Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of media on globalization
The impact of media across cultures
Globalization on identity formation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of media on globalization
Transnational media often impose different cultural and social consequences, especially in underdeveloped nations. Transnational media effect may not seem obvious, or intentional, but there is no doubt that transnational media and the capitalist elites in any nation are cooperating to achieve certain agenda to expand their dominance, and increase their profit. Such results are reached by multiple approaches that disguise the true intent of the existing of transnational media in any nation. To better understand how transnational media operates, and disseminate media content, numerous communication scholars developed theories that discuss the flow of media into and out of the non-dominant nations. Cultural imperialism and cultural dominance …show more content…
Contraflow claims that there is an equal flow of media content between developed and underdeveloped nations. Nations that subjected to cultural dominance are in fact producing their content, and they are exporting it to Westerns nations. The central claim of contraflow theory is to dismiss cultural imperialism, and that other nations are free and independent from transnational media domination, as they are generating programs that reflect the working classes, and providing alternatives to Western programming is the existing of Hindi movies in American movies theaters, it may seems that as if India is exporting their culture in a different nation, but in reality the movies are being produced by the same transnational media company that disseminate American programs in India. Contraflow cannot occur unless the programs are generated by subordinate 's nations, which represent their voices, and different perspectives with an independent media outlet that is not controlled by transnational media companies. Cultural proximity theory claim 's that audiences usually prefer what is relevant to their culture, what represent their lives and speak their language, over imported programs. Transnational media were able to achieve proximity, and close the gap of creating local programs that mimic local culture, and speak their languages, with a content that impose the dominant commercial …show more content…
It degraded and marginalized democracy, buried the chance for any voice of different perspectives that could march the nations to a better standards of living, civil liberties, and eliminating discrimination. The nation 's cultural identities are lost, important national and international matters are being viewed from a mere entertainment lenses. Values and norms are no longer pillars that impeded in nations, but rather changeable to serve the interests of transnational corporations, and the capitalist elites. Transnational structures, means of production, and programs content is nothing more than a medium to control the lives of the working classes, to turns them into consumerist 's moppets to sell their products, speared their ideologies, and increase their financial
Over the centuries, the media has played a significant role in the shaping of societies across the globe. This is especially true of developed nations where media access is readily available to the average citizen. The media has contributed to the creation of ideologies and ideals within a society. The media has such an effect on social life, that a simple as a news story has the power to shake a nation. Because of this, governments around the world have made it their duty to be active in the regulation and control of media access in their countries. The media however, has quickly become dominated by major mega companies who own numerous television, radio and movie companies both nationally and internationally. The aim of these companies is to generate revenue and in order to do this they create and air shows that cater to popular demand. In doing so, they sometimes compromise on the quality of their content. This is where public broadcasters come into perspective.
Reich, B. Robert. “How Capitalism Is Killing Democracy”. 15 Aug, 2007. 24 Apr, 2014. < https://bbhosted.cuny.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_50_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_977636_1%26url%3D>
The dispute that throughout “American Exceptionalism”, is an ancient perception of which becomes a well-respected idea that is idealistically important throughout history, it makes what America will become and forever be known as. It reflects on the ideas of foreign policies to become what we call America today; in which it remains the current movement in globalization. Eric Rauchway, Blessed Among Nations, explains that globalizations the movement of the regional economies, societies, and cultures that is combined through a constituent network of communication to lower a violation of social more, which makes America a world-wide leader in combating the cultural violation to these social mores. In our time, it seems that globalization has become an large extent the product of American policies since WWII.
The mass media are undoubtedly one of the most popular platforms through which people are able to learn about what is happening around them and across the globe (Woodrow and Reimer, 2014). This communication tool has managed to change the manner in which people receive and sieve information as well as disseminate it to others. In as much as the benefits of the mass media are numerous, its disastrous consequences cannot be ignored. In Canada, television is one of the most common outlets of media stations and it is used to air both local and international programming.
Sadri, Houman and Madelyn Flammia, “Mass Communication,” Intercultural Communication: A New Approach to International Relations and Global Challenges (New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2011).
...nce, that while the bourgeoisie can assert its interests everywhere.” (Conklin & Fletcher, 1999, p. 50). Even though today’s society has branched away from an imperialistic mindset, the roots of globalization promote the advancements of power to those who are already very much in power, minus the war and the bloodthirsty monopolizations. To step outside the spectrum of imperialism, and ponder upon today’s world culture, America seems to be shaping the world, as we know it. The blueprint of progress and ever changing industrial, economical and global influences are greatly dependent on that of America and their innovations. It may not be American scientists behind the computers at NASA or behind the keyboards of Windows computers but there are U.S. based industries. The exponential progress of Globalization can be directly linked to American affairs, without a doubt.
Many people argue that the West has dictated the global market for media, music and mass culture by multinational corporations. This dominance started to take place after World War II. This happened after the war because American businesses increased their profit by selling our nation’s pop culture abroad. In the reprint by Car Guarneri, he states that American corporations overwhelmingly took over foreign countries with: “movies, newspapers and magazines, jazz, rock and roll, comic strips, cartoons and ultimately television programs”(5). This process could be largely related to imperialism in the way that America is submersing other countries in its own cultures and ideas. American has already been doing this for more than sixty years since after the war, so there is no going back to the way things were before. If anything, our country is only going to get worse in dominating other countries to incorporate our culture into theirs. This cultural globalization that our country is promoting, supports both sameness and variety among the world’s people.
The mass communication that is present for cultural influence becomes impactful for people. Varying interpretations and definitions could be displayed for individuals. The limited cultural influences found in networks, internet, and advertisements only displays a small part of the entire image. For instance, specialized networks for Hispanics could be very influential to people, but they could only display a small part of the culture to the masses. This large network can easily focus on certain aspects of individual Hispanic cultures that could affect the perception of several people. Similarly, it was mentioned in class how conglomerations are only a few companies who control these networks. These networks could globalize the media and possibly skew the cultural influences found in the media. With only these limited perspectives then there would be less material to learn from. However, there are other mediums that could be found within families and communities that could influence individuals to understand their culture. But at the same time, for third and fourth generation individuals the media may be one of the main sources of cultural enrichment. It becomes a slippery slope for individuals to be comprehensive of the media they become exposed to. The responsibility for them is to be active in their consumption and to question
The 1999 Seattle protests brought the apparent proliferation of anti-globalization grassroot sociopolitical movements into the limelight of the world stage. Transnational social movements (TSMs), international nongovernmental organizations (INGOs), as well as the loose transnational activist networks (TANs) that contain them—all these came to be seen as an angry and no less potent backlash that's directed at the powerful states and increasingly towering economic IGOs such as the WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank. In the field of international relations, some regard this as a prophetic watershed event that signals the weakening and perhaps even collapsing of the state-centric system of international relations, while many others insist that Seattle is but an eventually insignificant episode in the book of globalization and state power, as evidenced by the Doha success.
One of the fundamental roles of the media in a liberal democracy is to critically scrutinise governmental affairs: that is to act as a watchdog of government to ensure that the government can be held accountable by the public. However, the systematic deregulation of media systems worldwide is diminishing the ability of citizens to meaningfully participate in policymaking process governing the media (McChesney, 2003, p. 126). The relaxation of ownership rules and control, has resulted in a move away from diversity of production to a situation where media ownership is becoming increasing concentrated by just a few predominantly western global conglomerates (M...
Stromback, J. and Esser, F. (2009) Shaping Politics: Mediatization and Media Interventionism, in Lundby, K (eds) Mediatization: Concept, changes, consequences. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc, pp. 205-223.
Global cultural imperialism is defined by Dunch (2002) is the economic and cultural hegemony of developed countries, which dictates the path of socio-economic progress, delineates cultural values, standards for civilization and cultural set up across the globe. Media basically refers to all the collective prime means of mass communication namely the internet, print, television and radio as according to Jenkins (2006). Due to technological advancement mass media has been able to extend its reach worldwide. According to Dyson (2011) media globalisation can be attributed to continuous developments in co...
With every passing day the world is shrinking, and the globalization process is taking place. Advances in communication, transportation, and computer technology have all played a role in making the world a smaller place. With the right equipment, people can talk to friends and family from the other side of the world. Traveling from America to Europe, which once required days at sea, now only takes hours in the air. Computer networking and fax machines allow world businesses to conduct negotiations within a matter of seconds. Images and personas such as the McDonalds’s golden arches and Mickey Mouse are recognized worldwide. When Saddam Hussein was captured, nearly every country knew about it within a matter of hours. Yet, while globalization is taking place, it is not doing so without dispute. Many countries, in fact, feel threatened by Western culture and consequently, are acting out to preserve their own identities. Differences in currency and standardized measuring units indicate hesitancy and possibly even an inability for people to accept the conformity of a singular global society. Also, characteristics of different cultures are in such a way unique that to alter them or blend them into other cultures would, in some people’s opinion, destroy both of them. After all, one would not expect to find tacos served in Italian restaurants, nor would one expect pasta and breadsticks to be the major selling items in Mexican restaurants. So, while globalization is taking place on different levels, fundamental differences in culture and pride in one’s own heritage both exist as strong forces preventing the emergence of a homogenized world society.
India has the largest democracy in the world and media has a powerful presence in the country. In recent times, Indian media has been subject to a lot of criticism for the manner in which they have disregarded their social responsibility. Dangerous business practices in the field of media have affected the fabric of Indian democracy. Big industrial conglomerates in the business of media have threatened the existence of pluralistic viewpoints. Post liberalisation, transnational media organisations have spread their wings in the Indian market with their own global interests. This has happened at the cost of an Indian media which was initially thought to be an agent of ushering in social change through developmental programs directed at the non-privileged and marginalised sections of the society. Though media has at times successfully played the role of a watchdog of the government functionaries and has also aided in participatory
People are using media to show the entire world the truth. Politicians are also using the media to make themselves look better and using Black PR to humiliate their opponents. In countries with communist or monarchy regime media is not an armed method to control people.