Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Transcendentalism philosophy and its relevance today
Transcendentalism the american scholar
Transcendentalism United States
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Transcendentalism philosophy and its relevance today
In today's society, the teachings of transcendentalist figures such as Emerson, Fuller, and Whitman are both thriving and dead. Many commonly practiced activities are the opposite of what these men preached, such as social trends. However, one place we do see a continuous use of transcendentalist ideals is in the movie business. Films are brimming with messages of anti-conformity, the importance of individualism, and the idea that society corrupts people. One movie that does this is Fight Club, written by Jim Uhls and released in 1999. This movie encapsulates all of the above themes and delivers them in a way that shows how these core concepts are still a part of our lives although being written over 100 years ago. One main point of the movie …show more content…
is that self reliance and anti-materialism is key because of the fact that it allows you to be independent and learn about yourself. The narrator, a suffering insomniac, learns that society is too easily captured with belongings, instead of individuals and their thoughts. This is done with the help of Tyler Durden, a figment of his imagination. Durden often speaks about the irrelevance of materials, and how they limit individual's potential. This is apparent when he explains, “The things that you own end up owning you.” In addition to this, Tyler also says, “Reject the basic … especially the importance of material possessions.” This mind set is much like that of Thoreau’s. Like Durden, the transcendentalist was very invested in the fact that a man should be self reliant, and not swayed or impacted by frivolous things such as furniture and decoration. This is demonstrated when he says, “Rather than love, than money, than fame, give me truth.” Above all, he, like Durden, believed the ideas and thoughts of people were what mattered, rather than consumeristic tendencies. Non conformity is a main theme in both transcendentalist writings and Fight Club.
In the beginning of the film, “The Narrator” tries to conform to society. But, upon joining fight club, he realizes that the world he lives in will never fully satisfy what he is after. This leads him to become his own person, and fall into his own rhythm. He discovers that he must save himself by reassuring his individualism, something he had lost by conforming to everyone else around him. Over the course of him realizing this, Tyler Durden says, “I say never be complete, I say stop being perfect, I say … let's evolve, let the chips fall where they may.” Instead of blending in with that around you, you must be constantly thinking things over in new ways. This will allow you to be able to discover new truths about both yourself and the world around you. This may remind you of Emerson, and that is because these two characters share shockingly similar ideas on the topic of non-conformity. Emerson once said, “Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.” Like the narrator, He believed that by sacrificing individualism and conforming, people sacrifice culture. He thought that people must deviate from the road of society in order to make their own mark on the world. In his writings of Self-Reliance, Emerson says, “Whoso would be a man, must be a nonconformist.” This quote shows how essential nonconformity is, and how highly is was regarded to impact
people. This core transcendentalist idea is very transparent throughout the entire film, and shows how these teachings are still being interpreted in different ways. Lastly, the film illustrates the transcendentalist concept that society corrupts you and your creativity. Emerson and Durden both believe that society limits people's abilities, and compromises development. Emerson said, “Society is a joint-stock company, in which the members agree, for the better securing of his bread to each shareholder, to surrender the liberty and culture of the water.” He believed that the people who made up the community were mindless in a way, since their surroundings had taken away their solo thoughts and actions. This was a very common transcendentalist way of thinking, since many of their concepts stemmed from the idea that people should be reliant on themselves, and not on those around them. Subsequently, Emerson strongly believed in the power that society has to deprave someone of their individuality. This way of the thinking is something that parallels that of Tyler Durden's throughout the film. He says, “Reject the basic assumptions of civilization.” In addition to this, Tyler constantly acts on his hatred for the binding nature of society in general. At one point in the movie, Tyler hatches a plan to destroy multiple buildings in the city all for the sake of toppling the economic chains of society. He is appalled by the employees who work for the companies in the buildings because they are stuck in their own little world. They are unable to realize how meaningless their lives truly are, because of the fact that they are being controlled by society. He believes they have lost all of their inventiveness. Although rather radical, this demonstrates Tyler and Emerson's similar ways of thinking on the topic of society.
...who can look past society’s structure and be independent in what he wants. The fact that DiCaprio supports gay rights shows that he is indeed a transcendentalist because he is going against society is firmly supporting a movement that society views as being immoral. Individualism is one of the fundamental ideas of Transcendentalism. The idea of thinking for oneself without the restrictions set by society. Individualism inspires free thought and actions based on a persons own values, not the values of others. At the time in which the transcendentalists thrived, many transcendental ideas were not well received by popular culture. Rather than taking this as a sign of defeat, the transcendentalists remained true to their values and continued to advocate their unpopular ideas. By remaining independent an individual is allowed to both retain their identity and expand it.
Society often pressures individuals within it to conform to different ideals and norms. This stems from the fact that individuals in a society are expected to act in a certain way. If a person or group of people do not satisfy society’s expectations, they are looked down upon by others. This can lead to individuals isolating themselves from others, or being isolated from others, because they are considered as outcasts. The emotional turmoil that can result from this, as well as the internal conflict of whether or not to conform, can transform an individual into a completely different person. This transformation can either be beneficial or harmful to the individual as well as those around them. The individual can become an improved version of himself or herself but conversely, they can become violent, rebellious and destructive. The novels Fight Club by Chuck Palahniuk and A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess both explore the negative effects experienced by individuals living within the confines of society’s narrow-mindedness. In A Clockwork Orange, protagonist Alex was the leader of a small group of teenage criminals. He did not have a healthy relationship with either one of his parents or with others around him. Instead he spent most of his time alone during the day and at night roamed the streets in search of victims he could mug or rape. In Fight Club the unnamed protagonist was an outcast in his community. He chose to distance and isolate himself from others and as a result had no friends, with the exception of Tyler Durden and Marla Singer. Due to his isolation, he often participated in nightly fights that took place in Fight Club so that he could relieve his anxiety and stress. In this way, Alex and the unnamed protagoni...
Gina Marchetti, in her essay "Action-Adventure as Ideology," argues that action- adventure films implicitly convey complex cultural messages regarding American values and the "white American status quo." She continues to say that all action-adventure movies have the same basic structure, including plot, theme, characterization, and iconography. As ideology, this film genre tacitly expresses social norms, values, and morals of its time. Marchetti's essay, written in 1989, applies to films such as Raiders of the Lost Ark and Rambo: First Blood II. However, action-adventure films today seem to be straying farther away from her generalizations about structure, reflecting new and different cultural norms in America. This changing ideology is depicted best in Oliver Stone's Natural Born Killers (1994), which defies nearly every concept Marchetti proposes about action-adventure films; and it sets the stage for a whole new viewpoint of action in the '90's.
In recent times, such stereotyped categorizations of films are becoming inapplicable. ‘Blockbusters’ with celebrity-studded casts may have plots in which characters explore the depths of the human psyche, or avant-garde film techniques. Titles like ‘American Beauty’ (1999), ‘Fight Club’ (1999) and ‘Kill Bill 2’ (2004) come readily into mind. Hollywood perhaps could be gradually losing its stigma as a money-hungry machine churning out predictable, unintelligent flicks for mass consumption. While whether this image of Hollywood is justified remains open to debate, earlier films in the 60’s and 70’s like ‘Bonnie and Clyde’ (1967) and ‘Taxi Driver’ (1976) already revealed signs of depth and avant-garde film techniques. These films were successful as not only did they appeal to the mass audience, but they managed to communicate alternate messages to select groups who understood subtleties within them.
In Palahniuk’s Fight Club, Tyler Durden is a conformist to society that experienced a personal tragedy which led him to disengage from the societal normality and found an organization known as Fight Club, an underground street fighting competition. Tyler was once an aspiring businessperson. His failure was the cause of his conformity. Tyler then began to work as a security guard, primarily conducting after hour duties. This led him to begin stealing left over human fat to create the ingredients for the manufacture of explosives with the aim of supplementing his income (Schuessler). Here a personal tragedy, specifically failure, led to a behavioural condition known as disengagement. Tyler retracted himself from the typical American societal expectations and rebelled through forms of crime and backlash.
“In philosophy, or religion, or ethics, or politics, two and two might make five, but when one was designing a gun or an aeroplane they had to make four” (Orwell 250). Winston lives in a time where a set of rules preventing him to be free are imposed on him – the Party defines what freedom is and is not. “Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows (Orwell 103)”. Winston expresses his views on The Party within his diary even though he knows it is not accepted by The Party or the Thought Police. The narrator in Fight Club uses fighting as a form of escapism from his anti-consumerist ideologies revealed by his alter-ego, Tyler Durden. “Fuck off with your sofa units and strine green stripe patterns. I say never be complete, I say stop being perfect, I say let’s evolve—let the chips fall where they may. (Fight Club)” Tyler urges the narrator to stop conforming to consumerist-imposed views of perfection and break barriers to evolve. Tyler and the narrator create a medium for people in similar positions to escape from societal bound norms; it is aptly named “Fight Club”. In comparison, both Tyler Durden and the narrator from Fight Club and Winston Smith from 1984 share
Fight Club was written by Chuck Palahniuk in 1996. This novel focuses on an unreliable narrator, his relationship with a dark man named Tyler Durden, and their creation of Fight Club, an underground boxing club which evolves into the anarchistic organization, Project Mayhem. Project Mayhem intends to tear down the American social structure, replacing big-headed bureaucrats with testosterone-filled, manly men as the ruling class. Even though many believe that Tyler Durden and the narrator are two different people, there is a sufficient amount of evidence to suggest the narrator suffers from Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID).
Society becomes so rationalized that one must push himself to the extreme in order to feel anything or accomplish anything. The more you fight in the fight club, the tougher and stronger you become. Getting into a fight tests who you are. No one helps you, so you are forced to see your weaknesses. The film celebrates self-destruction and the idea that being on the edge allows you to be beaten because nothing really matters in your life.
...from all material items and does not use society’s standards as the rules to his identity. According to Fight Club, Tyler has found his masculine identity and the members of Fight Club are able to do this as well by enduring the pain of Fight Club and not conforming to society’s standards. When one is not tied down to material items and possessions to define them, they see their true identity. This masculinity defined by Fight Club is the theory that freedom comes from having nothing; thereby men are liberated by society’s confines, most specifically the male American Dream.
The soap is made out of human fat, IKEA catalogues are desired, and fighting is equated to salvation. Chuck Palahniuk is the author of the book, Fight Club that in the late nineties was adapted into a film that would soon grow to have a cult following. Palahnuik develops characters that are very human with several flaws and animal instincts. The entire novel revolves around a secret fight club that takes place in bars. The protagonist goes here to escape his mundane life with other men who feel lost. The film uses lighting and moments of visual symbolism to further Palahniuk’s vision. Although the film and novel revolve around fighting, it is actually about the negativity of society’s consumerism, and the loss of identity in a changing world
Tyler Durden encourages the narrator to give up his consumerist, meaningless life to fight the exploitation inherent in corporate society. Similarly, Marx believed that the capitalist system inherently exploited workers, arguing that the interests of the capitalist class conflicted with that of the working class. Additionally, Marx’s core concept of historical materialism is realized in Fight Club. The narrator in this film strives to express himself through the items he possesses, searching for meaning in his life through physical objects. He looks for release in buying more and more things he does not need. This illustrates historical materialism, in which Marx argues that people are what they have. Additionally, Marx argues that the flow of ideas is also controlled by the capitalist class. The narrator in Fight Club is forced to come to terms with these ideas. He learns that buying and consuming more material objects does not make him happy, and is forced to confront the destruction of his consumerist identity when his apartment is suddenly destroyed. Additionally, the narrator’s thoughts are never completely his own, suggesting that he is grappling with the controlled flow of ideas inherent in capitalist society. All of these factors combine to force the narrator to look for life fulfillment elsewhere, hence the formation of fight club and the friendship of the dangerous Tyler
The film Pulp Fiction was an immediate box office success when it was released in 1994 and it was also well received by the critics, and celebrated for the way it appeared to capture exactly a certain pre-millennial angst and dislocation in Western capitalist societies. The term post-modernist, often used to refer to art and architecture, was applied to this film. The pulp fiction refers to popular novels which are bought in large numbers by less well educated people and enjoyed for their entertainment value. The implication is that the film concerns topics of interest to this low culture, but as this essay will show, in fact, the title is ironic and the film is a very intellectual presentation of issues at the heart of contemporary western culture and philosophy.
Fight Club is a movie that is based on a Chuck Palahniuk novel of the same name. The movie adaptation was written by Jim Uhls, directed by David Fincher and released October 15, 1999. The movie is about the life of the narrator, a depressed insomniac who works as a recall coordinator for an automobile company. The narrator is refused medication by his doctor, he turns to attending a series of support groups for different illnesses and uses these support groups for emotional release and this helps to temporarily cure his insomnia. This newfound cure ceases to help him when a girl, Marla Singer who is not a victim of any illness for which the support groups are offered begins to attend the support groups. The narrator returns from a business trip to find his apartment destroyed by an explosion, he calls Tyler Durden, a soap maker and sales man he met on one his business trips. Tyler offers the narrator a place to stay and together they start an underground “Fight Club” the narrator uses as his therapy for his insomnia. The club grows and becomes a source of psychotherapy for many other men. One of the concepts highlighted in the movie is how modern-day men in a supposedly civilized world use violent aggressive acts towards each other to as a means of emotional release and satisfaction.
The narrator is changed by his experience with fight club; his life becomes all about fight club. Fight club becomes the reason for the narrators existence. The narrator experiences a shift in consciousness; in that, he is able to understand more of who he is and what really matters in life through fight clubs trial by fire. Through battle and a mindset of counterculture and a complete expulsion of ...
In conclusion, the movie, Dead Poets Society, encompasses and propagates the idea of transcendentalism. The characters’ fearless nonconformity, displayed throughout the movie, demonstrates the importance and necessity of self-discovery and individual growth in a society. Many of the transcendentalist concepts stressed by Emerson and Thoreau are integrated into the movie through its characters and plot. The students who keenly take the philosophy of transcendentalism to heart and are inspired the most by it are as follows: Todd Anderson, Knox Overstreet, Neil Perry, and Charlie Dalton. These characters wholeheartedly accept the philosophy of transcendentalism, assume individual authority for their choices and embark on a trip of self-discovery and growth that will have a lasting impact on their lives.