Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Metaphors we live by examples
Essays analysing the use of metaphors
Metaphors Advantages and Disadvantages
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The experiment Sekhar plans at the beginning of the story is to tell the truth for an entire day. The reason as to why he conducted this experiment was because Sekhar believes that without speaking the truth, life is hopeless. In the story, Like the Sun, it said, “He realized that, morning till night, the essence of human relationships consisted in tempering truth so that it might not shock. This day he set apart as a unique day- at least one day in the year we must give and take absolute Truth whatever may happen. Otherwise life is not worth living.” Based on this paragraph, it shows to the readers the main character genuinely believes in honesty. However, because he was too truthful, conflicts were created. An example was when his wife served him breakfast. Instead of saying he was full like he always did, Sekhar said his wife’s masterpiece was difficult to eat. Thus, this leads his wife to wince, which suggests to …show more content…
the readers her hurt and melancholy feelings. On another occasion, his headmaster asked Sekhar to listen to his music. Since Sekhar told his honest opinion about how bad the headmaster’s singing was and to quit singing, it caused Sekhar stay up all night grading papers. Sekhar’s absolute truth caused him to harm his wife’s feelings and caused his boss to give him a harsh punishment. Honestly, I believe the main character was courageous enough tell the absolute truth. He came up with the courageous decision to tell the absolute truth. 2. The headmaster is angry that Sekhar told him the truth about his music. In the passage, the master told Sekar, “Your suggestion was useful. I have paid off the music master. No one would tell me the truth about my music all these days.” When the headmaster said this, it was perceived through a sarcastic tone. Nonetheless, the master forced the main character to grade a hundred papers within a day. He told Sekar how he spent a fortune on the music behind doors. Without giving sympathy, Sekar told his master how bad his singing was and how he should not continue his music any longer. Even though the headmaster asked for his opinion on the music, Sekhar offered a bit too much of his judgment. Therefore, it seems the master made the main character grade all the papers by tomorrow morning to teach him a lesson about honesty and to get revenge. In the beginning, the headmaster generously granted Sekhar ten days to grade the paper because he was doing the master a favor regarding listening to his music. Though, after the honest truth came out, the headmaster making him thoroughly scrutinized the papers was rather a form of revenge for Sekhar’s remark about his singing. Honesty is important to some extent, however, there is a limit to telling the truth. 3. There are benefits to Sekhar’s truth telling. In the story, Sekhar saw relationships often consisted of kind truths. Yet, he wanted to tell the absolute truth, no matter what the circumstance was for one whole day. Through his truth telling, he learned that telling too much of the truth is detrimental and will cause harmful consequences. As stated in the story, Sekhar compared the truth to a sun. No one is able to look directly into the sun without blinking. In comparison to the truth, no human being can directly handle it because it is too difficult to bear. For this reason, since telling the truth can hurt other people’s feelings, many people do not say the absolute reality. By the end of the story, even Sekhar, himself, understands saying the complete truth can cause him to lose friends, such as a teacher. When Sekhar heard about the death of so-and-so, he replied to his colleague that that person was mean and selfish. It might not have stated what the colleague said afterwards, but one can infer the friend was not pleased by Sekhar’s comment. Thus, telling the whole truth might have caused him to lose friends. In addition, Sekhar understood through this day “there is a small price to pay for the luxury of practicing Truth.” This sentence, from the story, means the truth is valuable and should be used wisely. Nevertheless, I applaud Sekhar for doing an experiment others would not do. Although he knew there will be consequences for his action, he persisted regardless. I felt Sekhar genuinely had a bright idea about telling the truth, yet he took the idea, “Honesty is the best policy,” to literally. 4.
Reality and truth are two different words. Meanwhile, the truth is based off of what once perceives, the reality of something is what truly occurs. Based on the results of Sekhar’s experiment, I believe people prefer to hear the reality through tempered truths. By being told the tempered truth, the person is telling the truth in a kinder and nicer way. If someone, such as a child, heard the absolute truth, without any sugarcoats, it might hurt their feelings. Similar to Like the Sun, Sekhar told his master what he truly believed. Instead of telling the headmaster he should possibly practice more, Sekar decides to tell him to quit music. This infuriated the master. Even if the absolute truth helps “toughen” someone up, the tempered truth does not hurt anyone’s feelings. Moreover, the absolute truth might even lose friendships, as well. In my opinion, since the truth is difficult to tell already, many people desire to hear the tempered truth. Consequently, if it is told in a kind manner, it is easier to understand than if the entire truth was
told.
Simon Wiesenthal’s book The Sunflower: On the Possibilities and Limits of Forgiveness spoke to me about the question of forgiveness and repentance. Simon Wiesenthal was a Holocaust prisoner in a Nazi concentration camp during World War II. He experienced many brutal and uneasy experiences that no human being should experience in their lifetime and bear to live with it. Death, suffering, and despair were common to Simon Wiesenthal that he questioned his own religious faith because he asks why would his God allow the Holocaust happen to his people to be slaughter and not do anything to save them. During Simon Wiesenthal time as a Jewish Holocaust, Simon was invited to a military hospital where a dying Nazi SS officer wanted to have a conversation. The Nazi SS officer told Simon his story of his life and confesses to Simon of his horrific war crimes. Ultimately, the SS officer wanted forgiveness for what he done to Simon’s Jewish people. Simon Wiesenthal could not respond to his request, because he did not know what to do with a war criminal that participate in mass genocide to Simon’s people. Simon Wiesenthal lives throughout his life on asking the same crucial question, “What would I have done?” (Wiesenthal 98). If the readers would be on the exact situation as Simon was
We, as human beings, tend to think that the truth is what we believe to be true. But the truth is the truth even if no one believes that it is the truth. We also think that the truth brings unpleasantness, and that we hate telling the truth. “The challenge of the sage is to decode the clues and solve the underlying riddle of existence, our own and that of the cosmos.” (The Sage). The relation between this quotation and my life is that, I always want to search for the truth, and telling the truth is another
Socrates once said, “The unexamined life is not worth living.” He questioned the very nature of why things were the way they were, while never settling for simple, mundane answers. Socrates would rather die searching for the truth than live accepting what he considered a blatant lie. I like to think of myself the same way. I too would rather examine the wonders of life rather than accept what I am just told. The truth is some can’t handle the truth. I on the other hand welcome it with earnest anticipation and fervent enthusiasm.
As members of a first-world nation, we are disrespectfully quick to point out the flaws and downfalls of impecunious societies and use the societies like mere scenery, even though we walk together on this earth. In “Sun and Shadow," Ray Bradbury manipulates Ricardo to convey to the reader the impertinence from outsiders and the responses from Ricardo and his fellow townspeople. A photographer is encountered doing a photo shoot on Ricardo’s property, and Ricardo becomes unhappy with his presence and angrily tells him to leave. After Ricardo’s increasingly sharp comments and attitudes augment, the photographer becomes satirical and facetious, poking fun at the lifestyle in which Ricardo lives. The short-tempered townsman reveals his defiance through actions projected towards the photographer. Through the use of characterization, Bradbury defines the fine societal line between Ricardo, the penurious dweller of the village, the inconsiderate photographer, and the sympathetic townspeople.
As for the truth and the lies present in the novel, the reader would have to carefully analyze both and associate them with the type of people the characters symbolize. In doing so, one would realize that the rich, the poor and the climbing, struggling class, are all based on a lot of lies and very little truth. Then how does one know how to look at life if one cannot distinguish the truth form the lies and vice versa? The answer is simple: One must learn how to take the truth with what lies between and make something of the life and world one lives in.
A Raisin in the Sun The creativity of Hansberry played a crucial role in the development of African-American drama since the Second World War. A Raisin in the Sun was the first play by an African-American author to be set on Broadway and was honored by the circle of New York theater critics. Drama of A Raisin in the Sun (1959) brought Hansberry to the Society of New York Critics Award as the best play of the year. A Raisin in the Sun shows the life of an ordinary African-American family who dreams of happiness and their desire to achieve their dream.
The Sun Shines Bright, one of John Ford 's most personal films remains one of his most forgotten. Taking place in 1905 (according to Tag Gallagher), it follows four distinct story lines all of which are based upon the deep fractures found within the small Kentucky town called Fairfield: 1.For all intents and purposes, the main storyline, concerns the protagonist, William Priest (affectionately known as 'Judge ' or 'Billy ' throughout), and his reelection campaign against the haughty, Yankee, racially intolerant son-of-a-carpet-bagger, Horace K. Maydew. 2. The return of orphan Ashby Corwin, and his wooing of the black sheep of the town, Lucy Lee Lake. 3. The arrest of U.S Grant, a black teenage banjo player on the charge of raping a local white girl. The lynch mob that marches into town is driven out by Judge Priest and the real culprit is found, and shot. 4. The melodrama surrounding the town secret of who Lucy Lee 's (birth) mother is and the subsequent reveal.
...hers might say. He tells our narrator, “The most important thing in the world is knowing the truth.” He goes on to remark, “The whole truth and nothing but the truth” (Mahfouz, 69). In this story, the Truth had a positive affect on the character. It gave him a new sort of freedom. He had gained a new sense of identity because of his new knowledge, and this evoked a sense of happiness in him.
Hard truth is uncomfortable to deal with; some cope with it with the approach of denial and anger.
William Faulkner is often considered to be the greatest writer in the America history. His fame rests largely on his novels, especially for his closely examination of the southern culture. "That evening sun" is a good example of it.
In order to succeed one needs truth. Everyone is capable of making decisions, however, truth is a key accessory to making such decisions better. One must be aware that what one believes, imagines, and desires to be true, are all different (Blackburn, 2009). Defining truth is difficult for some claim truth is concrete and can be proved in a structural manner. Others simply avoid the definition saying it is too abstract to be narrowed down into a single statement the world can agree on. For example, students have different ways of learning, thus to each student, a particular learning style is the best way to learn, and that is the student’s truth. Many have tried to tackle the definition of truth and from it came about the Correspondence Theory,
In The Star by Arthur C. Clarke (Clarke 44-49), an astrophysicist and Jesuit priest’s faith is challenged when he and his crew discover the remaining artifacts of a destroyed civilization. He learns that the advanced civilization lived on an earth-like planet in another solar system, and they spent their final years building a vault (filled with their achievements and artifacts) on their outermost planet, which was distant enough to survive the supernova. After the discovery of the dead race’s artifacts, the Jesuit priest finds himself questioning God. The story ends with an ironic twist, as the main character realizes that the beacon that shined above Bethlehem when Jesus was born was the same supernova that ended the distant race.
There are four stances in defensive communication, the first being placating. This is when an individual is sacrificing themselves to please others. The second is blaming, when the individual is sacrificing others to maintain themselves. The third is super-reasonable, when the individual maintains the context but sacrifices others and themselves. The last is irrelevant, when the individual not only sacrifices themselves but the context and others as well. Satir’s goal was to help families communicate learn to communicate better based on which stance was being
Deception causes characters to feel pain and to have lowered self-confidence. It also causes people in real life pain. Therefore, deception versus reality needs to be recognized in real life and its effects on people can be seen from characters in Great
Truth allows humans to stand-alone. When they find truth they are able to be one against the whole. "Being in a minority even a minority of one did not make you mad. There was truth and there was untruth, and if you clung to the truth even against the whole world, you were not mad."(Pg.171, Nineteen Eighty-Four) This fact allows Winston to fight against the party. Truth is a powerful weapon that can defeat all odds. "One voice speaking truth is greater force than fleets and armies, given time." (Pg. 27, The Left Hand of Darkness) Genly Ai knew that eventually the people of Winter would accept the truth, however it would only take time.