He was complex, he was known as the father of his country, he was Toussaint Louverture. Who was Toussaint Louverture? Toussaint was a young slave born around the 1740s. He was born in Saint Domingue (present day Haiti). He started out as a herder and worked his way up to overseeing fellow slaves. His Godfather taught him how to read and write and soon enough he was granted freedom by his owner and rented a coffee plantation with his own slaves. How we should remember Toussaint Louverture is kind of a controversial subject. I believe that Toussaint should be remembered as a great Haitian leader because he was tough, he had a good sense of moral leadership, he was compassionate and had political skill. Louverture was tough a tough leader. In 1793, he commanded a rebel army of 4,000 troops against the French. Louverture’s tough, leadership qualities allowed him to quickly become commander-in-chief of the army in Saint Domingue. As commander-in-chief, Toussaint ran an orderly camp where he trained men in both guerilla tactics and the European shoulder-to-shoulder style of war. He defeated the British, became ruler of Saint Domingue and conquered Santo Domingo, the Spanish part of the island. …show more content…
He also joined slave revolution and served as a doctor for the troops. After the French abolished slavery he stopped the revolt and joined the French side against Spain and England. So he was moral because in a way the he was helping his enemy. He assembled and headed the commission that created Saint Dominigue’s Constitution of 1801. With his courage and generosity he gained respect from the people around him and also earned the title “Papa Toussaint” because he was known as the father of his
He helped form one of the most successful slave revolts in history and created a black-led government that saw a revival in a colony that had been almost completely burned to nothing. He knew that liberty was important to the colony, but also understood the fundamental importance of having a successful economy. He persevered even when those around him heavily resented him. As a military leader, Toussaint was idolized by his troops. He led by example and embarked on and shared their dangers. He was gifted with genius when it came to military tactics, despite what stereotypes other European generals had, and his guerilla style warfare was a huge success. In his time, Toussaint managed to win support from many of the former slaves, drove Spanish and British troops out of the colony, and defeated internal conflicts. During his time he also managed to make peace with revolutionary France following the abolition of slavery, until the return of Napoleon. Toussaint had completely conquered St-Domingue and abolished slavery on the
Samuel de Champlain, who’s known as “The Father of New France” was a French explorer during the 17th century. He also was a navigator, cartographer, soldier, administrator, and chronicler of New France. He is famous for discovering Lake Champlain, Quebec City, and he helped establish the governments of New France.
Phillips' juxtaposition amplifies his argument that a man of color has the same capabilities as other men. The orator compares Toussaint, the leader of the only successful slave insurrection in history, to Napoleon, "the great captain of the nineteenth century." Ironically, both men, although adversaries, inspired political movements founded on the principle of liberty, equality, and brotherhood. Phillips next pits Toussaint against the revered George Washington. Both men were liberators - Washington fought for American independence, while Toussaint fought for human rights in Haiti. Positioning these heroes side by side, the difference between them becomes as apparent as their similarity; Washington was a slaveholder, and Toussaint was a slave liberator. Phillips then measures the Haitian general against the English leader, Oliver Cromwell. Concluding that Toussaint's successes surpassed Cromwell's, Phillips aptly points out "the state Cromwell founded went down with him into the grave." History bears out this assertion; in 1660, when Charles II came to the English throne, his supporters ...
The late 18th century and early 19th century was a prominent time period in which the French Revolution and Haitian revolution occurred. Both revolutions were connected to each other such that they shared similar causes and consequences. Together, France and Haiti were angered by the inequality and unfair privileges that continued to appear in their societies. At the same time, they were inspired and hopeful of bringing the Enlightenment ideas into reality. Although they were able to accomplish most of what they fought for, such as the abolition of slavery, they still took part in bloody revolutions. However, one of the greatest differences in their outcomes was that France emerged as a new, firm government as Haiti staggered with its new independence.
Enlightened despotism is when there is an absolute ruler, in some cases a tyrant, who follows the principles of the Enlightenment through reforms. Permitting religious toleration, allowing freedom of the press and speech, and expanding education are a few main guidelines to being and enlightened despot. Napoleon I is often referred to as one of the greatest enlightened despots. Although, he did not follow the ideas of the enlightenment entirely, he managed his country in a way that he maintained complete authority as well as many of the gains of the French Revolution. Yes, Napoleon did want to do a few things for himself, but he also ruled for the majority in most cases, promote government-funded education, and supported many other enlightened ideas. But, most importantly, Napoleon did what he thought would make his country stronger.
Toussaint: He was born as slave. However, he became a free people and joined slave rebellion. The significance for him is the leader of the rebellion. He directed other slaves and told them what to do.
Pierre Toussaint born 27 June 1766 and died June 30, 1853. He was a previous slave from the French settlement of Saint-Domingue now Haiti who was conveyed to New York City by his owners in 1787. Pierre Toussaint came to New York from Haiti in 1787. He was enrolled as a disciple to one of the city's driving hairdressers. Toussaint had an ability for the entangled craft of style. Pierre Toussaint hairdressing business was very successful which made him very rich, so he used that money to help take care his master’s wife after he died. He purchased his wife freedom and his sister. Pierre Toussaint was a devout Catholic so he believed in the doctrine of giving to the poor and needy. In fact, he gave lots of money to various charity organizations.
...tles the argument that Haiti is too small to compare Louverture and other great men by saying “I know it was a small territory; it was not as large as the continent; but it was as large as that Attica…” which helps to convince the crowd that Louverture should be taken seriously because he is similar to the leaders of ancient Greece.
Patrice Emry Lumumba, a martyr for a worthy cause, of a foolish man with unrealistic hopes and ambitions? Due to his hard work, unrelenting persistence, and aspirations, his homeland, the Congo, gained their independence from the colonizing country of Belgium July 1st, 1960. Not long after though, there was a price over his head, and he only got to see the payoff of his work for a little less than six months. What killed Patrice Lumumba is a combination of many players including the actions he himself took, other political powers like Sese Seko Mobutu, Moise Kapensa Tshombe, and Joseph Kasavubu, and the other influential nations including the colonizing country of Belgium.
...arly successes and his military brilliance classifies him as a hero in this sense. His political reign was also one of debate. Although he awarded many rights, he challenged them with other restrictions. Overall, France was stable following the horrid Reign of Terror but it also awarded more rights than in the old regime. Finally, the social aspect of France could prove Bonaparte to be either heroic or tyrannical as well. Many social changes transgressed during his reign. For instance, there was an increase in education and an end to feudalism, however Napoleon ruled the imperial catechism and was emperor for life. Overall the social changes were an improvement from the old regime, therefore classifying his as a hero for his time period. Overall, Napoleon was a hero in all three aspects of French life, although there were many aspects which were tyrannical as well.
When the French Revolution broke out a young Haitian mulatto named Vincent Oge was on business in France. His extended family of free Creoles owned a coffee plantation and a commercial business with slaves on Saint-Domingue. Caught up in the excitement of the French revolution, he embraced its principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity with great enthusiasm and became a supporter of French constitutional nationalism. As a part of the general atmosphere of emancipation prevalent during the revolution, he joined the antislavery Society of the Friends of Blacks in Paris and demanded that French constitutionalism be extended to Saint-Domingue.
In 1793 Napoleon got to command French troops and they chased out the British from Toulon.
Charles Andre Marie Joseph de Gaulle was one of the most prominent Frenchmen to ever live. This is partly the reason why I selected him. Being part French, I have an interest in Frances History and society, both of which de Gaulle had a great part in. He fought hard for his country in WWI and bore the scares of battle for the rest of his life. In WWII he inspired the people of occupied France to fight for their liberation and led the French Resistance against Hitler and the Nazis. By forming the Fifth Republic, he replaced a weak government with a stable and effective one.
recognized as a writer. He became one of the most famous and well paid French