Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The consequences of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Independence of canada
The consequences of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Since the Confederation of Canada until today, the province of Quebec has always wanted become its own nation by separating from Canada. As a result, Canada’s scariest ever terrorist group, the Front de Libération de Quebec (FLQ), wrote the darkest chapter in Canadian history, The October Crisis. To end the terror, Canadian Prime Minister, Trudeau, was forced to invoke the War Measures Act (WMA) during his term in 1970 which was flawed with disapproval and controversy since it was the first time the Act was used during peacetime. However, despite the criticism, his decision to invoke the War Measures Act was reasonable because of the fear presented by the FLQ, the public and governmental demands, and the end result of the October Crisis.
In 1970, Trudeau was tremendously criticized for the implementation of the WMA, however, his verdict was correct due to the fright and ambiguity that looms over the FLQ. The FLQ was a sovereigntist “revolutionary movement” that arose in 1963 and were willing to use violence to end English colonialism is Quebec. They started their violence by placing bombs in federal armouries and the neighbourhoods of wealthy Anglophones. Nevertheless, their violence did not stop but, it rose drastically. In 1968, the movement set large bombs at “a federal government bookstore, at McGill University, at the residence of Jean Drapeau and the provincial Department of Labour”. On February 1969, the group wounded 27 people through a bomb placed at the Montreal Stock Exchange. Committing over 200 bombings in 7 years as the group split into 2 cells; Chenier and Liberation cell. In the fall of 1970, the Liberation cell kidnapped British trade commissioner James Cross, and 5 days later the Chenier cell kidnapped the ...
... middle of paper ...
...ill help achieve his dream rather than violence. Finally, Claude Ryan, future leader of the Liberal party, said that “the Bourassa government placed itself under the tutelage of the Trudeau government.” This shows that due to the execution of the WMA, the government of Québec and Canada worked together, despite their differences. This relationship possibly might have resulted in Trudeau making 1982 Charter of Rights and Freedoms, so the Quebecers can feel as a part of Canada. Therefore, the end result, which was positive, proves that Trudeau’s implementation of the WMA was correct.
In conclusion, Canada should be thankful, not disrespectful, of Trudeau’s implementation if the WMA during the October Crisis of 1970. His actions were acceptable because of the fear presented by the FLQ, the public and governmental demands, and the end result of the October Crisis.
The years since the Battle of Vimy Ridge may have passed quickly, but the legacy of the Canadians whose accomplishments were great in that pivotal First World War battle lives on. Many people claim to this day that Canada came of age as a country on those hard April days in 1917. At first, through the meticulous planning of the battle, the world saw a nation capable of working together and making decisions as a team. Afterwards, with the range of technical and tactical innovations involved in the attack, the world saw a strong nation unafraid to protect and defend. In the end, through great sacrifice the world bore witness to the birth of the Canadian legacy.
...e to power in Quebec. This indicates that Quebecers supported non-violent methods in order to achieve independence for Quebec, rather than the violent methods of the FLQ, also indicating that the efforts of the FLQ would have been subdued by the Parti Quebecois. The death of Pierre Laporte was another unfortunate occurrence as a result of the War Measures Act which could have been avoided, yet some still believe his death is not related to the invocation of the War Measures Act. Justification is required for all actions which spark debate, and in events where the justification is provided under false pretences, someone must be held responsible. In this case it remains the Trudeau government. Trudeau may have had an admirable political career in which he made many wise decisions, however, the invocation of the War Measures Act in October 1970 was not one of them.
Before the General Strike, the Canadian government was fully invested in WWI, whereas most Canadian citizens were not; the dissonance urged industrial workers to unionize. From the beginning of Canada’s involvement in the Great War, their industrial complex mass-produced supplies and armaments for the Allied Powers. Most Canadian citizens had no qualms with the shift in the job market until there were not enough workers to produce the basic material goods necessary within Canada’s borders. The citizens began to form groups, seemingly in opposition of the government and its advocacy for war. To the Canadian government, this was incredibly concerning, presenting the possi...
“Just watch me.”Joseph Philippe Pierre Yves Elliott Trudeau said in 1970. He meant it as he fought to keep Quebec a part of Canada. Not only did he do that, he managed to be prime minister for 16 years, as well as being Canada’s youngest leader at the time. He brought greater civil rights to Canadians, Quebec citizens mainly. His charismatic personality matched his innovative ideas, that enhanced Canada for the better. For his entire political career, not only did Canada watch him, the whole world watched him change the country for the better. He made a radical change to Canada by championing the idea of officially implementing bilingualism. Trudeau was a trailblazer from the moment he was elected.
Armed radicalists in the streets of Quebec, Nation wide panic, an insurmountable evil. The imagery of the 1970 October Crisis is clear. Perhaps almost excessively so. The crisis, beginning on October 5th 1970 stretching over a period of three months, would go on to become a landmark example of the state of french Canada, as well as the most hotly debated topic in Canadian legal history. The ordeal began when members of a radical separatist group, the Front de libération du Québec, or FLQ, kidnapped James Cross, a British consul in order to gain political notoriety and the attention of the Canadian population . The FLQ had the intention of making various demands (The reading of their manifesto on national television, safe passage to Cuba to
A century ago, Canada was under control by the British Empire. The battles we fought the treaties we signed and the disputes we solved all helped us gain independence from our mother country “Britain”. Canadians fought a long battle protecting others, and from these battles we gained our peaceful reputation and our independence from Britain. Canada became a nation on July, 1st 1867. Although we were an independent country, our affairs and treaties were all still signed by Britain. In the next years Canada would establish its own government, and lead its own affairs. Many important events led to Canada’s independence, one of the earliest signals that Canada wanted to establish autonomy was the Chanak affair of 1921. In addition the battle of Normandy, which occurred on June 6 1944, contributed to the autonomy of Canada. The Suez Canal Crisis, which took place in the year 1956, earned Canada a place in the media spotlight, displaying Canada as a peaceful country that deserves the right to be independent. One of the final steps that aided with Canada’s independence from Britain was the Canada Act of 1982. Independence from Britain steadily increased throughout the 20th century because of political decisions made in Canada.
Canada experienced the revolution of changing politics and new ideologies, it was a necessary wave
Trudeau had to work quickly and efficiently in order to locate Cross before he was hurt, as well as make very difficult decisions. He chose to enact the War Measures Act because the FLQ appeared as a real threat at the time which could potentially overthrow the government. The various attacks that they planned before injured and killed innocent lives, and Trudeau was not going to stand and do nothing. Furthermore, the support of the FLQ was growing large at the time, with about 3000 people gathering up at the Paul Sauvé Arena during the October Crisis in order to show their support. If Trudeau did not diminish this revolution, it may have grown into an actual terrorist threat at
The War Measures Act, which had been created for the protection and benefit of Canadian...
... A successful strategy in the accommodation of national minorities within a liberal democracy could be founded upon mutual trust, recognition and sound financial arrangements. However, a certain degree of tension between central and regional institutions may remain as a constant threat in this complex relationship since they entertain opposing aims. The federal governments determination to protect its territorial integrity, and its will to foster a single national identity among its citizens clashes with Quebec’s wish to be recognized as a separate nation and decide upon its political destiny and to foster its distinct identity (Guibernau pg.72). Moreover, if the ROC and the federal government can come to an agreement on terms that satisfy the majority and an identity that encompasses the heart of a country; Canada will continue to exist with or without Quebec.
Prime Minister Diefenbaker was greatly distressed with the fact that the U.S. had chosen not to consult Canada about their plans for the Cuban Missile crisis. He was frustrated because it showed a lack of respect, it did not allow Canada sufficient time to prepare, and he was not sure if the U.S. was simply overreacting. This showed great disrespect to Canada, as Canada was the U.S.’s biggest ally. Through Canada’s commitment to NORAD and NATO, Canada was required to be consulted based on signed documents within the NORAD agreement. Consultation was necessary as Canada was the only country in the western hemisphere that shared a close military alliance with the Americans. While the situation was being monitored in Cuba, the President had time to consult Canada, but chose not to, as he saw Diefenbaker’s government as a ‘trivial slide show’. This crisis had serious implications for all of North America; Canadians found themselves at the brink of nuclear war without their consent and helpless to influence the course of events. Canada had no opportunity to offer its own vi...
Canada is known by outsiders to be a very peaceful country. But if you ask any Canadian they well tell you that is unfortunately not the case. For there is a large ongoing conflict between Canadians. The conflict is between the French and the English, or more specifically between Quebec and the rest of Canada. As a result of this conflict, along with some wrongdoing and propaganda. Quebec has considered and has gone as far to hold referendums over Separatism (Surette,2014). Separatism is that the province of Quebec separates from the rest of Canada to form its own country. Which would have immense effects on indubitably Quebec but also the rest of Canada (Martin, 2014). This report will focus on the root causes and origin of Quebec Separatism, the current state of Quebec Separatism and finally how we as a society can act towards Quebec Separatism.
Hauss, Charles. Comparative Politics: Domestic Responses to Global Challenges : A Canadian Perspective. 7th ed. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2011. Print.
The World War I conscription crisis worsened the pre-existing tension between Quebec and the rest of Canada by creating a feeling of isolation from Quebec to Canada, the government, and Britain causing the want to be separated (Gale Canada in Context, 2011). The French-Canadians thought they had no business in the war like as if they were forced to take part in something that has nothing to do with them (Gale Canada in Context, 2011). They felt “little to no allegiance with the rest of Canada, viewing the army solely as an English-Canadian entity (Gale Canada in Context, 2011). The Québécois also felt detached from the government in this way (Gale Canada in Context, 2011). Due to Regulation 17 (the debate of the French language being taught
The period in which Quebec Premier Maurice Duplessis ruled is known as “le Grande Noirceur”, or the Great Darkness, because the public was left unaware of the situation. The Great Darkness was, “an era of corruption where Quebec made no social, political or economical advancements” (“Duplessis Era (1956)”). Duplessis’ ignominious actions that included rigging the elections, instilling the Padlock Law, and deeming orphans mentally ill will expose him for the dishonourable man he is.