Franz Kafka, a prominent Jewish Czechoslovakian author who wrote in German, recognized as an influential writer across the globe due to his abstract and twisted, parallel societies. He is well known for inducing and bewildering oppressiveness of modern life. Furthermore, his characters usually deal with anxiety, alienation, and constantly face failure and futility. Numerous characteristics are displayed through Gregor Samsa, in Kafka’s novel, The Metamorphosis, published in 1915. A glance at the title clearly suggests that there will be some kind of transformation, being a physical or literary change, involving the characters. Kafka successfully demonstrates a change in relationship between Gregor and his family before and after his transformation. …show more content…
The majority of conflicts are influenced by his drastic change, thus Gregor being imprisoned in his room which is the only physical memory he can hold on to. This is of vital importance, because Kafka utilizes Gregor’s room as a symbol of character development, conflict, the past, and recurring social tensions throughout the novel. One day a man, the next day a monstrous vermin. Gregor Samsa came to the realization that due to his transformation he would not be able to aid his family financially anymore, nor keep a steady income, he felt guilt, sorrow, and failure. On the other hand, Gregor was no use to his family, and soon became neglected and mistreated by the ones he loved the most. Tensions begin to rise within the first few pages, “With hostile expression his father clenched his fist, as to drive Gregor back to his room” (Kafka 14). The diction of the word “hostile” itself is significant because his father’s attitude had already changed as soon as Gregor was late to his job for the first time in many years. Things really begin to change as soon as Gregor is trivial to the family, “His mother, bent low under the light, sewed delicate lingerie for a clothing store, his sister, who had taken a job as a sales girl” (38-9). The situational irony is demonstrated how his whole family held a job as soon as he stopped working, it never occurred to them before. The relationship is developed over time, and the family became less dependent and grew a lot closer without Gregor, after his metamorphosis. Gregor remained a static character, remaining in the burden of his so called room; while everyone around him underwent a dynamic change, thus changing their attitude toward Gregor in a negative way.
Gregor beings to realizes that he cannot go to work, “I'm just opening up, in a minute. A slight indisposition, a dizzy spell, prevented me from getting up. I'm still in bed. But I already feel fine again” (11). One would typically think waking up as human sized vermin would astonishingly petrify their own being; Gregor's initial thoughts were to catch the next train since he was already late. The reader begins to notice that abstractness from Kafka, where the abnormal is a typical day in the novel. Furthermore, Gregor would ought to see the best in anyone, no matter the situation. For example, “Gregor heard him open the complicated lock and secure it again after taking out what he had been looking for. Their explanations by his father were to some extent the first pleasant news Gregor had heard since his imprisonment. He had always believed that his father had not been able to save a penny from his business…” (25). All his life, Gregor did not once question his family, and now that he found out that his father had been taking his own hard earned money for personal uses. Kafka chooses to make Gregor ignorant about the financial situation to characterize his family as selfish, and greedy. On the other hand, he has not come to realize that he has been used and taken advantage of, thus being characterized as innocent and most definitely vulnerable. It does not get much better, the diction of “imprisonment” demonstrates Gregor’s true feelings of unsatisfaction and isolation. Gregors own room stands in his between him and his family in his own point of view. While his family look at it as a resolution to having to deal with the
bug. The relationship between Gregor, his family, and people develops into a mutual misunderstanding; The room is utilized as a physical manifestation of a burden that Gregor tries to overcome, only resulting in problems of negligence, and constant abuse. Gregor begins with no control of the situation, “I'm amazed. I thought I knew you to be a quiet, responsible person, and now you want to start strutting about, flaunting strange whims” (11). It is quite the exaggeration, how the manager comes all the way from work just to get Gregor back to work. Once again, Gregor has not missed a day in over five years and his boss is tormenting him at an unnecessary cause, only showing how Gregor had been manipulated over the course of his employment. Gregor can not do anything because he can not open the door and barely move his body. To only make things worst, “Did you understand a word...he isn’t trying to make a fool of us, is he?” (12). Kafka chooses to make Gregors language foreign to his family because in the end no one understands Gregor on a literal and on an emotional level to actually make him feel wanted. His feelings become an emotional rollercoaster, “...lying in the darkness of of his room, invisible from the living room, he could see the whole family sitting at the table under the lamp and could listen to their conversation, as it were with general permission; and so it was completely different from before” (38). Furthermore, he is not allowed to leave his room, only on certain occasions. His family actually seems a lot happier without him and can not see Gregor as a Samsa anymore. This is significant because this shows us how Gregor is a slave and is tied to the oppressive chains of misconception. Kafka presents Gregor as a character who holds on to his memory, and past human life within his room, to be even the slightest bit of happy from his devastating alienated life. Gregor beings by expressing himself, “...lean against the window, evidently in some sort of remembrance of freedom he used to have from looking out the window... which he uses to curse because he saw so much of it, was now completely out of range” (28). This flashback is significant due to the fact that the minor things bring back major memories. It was not his choice to have a life like this, but he does have the choice to be happy, so he does so by holding on to his past. “They were clearing out his room, depriving him of everything that he loved; they had already carried away the chest of drawers, in which he kept the fretsaw and other tools...the desk he had done his homework on when he was a student at business college” (33). His tone takes a turn and suddenly feels quite hollow inside. Although he did not have that sincere and affectionate connection with his family, he was about to lose his memories. Although his furniture took up a lot of space, it meant a lot to Gregor for the little he had. “He didn't know what to salvage first, then he saw hanging conspicuously on the wall, which was otherwise bare already the picture of the lady all dressed in furs, hurried crawled up on it and pressed himself against the glass, which would give a good surface to stick to and smoothed his hot belly” (33-4). Kafka utilizes the diction of “salvage” to characterize Gregor as desperate and anguished, he seems to have a deep attraction to the women framed on the wall. It was Gregor's pleasure and the closest thing he had to a woman. The significance of Gregor's room is a universal symbol for a variety of the literary aspects. It can be viewed as the major foundation of the novel. The character development, conflict, the past, and all sorts of social tensions are represented in not just any room, but the room where the primary basis of the novel started. Kafka demonstrates how vital the setting can be to show us how burdens can more than just a physical concept. If Kafka showed us one thing, is that life is like a room; one must find a door to their own destiny, instead of letting others close it, even the ones closest to us.
The world lies on a thick plate of morality, love, sympathy, opinion, and vitality – all of which are contributions to what shapes humanity. Humanity overtime has strengthened in fluctuating wavelengths through infinite trials and tribulations. In ‘The Metamorphosis,’ the protagonist of the novel, Gregor Samsa, transforms into a vile, repulsive insect: a cockroach. This occurrence strikes a test for the Samsa household, playing a role on their behaviors and the meaning of “humanity” itself.
Franz Kafka's The Metamorphosis is so strikingly absurd that it has engendered countless essays dissecting every possible rational and irrational aspect of the book. One such essay is entitled "Kafka's Obscurity" by Ralph Freedman in which he delves down into the pages of The Metamorphosis and ferrets out the esoteric aspects of Kafka's writing. Freedman postulates that Gregor Samsa progresses through several transformations: a transformation of spatial relations, a transformation of time, and a transformation of self consciousness, with his conscious mutation having an antithetical effect on the family opposite to that of Gregor. His conjectures are, for the most part, fairly accurate; Gregor devolves in both his spatial awareness and his consciousness. However, Freedman also asserts that after Gregor's father throws the wounding apple, Gregor loses his sense of time.
Franz Kafka, in his novel The Metamorphosis, explores two conflicting ideas through his protagonist Gregor: unity and isolation. Gregor’s transformation created a whole life of distress for him, but on the other hand also formed a deeper and better relationship for the rest of the family.
“Life can either be accepted or changed. If it is not accepted it must be changed. If it cannot be changed it must be accepted.”- Winston Churchill. Change is frightening, but without change you can never accomplish a greater goal. Gregor experienced a dramatic change in his life. He may or may not have experienced the physical change described, but he did experience a mental change. The mental change opened Gregor’s eyes to what really mattered in life. Once Gregor accepted his physical change he was able to begin his mental change. Gregor’s values in life had changed dramatically from beginning to end. Though Gregor was subjected to ridicule, he was given the greatest gift. The opportunity to change is the greatest gift anyone can
Arguably one of Franz Kafka 's most brilliant works, The Metamorphosis provides many ambiguities for readers to consider. One of the many thought-provoking aspects of Kafka’s story is Gregor Samsa 's transformation into a bug, rather than any other animal. What is Kafka trying to say by using this symbol to describe Gregor? One explanation for this may be the many qualities that Gregor 's character shares with bugs and how they are perceived by humans. Through the details presented in the story, it is clear that Kafka has chosen for Gregor to become a bug because, like an insect, he has a robotic-like work ethic, an altruistic nature, and lacks of significance to others.
Strained, overworked and mistreated was all Gregor has known. His family needs him so they can live comfortably with as little effort as possible. There are no strong family bonds or relationships because there is no love and respect within the family. Gregor provides and makes a comfortable life for his able bodied family with little regard to his own well being. However, he gains no respect and continually puts up with the family de-humanizing him. In Franz Kafka’s “Metamorphosis”, the well being and financial stability of Gregor’s family rest solely on him by the consent of the family making it impossible for close family relationships to form.
There is a theory that dream and myth are related which is conveyed through the writing of Douglas Angus’ Kafka's Metamorphosis and "The Beauty and the Beast" Tale and supported by Franz Kafka’s Metamorphosis. The stories are very symbolic when conveying the metamorphosis of a human being. Unlike Beauty and the Beast, in the Metamorphosis some suggest love is received through acts of cruelty yet in actuality it appears that cruelty results in heartache. Due to being a beast, the repulsiveness requires genuine love which can achieve the “magical transformation.” This “magical transformation” is not achieved and creates a twist in the plot derived from the concepts in the “Beauty and the Beast.”
After attaining his readers attention Kafka goes onto describing Gregor’s new physical state. It is thus established that Gregor is the main character of the story. Gregor’s new body ‘which was as hard as armour’ can be seen as a protecting net for him; possibly preparing him for his troublesome future.
Franz Kafka illustrates in his book the struggle that most humans have throughout their life: ‘Who am I?’ He demonstrates this through his radical and exaggerated formation of The Metamorphosis, a man becoming a bug; or a bug always thinking he was a man, then realizing that he is and always has been a bug. This bug, Gregor Samsa, goes through an immense psychological realization at the beginning of the book; he had been deceived by his own mind from the beginning of his life. Throughout Gregor’s Metamorphosis, Gregor experiences the loss of his self actualization, recognition, belonging, security, and physiological needs. His situation had taken away all the basic psychological needs of any human as illustrated by Maslow’s Hierarchy of
The Metamorphosis is said to be one of Franz Kafka's best works of literature. It shows the difficulties of living in a modern society and the struggle for acceptance of others when in a time of need. In this novel Kafka directly reflects upon many of the negative aspects of his personal life, both mentally and physically. The relationship between Gregor and his father is in many ways similar to Franz and his father Herrman. The Metamorphosis also shows resemblance to some of Kafka's diary entries that depict him imagining his own extinction by dozens of elaborated methods. This paper will look into the text to show how this is a story about the author's personal life portrayed through his dream-like fantasies.
In The Metamorphosis, Franz Kafka manifests naïveté of Gregor Samsa by prolonging his realization of societal banishment due to underexposure. Revelations made by Samsa later prove his ignorance of his purpose in the eyes of his family. In addition to the many instances in which Gregor is trialed, Kafka’s continuous stream of distractions mimic Gregor’s persona.
In a similar manner The Metamorphosis, Kafka's pneumatic Gregor Samsa finds himself as a material expression, but after his form is altered, he begins embrace the freedom alienation can provide. Through the character of Gregor Samsa, Kafka suggests that, although one may be continually defined by others as an outside form is altered, if any independence is achieved it can be crushed by society. Kafka believed soc...
This was the case of Franz Kafka; his inability to physically express his opinions to his family in reality, lead him to intellectually pursue his thoughts and relationship into the imaginary, his writings, as displayed in his short novella, “Metamorphosis.” Due to Kafka's life background and the nature of his society in the beginning of twentieth century in Prague, his only and main outlet in expressing his thoughts were to put them down onto paper. As a result, Kafka utilizes these two elements to satirize his internal thoughts into fiction. Although his stories are label as fiction, beyond its contextual interpretation, his stories are a reflection of his life. Needless to say, the most apparent factors that bleed through “Metamorphosis” are Kafka’s life relationship with his family and how he saw himself within that dynamic. Therefore, we can imply that the protagonist Gregor Samsa in “Metamorphosis” can well be the embodiment of Kafka himself. However, because the novella was written in fictional form, where taking the impossible of reality and making it possible, it can be hard to relate the interaction among characters to Kafka real life relation to his family. None the less, through the lens of biographical criticism in the analysis of “Metam...
Have you ever experienced life altering events which changed the way you’ve thought of things? In The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka, Kafka mentions that life changing events could potentially alter the way you go about life good or bad. When human beings experience traumatic events, you get to see their true colors. After Gregor’s transformation he still proceeded as if he was a human which causes destruction in his family: this relates to the theme of when people experience traumatic events, you get to see their true color.
Through Gregor’s transformation in The Metamorphosis, Franz Kafka allows the reader to explore the meaning of identity. By pulling in Marx’s own theories on capitalism and how it affects the working class’s identity, the reader is able to gain insight on the question of identity that the novel poses. Gregor’s metamorphosis resembles Marx’s beliefs on how identity is affected by capitalism through the alienation Gegor experiences, as well as the cause of his death and the form that his metamorphosis gives him. Joshua Fenlon’s criticism, “On Kafka’s