Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The aesthetics of romantic poetry
Note on romantic poetry
Essay on romantic poetry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The aesthetics of romantic poetry
Ralph Waldo Emerson has taken the place in history as one of the most influential writers in the 19th century because of his romantic style of writing. The poem Amulet continues Emerson’s trend of romantic poems. In the poem Amulet, Emerson takes the reader on a poetic journey that shows the transitions and reality of love. The first stanza illustrates love through visions of happiness and gifts but then shows how quickly the feelings of love can change. As the poem moves to the next stanza, Emerson asks for protection from this changing love. Highlighting feelings of being in love to being out of love, By the third stanza, Emerson shows that love is in fact transitional. In the end, the reader is left with an understanding the poem's meaning implies that nothing can really protect a person from love that is lost. Emerson uses literary devices such as personification, symbolism, and metonymy to illustrate his message. The form of the poem is a ballad, which he uses strategically because ballads are usually written about love.
Emerson begins his message, using the first stanza of The Amulet to provide a historical perspective for the reader. “Your picture smiles as first it smiled, The ring you gave is still the same,
” The concept of the picture implies that the speaker and another person are separated either mentally or physically, as the speaker is looking at a picture of her/him. The ring is a gift and thereby describes a relationship between the speaker and presumably the same person. The story changes course however, when the speaker receives news, which confuses him about his/her relationship status, “Your letter tells, O changing child.” The stanza finally ends with the speaker writing “No tidings since it came” which c...
... middle of paper ...
...orever, and that nothing can protect people from lost love. The poem was written in a calm manor, as the speaker had seemed to be humbled by his experiences with his loved one.
For the structure of The Amulet Emerson uses different instances of past and present tense, which allows the reader to understand the past, so they can understand the relevance of the present. “Your picture smiles as first it smiled,” and “The ring you gave is still the same,” by providing the reader this information, it illustrates that the poem has some historical perspective that is important to analyze. This helps to solidify that love was once present between the speaker and his lover. Emerson also uses the form of a free verse poem, which benefits The Amulet because it allows Emerson to use the words he wishes to display his message without having to follow a direct rhyme scheme.
The speaker’s rocky encounter with her ex-lover is captured through personification, diction, and tone. Overall, the poem recaps the inner conflicts that the speak endures while speaking to her ex-lover. She ponders through stages of the past and present. Memories of how they were together and the present and how she feels about him. Never once did she broadcast her emotions towards him, demonstrating the strong facade on the outside, but the crumbling structure on the inside.
Throughout the lives of most people on the planet, there comes a time when there may be a loss of love, hope or remembrance in our lives. These troublesome times in our lives can be the hardest things we go through. Without love or hope, what is there to live for? Some see that the loss of hope and love means the end, these people being pessimistic, while others can see that even though they feel at a loss of love and hope that one day again they will feel love and have that sense of hope, these people are optimistic. These feelings that all of us had, have been around since the dawn of many. Throughout the centuries, the expression of these feelings has made their ways into literature, novels, plays, poems, and recently movies. The qualities of love, hope, and remembrance can be seen in Emily Bronte’s and Thomas Hardy’s poems of “Remembrance” “Darkling Thrush” and “Ah, Are you Digging on my Grave?”
... a private matter: "all who heard" and "all should cry." It is a collective enchantment with the poet at the center of it. The magic of the final spellbinding lines -- beyond explication -- is based partly on abracadabra incantation ("Weave a circle round him thrice") and our corporate recollections of holy visionaries. The poet compels the vision of the public, but at the same time he is an outcast among them -- untouchable and even cursed ("his flashing eyes, his floating hair!") by his gift. The lines become completely suggestive in their wild blend of holiness, sensuality, prophecy, and danger. The poet and poem have have become their own "miracle of rare device," and the reader has borne witness to the creative miracle.
“With love’s light wings did I o'erperch these walls, for stony limits cannot hold love out.”
The speaker seems to divide his thoughts into three parts: what she knows about their relationship, what would happen if she left him, and what would happen if she were to continue to love him. While the language used in the poem is very romantic with magnificent imagery of autumn leaves, ocean shores, and blooming flowers, the meaning conveyed is not romantic. Instead of expressing a love that would last even unrequited, the speaker explains the reality and selfishness of love. If she forgot him, he would have already forgotten her first.
On the surface the poem seems to be a meditation on past events and actions, a contemplative reflection about what has gone on before. Research into the poem informs us that the poem is written with a sense of irony
This poetic device aided the reader to visualize not only how silent and dead the leaves were, but also to perceive the atmosphere of the poem. In the poem “Time Does Not Bring
... be casting stones, or holding a conversation. The speaker of the poem does not move on from this emotional torment, yet I do feel as if in his quest for closure he does resolve some of the tumultuous feelings he does have in regard to losing his love.
At the being of story, “The Lottery” children looks like playing stones, but that was not fact. The fact was that those collected stones were for throwing the people at the ends of lottery. Every year the old men alone with his family and all other family needs their support of each other to protect from stones attack. Old man warner was saying, “Come on, come on, everyone”, after people start hitting each other by stone (Jackson). In the story “The Necklace” Mathilde, borrow a necklace from her rich friend to wear at ministry party (Maupassant 23). While walking in a party she loses it. That was an expensive diamond necklace and they need to buy another. Before she did not like her husband because of his poorness, but after her mistake she needs husband to help to paid off the necklace’s fee. “The Necklace” and “The lottery” were the story, which shows how family is important to us.
The main line that directs the poems feelings is "The wraith of Love's sweet Rose is here, It haunts me everywhere! ". The ghost of "Love's sweet rose" is in my life and mind. The ghost of that rose is in my presents and is with her everywhere she goes.
and ease the pain of his loss. The poem can also suggest to us that at
“The Necklace” ends up to be a very ironic story as it explains why valuing the more important things in life can be very effective towards a person’s happiness. One example of the story’s irony is when she is at the party dressed as a beautiful and fancy woman. ‘She danced madly, wildly, drunk with pleasure, giving no thought to anything in the triumph of her beauty, the pride of her success…’ (pg 193). This is a form of dramatic irony because Guy explains earlier that Mme. Loisel is just a middle class woman who dreams of a wealthy life, but she is just alluding herself as a luxurious woman. Another example of irony in the story is when Madame found out that the necklace was paste. On page 196, Mme. Forestier, Ma...
“The Bells,” a poem written by Edgar Allan Poe, conveys a cheerful tone through distinct sounds and repetition of words. A deeply onomatopoeic poem, “The Bells” progresses after every stanza. Primarily, the alliteration, assonance, and onomatopoeia in the poem produce a happy tone; but, towards the end of the poem, the sound devices help establish a gloomier tone. In each stanza, the bells are made of a different metal substance. In the first stanza, the bells are described as silver. In this case, the bells are pleasant, precious, and strong. Moreover, the bells portray the stages in life. The first stanza explains a man’s happy childhood. The golden bells in the second stanza are an example of a man’s love life through marriage. The brazen bells in the third stanza depict the terror of a human’s life through aging, and the iron bells in the fourth stanza show the mourning and death of a human. To fulfill the sense of excitement and happiness throughout the first stanza, Poe uses repeating words and consonants, long vowels, and imitation of sounds. The alliteration, assonance, and onomatopoeia all contribute to the joyful and merry tone of “The Bells.”
The Necklace also displays distinctive realism in the use of socioeconomic influences which are essential to the plot. The major conflict in the story would be absent and the theme would not be obtainable without Mathilde Loisel’s insecurity about her own socioeconomic reputation. An example of Loisel’s self-deprivation nature is presented when she realizes she does not have a necklace, she says “I shall look absolutely no one. I would almost rather not go to the party” (Maupassant, sec. 3). Another example of the self-conflict caused by social pressure is Loisel’s immediate attempt to replace the necklace and her reluctance to speak to her friend Madame Forestier about the necklace for ten whole years. If she were not conflicted by societal pressures she might have avoided the whole situation altogether. The Necklace establishes a realistic difference in value between the necklaces and proposed clothing. Her husband proposes flowers which were valued 10 franks so in any case if she had chosen the flowers there would have been an insignificant economic loss. Her decision not to tell her friend about the necklace ends up costing her seven times the worth of the original. The roses symbolize the simpler things in life to the theme of the story. Mathilde Loisel’s withered appearance at the end
In the short story “The Necklace”, the main character, Loisel, is a woman who dreams of greater things in her life. She is married to a poor clerk who tries his best to make her happy no matter what. In an attempt to try to bring happiness to his wife, he manages to get two invitations to a very classy ball, but even in light of this Loisel is still unhappy. Even when she gets a new dress she is still unhappy. This lasts until her husband suggests she borrows some jewelry from a friend, and upon doing so she is finally happy. Once the ball is over, and they reach home, Loisel has the horrible realization that she has lost the necklace, and after ten years of hard labor and suffering, they pay off debts incurred to get a replacement. The central idea of this story is how something small can have a life changing effect on our and others life’s. This idea is presented through internal and external conflicts, third person omniscient point of view, and the round-dynamic character of Loisel. The third person limited omniscient point-of-view is prevalent throughout this short story in the way that the author lets the reader only see into the main character’s thoughts. Loisel is revealed to the reader as being unhappy with her life and wishing for fancier things. “She suffered ceaselessly, feeling herself born for all the delicacies and all the luxuries.” (de Maupassant 887) When her husband tries to fancy things up, “she thought of dainty dinners, of shining silverware, of tapestry which peopled the walls…” (de Maupassant 887) As the story goes on her point of view changes, as she “now knew the horrible existence of the needy. She took her part, moreover all of a sudden, with heroism.” (de Maupassant 891) Having the accountability to know that the “dreadful debt must be paid.” (de Maupassant 891 ) This point-of-view is used to help the reader gain more insight to how Loisel’s whole mindset is changed throughout her struggle to pay off their debts. Maupassant only reveals the thoughts and feelings of these this main character leaving all the others as flat characters. Loisel is a round-dynamic character in that Maupassant shows how she thought she was born in the wrong “station”. “She dressed plainly because she could not dress well, but she was as unhappy as though she had really fallen from her proper station.