Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History of toyota case study
Toyota Motor Corporation Company Background
History of toyota case study
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History of toyota case study
Kiichiro Toyoda found Toyota Motor Corporation on August 28th 1937. Kiichiro Toyoda is the father of the giant automotive industry, Toyota. The headquarters of Toyota is located in Toyota, Aichi Prefecture, Japan. Toyota Motor Corporation has manufacturing plants all around the world with a total of 32 countries consisting of Malaysia, Japan, America, China, Australia, Thailand, Singapore, Belgium, Bangladesh, Vietnam, Philippines, Pakistan, Indonesia, India, Taiwan, Egypt, South Africa, Kenya, Kazakhstan, Russia, U.K, Turkey, Portugal, Poland, France, Czech Republic, Venezuela, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina and Canada. As a giant in the automotive industry, the company consists 333,498 employees as from 31st March 2013(Toyota, 2013). The information …show more content…
To begin with Toyota Motor Corporation’s market structure, we have to know that the automobile giant is an Oligopoly. Oligopoly means, “a market dominated by a small number of participants who are able to collectively exert control over supply and market prices” (Investorwords, 2013). The definition for market structure isThe interconnected characteristics of a market, such as the number and relative strength of buyers and sellers and degree of collusion among them, level and forms of competition, extent of product differentiation, and ease of entry into and exit from themarket(BusinessDictionary, 2013).The characteristic of oligopoly are few firms, moderate barrier to entry, price maker and so on. There are only few competitor of Toyota such as Honda, Nissan, Hyundai, KIA and Volkswagen. In addition, Toyota also is a price maker which they can easily make a decision to set a price without following the market price due to they have the largest proportion market share. Entry barriers help existing firms to exercise market control due to the government restrictions, copyright and patent issues. Thus, it is hard to develop a new car firm into the market (Mehta, 2013).In Malaysia, Toyota and two other brands Proton and Perodua control the automobile market. By looking at Figure 2., we can see that the market share of Toyota in 2011 is 15.1% according to Italia (2012). Toyota Motor Corporation is ranked 3rd on the market position with 15.1% which is relatively lower than the first two. Perodua is ranked 1st with 31.2%, followed by Proton with a market share of 26%. The competition for the top two spot seems hard for Toyota, however Toyota has a good advantage over the 4th rank brand, which is Honda with only 7.4% of the market
While the market shares of the ownership types suggest that the UK petrol market is more towards monopolistic competition than oligopoly, the manner in which the companies behave indicates otherwise. Although both monopolistic competitive companies and oligopolies engage in non-price completion, the companies are interdependent and there are considerable barriers to entry. In this case, the UK petrol retail market reflects competitive oligopoly as the retailers are competing against each other.
The Standard Oil Monopoly John D. Rockefeller was the founder of the Standard Oil Company. He opened his first refinery in Cleveland, Ohio in 1863. In 1870 he created Standard Oil. By the 1890s, Rockefeller controlled 90% of the United States pipelines and refineries. Many critics of Rockefeller claim this was due to unfair business practices which gave him a monopoly on the oil market.
Toyota allegedly is accused of 'Unintended Acceleration' of some of their model cars. The Prius and the Lexus HS has known safety issues of possible faulty breaking systems and a recall is issued. Further, in 2010 the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) ordered Toyota Motor Corporation to issue a recall on several other motor vehicles for known issues such as the sticky accelerator pedal. Toyota states that the sticky accelerator was due to factory installed floor mats that the company issues with each of their new vehicles and Toyota stated for the consumer to remove the floor mats to fix this problem. Conversely, investigators from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) found no link between the unintended acceleration and flaws of electronic throttle. Investigators instead, blamed driver error or floor mats to be the cause.
Currently, the major competitors within the industry are Ford, DaimlerChrylser, General Motors (GM), Honda, Toyota, and Volkswagen. A few United States (US) manufacturers produce 23% of the world’s vehicles while Japan is responsible for 21%. The tendency for the industry is to be a global producer of automobiles; parts can be made throughout the world and assembled in many different places. The trend of consolidation has continued throughout today. Presently, this is evident in the recent acquisition of Chrysler by Daimler-Benz in late 1998, thus forming DaimlerChrylser. These consolidations have proved beneficial to consumers since companies have been able to reduce costs and pass those savings on to the customers. Some of the other major examples of consolidation are Nissan selling off a controlling 37% interest to Renault; General Motor’s 49% ownership of Isuzu; and Ford’s 33% majority of Mazda. Other efforts to become more competitive have translated into the European Union dropping trade barriers and European carmakers employing cost reducing efforts. American manufacturers have seen 2-3% growth over the last few years. Some current trends are the explosion in popularity of the Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV) and big luxury vehicles.
Within this essay, I will discuss Toyota’s generic strategies, which include cost leadership and differentiation. I will then discuss their diversification strategies, in which they have ventured outside of the automotive
Fierce competitors: Due to having many cars in market ever one wants to achieve the number one position. Competitors of Ford Motors generally have cut throat scenario. They give money to vendor they sell cars and vendor provide money to the dealer they help to push the product. In most of time features are same some additional facility provided which again help in sale of cars. Many of the car sellers provide the credit facilities which have made competition more. Seventy five of loans are indirect or even arranged by dealers. Therefore, they have two sets of customers one who actually buy cars and dealers
Introduction: Toyota Motor Corporation is a very successful automobile manufacturer that is recognized globally. They have continued to obtain and retain a competitive advantage over their counterparts, despite recalls over many years. Regardless of recalls, Toyota has been quick to rectify their shortcomings and continue to lead the automotive industry with their innovative measures. In this essay, I will discuss key internal factors for Toyota. Within those factors will include Toyota’s core competencies, which are what they do really well in comparison to their competition, three of their strength’s, which will include their posture within the automobile market and their heavy focus on research and development, and two of their weaknesses.
The erstwhile Maruti Udyog limited was the market leader for many years but the lead has been dwindling in the recent years. It has fallen from 45% of the market to 39% in the last 5 years. This has happened even when the overall sales of Maruti are growing by over 22% annually. This shows the rapid rise of the Indian auto industry.
BMW having high market share in European and U.S luxury car markets, started facing issues with launch product qualities and also facing a fierce competition from Japanese producers. Currently the market share was still stable but the rigorous growth of Japanese producers would affect BMW in future. These Japanese competitors had set higher standards of conformance.
AutoEdge is facing crisis since millions of its automobiles has had to be recalled due to product quality issues. Many things should be considered in order to implement a proactive response to rectify the situation. As the research analysis, I have been tasked will helping to rebuild AutoEdge’s reputation as well as to reduce and control operating costs. When making any decision on implementing change within the organization market analysis must look at the market structure of the organization. Market structure is made up of the relationship that exists between buyers, sellers, competition, product differentiation, and ease of entry into and exit from the market. The article “Review of Market Structure” (n.d.) defines market structure as the “microeconomic characteristics of different markets” and include such elements as competition level, high versus low entry barriers, and scale (Review of Market Structure, n.d.) To make the decision the decision to relocate, AutoEdge must analysis and evaluate of market structure. This report will discuss the four different types of market structures: monopoly, oligopoly, monopolistic competition, and pure competition. Additionally, it will outline the type of market structure AutoEdge fits into, how that market structure impacts the level of competition, elasticity of demand, price, and position in the industry.
Toyota’s uses both differentiation and low cost as generic strategies to try and gain a competitive advantage over their competitors in the automotive industry. The market scope that Toyota uses is a broad one that encompasses nearly every type of customer that is in the market to purchase an automobile. Toyota is able to target such a large market because they have something for everyone. Toyota has four wheel drive trucks and SUVs for the outdoor types or those who live in areas that face severe weather conditions, hybrid models like the Prius for the eco-friendly customers that are interested in saving the environment, along with the standard cars for general, everyday use. Additionally, Toyota provides vehicles for all price ranges.
Toyota Motor Corporation is one of the largest automakers in the world. At its annual conference in Tokyo on May 8, 2008, the company announced that activities through March 2008 generated a sales figure of $252.7 billion, a new record for the company. However, the company is lowering expectations for the coming year due to a stronger yen, a slowing American economy, and the rising cost of raw materials (Rowley, 2008). If Toyota is to continue increasing its revenue, it must examine its business practice and determine on a course of action to maximize its profit.
Ital Automotive (Shanghai) Co., Ltd is likely to share the features of oligopolistic market structure, for its relative dominance of the luxury car industry, high barriers to entry, differentiated products and interdependence of the Ferrari and its competitors. Thus, I researched the extent to which it approximates an oligopolistic market structure.
Toyota- focused differentiation, medium pricing, breadth of product line is low. Company is known for quality products, and nice styling.
To explain the barriers of entry, let us take the example of America's best-selling SUV in 2014 which was the Honda CR-V, for the third consecutive year followed by Ford Escape. These two companies with their immense economies of scale are posing a high barrier to entry for their share of the market. Honda CRV is able to offer the better fuel economy and safety rating without incurring a loss and maintaining the majority of the market share. This makes it difficult for firms like Volkswagen who are leaders in Europe to enter this market.