Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A little learning poem analysis
Essay on literary devices
Introduction to poetry poem analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A little learning poem analysis
Poetry is an effective method to convey empathy to an audience, briefly and directly. Whether it be mood, symbolism, or personification, every poetic device used in literature can be used successfully to move readers and induce feelings of compassion. “Wildlife Management I” by James Galvin and “Traveling through the Dark” by William E. Stafford, are perfect examples of poems rich in pathos. They evoke a higher sense of understanding and connection. What distinguishes “Wildlife Management I” from Stafford’s composition, however, is its highly descriptive setting, dark irony, and tendency to urge the protagonist to make a decision under pressure, making it far more poignant and emotion-generating. In Galvin’s “Wildlife Management,” the surroundings of two characters are depicted heavily with personification. The trees are said to “keep their own counsel,” (v. 1) with the exception of one pine tree that …show more content…
“gesticulates wildly, as if it suffered from its own inner cyclone” (vv. 2-3). Not only are the trees personified, but produce an image of a dark windy forest that appeals to one’s visual sense. The fifth verse of Galvin’s portrayal of the background implies something dangerous and tragic passing, and remaining, as if a plague erupted across a nation, leaving behind its aftermath. Directly quoting Galvin, he states, “We forget about the sunset and the dark coming on across the plain” (v. 5), suggesting the dark will not be departing soon. Whereas Stafford’s “Traveling through the Dark,” is direct, undetailed, and cuts to the chase. “Traveling through the dark I found a deer; dead on the edge of the Wilson River road,” (v.1) is a rather flimsy attempt at captivating audience with empathy, especially when it is the beginning of the poem; the determining factor of whether the entirety is worth reading or not. Altogether, each author has their own style of establishing a setting, but it is obvious that Galvin has fabricated the more mature and profound. In “Wildlife Management I,” the last verse is sprinkled with sad verbal irony.
One of the coyotes catches a twin baby antelope, “dangling it by the nape as gently as if it were her own” (v. 26) The irony dawns on the reader- the calf was bitten and drooped from its neck, as if the coyote brought it into the world and raised it, when it was actually the mother antelope who nourished it and kept it safe, to end up losing it, leaving behind the tragedy and grief of a lost life. Some would agree with the protagonist’s choice of rejecting to slaughter the coyotes. Stafford’s “Traveling through the Dark,” however, contains no irony and makes the death of a deer sound unimportant and common. He states, “It is usually best to roll them into the canyon” (v. 3). It seems like the person is accustomed to finding doe killings on the road, and knows how to suitably get rid of them, radiating an aura of cold-heartedness and darkness. Overall, Galvin has given his poetry more depth by using irony, and produced more sympathy from the audience than Stafford’s flat
poem.
Cheng, Ah. The King of Trees. Trans: Bonnie S. McDougall. New York,NY: New Directions, 2010. Print.
"The Bull Moose" by Alden Nowlan is a finely crafted poem which reminds us of how far man has strayed from Nature. Through a carefully constructed series of contrasted images, Nowlan laments, in true Romantic fashion, man's separation from Nature.
Therefore, Oliver’s incorporation of imagery, setting, and mood to control the perspective of her own poem, as well as to further build the contrast she establishes through the speaker, serves a critical role in creating the lesson of the work. Oliver’s poem essentially gives the poet an ultimatum; either he can go to the “cave behind all that / jubilation” (10-11) produced by a waterfall to “drip with despair” (14) without disturbing the world with his misery, or, instead, he can mimic the thrush who sings its poetry from a “green branch” (15) on which the “passing foil of the water” (16) gently brushes its feathers. The contrast between these two images is quite pronounced, and the intention of such description is to persuade the audience by setting their mood towards the two poets to match that of the speaker. The most apparent difference between these two depictions is the gracelessness of the first versus the gracefulness of the second. Within the poem’s content, the setting has been skillfully intertwined with both imagery and mood to create an understanding of the two poets, whose surroundings characterize them. The poet stands alone in a cave “to cry aloud for [his] / mistakes” while the thrush shares its beautiful and lovely music with the world (1-2). As such, the overall function of these three elements within the poem is to portray the
William Faulkner overwhelms his audience with the visual perceptions that the characters experience, making the reader feel utterly attached to nature and using imagery how a human out of despair can make accusations. "If I jump off the porch I will be where the fish was, and it all cut up into a not-fish now. I can hear the bed and her face and them and I can...
In the favela of São Paulo, Brazil, 1958, Carolina Maria de Jesus rewrote the words of a famous poet, “In this era it is necessary to say: ‘Cry, child. Life is bitter,’” (de Jesus 27). Her sentiments reflected the cruel truth of the favelas, the location where the city’s impoverished inhabited small shacks. Because of housing developments, poor families were pushed to the outskirts of the city into shanty towns. Within the favelas, the infant mortality rate was high, there was no indoor plumbing or electricity, drug lords were governing forces, drug addiction was rampant, and people were starving to death. Child of the Dark, a diary written by Carolina Maria de Jesus from 1955 to 1960, provides a unique view from inside Brazil’s favelas, discussing the perceptions of good
Cheng, Ah. The King of Trees. Trans. Bonnie S. McDougall. New York: New Directions, 2010. Print.
Without any relatable hardships, people could only express sympathy or compassion, in that they would never be able to truly relate to other people’s hardships. People are limited to empathizing with only the similar hardships that they themselves have endured when they take the risk of pursuing self-interest. This further establishes the importance of the unique relationship between personal desires and empathy in one’s life. One is only able to gain the ability to empathize after failing in a pursuit of their own. Through the poem “Empathy”, Stephen Dunn emphasizes the importance of having one’s own stockpile of unpleasant memories from various pursuits gone wrong when it comes to having a sense of truly understanding the plight of
I will discuss the similarities by which these poems explore themes of death and violence through the language, structure and imagery used. In some of the poems I will explore the characters’ motivation for targeting their anger and need to kill towards individuals they know personally whereas others take out their frustration on innocent strangers. On the other hand, the remaining poems I will consider view death in a completely different way by exploring the raw emotions that come with losing a loved one.
Have you ever gone to the store and seen something you have always wanted to buy, but can’t because of your current situation. A similar thing occurs in the poem “Traveling Through the Dark” when the speaker is unable to help the dead doe and her fawn because of the situation. However, in the poem “Birdfoot’s Grampa” the old man was able to help the toads because he was in a better situation to help. The contrast between these poems reveals the fact that our ability to accomplish a goal is most dependent on the situation we are currently in.
In Richard Connell’s short story, “The Most Dangerous Game,” motivations and justifications for hunting are revealed through the conflicting ideas of two hunters who disagree on what constitutes civilized hunting. In this short story, the protagonist is a hunter named Sanger Rainsford who states early in the story that animals have “no understanding” of emotion, including fear (Connell, pg 1). This may be how Rainsford justifies hunting, as he believes that his prey has neither a sense of fear nor the capability to understand that they are being hunted. In this way, Rainsford does not see what he is doing as cruel, as he believes that animals, unlike humans, do not understand emotion, and therefore their lives do not have value. Believing that
In the book "Souls of Dark Society" by W.E.B. Dubois he expresses a great deal of actualities that accept as well as develops the truths of "A Concise History: African Americans" by Hine. In his book "Souls of Dark Society" W.E.B. Dubois suggests that "the issue of the Twentieth Century is the issue of the color-line." He likewise examines how this influences the general population amid this time. The book offers a clarification of the advancement of African American, the impediments that they confronted to get this advancement, and the conceivable outcomes for future advancement as the country entered the twentieth century. Du Bois contends there ought to be a harmony between the "standards of lower training" and the "standards of
... Nature, including human beings, is `red in tooth and claw'; we are all `killers' in one way or another. Also, the fear which inhabits both human and snake (allowing us, generally, to avoid each other), and which acts as the catalyst for this poem, also precipitates retaliation. Instinct, it seems, won't be gainsaid by morality; as in war, our confrontation with Nature has its origins in some irrational `logic' of the soul. The intangibility of fear, as expressed in the imagery of the poem, is seen by the poet to spring from the same source as the snake, namely the earth - or, rather, what the earth symbolizes, our primitive past embedded in our subconsciouness. By revealing the kinship of feelings that permeates all Nature, Judith Wright universalises the experience of this poem.
“Hawk Roosting” and “Golden Retrievals” show contrasting views of the world through an animal's perspective. The “hawk” looks upon the world as if it were his own, like a god, However, the “dog” sees life in the moment, and in a simplistic way. These two poems use poetic devices like contrasting tones, various diction, and vivid imagery.
Nature is often a focal point for many author’s works, whether it is expressed through lyrics, short stories, or poetry. Authors are given a cornucopia of pictures and descriptions of nature’s splendor that they can reproduce through words. It is because of this that more often than not a reader is faced with multiple approaches and descriptions to the way nature is portrayed. Some authors tend to look at nature from a deeper and personal observation as in William Wordsworth’s “I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud”, while other authors tend to focus on a more religious beauty within nature as show in Gerard Manley Hopkins “Pied Beauty”, suggesting to the reader that while to each their own there is always a beauty to be found in nature and nature’s beauty can be uplifting for the human spirit both on a visual and spiritual level.
In the book Heart of Darkness, by Joseph Conrad; he has caused some controversy among other writers. Chinua Achebe author of An Image of Africa argues that Conrad is a “bloody racist”, and his book dehumanizes Africans. Whereas Wilson Harris the author of The Frontier on Which Heart of Darkness Stands, believes that Conrad is using a novelistic theme, Achebe is misinterpreting Conrad and his novel, and Joseph Conrad is not a racist and his protagonist Marlow is just a character that is part of Conrad’s imagination who comes to life on paper, but do not have any resemblance.