are all crucial steps in making a team successful. In 1977, Tuckman and Mary Ann Jensen added a fifth stage, the adjourning stage. (P) Just because there are several talented people in a group together
…show more content…
As a team they learn what the challenges will be and what is expect of them. As a newly formed team, the members will decide on roles and ground rules. As this stage, the leader needs to be direct and understand the goals for the team to move through each stage successfully (The Team Building Directory). During this times deadlines, member’s skills, backgrounds, and interests should be discussed. Team members should familiarize themselves with each other. “During this stage, the team will probably not be very productive yet because this stage focuses more on the people than the task at hand” (5 STAGES OF TEAM DEVELOPMENT). This is where the team leader or the management staff that will be overseeing the team, start looking for team members to add to the team. It isn’t as easy as just selecting random people from within the organization or just asking people to sign up and allowing those people to start. The leader must select individuals who have a specific background or experience level that will allow for the team to be effective and collaborative. The leader plays their biggest role in this stage as well once the team is formed. The team members are still getting to know each other and are learning about the project. The leader must be able to push the team forward and help the members of the team figure out their roles. This stage could take some time because it could take longer for some members …show more content…
The team is in unison with the goals that are set. There are still problems but when the team comes together to express the differences and work toward resolving the issue, it is certainly leading to the next step in team development. Dysfunctional conflict will hinder the team development: goals will not be reached, thus making the team split because consensus is not obtained. Dysfunctional conflict, if not resolved immediately, will hinder the team performance. There are 2 types of conflicts. Task conflict occurs during brainstorming, which is where most conflicts begin. The team comes up with ideas and then everyone agrees or disagrees with the idea. The person whose idea is rejected may have hurt feelings or may still feel the rejected idea is still the best answer. This type of conflict can be resolved easily by openly discussing the issue involved. The relationship conflict involves personality clash. This is termed a dysfunctional conflict. This type of conflict is not as easily resolved. Two personality clash, for example both trying to take control of the meeting, both personalities are aggressive. The third step is the Process conflict which involves who is responsible for what part of the project and how it will be done. The process conflict should be easy to resolve and contain once brainstorming is
Psychologist Bruce Tuckman came up a team building strategy “forming, storming, norming, and performing”. He explained how to follow this strategy to formulate a team, and to take the team to a high level of performance. The movie Remember the Titians is one of the best examples to explain these four stages of Tuckman.
The value of using Tuckman’s model (forming, storming, norming, performing, adjourning) is that it helps us understand that teams evolve. It also helps us to consider how they may encounter different problems at different stages of their development.
An effective team typically develops through several stages. Tuckman and Jensen developed a model for how teams should develop that includes five stages: forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning (as cited in Martin ,2006 and Fulk, Bell,& Bodie ,2011). In forming, the first stage in team development, team members are introduced to the team’s purpose and goals(Martin, 2006 ; Fulk et al. ,2011). Fulk et al. (2011) explain that members are usually motivated and excited about working together to accomplish the specific goal, but they point out that interactions among team members can be affected by uncertainty about purpose, anxiety, mistrust ,and reluctance to share ideas and opinions. Nevertheless, despite such uncertainties, team members usually avoid conflict and move on to the next stage, storming(Fulk et al.,2011). Unlike the forming stage, the storming stage is marked by conflict (Martin...
This section will summarize Tuckman´s contribution to the field of team development given his recognized validity and generalized applicability. A brief background review of his work will be followed by the extension of his theory, in 1977, by himself and Jensen, that added a fifth stage to the model. Finally, the implications of the theory will be briefly summarized as well as a starting point to the presentation of a unique team development model.
“The team is faced with creating cohesion and unity, differentiating roles, identifying expectations for members, and enhancing commitment. Providing supportive feedback and fostering commitment to a vision are needed from the team leaders (Developing Management Skills).” ... ... middle of paper ... ...
The Tuckmans theory is a model which includes the 4 stages which are: forming, storming, norming and performing, the stages are used to explain how a team is formed. The 4 stages suggest that as the stages go by, individuals in the team will start to develop maturity to work with each other and the ability to communicate without a struggle. The model also suggests that the relationship between the team members would be established and the responsibility of each member would be clear as the leader changes the leadership style.
University of Washington. (2013). Four (Five) Stages of Team Development – Bruce Tuckman. Retrieved April 2014, from University of Washington: depts.washington.edu/oei/resources
As the processes and systems used in business have become more complex, teams, not individuals, have become popular in many organizations. Teams are made up of individuals from an organization brought together to solve a problem, improve a process or implement a new process. “A major advantage that a team has over an individual is its diversity of resources and ideas” (Burns, 1995, p. 52). However, this diversity can cause conflict within the team. The success of the team is strongly influenced by the team’s ability to recognize the causes of, manage and resolve conflict.
When first being introduced to a group, it can be quite stressful trying to figure out how you and your team members are going to function together. As with any group, there are a few milestones that need to be reached in order to ensure a functional and successful relationship. Specifically, groups need to go through Tuckman’s Group Development Stages. These stages consist of forming, storming, norming, performing, and in some scenarios, a final stage of adjourning may be reached. After participating in this assignment, we as a group were easily able to identify, and analyze, each stage of our development.
A group can only be called a team if the members are actively working together toward a common goal. A team must have the capability to set goals, make decisions, solve problems, and share responsibilities. For a team to be successful, trust must be earned between its members by being consistent and reliable (Temme & Katzel, 2005). When more than one person is working on a particular task, inconsistent views or opinions commonly arise. People come from different backgrounds and live through different life experiences therefore, even when working towards a common goal, they will not always see eye to eye. Major conflict that is not dealt with can devastate a team or organization (Make Conflict Work, 2008). In some situations, conflict can be more constructive than destructive. Recognizing the difference between conflict that is constructive to the team and conflict that is destructive to the team is important. Trying to prevent the conflict is not always the best way to manage conflict when working within a team setting. Understanding conflict, what causes it, and how to resolve conflict effectively, should consume full concentration.
Differences within the team are the major reason for conflict. This stems from differences in opinion, attitude, beliefs, as well as cultural back grounds and social factors. The Conflict can be positive which is functional and supports or benefits the organization or a person’s main objectives (Reaching Out, 1997). Conflict is viewed as positive when the conflict results in increased involvement form the group, increased cohesion, and positive innovation and creativity. Conflict tends to be positive as well when it leads to better decisions, and solutions to long-term problems.
Tuckman’s theory of development claims, “In the first stage of team development or organization, individuals come together to establish the ground ru...
The stages of team development are forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. Norming is the first stage that involves team members getting to know each other and trying to figure out where they fit in. As a leader, it is important to provide clear directions and set proper goals and expectations during this stage. Storming is the next stage and as the name suggest it is characterized with struggles, challenges, conflicts, and competition among team members. During this stage, I will provide a mediating role and facilitate conversations that steers the team towards the right
The work community has several members, it is vital that these individuals act as a group, so that the common goal was achieved. This section describes the team, the team's importance, team building and why before-mentioned issues are important. This section also takes place through the cases and at the end of the self-evaluation.
The first stage in developing a team as it relates to group dynamics is forming, this is the stage where team members come together and they question what they are therefore, who else is a part of the team, who they are comfortable with, and this enables them to get involved as well as allowing the team the opportunity to introduce themselves to each other. The second stage is storming, and in this stage the team members begin to voice their opinions and differences as well as align themselves with others who share their same beliefs. This is an important stage for the team because team members will begin to become more involved with one another, and when they voice their concerns, they can feel like they are being represented and understood. The third stage is norming in the stage team members begin to establish a shared common commitment to the purpose of why the team is there, where they can establish their overall goals and how the goals are going to be achieved. In the fourth stage, known as performing, the team works effectively and efficiently to gather towards achieving the goal.