Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The things carried by Timothy O'Brien
The things they carried literary devices
Tim O'brien the things they carried facts/essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The things carried by Timothy O'Brien
For Tim O’Brien in The Things They Carried, the question of truth is omnipresent. A collection of stories set in the context of the disastrous theater of the Vietnam War, O’Brien constantly grapples with the nature of storytelling and the difficulty, perhaps futility, of telling an accurate story about the horrors of modern imperial warfare while also sufficiently conveying the clouded memories and emotional experiences of its direct participants. Indeed, much of the novel revolves around the demarcation between what he calls “happening-truth”, a simple rendering of objective facts about events, and “story-truth”, that which exposes the difficult, abstract emotional reality of his characters and, finally, himself; in the words of O’Brien, …show more content…
that which may be “truer than the truth” (80). In no chapter is this better illustrated than “The Sweetheart of the Song Tra Bong”, an outlandish story of a young woman visiting her soldier boyfriend in Vietnam, only to turn into a monstrous volunteer for the Green Berets. The emotional power of the story evokes a disturbing inner-truth, one that is more intimately, perhaps more factually, examined in another chapter, “The Ghost Soldiers”, where O’Brien explores his cruelty towards a medic.
“The Ghost Soldiers” reveals that the “truer than the truth” story of “The Sweetheart of the Song Tra Bong” is O’Brien’s internal wrestle with his own darkest impulses, those which find destruction, domination and violence, the traits of warfare, instinctively gratifying. Both “The Ghost Soldiers” and “The Sweetheart of the Song Tra Bong” center around a traumatic event set near the Song Tra Bong, a river in Vietnam. In “The Ghost Soldiers”, O’Brien recounts the second time he was shot and the botched treatment by a new field medic, Bobby Jorgenson, which results in a serious infection to his rear-end; the result is a twisted story of O’Brien’s descent into obsessive malice towards Bobby. In “Sweetheart”, a soldier, Mark Fossie, is horrified to witness the transformation of his visiting young girlfriend, Mary Anne, as she begins to go out on excursions with the Green Berets and, eventually, becomes a murderous volunteer soldier who relishes in the violence and death she creates. The similarities between the two stories seem to elicit the same “story-truth”: both are tales of the discovery of human brutality; “Sweetheart” being a more fantastical take on the theme, “The Ghost Soldiers” more straightforward. But the contrasts between the structure of the two stories may provide further insight into O’Brien’s own psychological struggle as a veteran of modern war. “The Ghost Soldiers” is O’Brien’s confession of the spiteful feelings he holds towards Bobby Jorgenson. When describing Bobby’s frozen response as he lies in shock from his wound, O’Brien uses a series of degrading descriptors to convey his hostility: “son-of-a-bitch”, “scared-white face”, “buggy eyes”, “the way his lips twitched and the silly excuse he had for a mustache” (181); later, he will call Bobby “a little squirrel of a guy, short and stumpy looking” (189). O’Brien’s words are heavily laced with insults specifically designed to attack Bobby’s masculinity, suggesting he is fearful, weak, small; mothered by a “bitch”. Later, O’Brien recounts feeling “humiliated” in hospital care, as his nurses jokingly call his wound “diaper rash”. This “made [O’Brien] hate Bobby, […] gut hate, the kind of hate that stays with you even in your dreams” (182). Specifically, he wishes “to make Bobby Jorgenson feel exactly what [he] felt” (184); not just the pain and fear of the injury, but the embarrassment of his emasculating wound. In both style and content, this chapter reveals a violent impulse within O’Brien which goes beyond mere exhilaration from the chaos of warfare, into an obsessive, dark viciousness towards human beings who burden him with what he perceives as inferiority and feebleness. Finally, O’Brien acts upon these feelings with the help of a friend, Azar, rigging a complex prank involving ropes tied to noisemakers and flares near Bobby’s position to frighten him. As they rattle the noisemakers with the ropes, O’Brien reveals his immense satisfaction in psychologically punishing Bobby: I felt a sense of immense power […] Like a puppeteer. Yank on the ropes, watch the silly wooden soldier jump and twitch. […] It was cruel, I knew that, but right and wrong were somewhere else. I heard myself chuckle. (198) Then, they enact the next stage of the prank, setting off flares near Bobby as he lets out a fearful cry.
In a peculiarly indulgent bit of prose, O’Brien again reveals the grandiose feelings this callous act brings him, ascribing to himself some vaguely otherworldly attributes as he fills his target with fear: I was down there with him, inside him. I was part of the night. I was the land itself–everything, everywhere–the fireflies and paddies, the moon, the midnight rustlings, the cool phosphorescent shimmer of evil–I was the blind stare in the eyes of all those poor, dead, dumbfuck ex-pals of mine–all the pale young corpses […] I was the beast on their lips–I was Nam–the horror, the war. (199) Bobby ultimately discovers the prank and the two make a sort of amends, with Bobby recommending O’Brien go into film directing after orchestrating such an elaborate show. But the chapter closes on an ominous note: during the prank, Azar insulted O’Brien for wanting to end it too early in his eyes, and eventually kicked O’Brien in the head, calling him sad (206). Given what the preceding pages have shown us, the last words of the chapter are unsettling: “Let’s kill Azar”. Jorgenson gave me a half-grin. “Scare him to death,
right?” “Right,” I said. “What a movie!” I shrugged. “Sure. Or just kill him.” The impulse explored in “The Ghost Soldiers” is instructive in interpreting “Sweetheart”, a captivating, disturbing, and thoroughly unbelievable tale. As told by O’Brien’s friend Rat Kiley, another soldier, the stable and steady Mark Fossie, has his girlfriend, Mary Anne, visit Vietnam. She is cheerful and holds a sunny disposition, “perky and fresh-faced, like a cheerleader” (92). She admires the culture and environments of Vietnam. She even swims in the Song Tra Bong. In this way, she is analogous to the other soldiers, including O’Brien, who arrived to Vietnam possessing innocence, curiosity, and a moral conscience. However, before long, she is associating with the Green Berets, going out on missions with them. Eventually, Fossie goes in to the camp of the Berets to find his girlfriend. He discovers her living quarters, a hooch that includes a pile of bones beneath a foul sign which includes a racial slur. When he finds Mary Anne, she is wearing a necklace beaded with the tongues of Vietnamese corpses. He confronts his girlfriend, who informs him that what she’s doing isn’t “bad”. As Fossie looks on at the transformation in shock, she informs him that he is “in a place[…] where you don’t belong” (106). Then, in perhaps the most disturbing moment of the book, Mary Anne explains her feelings about Vietnam: Sometimes I want to eat this place. Vietnam. I want to swallow the whole country-the dirt, the death-I just want to eat it and have it there inside me. That’s how I feel. It’s like this appetite. […] I feel close to myself. When I'm out at night, I feel close to my own body, I can feel my blood moving, my skin and fingernails, everything, it's like I'm full of electricity and I'm glowing (106) But given what we know about O’Brien’s storytelling philosophy and the impulses explored in “The Ghost Soldiers”, it is perhaps best to conclude that this speech is O’Brien’s, not the fictional Mary Anne’s. It is he who possesses this latent sadism, which is far more than just a desire to win or the adrenaline rush of combat. There is within him an urge to consume others, to pile their bones up, to collect their tongues. Fossie, then, is O’Brien’s own superego, learning from his own now-fully exposed id, Mary Anne, that he doesn’t belong in warfare. This terrible emergence of a wicked unconscious is so horrible for O’Brien that he can only properly explain it through “story-truth”, though he hints at, behind the shield of understatement, in “The Ghost Soldiers”: I’d turned mean inside. Even a little cruel at times. For all my education, all my fine liberal values, I now felt […] something dark and beyond reason. It’s a hard thing to admit, but I was capable of evil. I wanted to hurt Bobby Jorgenson. (190-191) Whatever truly did happen at the Song Tra Bong - or whether anything in particular happened there at all - the war led to a traumatic self-realization for O'Brien. The emergence of this sadistic trait deep within him is more directly addressed in “The Ghost Soldiers”, but it is more vividly and effectively chronicled in the embellishments of “Sweetheart”, where the sheer morbidity he is capable of imagining better reveals the existentially mortifying nature of his revelation. This tendency directly clashes with his morality; previously in the book, he is trying to avoid the draft and decidedly anti-war. For him, the discovery that he was not immune to the darkest recesses of the human imagination and emotion is catastrophic, so much that he had no choice but to explain it in the “story-truth” of an innocent young woman gone mad with bloodlust. O’Brien’s dilemma, then, is a reflection of the American empire: the conflict between professed liberal, humanitarian aspirations, and primal, brutal instincts when real-world situations frustrate them. For both O’Brien and the U.S., moral self-justification can become license to revel in the depravity of violence.
In The Things They Carried, an engaging novel of war, author Tim O’Brien shares the unique warfare experience of the Alpha Company, an assembly of American military men that set off to fight for their country in the gruesome Vietnam War. Within the novel, the author O’Brien uses the character Tim O’Brien to narrate and remark on his own experience as well as the experiences of his fellow soldiers in the Alpha Company. Throughout the story, O’Brien gives the reader a raw perspective of the Alpha Company’s military life in Vietnam. He sheds light on both the tangible and intangible things a soldier must bear as he trudges along the battlefield in hope for freedom from war and bloodshed. As the narrator, O’Brien displayed a broad imagination, retentive memory, and detailed descriptions of his past as well as present situations. 5. The author successfully uses rhetoric devices such as imagery, personification, and repetition of O’Brien to provoke deep thought and allow the reader to see and understand the burden of the war through the eyes of Tim O’Brien and his soldiers.
To write a true war story that causes the readers to feel the way the author felt during the war, one must utilize happening-truth as well as story-truth. The chapter “Good Form” begins with Tim O’Brien telling the audience that he’s forty-three years old, and he was once a soldier in the Vietnam War. He continues by informing the readers that everything else within The Things They Carried is made up, but immediately after this declaration he tells the readers that even that statement is false. As the chapter continues O’Brien further describes the difference between happening-truth and story-truth and why he chooses to utilize story-truth throughout the novel. He utilizes logical, ethical, and emotional appeals throughout the novel to demonstrate the importance of each type of truth. By focusing on the use of emotional appeals, O’Brien highlights the differences between story-truth and happening-truth and how story-truth can be more important and truer than the happening-truth.
The word "hero" is so often used to describe people who overcome great difficulties and rise to the challenge that is set before them without even considering the overwhelming odds they are up against. In our culture, heroes are glorified in literature and in the media in various shapes and forms. However, I believe that many of the greatest heroes in our society never receive the credit that they deserve, much less fame or publicity. I believe that a hero is simply someone who stands up for what he/she believes in. A person does not have to rush into a burning building and save someone's life to be a hero. Someone who is a true friend can be a hero. A hero is someone who makes a difference in the lives of others simply by his/her presence. In Tim O'Brien's novel, The Things They Carried, the true heroes stand out in my mind as those who were true friends and fought for what they believed in. These men and women faced the atrocities of war on a daily basis, as explained by critic David R. Jarraway's essay, "'Excremental Assault' in Tim O'Brien: Trauma and Recovery in Vietnam War Literature" and by Vietnam Veteran Jim Carter. Yet these characters became heroes not by going to drastic measures to do something that would draw attention to themselves, but by being true to their own beliefs and by making a difference to the people around them.
The novel, “The Things They Carried”, is about the experiences of Tim O’Brian and his fellow platoon members during their time fighting in the Vietnam War. They face much adversity that can only be encountered in the horrors of fighting a war. The men experience death of friends, civilians, enemies and at points loss of their rationale. In turn, the soldiers use a spectrum of methods to cope with the hardships of war, dark humor, daydreaming, and violent actions all allow an escape from the horrors of Vietnam that they experience most days.
Some authors choose to write stories and novels specifically to evoke certain emotions from their readers as opposed to writing it for just a visual presentation. In order to do this, they occasionally stretch the truth and “distort” the event that actually occurred. The Things They Carried, by Tim O’Brien, is a compilation of short stories about the Vietnam War with distortion being a key element in each of them.
Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried is a very uniquely written book. This book is comprised of countless stories that, though are out of order, intertwine and capture the reader’s attention through the end of the novel. This book, which is more a collection of short stories rather than one story that has a beginning and an end, uses a format that will keep the reader coming back for more.
Courage and Cowardice in The Things They Carried by Tim O'Brien Through The Things They Carried, Tim O’Brien moves beyond the horror of fighting in the Vietnam War to examine with sensitivity and insight the nature of courage and fear. Included, is a collection of interrelated stories. A few of the stories are brutal, while others are flawed, blurring the distinction between fact and fiction. All the stories, however, deal with one platoon. Some are about the wartime experiences of soldiers, and others are about a 43-year-old writer reminiscing about his platoon’s experiences.
Written by author Tim O’Brien after his own experience in Vietnam, “The Things They Carried” is a short story that introduces the reader to the experiences of soldiers away at war. O’Brien uses potent metaphors with a third person narrator to shape each character. In doing so, the reader is able to sympathize with the internal and external struggles the men endure. These symbolic comparisons often give even the smallest details great literary weight, due to their dual meanings. The symbolism in “The Things They Carried” guides the reader through the complex development of characters by establishing their humanity during the inhumane circumstance of war, articulating what the men need for emotional and spiritual survival, and by revealing the character’s psychological burdens.
Tim O’Brien wrote the novel The Things They Carried in 1990, twenty years after the war in Vietnam.In the novel,Obrien takes us through the life of many soliders by telling stories that do not go in chronical order. In doing so we get to see the physical and mental things the soldiers carry throughout the war in Vietnam.Yet the novel is more than just a description of a particular war. In the things they carried Tim O’Brien develops the characters in the book slowly, to show the gradual effect war has on a person. O’Brien shows this by exploring the life of Henry Dobbins, and Norman Bowker.
The novel The Thing They Carried is a compilation of short stories that share underlying themes and characters. One of the stories is called “How to tell a True War Story”. In this story the narrator expands on a central theme of the distinction between truth and fiction when writing a war story. The story, like most of the other stories in the novel jumps erratically between events, which oftentimes creates confusion and a sense of the surreal in the story. Throughout the story the narrator repeatedly shows that when writing a war story the “story truth is truer sometimes than happening truth.”(O’Brien pg. 171) This quotation encompasses the theme and supports it. The narrator’s use of stylistic devices coupled with stories such as “How to Tell a True War Story” and “Good Form” exemplifies how fiction can fully represent the truth whilst the facts fall miserably short.
Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried has readers and critics alike scratching their heads with wonder about the meaning of “story-truth” and “happening-truth.” Although, he served in the Vietnam War from 1968 until 1970, he fabricates the events of the war throughout The Things They Carried. At the same time, he insists that the truth lies at the heart of the emotion in the story, an idea that many readers question. Furthermore, it is pointless for the reader to attempt to sort through the stories and differentiate between the “story-truth” and “happening-truth,” because it is nearly impossible. This tactic is one of O’Brien’s more ingenious writing methods. He does not want the reader to know the difference between the two because in his opinion that fact is irrelevant. O’Brien obviously thinks outside the box and has everyone questioning reality. However, this fact is truly ironic, because the point is not to care what type of “truth” it is, but to instead feel the raw beauty of the emotion and to accept it as the truth. While trying to define “story-truth” and “happening-truth,” a couple chapters in particular focus on the idea of truth, “How to Tell a True War Story,” “The Man I Killed” and “Good Form.” O’Brien believes that the most important thing for a reader is to experience the emotion of the story, be it “story-truth” or “happening-truth,” as long as the real emotion is conveyed and understood by the reader, then it is as true as it could possibly be.
Tim O’Brien’s novel The Things They Carried challenges the reader to question what they are reading. In the chapter “How to Tell a True War Story”, O’Brien claims that the story is true, and then continues to tell the story of Curt’s death and Rat Kiley’s struggle to cope with the loss of his best friend. As O’Brien is telling the story, he breaks up the story and adds in fragments about how the reader should challenge the validity of every war story. For example, O’Brien writes “you can tell a true war story by its absolute and uncompromising allegiance to obscenity and evil” (69), “in many cases a true war story cannot be believed” (71), “almost everything is true. Almost nothing is true” (81), and “a thing may happen and be a total lie; another thing may not happen and be truer than the truth (83). All of those examples are ways in which O’Brien hinted that his novel is a work of fiction, and even though the events never actually happened – their effects are much more meaningful. When O’Brien says that true war stories are never about war, he means that true war stories are about all the factors that contribute to the life of the soldiers like “love and memory” (85) rather than the actual war. Happening truth is the current time in which the story was being told, when O’Brien’s daughter asked him if he ever killed anyone, he answered no in happening truth because it has been 22 years since he was in war and he is a different person when his daughter asked him. Story truth
In the last chapter of The Things They Carried, all the stories interlock into a jigsaw puzzle that creates a great message. Each theme is highlighted by each of the major stories that are being retold. The sun in which everything revolves around is the presence of O'Brien and his own experiences; writing about himself alternating between the first and third person narrative voices.
The Things They Carried is a collection of stories about the Vietnam War that the author, Tim O’Brien, uses to convey his experiences and feelings about the war. The book is filled with stories about the men of Alpha Company and their lives in Vietnam and afterwards back in the United States. O’Brien captures the reader with graphic descriptions of the war that make one feel as if they were in Vietnam. The characters are unique and the reader feels sadness and compassion for them by the end of the novel. To O’Brien the novel is not only a compilation of stories, but also a release of the fears, sadness, and anger that he has felt because of the Vietnam War.
Tim O’Brien, author of The Things They Carried, expresses his journey throughout the Vietnam War via a series of short stories. The novel uses storytelling to express the emotional toll the men encountered, as well as elucidate their intense experiences faced during the war. The literary theory, postmodernism, looks at these war experiences and questions their subjectivity, objectivity, and truth in a literary setting. It allows the reader to look through a lens that deepens the meaning of a work by looking past what is written and discovering the various truths. O’Brien used the storytelling process to illustrate the bleeding frame of truth. Through his unique writing style, he articulates the central idea of postmodernism to demonstrate the