Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Proofs of God's existence
Proofs of God's existence
Arguments that prove god's existence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Proofs of God's existence
Some have argued that trying to prove the existence of God is incompatible with religious faith of the existence of God. What do you think about this?
Yes, this is popular doctrine but I do not believe it is incompatible, I simply think it’s frowned upon and a "should not" situation instead of a "cannot" situation.
Personally, I am of Christian upbringing and in so being, I was raised in the church studying the Bible and drawing from those Biblical teachings. Even in the Bible, the idea that we must not question God is preached (Romans 9:20 is one citing of this teaching in the Bible) and even the final paragraph of the Bible tells the reader to neither add nor take away from the Scripture, meaning that this is a law that is signed, sealed, delivered.
…show more content…
Human beings are curious beings always seeking for answers to every unknown. Therefore, the will to want to prove God's existence is simply human nature's natural inclination to prove, that which is unknown. A second reason as to why I disagree with this statement is because even the Bible acknowledges the need for human beings to wonder and inquire about the existence of God, and the Biblical God in fact heeds to this pondering and manifests himself multiple times to prove His own existence (cite the story of Moses and Pharaoh as one example, or the story of Elijah vs the believers of Baal in 1 Kings 18). In both of these scriptures, the biblical God showed evidence of himself upon being called upon to show to the people that He is in fact God. Therefore, if God himself can acknowledge this utmost desire of man to know, why would we then say that trying to prove his existence is INCOMPATIBLE with religious faith? The two can in fact work hand in hand in my
The other answer to the question is that faith is doubt. This basis relies on the fact that since there is so little proof, one must doubt therefore one must have faith.
In conclusion I am left pretty much in the same place as I have started. It is impossible to prove or disprove the existence of God philosophically. For every philosopher who publishes his or her opinions on the subject, three more are there to tear it down. In the end I think it is best that man does not figure out the answer to this lifelong question. Some things are better left unanswered.
Just because there is not evidence does not mean that is evidence he does not exist. I do not believe that people believe in god, just because they do believe that god exist, but because it gives them something that others cannot. It brings people together and gives people hope in the worst of times, and it can fill voids in peoples lives that are rather impossible to fill. It also gives them a reason to live, and live moral ones at that. However, this is also a problem in the discussion of th...
However, there is no researchers or method to either prove or disprove the existence of “God”. Descartes argues that the mind and soul cannot be measure in science; the mindless mechanistic “coincidences” is the direct results of God’s work. To conclude, the argument is all about faith and beliefs. There is no doubt that science contradicts religion, even some greatest scientists of the world have declared that there is some invisible power that we cannot explain through science. Yet, I believe that we should consider evidence that we have in order to examine the reality and “truth”. Our experiences of everyday life, the time that passed, the behaviors that we observe, were far more convincing than something that bases on a vague
In this paper, I will explain how Descartes uses the existence of himself to prove the existence of God. The “idea of God is in my mind” is based on “I think, therefore I am”, so there is a question arises: “do I derive my existence? Why, from myself, or from my parents, or from whatever other things there are that are less perfect than God. For nothing more perfect than God, or even as perfect as God, can be thought or imagined.” (Descartes 32, 48) Descartes investigates his reasons to show that he, his parents and other causes cannot cause the existence of himself.
Having faith is believing in things that you don’t see. According to the Meditations, Descartes gets rid of beliefs that he isn’t certain of and keeps the ones that are undoubtable. He tries to prove that God has must exist since we have such a clear and distinct idea of him. I believe it is impossible to prove without a doubt that God exists.
Religious believers say that the proof of God’s existence is in all of the things that aren't addressed by science. They believe that God has a plan that is beyond the capability of human understanding.
The Moral Argument for the Existence of God Kant did NOT put forward a moral argument and anyone who said he does is wrong!!!! Kant rejected all attempts to argue from the world to God, he regarded such an exercise as impossible. However he thought that God was a POSTULATE of practical reason. If you share Kant’s assumptions, then it becomes necessary to assume that there is a God.
Truth, what is truth? This question itself has a thousand answers, no person can ever be sure of what truth is rather, truth can be justified, it can checked for reliability with strong evidences and logic. If the evidence proves to be accurate then it can be established that a certain answer is the truth. However, have we ever tried to think about what intrigues us to seek the truth? To think about a question and set foot firmly on the path of knowledge. Definitely it has! That was the very cause itself which is why this world has witnessed some of the greatest philosophers like Aristotle, Plato and Socrates etc. along with the school of thought. The ability to think and reason is one of the greatest ability humans have, it is what distinguishes us from the animals. It is what gives us free will, the ability to control our own outcomes. However, it is that ability to ‘think’ itself which has caused men to rebel with the myths and statements established about the unseen and natural forces since the beginning of time. It gave rise to questions such as: Do aliens exist? Is there a world of the unseen? Life after Death and the most popular question since the beginning of times, Does God exists? And the answer is ‘yes’. Here is how I will justify my stance.
Proving the existence of God is a worthwhile task. If someone did come up with a complete, foolproof argument for the existence of God, the people of the world would have no choice but to believe in His existence. However, even though St. Thomas Aquinas makes a worthy effort, I believe that such a task is not possible through logic and reasoning alone. There is an element of faith that must be present for people to believe, and if that element is not there, no matter how foolproof an argument seems to be, there will always be those who do not believe. In his fifth argument, St. Thomas Aquinas makes as close to foolproof argument that I believe anyone could make, and, for me, it does prove God's existence. However, if that element of faith is not there, I do not think you can completely prove God's existence to everyone.
Instinctually, humans know that there is a greater power in the universe. However, there are a few who doubt such instinct, citing that logically we cannot prove such an existence. St. Thomas Aquinas, in his Summa Theologica, wrote of five proofs for the existence of God. The Summa Theologica deals with pure concepts; these proofs rely on the world of experience - what one can see around themselves. In these proofs, God will logically be proven to exist through reason, despite the refutes against them.
God can be defined as a being conceived as the perfect, omnipotent, omniscient originator and ruler of the universe, the principal object of faith and worship in monotheistic religions (1). There are many people that do not believe in any religion. People who do not believe in a religion have no reason for believing in a God. People who do not believe in a God and argue against the existence of God are proving something that is completely false. There is a God for numerous reasons.
In the question of faith and reason it is ridiculous to claim that God or any matter of the Divine may be proven by reason. And although I agree with the Bernard of Clairvaux on this one matter I agree for a different reason. He leaves the only answer to be faith. I do not think there is any true way to prove religious matters. Though it may be easy at times to disprove them with the use of reason, it becomes difficult to do so with faith. It is impossible to use faith and reason in conjunction with eachother. Faith is a belief in something that does not have reason, so therefore if something can be proved with philosophical reasoning there would be no reason to have faith except for in the case where reason does not answer the question. This reasoning equation, in the end, does not add up.
In this essay I discuss why there is proof that there is a supernatural being known as God, who has created everything we know and experience.
Existence of God: Atheism vs. Religion The question of Gods existence has been debated throughout history; philosophers, from Plato to Socrates, weighing in on the debate. The Argument has become so controversial that numerous theories and 'explanations’ have been created to prove or disprove the existence of God. Dissidents of the concept of God contradict religion, their ignorance in the discussion leads them to falsely accuse God of not being real even though, God is alive. Religious thinkers have fought tirelessly to shut down the atheists spread of ideas, which came on the scene when advancements in sciences took place.